Other
See other Other Articles
Title: Ron Paul Institute: Charlie Hebdo Massacre, Like 9/11, Was a False Flag Operation
Source:
The Weekly Standard
URL Source: http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs ... lse-flag-operation_823755.html
Published: Jan 14, 2015
Author: Daniel Harper
Post Date: 2015-01-15 17:12:46 by yukon
Keywords: None
Views: 68352
Comments: 129
An institute named for the father of possible presidential candidate Rand Paul has published a piece saying the Charlie Hebdo massacre, like 9/11, was a false flag operation. The claim comes in piece titled, "Charlie Hebdo Shootings: False Flag?," put online today at the Ron Paul Institute. "The Charlie Hebdo affair has many of the characteristics of a false flag operation. The attack on the cartoonists’ office was a disciplined professional attack of the kind associated with highly trained special forces; yet the suspects who were later corralled and killed seemed bumbling and unprofessional. It is like two different sets of people," reads the first paragraph of the piece. Usually Muslim terrorists are prepared to die in the attack; yet the two professionals who hit Charlie Hebdo were determined to escape and succeeded, an amazing feat. Their identity was allegedly established by the claim that they conveniently left for the authorities their ID in the getaway car. Such a mistake is inconsistent with the professionalism of the attack and reminds me of the undamaged passport found miraculously among the ruins of the two WTC towers that served to establish the identity of the alleged 9/11 hijackers. It is a plausible inference that the ID left behind in the getaway car was the ID of the two Kouachi brothers, convenient patsies, later killed by police, and from whom we will never hear anything, and not the ID of the professionals who attacked Charlie Hebdo. An important fact that supports this inference is the report that the third suspect in the attack, Hamyd Mourad, the alleged driver of the getaway car, when seeing his name circulating on social media as a suspect realized the danger he was in and quickly turned himself into the police for protection against being murdered by security forces as a terrorist. .... Some will contend that Muslims are sufficiently stupid to shoot themselves in the head in this way. But how do we reconcile such alleged stupidity with the alleged Muslim 9/11 and Charlie Hebdo professional attacks? If we believe the official story, the 9/11 attack on the US shows that 19 Muslims, largely Saudis, without any government or intelligence service support, outwitted not only all 16 US intelligence agencies, the National Security Council, Dick Cheney and all the neoconservatives in high positions throughout the US government, and airport security, but also the intelligence services of NATO and Israel’s Mossad. How can such intelligent and capable people, who delivered the most humiliating blow in world history to an alleged Superpower with no difficulty whatsoever despite giving every indication of their intentions, possibly be so stupid as to shoot themselves in the head when they could have thrown France into turmoil with a mere lawsuit? The Charlie Hebdo story simply doesn’t wash. If you believe it, you are no match for a Muslim. One wonders what Rand Paul thinks of this crack pot conspiracy theory pushed by his father's institute.
Poster Comment: Is there a posting category for Ron Paul lunacy?
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-58) not displayed.
.
.
.
#59. To: yukon (#58)
I think you accidently posted to me instead of Yukon. Since Yukon doesn't want to increase his knowledge or find the truth. Yukon ignored question 40.
Who ignored them? Do you know how many items can explode in a fire?
No you don't.
I'm sure you've seen the video with poofs of smoke shooting out of the wtc prior to collapse. What caused these multiple explosions on multiple floors? I'm sure someone can pull up the video. You still never answered a simple question that I asked about Bush and how he saw the first plane hit. No more questions of yours will I answer until you answer. Fair is fair.
You for one.
