[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

House Speaker Mike Johnson Calls “Separation of Church and State” a “Misnomer”

Epic Bear Fight - NO MUSIC...Full length

1611 KJV Bible Compared To The 1560 Geneva Bible

South African lawmakers vote to suspend diplomatic ties with Israel, shut embassy

Jesus Continues To Reveal Himself Through Dreams In These Last Days

Speaker Mike Johnson Slams DOJ Live

History of Artificial Intelligence & Mark of the Beast

NEW VIDEO From January 6th

How We Are Being Conditioned For "Disease X"

Romans 11:26-27 King James Version 26 And so all Israel shall be saved

It Was a Set-Up: Recent J6 Footage Shows Capitol Police May Have Incited Riot – Fired on Massive Trump Crowd Without Warning

What’s the Connection Between Eugenics and Evolution?

This Was The First Thing Jesus Warned About In The End Times

Plandemic 3: The Great Awakening

Iranian politician and former IRGC minister Brig.-Gen. Mohsen Rafighdoost told Iranian TV in an interview that Iran is holding Western hostages

Are Scientists Confirming Bible Prophecy Regarding Eruptions In The Last Days?

Israel Hamas Conflict : 17 नवंबर को Israel में 'ब्लैक आउट'

chenweihua

IDF shares a new video, shows weapons at civilian sites in northern Gaza

Israeli military video said to show destruction of Hamas tunnels in Gaza

Unseen footage: Israeli army's daring Gaza evacuation | News9

Aircraft Carrier USS Dwight D. Eisenhower Now in Gulf of Oman

Terrorists shoot at IDF soldiers from Gaza hospital

Terrorists in Columbus Ohio

Researchers have just discovered a ‘kill switch’ that causes cancer cells to self-destruct in possible medical breakthrough

Mike Johnson LIVE | Speaker Mike Johnson Vs Joe Biden LIVE

Israeli Navy’s Unit for Underwater Missions located dozens of weapons in the Gazan maritime region

Is Trump Paralleling an Ancient Leader?

Footage from the operations in the Rantisi Hospital

GO TO HELL EVIL MUSLIM

The Internet Kill Switch Has Arrived With Larry Ragland

The Syllabus Of Errors Pope BI. Pius IX - 1864

James Carville explains everything about Mike Johnson

This Is The Technology The Bible Warned Us About

Israel Palestine War Update LIVE: Israeli Tanks And Forces Hit Multiple Targets, Invading Gaza

Yellow Fever: Coming to the U.S.?

Scientists Unveil 'Air Vax' to Combat Vaccine Hesitancy

Judge Arthur Engoron Orders Ivanka Trump to Testify at Father’s NY Trial

House Republicans Set Legislative Priorities After Electing Mike Johnson as Speaker

US Warplanes Conduct Major Strikes On 'Iranian Proxies' In Syria

Tucker Carlson Warns America Is on the 'Brink of Collapse'

MasterCard's New 'Digital ID' Allows Governments to Track Public’s Vaccination Status

American Oligarchy: Meet the Billionaire Mega-Donors Behind the Biden Presidency

Sanctuary State Illinois: Illegal Aliens Freed from Jail After Allegedly Stealing $1.7K in Clothes from Macy’s

'Reasonable Decisions': 70% Of Criminals Dem Gov Released Early Went On To Commit More Crimes

Rep. Jamaal Bowman Pleads Guilty To Pulling Fire Alarm In Capitol Building

ACLU Declares Trump Gag Order To Be Unconstitutional

Mike Johnson Elected House Speaker

Texas AG Sues Biden Administration For Cutting Razor Wire At Southern Border

Retail Credit Card APR Hits Record 28.93% Average


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

BANNED AT LIBERTYPOST
See other BANNED AT LIBERTYPOST Articles

Goldi banned censored delete elpee

Title: Clarification requested if needed
Source: libertypost
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jan 12, 2015
Author: sysadmin LP
Post Date: 2015-01-12 10:44:49 by tpaine
Keywords: None
Views: 30981
Comments: 61

To: tpaine

Subject: Clarification requested if needed

>> sysadmin-LP -- It has come to light that I may have misinterpreted some part of your offer. If so this was not intentional on my part, I was piecing together parts of several emails to arrive at a cogent description of the entire package.

----- I asked you in my 'offer' emails to post them at LP, because you refused to allow me to comment there. --- Instead, you pieced together parts, which in my opinion led to an non cogent description of the entire email exchange.

>> Information short, what I gathered from your emails and what I have attempted to represent: --- Your accepting ownership of LP is contingent on the following conditions: --- 1. If 25% or more of LP active users indicate they do not want you as owner, (that is, do not vote for you) the offer is withdrawn and you do not accept ownership. (This logically translates to 75% approval. A vote for another option is counted toward the 25% figure.) ---- 2. You will not take ownership until a suitable moderator is selected with a 75% approval rate from LP members. --- (If you have been following the discussion thread on LP of course you already know this but I wanted to put it on the table as accurately as possible.)

