[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"The 2nd Impeachment: Trump’s Popularity Still Scares Them to Death"

"President Badass"

"Jasmine Crockett's Train Wreck Interview Was a Disaster"

"How Israel Used Spies, Smuggled Drones and AI to Stun and Hobble Iran"

There hasn’T been ... a single updaTe To This siTe --- since I joined.

"This Is Not What Authoritarianism Looks Like"

America Erupts… ICE Raids Takeover The Streets

AC/DC- Riff Raff + Go Down [VH1 Uncut, July 5, 1996]

Why is Peter Schiff calling Bitcoin a ‘giant cult’ and how does this impact market sentiment?

Esso Your Butt Buddy Horseshit jacks off to that shit

"The Addled Activist Mind"

"Don’t Stop with Harvard"

"Does the Biden Cover-Up Have Two Layers?"

"Pete Rose, 'Shoeless' Joe Reinstated by MLB, Eligible for HOF"

"'Major Breakthrough': Here Are the Details on the China Trade Deal"

Freepers Still Love war

Parody ... Jump / Trump --- van Halen jump

"The Democrat Meltdown Continues"

"Yes, We Need Deportations Without Due Process"

"Trump's Tariff Play Smart, Strategic, Working"

"Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts"

"Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands

"Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies"

"Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk"

KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel

"Trade should work for America, not rule it"

"The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP"

"How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap"

‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’

Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible"

"Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!"

"If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think"

"Ending EPA Overreach"

Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built

Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew

The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED!

Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing!

Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy?

Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia)

"Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department"

Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent

"Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail"

Any suggestion that the USA and NATO are "Helping" or have ever helped Ukraine needs to be shot down instantly

"Real problem with the Palestinians: Nobody wants them"

ACDC & The Rolling Stones - Rock Me Baby

Magnus Carlsen gives a London System lesson!

"The Democrats Are Suffering Through a Drought of Generational Talent"

7 Tactics Of The Enemy To Weaken Your Faith

Strange And Biblical Events Are Happening

Every year ... BusiesT casino gambling day -- in Las Vegas


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

International News
See other International News Articles

Title: 'Made in China' nuclear reactors a tough sell in global market
Source: Yahoo!/Reuters
URL Source: http://news.yahoo.com/made-china-nu ... -market-071036971--sector.html
Published: Mar 6, 2015
Author: Charlie Zhu and David Stanway
Post Date: 2015-03-06 09:01:55 by Willie Green
Keywords: None
Views: 2652
Comments: 22

HONG KONG/BEIJING (Reuters) - As China signs global deals to export its nuclear power technology, it faces a huge obstacle: it still needs to show it can build and safely operate these reactors at home.

Aided by foreign technology acquired during three decades of development, China has the highest number of reactors being built and ambitions to export its home-grown models to an overseas market worth hundreds of billions of dollars.

Premier Li Keqiang told an annual parliamentary meeting this week that the China aimed to increase its share of global sales in a range of advanced industries, including implementing major projects in nuclear power.

And in a sign of progress on exporting its own nuclear technology, China signed a preliminary agreement last month to sell its flagship Hualong 1 reactor to Argentina.

But despite state media describing the deal as the model's "maiden voyage", China has not yet built Hualong 1, raising questions about the country's capacity to deliver reactors for the global market.

"Our fatal weakness is our management standards are not high enough. There is a big gap with international standards," said Xu Lianyi, a senior expert at China's State Nuclear Power Technology Corp (SNPTC), referring to the challenges China faces expanding its nuclear power sector.

SNPTC, which was set up to receive technology transferred from Westinghouse Electric Co., is trying to develop another reactor ultimately targeted at the world market.

Although China has operated Western-designed reactors at home for more than 20 years, it will need to convince buyers of the reliability of its own technology, particularly given a checkered reputation on industrial standards and safety in some other areas such as mining.

China's first Hualong 1 project, in Fujian province, may not be completed until 2020, assuming it breaks ground this year and construction goes smoothly, said Li Ning, dean of the School of Energy Research at Xiamen University.

TECHNOLOGICAL PROBLEMS

China has been slow to approve new nuclear projects after a year-long safety review following Japan's Fukushima disaster in 2011.

Beijing has promised to stick to the highest safety standards, using so-called "third generation" reactors like Hualong 1 and CAP1400, another home-grown model identified for future export.

Due to be based on technology transferred from Westinghouse, the launch of CAP1400 will depend on the completion of a pilot Westinghouse third-generation reactor in Zhejiang province, which is facing a three-year delay because of technological problems.

Reflecting the obstacles of breaking into a market dominated by the likes of France's Areva and Russia's Rosatom State Nuclear Energy Corp., Beijing is encouraging consolidation to cut internal rivalry and pool intellectual property and financial resources.

Plans for a merger between SNPTC and state-run electricity producer China Power Investment were unveiled on Feb. 3, potentially creating a firm with total assets of more than 600 billion yuan ($96 billion), industry experts estimate.

The strategy is similar to one used in the high-speed rail sector. By adapting foreign technology for a huge home network, China's trainmakers are now emerging as global competitors for Siemens, Alstom and Bombardier.