The fact that he remained at the school instead of being whisked away by the Secret Service is telling in itself. The Secret Service at Booker Elementary: The Dog That Did Not Bark The Sarasota Herald Tribune announced Bush's visit to Booker Elementary on September 8th, giving the 9-11 planners three days to include Bush as a target for a diving jetliner. Nobody could have safely assumed he was not a target. The Booker Elementary video shows the Secret Service did not rush in to remove the President to a secure location, or at least to the safety of the armored Presidential Limousine. That's their job. That's what they do in the case of a real surprise attack with many unknowns. They don't do anything else. But the Secret Service did nothing. The dog did not bark. Also, as you alluded, Bush somehow magically saw the first plane hit the tower. Bush at Booker Elementary THE VIDEO THAT PROVES 9/11 WAS NOT A SURPRISE You may have heard the strange story of how George Bush claimed to have seen the first plane hit the World Trade Tower on a television in Booker Elementary School before going into a classroom to hear some children read. This is a strange story because there were no live broadcasts of this impact. Still stranger was Bush's reaction on being told of the second impact by chief of staff Andrew Card. There was none. Bush simply went on with the school visit and listened to children reading about a pet goat. For twenty minutes. What caused these multiple explosions on multiple floors? No, I've seen them as the collapse begins and progresses. Who says there were multiple explosions on multiple floors. There are all kinds of items that will "explode" in a fire. Why do you believe there are warnings on aerosol cans to keep away from heat and fire. DO NOT INCINERATE. Please do a little research and stop embarrassing yourself.
Yeah those were aerosol cans popping out of the side of the building. That is a perspective I have not seen yet.
Please list all those people who heard and witnessed explosions caused by planted bombs. I've researched the 9/11 disaster extensively for well over 10 years and I've yet to find one witness to a bomb exploding in the WTC.
Who claimed that? You're a waste of time.
He's ridiculing you, pea brain.
Bombs blew up the buildings. The plane crashes were holograms. All the passengers are now in sweat camps in Asia making cheap products for Walmart.
Obama has played at being a president while enjoying the perks … golf, insanely expensive vacations at tax-payer expense. He has ignored the responsibilities of the job; no plans, no budgets, no alternatives … just finger pointing; making him a complete failure as a president
He's incapable of rational discourse as are the majority of truthers.
William Rodriguez
You really believe that crap? lol
That is why you wont answer the Bush seeing first plane. Ok I'm bored with you. You have nothing to add.
Did he describe the bomb he saw?
There are entire coffee table books dedicated to Bushisms. Why didn't all you truther investigators ask him about it on 10/12/2001?
"Research" isn't your strong suit is it. What Bomb? What Testimony? Firefighters, Paramedics and Emergency Medical Technicians say they heard Bombs going off in the WTC There's more if you're actually interested
"Research" isn't your strong suit is it. Yes it is. Not one of your "witnesses" described a bomb. They described explosions that SOUNDED LIKE a bomb exploding. You'll have to do better in the future. If you'd like I can refer you to real scientific investigations.
Ohio? A known hijacked jet flew for ~30 minutes towards Washington DC and not only was it not intercepted - THERE IS NO PICTURE OF IT- or there is and it hasn't been published. Imagine that. After the towers were hit, a *KNOWN HIJACKED AIRPLANE* flew towards the center of the BIGGEST SUPERPOWER ON EARTH - for 30 minutes -who had just fought a cold war with a nuclear powered nation. And it was piloted by a man who was told he couldn't rent a Cessna because he couldn't control it. Then this magic pilot *overflew* the Pentagon and made a descending 270 degree turn and flew into the first floor of the center of the worlds most powerful defense headquarters. Not a shot fired, not a single picture exists. We're supposed to believe there aren't any anti aircraft batteries in DC? LOL! It's absurd. Completely batsh*t absurd.
Don't look now but while you pick nits your nation has been looted.
It's absurd. Looks like a person that was barely competent to fly that type of aircraft, doesn't it? Do you ever wonder if the Pentagon was the intended target?
Try to remain focused on the thread contents, okay?
They happened to be sent out on patrol over the Atlantic that day. Then their website happened to be scrubbed the next day to say that it wasn't responsible for air defenses over Washington DC.
There was a power down at the wtc prior to 911. Marvin Bush's company just happened to do security for the wtc and the airliner who crashed into wtc.
If it is nonsense. Then answer me just one question please. Bush on the white house site there is text. On the net there is video. He said he saw the first plane hit and he thought what a terrible accident. Did you think it was a terrible accident. Who in their right mind thinks a plane running into the wtc could be an accident. Bush himself said he saw on tv the first plane hit. Did you see the first plane hit on tv? I didn't. Because it wasn't on tv live. When Bush said he thought it was a terrible accident. That means the first plane. You think that passes the smell test? People are free to come to the site and discuss issues. If some discussion makes people uncomfortable. If they decide to leave. That is their prerogative. This is my opinion. Should I hide it and pretend it isn't so maybe a few more people post here?
