The Democrats War On Women
See other The Democrats War On Women Articles
| housewife, work, |
Title: Hillary Clinton Is Building Her Democratic Army As The GOP’s Worst Nightmare Comes True (Squawk and Awww)
Source:
PoliticusUSA
URL Source: http://www.politicususa.com/2015/02 ... team-republican-nightmare.html
Published: Feb 7, 2015
Author: Sarah Jones
Post Date: 2015-02-07 17:39:35 by Hondo68
Ping List: *Neo-Lib Chickenhawk Wars* Subscribe to *Neo-Lib Chickenhawk Wars*
Keywords: None
Views: 2367
Comments: 9
Hillary Clinton hasn’t even announced her 2016 run yet but she is already staffed up with huge Democratic talent, some of which is coming to her straight from the Obama White House. Planning to delay campaigning until late summer, the former Secretary of State, Senator, and First Lady has already amassed a Dream Team, pulling from Obama’s team to round out her already solid support. Anne Gearan and Dan Balz at the Washington Post reported that even though she hasn’t even announced yet, Clinton’s campaign is looking like an incumbent’s reelection campaign: At this point, without so much as an announcement, she has settled on — at the least — a campaign chairman, a campaign manager, a chief strategist and lead pollster, another pollster, a lead media adviser, a communication director, a deputy communications director, a focus group director and a communications strategist. … Her effort at this stage looks a lot like an incumbent’s reelection campaign: She will be running largely in support of a sitting president and his agenda, and is busy hiring many of President Obama’s former aides. Jim Messina, who helped engineer Clinton’s downfall in 2008 as a senior aide to Obama’s campaign, now runs a super PAC devoted to supporting her in 2016. “It’s her turn and her time,” he said on MSNBC this week. “We’re going to do whatever it takes to make sure she’s the president of the United States.” While pundits and strategists focus on fears that Clinton could lose her edge by delaying hitting the trail and worry over appearances of inheriting a mantle from President Obama, there is another side to this coin. What we have here is a strong would-be candidate, who consistently polls as a favorite politician, who is well known to the American people, whose last name is associated with economic boom times, and who is also carrying her own unique mantle of potentially being the first female President. That’s a pretty heady mix of positives with a dose of freshness, and it’s coming on the wave of a Republican war on women that is only getting more obvious as even their own female representatives balk at their attempts to deny women liberty. Now, add to that the savvy skill set of the seasoned-under-fire Obama team – from strategy, messaging and digital talent to polling talent. Clinton is filling in the gaps where her 2008 campaign was stressed. She is utilizing the very talent that brought her down. It’s brilliant. It’s also further evidence of the imagined deal back when President Obama asked her to be his Secretary of State, a job which undeniably beefs up foreign policy cred – a continued weakness on the Republican side. The biggest challenge for Clinton is going to be not falling into the trap of Democrats of 2014; that is, not alienating the Obama supporters in necessary efforts to distinguish herself from the President. To this end, I hope she doesn’t go with the “more confident” foreign policy line tossed out in the Washington Post article. “Bolder” might work. But “more confident” feeds right into the Republican criticism that gets up the backs of Obama Democrats. (See Wendy Davis for how to do this the right way.) Because of the heir apparent appearance of much of her would be candidacy, Clinton will be attacked for being like royalty, for being lazy, for not earning it, and other Rovian digs that attack her strengths. But these attacks will be hard to make stick, given her long career full of earnest hard work for causes she has steadily believed in. Also, the first female president didn’t earn it? LOL. Say it again, Republicans, because that’s almost as much of a winner as the latest GOP mantra that rape is an opportunity. The thing is, Hillary Clinton didn’t sit back and lick her wounds after 2008. She swallowed her pride and took a tough job working for her opponent after a bitter campaign. And now she is demonstrating again that she is hungry and sharp by hiring the exact people she needs to run the best campaign she can. This means she accurately assessed her last campaign, instead of deluding herself with Romney-esque feelings of entitlement. Who does that? A winner, that’s who. No, that’s not a prediction; it’s just a fact that people who are willing to honestly assess their own weaknesses and work hard to overcome them are more apt to be successful than those whose egos are too weak to handle criticism and self reflection. It’s also true that people whose egos can not only handle losing but turn it into an opportunity make stronger, better leaders. This is the kind of person who should scare opponents. It’s not the heir-apparentness — it’s her steel spine, loyalty, gritty determination and steady vision for the under privileged that make Clinton so dangerous to Republicans.