Under a hotly-fought multibillion-dollar nuclear power deal struck with Pittsburgh-based Westinghouse, China secured a significant technology transfer agreement in 2007.

China has been absorbing and localizing the technology to develop the CAP1400 and says it has full intellectual property rights on the model and Hualong 1.

The Beijing office of Westinghouse, which is now controlled by Japan's Toshiba Corp, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

While technology rights may not stoke tensions, Beijing's pledge to aid the overseas expansion of Chinese firms risks raising the hackles of competitors if sectors like nuclear are deemed unfairly subsidized.

A fax sent to China's National Development and Reform Commission seeking comment on the country's nuclear strategy was not responded to.

CONFIDENCE

Along with Argentina, progress was being made on potential nuclear deals with Turkey and South Africa, said Wang Zhongtang, chief engineer at SNPTC.

But an official at the China National Nuclear Corporation, which is leading efforts to export Hualong 1 to Argentina, said China still has "huge amounts of work to do" before it can become a nuclear powerhouse, including rolling out Hualong I at home. The official declined to be named because he was not authorized to speak to the media.

With 22 reactors in operation, and a further 26 under construction, China aims to raise its total domestic nuclear power capacity to 58 gigawatts (GW) by 2020, up from 20.3 GW at the end of last year, in a program estimated to cost $100 billion. Nuclear capacity would still only meet 3 percent of total electricity needs by 2020.

The China representative of the World Nuclear Association, an industry body, said China needed to show it had operational experience, particularly in a foreign environment to sell its new designs abroad.

"It is a question of confidence from outside of China," said Francois Morin.


Poster Comment:

Under a hotly-fought multibillion-dollar nuclear power deal struck with Pittsburgh-based Westinghouse, China secured a significant technology transfer agreement in 2007.

Jorge Arbusto betrayed our nation and enabled China's future as the world's only nuclear superpower.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 12.

#9. To: Willie Green (#0)

Although China has operated Western-designed reactors at home for more than 20 years, it will need to convince buyers of the reliability of its own technology, particularly given a checkered reputation on industrial standards and safety...

This, from the same people who demonstrate a complete and utter disregard for human life.

Does ANY one doubt that ChiCom nuclear reactors are booby-trapped?

Willie, would you ride a ChiCom manufactured train with any measure of confidence?

Liberator  posted on  2015-03-07   9:50:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Liberator (#9)

Willie, would you ride a ChiCom manufactured train with any measure of confidence?

I think the Maglev technology they stole from Transrapid would be relatively safe. It's elevated guideway is a dedicated right-of-way that completely avoids potential for collision with other vehicles. And the wrap-around design of the maglev vehicles prevents them from flying off the track if anything does go wrong.

I don't think I'm being a naive pollyanna about this, just because I like choo-choo trains. Quite the opposite... I'm a cynical old fart and a firm believer in Murphy's Law. I would NEVER sit atop a ChiCom rocket for a tourist trip to the International Space Station. As an engineer, I'm still fascinated by space age technology... but I'm not so stupid to risk blowing my butt to kingdom come by sitting on top of a giant chinese firecracker. LOL!

Willie Green  posted on  2015-03-07   10:31:21 ET  (1 image) Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 12.

#13. To: All (#12)

I would NEVER sit atop a ChiCom rocket for a tourist trip to the International Space Station.

Well the truth is... I'd never sit on top a rocket that ANYBODY built.
Mr Murphy turns too many of them into firecrackers, even if it's only 1-in-a-1000 or 1-in-100,000... I'm more than happy to watch someone else blast off into space from a safe distance right here on the earth's surface where the Good Lord's gravity intends me to be.

Willie Green  posted on  2015-03-07 10:42:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Willie Green (#12)

I think the Maglev technology they stole from Transrapid would be relatively safe.

Not inspiring much confidence in me IF I were traveling on a ChiCom manufactured track and system -- even IF it were based on reliable technology. (The ChiComs have a nagging habit of cutting every corner known to man.)

I don't think I'm being a naive pollyanna about this, just because I like choo-choo trains. Quite the opposite... I'm a cynical old fart and a firm believer in Murphy's Law. I would NEVER sit atop a ChiCom rocket for a tourist trip to the International Space Station. As an engineer, I'm still fascinated by space age technology... but I'm not so stupid to risk blowing my butt to kingdom come by sitting on top of a giant chinese firecracker. LOL!

HEH! @"sitting on top of a giant Chinese firecracker." That'll clear the sinuses.

I realize you're practical and appreciate technology. It's just that were the Germans or French were building nuke reactors (or train systems), the confidence level would be appreciably elevated. "Murphy's Law" applies to ALL ChiCom stuff, doesn't it?

Liberator  posted on  2015-03-07 10:49:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Willie Green (#12)

I think the Maglev technology they stole from Transrapid would be relatively safe.

You might want to think that one over again,Willie. The tracks and every other part will be made in China out of Chinese steel.

sneakypete  posted on  2015-03-07 11:52:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 12.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com