That is nonsense. I saw on Good Morning America that the planes were on patrol over the atlantic. No one thought they came from across the ocean. They were tracked the whole time.
You can believe whatever you want. But I am just curious. Do you think JFK was killed by lone gunman Lee Harvey Oswald?
Gee whiz man, Bush ADMITTED that he saw the first plane hit!
Don't you ever research anything for yourself? You just spew CT kook nonsense.
I did research one thing. No ones account here has ever been hacked.
Uh, no. Do you know who was head of security at the time? Do you have any opinions that didn't come directly from a government approved source?
Yeah, and no one has ever changed or added filth to article titles. You'll never change, will you? Matthew 23:27-28 "Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you are like whitewashed tombs which on the outside appear beautiful, but inside they are full of dead men's bones and all uncleanness. "So you, too, outwardly appear righteous to men, but inwardly you are full of hypocrisy and lawlessness.
Don't get SOD started on that one!
Ironically, the latest broadcast from 911 Free Fall/NoLies radio.com deals with this exact topic. It's an audio interview with Robin Hordon, a former air traffic controller. This is a Must Hear Interview! http://noliesradio.org/archives/94303 Robin Hordon on Civil Informationing Robin Hordon is a former air traffic controller, a 9/11 Truth activist, and writer. In this episode of 9/11 Free Fall he speaks from his own professional experience about the alleged failure of U.S. air defenses on 9/11, and about “civil informationing”, which is a more calculated and strategic approach to educating others about the 9/11 Truth information All of 911 Free Fall's interviews are highly recommended. Excellent information. https://www.youtube.com/user/911freefall/videos
“Conspiracy theory” is a term that at once strikes fear and anxiety in the hearts of most every public figure, particularly journalists and academics. Since the 1960s the label has become a disciplinary device that has been overwhelmingly effective in defining certain events off limits to inquiry or debate. Especially in the United States raising legitimate questions about dubious official narratives destined to inform public opinion (and thereby public policy) is a major thought crime that must be cauterized from the public psyche at all costs. Conspiracy theory’s acutely negative connotations may be traced to liberal historian Richard Hofstadter’s well-known fusillades against the “New Right.” Yet it was the Central Intelligence Agency that likely played the greatest role in effectively “weaponizing” the term. In the groundswell of public skepticism toward the Warren Commission’s findings on the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, the CIA sent a detailed directive to all of its bureaus. Titled “Countering Criticism of the Warren Commission Report,” the dispatch played a definitive role in making the “conspiracy theory” term a weapon to be wielded against almost any individual or group calling the government’s increasingly clandestine programs and activities into question. This important memorandum and its broad implications for American politics and public discourse are detailed in a forthcoming book by Florida State University political scientist Lance de-Haven-Smith, Conspiracy Theory in America. Dr. de-Haven-Smith devised the state crimes against democracy concept to interpret and explain potential government complicity in events such as the Gulf of Tonkin incident, the major political assassinations of the 1960s, and 9/11. “CIA Document 1035-960” was released in response to a 1976 FOIA request by the New York Times. The directive is especially significant because it outlines the CIA’s concern regarding “the whole reputation of the American government” vis-à-vis the Warren Commission Report. The agency was especially interested in maintaining its own image and role as it “contributed information to the [Warren] investigation.” The memorandum lays out a detailed series of actions and techniques for “countering and discrediting the claims of the conspiracy theorists, so as to inhibit the circulation of such claims in other countries.” For example, approaching “friendly elite contacts (especially politicians and editors)” to remind them of the Warren Commission’s integrity and soundness should be prioritized. “[T]he charges of the critics are without serious foundation,” the document reads, and “further speculative discussion only plays in to the hands of the [Communist] opposition.” The agency also directed its members “[t]o employ propaganda assets to [negate] and refute the attacks of the critics. Book reviews and feature articles are particularly appropriate for this purpose.”
Comments (100 - 129) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestYour failure to read the provided materials only proves your disinterest in increasing your knowledge and finding the truth. I won't waste my time further on you.
#60. To: Deckard (#56)
Why did they ignore the dozens of firemen and first responders who heard explosions?