Poster Comment:
Hillary does Selma, Alabama
(3 images)
Subscribe to *Neo-Lib Chickenhawk Wars*
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: hondo68 (#0)
The article is true: Hillary Clinton is a tremendous threat to the GOP. To face that thread, the Republicans are going to have to unify around a candidate that is popular with the wider American electorate…OR the economy is going to have to go south and the people are going to have to be utterly sick of Obama and the Democrats.
Does this mean we get to have Jeb Bush to have and honour as our Presidential candidate? If so, I shall vote for an ally cat as a write-in choice.
If elections still mattered, then Hil-liar-y would be a threat. They don't, so she's not. Emperor Zero may decide he's not ready to leave, anyway. Who says there WILL be a 2016 election?
I'm betting it will be Walker. I've been looking for a reason to hate Walker, because he's a Republican and I hate Republicans. But I haven't come up with anything yet. He seems to be sincerely pro-life.
Her time to do what? In her entire lifetime she has done nothing in her life but graduate from a collegiate whore house as an angry bitter subversive who was lucky enough to marry the biggest slick and whoremaster available. The thing is, Hillary Clinton didn’t sit back and lick her wounds after 2008. She swallowed her pride and took a tough job working for her opponent after a bitter campaign. Right! She was given a highly pretentious job for which she was completely unprepared and was incompetent thus adding another glamorous fictatious title to her resume. She even had to duck sniper bullets in the ME to do it. The people in this country are nuts for voting for the people they vote into high office.
ROFLMAO! Who writes this stuff,the people from Comedy Central? Trying to pass Bubbette! off as an accomplished hard worker who is modest and who is where she is because of her hard work and dedication to the "little peep-puls" earns this one a humor ping. She is the most dishonest person to have ever ran for public office,and she owes ALL of her success on marrying the "right" hillbilly. If it wasn't for Bubba Bill and his connections she would have never been hired to any professional position after the review she got from Cox after being fired from the Watergate Committee. He flat out stated she should "never be hired for another position of public trust.",and she hasn't been other than political appointments arraged by her hubby. Which is another reason this "strong and accomplished woman who has done this all on her own" is laughable.
Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
The GOP is the only threat to the GOP.
Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
Yeh. And a pretty lethal threat at that, by my lights.
Yeh. And a pretty lethal threat at that, by my lights. The Dims are being eaten alive by jealousy. They can't even do that right.
Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
#2. To: Vicomte13 (#1)
To face that
thread [threat], the Republicans are going to have to unify around a candidate that is popular with the wider American electorate…OR the economy is going to have to go south and the people are going to have to be utterly sick of Obama and the Democrats.
#3. To: hondo68 (#0)
#4. To: Pridie.Nones (#2)
Does this mean we get to have Jeb Bush to have and honour as our Presidential candidate? If so, I shall vote for an ally cat as a write-in choice.
#5. To: hondo68 (#0)
(Edited)
Jim Messina, who helped engineer Clinton’s downfall in 2008 as a senior aide to Obama’s campaign, now runs a super PAC devoted to supporting her in 2016. “It’s her turn and her time,”
Oh, the suffering and wound licking she went through...
#6. To: hondo68, *Humor*, *Crime and Corruption*, *Hypocrisy and Hypocrites*, *2016 The Likely Suspects* (#0)
It’s also true that people whose egos can not only handle losing but turn it into an opportunity make stronger, better leaders. This is the kind of person who should scare opponents. It’s not the heir-apparentness — it’s her steel spine, loyalty, gritty determination and steady vision for the under privileged that make Clinton so dangerous to Republicans.
#7. To: Vicomte13 (#1)
The article is true: Hillary Clinton is a tremendous threat to the GOP.
#8. To: sneakypete (#7)
The GOP is the only threat to the GOP.
#9. To: Vicomte13 (#8)
The GOP is the only threat to the GOP.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]