[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Watching The Cops Title: From Neighborhood Cops to Robocops: The Changing Face of American Police “Technological progress has merely provided us with more efficient means for going backwards.” ― Aldous Huxley, Ends and Means If 2014 was the year of militarized police, armored tanks, and stop-and-frisk searches, 2015 may well be the year of technologized police, surveillance blimps and scan-and-frisk searches. Just as we witnessed neighborhood cops being transformed into soldier cops, we’re about to see them shapeshift once again, this time into robocops, complete with robotic exoskeletons, super-vision contact lenses, computer-linked visors, and mind-reading helmets. Similarly, just as military equipment created for the battlefield has been deployed on American soil against American citizens, we’re about to see military technology employed here at home in a manner sure to annihilate what’s left of our privacy and Fourth Amendment rights. For instance, with the flick of a switch (and often without your even being aware of the interference), police can now shut down your cell phone, scan your body for “suspicious” items as you walk down the street, test the air in your car for alcohol vapors as you drive down the street, identify you at a glance and run a background check on you for outstanding warrants, piggyback on your surveillance devices to listen in on your conversations and “see” what you see on your private cameras, and track your car’s movements via a GPS-enabled dart. That doesn’t even begin to scrape the surface of what’s coming down the pike, with law enforcement and military agencies boasting technologies so advanced as to render everything up until now mere child’s play. Once these technologies, which used to belong exclusively to the realm of futuristic sci-fi films, have been unleashed on an unsuspecting American public, it will completely change the face of American policing and, in the process, transform the landscape of what we used to call our freedoms. It doesn’t even matter that these technologies can be put to beneficial uses. As we’ve learned the hard way, once the government gets involved, it’s only a matter of time before the harm outweighs the benefits. Imagine, if you will, self-guided “smart” bullets that can track their target as it moves, solar-powered airships that provide persistent wide-area surveillance and tracking of ground “targets,” a grenade launcher that can deliver 14 flash-bang grenade rounds, invisible tanks that can blend into their surroundings and masquerade as a snow bank or a soccer mom’s station wagon, and a guided mortar weapon that can target someone up to 12 miles away. Or what about “less lethal weapons” such as the speech jammer gun, which can render a target tongue-tied; sticky foam guns, which shoot foam that hardens on contact, immobilizing the victim; and shock wave generators, which use the shockwaves from a controlled explosion to knock people over. Now imagine trying to defend yourself against such devices, which are incapable of distinguishing between an enemy combatant and a civilian. For that matter, imagine attempting to defend yourself or your loved ones against police officers made superhuman thanks to technology that renders them bullet-proof, shatter-proof, all-seeing, all-knowing and all-powerful. Does rendering a government agent superhuman make them inhuman, as well, unable to relate to the mass of humanity they are sworn to protect and defend? Pointing out that the clothes people wear can affect how they act, Salon magazine reporter Geordie Mcruer notes that “when clothing has symbolic meaning – such as a uniform that is worn only by a certain profession – it prepares the mind for the pursuit of goals that are consistent with the symbolic meaning of the clothing.” Mcruer continues:
While robocops are problematic enough, the problem we’re facing is so much greater than technology-enhanced domestic soldiers. As I make clear in my book A Government of Wolves: The Emerging American Police State, we’re on the cusp of a major paradigm shift from fascism disguised as a democracy into a technocratic surveillance society in which there are no citizens, only targets. We’re all targets now, to be scanned, surveilled, tracked and treated like blips on a screen. What’s taking place in Maryland right now is a perfect example of this shift. With Congress’ approval and generous funding (and without the consensus of area residents), the Army has just launched two massive, billion dollar surveillance airships into the skies over Baltimore, each airship three times the size of a Goodyear blimp, ostensibly to defend against cruise missile attacks. Government officials claim the surveillance blimps, which provide highly detailed radar imaging within a 340-mile radius, are not presently being used to track individuals or carry out surveillance against citizens, but it’s only a matter of time before that becomes par for the course. In New York, police will soon start employing mobile scanners that allow them to scan people on the street in order to detect any hidden objects under their clothes, whether it be a gun, a knife or anything else that appears “suspicious.” The scanners will also let them carry out enhanced data collection in the field—fingerprints, iris scans, facial mapping—which will build the government’s biometric database that much faster. These scanners are a more mobile version of the low radiation X-ray vans used to scan the contents of passing cars. Google Glass, being considered for use by officers, would allow police to access computer databases, as well as run background checks on and record anyone in their line of sight. One program, funded by $160 million in asset forfeiture funds, would equip police officers and vehicles with biometric smartphones that can scan individuals’ fingerprints and cross check it against criminal databases. The devices will also contain real-time 911 data, warrant information from federal, state and city databases, photographs of missing persons, suspects, Crime Stoppers posters and other persons of interest, and the latest cache of information on terror suspects. Stand-off lasers can detect alcohol vapors in a moving car. “If alcohol vapors are detected in the car, a message with a photo of the car including its license plate is sent to a police officer waiting down the road. Then, the police officer stops the car and checks for signs of alcohol using conventional tests.” Ekin Patrol cameras, described as “the first truly intelligent patrol unit in the world,” can not only detect the speed of passing cars but can generate tickets instantaneously, recognize and store the license plates of stopped, moving or parked vehicles, measure traffic density and violation data and engage in facial recognition of drivers and passengers. Collectively, all of these gizmos, gadgets and surveillance devices render us not just suspects in a surveillance state but also inmates in an electronic concentration camp. As journalist Lynn Stuart Parramore notes:
Unfortunately, eager as we are for progress and ill-suited to consider the moral and spiritual ramifications of our planned obsolescence, we have yet to truly fathom what it means to live in an environment in which we are always on red alert, always under observation, and always having our actions measured, judged and found wanting under some law or other intrusive government regulation. There are those who are not at all worried about this impending future, certain that they have nothing to hide. Rest assured, soon we will all have nowhere to hide from the prying eyes of a government bound and determined to not only know everything about us—where we go, what we do, what we say, what we read, what we keep in our pockets, how much money we have on us, how we spend that money, who we know, what we eat and drink, and where we are at any given moment—but prepared to use that information against us, whenever it becomes convenient and profitable to do so. Making the case that we’re being transformed as citizens, neighbors and human beings, Parramore identifies six factors arising from a society in which surveillance becomes the norm: a shift in power dynamics, in which the “watcher” becomes all-seeing and all-powerful; an incentive to turn citizens into outlaws by criminalizing otherwise lawful activities; diminished citizenship; an environment of suspicion and paranoia; a divided society comprised of the watchers and the watched; and “a society of edgy, unhappy beings whose sense of themselves is chronically diminished.” As Parramore rightly concludes, this is “not exactly a recipe for Utopia.” Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 32. There is no recipe for Utopia, so law enforcement always has to stay a step ahead of the criminals.
#6. To: Willie Green (#1) There is no recipe for Utopia, so law enforcement always has to stay a step ahead of the criminals. There is a newly manifestation of yellow journalism by those who have fear that tends to generate and promote systemic self-sanctioned hatred and brutality against cops. This has become a reproductive issue for them and is hardly newsworthy. But then, any uncontrollable fear and hatred never is.
#7. To: Gatlin, Willie Green (#6) hardly newsworthy. Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state. They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends. Paul Craig Roberts promote systemic self-sanctioned hatred and brutality against cops. No one is promoting "hatred and brutality against cops" you pompous windbag. Are you not concerned that the militarization of local police has resulted in less freedom and liberty? Cops should act like cops, not soldiers. But hey - you go right ahead and keep shilling for the police state.
#8. To: Deckard (#7) Are you not concerned that the militarization of local police has resulted in less freedom and liberty? It's a smaller world than it was 50 years ago... In fact, I'll probably sleep easier because I know they wouldn't need all that stuff if they were coming after me anyway. I'm getting way too old to put up any resistance and would surrender peacefully. Then I'd let THEM worry about providing me with food, shelter & my old people meds. LOL! They wouldn't do it because it's not in their budget!
#13. To: Willie Green (#8) I figure local police need to be prepared, just in case they have to take care of some jihadist terrorists like they had in Paris. Unfortunately, they are preparing for patriots and constitutionalists. Police: Armored Military Vehicles Needed for ‘Constitutionalists’ with Firearms A Washington state sheriff’s deputy proclaiming that law enforcement officers need armored military vehicles because of “constitutionalists” with firearms.
#19. To: Deckard (#13) Unfortunately, they are preparing for patriots and constitutionalists. Well then you better stockpile more MREs and tinfoil hats...
#21. To: Willie Green (#19) 72 Types Of Americans That Are Considered “Potential Terrorists” In Official Government Documents Below is a list of 72 types of Americans that are considered to be “extremists” and “potential terrorists” in official U.S. government documents. To see the original source document for each point, just click on the link. As you can see, this list covers most of the country…
#23. To: Deckard (#21) http://exiledonline.com/rightwin...phobe-attacks-the-exiled/ The author of the article is an attorney (yeah, they haven't screwed the American people) and president of the Rutherford Institute. He is described rather harshly in the above linked article.
#25. To: Vinny (#23) The author of the article is an attorney (yeah, they haven't screwed the American people) and president of the Rutherford Institute. He is described rather harshly in the above linked article. Rutherford isn't well liked by the statists and police state cheerleaders who infest this site either. That alone tells me that he's right on the money. Your link goes to a hit piece that is eerily reminiscent of the attacks on Ron Paul when he ran for POTUS.
#28. To: Deckard (#25) Your link goes to a hit piece that is eerily reminiscent of the attacks on Ron Paul when he ran for POTUS. He didn't run for president, he collected a lot of money from naive people and then took a swan dive into the lap of the establishment Republican party. He and Rand are frauds.
#29. To: Vinny (#28) (Edited) He and Rand are frauds. I agree with you about Rand - he is nothing like his dad. Looks like we have another Ron Paul-hater on the site.
#31. To: Deckard, Vinny (#29) Looks like we have another Ron Paul-hater on the site. Now, whatever gave you that idea? Welcome, Vinny.
#32. To: Gatlin (#31) Pleasure.
Replies to Comment # 32. There are no replies to Comment # 32.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 32. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|