#61. To: A K A Stone (#59)
I think
#62. To: yukon Deckard (#60)
Who ignored them? Do you know how many items can explode in a fire?
#63. To: yukon (#60)
Who ignored them?
#64. To: A K A Stone (#62)
(Edited)
You still never answered a simple question that I asked about Bush and how he saw the first plane hit.
1913: Congress authorized permanent [Secret Service] protection of the President and the statutory authorization for President-elect protection. [secretsevice.gov] Bush Saw The First Plane Hit! Advanced Knowledge of 9/11
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state.
Paul Craig Roberts
They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.
#65. To: A K A Stone (#62)
I'm sure you've seen the video with poofs of smoke shooting out of the wtc prior to collapse.
#66. To: yukon (#65)
Why do you believe there are warnings on aerosol cans to keep away from heat and fire
#67. To: A K A Stone (#63)
You for one.
#68. To: A K A Stone (#66)
those were aerosol cans popping out of the side of the building.
#69. To: yukon (#68)
#70. To: yukon (#68)
#71. To: Fred Mertz (#69)
#72. To: yukon (#67)
I've researched the 9/11 disaster extensively for well over 10 years and I've yet to find one witness to a bomb exploding in the WT
#73. To: no gnu taxes (#70)
The plane crashes were holograms.
#74. To: yukon (#71)
He's incapable of rational discourse as are the majority of truthers.
#75. To: no gnu taxes (#70)
#76. To: A K A Stone (#72)
William Rodriguez
#77. To: A K A Stone (#74)
That is why you wont answer the Bush seeing first plane.
#78. To: A K A Stone, Deckard, yukon (#74)
#79. To: Nexus6 (#78)
#80. To: yukon (#67)
I've researched the 9/11 disaster extensively for well over 10 years and I've yet to find one witness to a bomb exploding in the WTC.
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=3447
9/11: Paul Lemos testimony - WTC explosions bombs during collapse
New 9/11 Eyewitness Evidence of Bombs at WTC
9/11 Firefighters Reveal Bombs Destroyed WTC lobby
#81. To: Operation 40 (#80)
#82. To: A K A Stone (#47)
(Edited)
why did they allow 4 hijacked planes to fly on a joy rider all the way to Ohio without being intercepted.
Actual flight path of AA 77
#83. To: yukon (#81)
#84. To: Operation 40 (#82)
Actual flight path of AA 77
#85. To: Operation 40 (#83)
#86. To: Operation 40 (#82)
270 degree turn and flew into the first floor of the center of the worlds most powerful defense headquarters. Not a shot fired, not a single picture exists. We're supposed to believe there aren't any anti aircraft batteries in DC? LOL!
#87. To: Nexus6 (#78)
No bombs went off on 9-11. No controlled demolition. You would have to believe that years of intrusive preparation to a continuously occupied set of buildings by hundreds of workers would have gone totally unnoticed.
#88. To: A K A Stone (#86)
#89. To: Nexus6 (#78)
This CT insanity is going to drive any rational person away from your site.
#90. To: yukon (#88)
No, they were scrambled to intercept. The hijacked planes were assumed to be headed into the US from across the Atlantic.
#91. To: Nexus6 (#78)
#92. To: yukon (#77)
There are entire coffee table books dedicated to Bushisms.
Bush Saw The First Plane Hit! Advanced Knowledge of 9/11
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state.
Paul Craig Roberts
They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.
#93. To: A K A Stone (#90)
That is nonsense
#94. To: yukon (#93)
#95. To: Nexus6 (#78)
You would have to believe that years of intrusive preparation to a continuously occupied set of buildings by hundreds of workers would have gone totally unnoticed.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state.
Paul Craig Roberts
They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.
#96. To: A K A Stone (#94)
#97. To: A K A Stone, Nexus6 (#91)
Do you think JFK was killed by lone gunman Lee Harvey Oswald?
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state.
Paul Craig Roberts
They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.
#98. To: A K A Stone, All (#82)
This show was broadcast on January 15, 2015
Robin Hordon 
#99. To: yukon, Nexus6, A K A Stone (#93)
...CT kook nonsense.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state.
Paul Craig Roberts
They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.
.
.
.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]