------- I have been attempting (like others) to follow your comments on those threads, and and like the others, I find them confusing. Why don't you just post our original email exchange, in its entirety, and then try to explain why you decided to make this a complicated four choice election instead of simply asking the members if they wanted me as an owner? ----- If 25 individuals had voted no, that would have been the end of it for me.

>> If I am mistaken in any of this please provide a precise statement of the contingencies which I will post in its entirety on your behalf. If there are any significant errors in my reporting of your offer I will publicly apologize for my error in interpretation and take whatever action is necessary to insure a fair vote, including invalidation of current votes and starting the process over if it comes to that. Despite our differences you made a bona fide offer and it is my desire to give you a fair shake. ------ sysadmin posted on 2015-01-12 9:11:42 ET

-------- The way you put on a four part 'election' did not make it a fair shake for anyone, imho. --- But it did indicate that my ownership of the site was not acceptable for at least 25 out of the 100 or so active members. So be it...

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 48.

#3. To: tpaine (#0)

sysadmin is wilting under the intense pressure of the poll he constructed.

Oh, it's killing him!

Fred Mertz  posted on  2015-01-12   10:56:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Fred Mertz, Y'ALL, tooconservative (#3)

sysadmin LP --- I understand what you are saying, but this process has all taken place in the open and tpaine has not complained.

Bull, I've complained about his procedure since I've been posting here. And most if not all of those posts have been reposted at LP.

TooConservative--- That's harder to do when he's banned here. You could at least let him comment but not post articles. --- And regardless of whether he complains, he made one proposal only. A single vote for him and for his moderator (assuming he can find one). Not tossing in Pericles, you or shutting LP down.

Obviously, sysadmin, will not hear any criticism of his methods.

Obviously, he is winning hands down already. Only votes for you or for shutdown can exclude him in any fair assessment of the votes cast. ---- Are you really content to hand the forum over to a retread who Goldi banned instead of someone who posted steady for 10 years at TOS and then posted for 8 years here at LP without getting banned? Maybe the record should be allowed to speak somewhat for itself. ---- tpaine should have apologized for posting Volokh. But not everyone knows that WaPo purchased Volokh. I always oppose posting LAT/WaPo articles due to their litigation against TOS. But LP is a non-profit and a very tine forum, not even visible on Google/Yahoo/Bing. So the risk really is quite minimal. There are far better targets for packs of media lawyers to sue than to pick on LP. For instance, the known for-profit aggregators over at TOS. And they get away with excerpts and reach a far larger audience.

Your kicking a dead sysadmin's horse. He's convinced I did something, gasp, illegal...

The point remains: tpaine never proposed taking a vote on anything other than him and his choice of moderator and that alone. So when you keep trying to say these are tpaine's conditions, that isn't true. He never proposed a vote between him and Destro. Or between him and you. Or between him and shutting down LP. tpaine proposed none of that. You can't seriously pretend that he did. If you think he did, post his email here where he suggests anything other than a straight up-down vote on him and a moderator.

Thank you for calling his bluff.

Of course, I'm not even sure that tpaine is still interested. --- TooConservative

Frankly, I'm not. Even with you as a moderator/techie, I can see that it just wouldn't work. -- I hate to see LP go under, but as someone mentioned, LF is an option, among with thousands of others.

tpaine  posted on  2015-01-12   11:20:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#45. To: tpaine, Fred Mertz, hondo68, redleghunter (#5)

Thank you for calling his bluff.

Probably pushed him over the edge. I had a very strong feeling it was all over when Neil posted his close-it-down comment. After that point, sysadmin's comments indicated no real consideration was ongoing.

Neil mentioned that he visited sysadmin at Thanksgiving when he was back in the States. They know each other in real life. Goldi and sysadmin knew each other, maybe back in college. Neil never met Goldi in person but knew sysadmin. Then we have this post by sysadmin:

"I've been with LP since Goldi and Neil came up with the idea, helped build the first server, and have worked with it ever since behind the scenes. Turning out the lights is not an easy thing at all but it is something that needs to be done."

And what was LP's first server and where was it located? Don't post the answer but you should be hearing bells ring.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-01-12   20:25:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: TooConservative (#45) (Edited)

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-01-12   20:27:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#48. To: A K A Stone (#46)

Clue me in if you want to. Or not if you don't.

It's ancient history, how LP started and all that. Excruciatingly dull stuff.

I'll spare you any explanation. You'll thank me later.     : )

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-01-12   20:29:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 48.

        There are no replies to Comment # 48.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 48.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com