[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Epidemic of Sudden Adult Deaths Finally Made News

Classes Canceled for Nearly Half a Million Students as L.A. School Employees Strike

Nineteenth anniversary of Kosovo Kristallnacht perpetrated on NATO’s watch

The Biggest Covid Question: What Will Happen in 10 years?

The US Has the World Setup for a Worse Financial Crisis Than in 2008

Mom files lawsuit after being reported to law enforcement for questioning “polysexual” school poster

Symposium: Aside from Bush & Cheney who is at fault for the Iraq War?

French MPs threatened with guillotine ahead of crucial vote

Why aren't any colleges showing us their research that justifies the mandates?

Right-wing host calls for military to execute Obama if Trump is indicted

“Driving”…

Praying Football Coach Receives Nearly $2 Million Settlement from School District

Chalcedon: The Aftermath

A Dose of Reality: Can You Handle It?

House GOP turns knives on Manhattan DA over potential Trump arrest

Deficit Hawk Hypocrites and Warmongers Unite, Apparently Hoping to Start WWIII

The Sun Rose Anyways

A Highway to Peace or a Highway to Hell?

Jim Jordan says ‘bookkeeping error’ at center of Trump hush-money case

All the conspiracy that's fit to print

Trump accuses Manhattan DA of ‘interference in a presidential election’

DeSantis slams Manhattan DA in first remarks on potential Trump indictment

Oxfam erases “mother” and “father” in new language guide

N. Korea drills 'nuclear counterattack,' appears to launch missile from silo

Supposedly 'sustainable' electric cars are getting junked over minor damage

Nord Stream Salon | Sy Hersh

Veto of Kansas bill on trans athletes sets up override fight

Donald Trump says he will be arrested on TUESDAY, as New York prosecutors move to indict him over hush money payments to porn star Stormy Daniels

The Covid “Killer Vaccine”

The Day All The ATMs Ran Out Of Cash (The sudden collapse of prices. The Great Depression began with the collapse of stock market prices in 1929. That was preceded by the collapse of agricultural prices in the United States during the 1920s.)

Bush-Era Neocons Should Shut Up About Iraq (And Everything Else)

Are Bank Failures Tied to Covid Lockdowns and That Giant Economic Destruction Created Over the Past Three Years?

Gnosticism in the Modern West

FACT CHECK: Member of House of Lords uses Mainstream Media to claim that “Antivaxers are a global menace who must be defeated”; So why did the Triple+ Vaccinated account for 92% of all COVID Deaths in 2022? And why are Mortality Rates per 100k LOWEST

Betting All on Hegemony; Risking All, To Stave Off Ruin

E Verify is BS

‘Your god is way too small’ if you don’t support killing preborn humans, says Minnesota pastor

Pro-abortionists lobby for the ending of one life and the damaging of another

Utah governor Cox signs bill that says all abortions must be performed in hospitals. Abortion clinics could be out of business

Surrexit Christus - The Lord Is Risen

Pentagon Mobilized to Support Tech Startups After Bank Failure

A Lamb Goes Uncomplaining Forth

Report: FBI, DOJ now investigating TikTok's surveillance of Americans

Bread of Heaven, Living Manna

China Worried as Japan Accelerates “Dangerous” Militarization

Pro-life Students Hounded Out of Smithsonian Score Legal Victory

Biden family's influence peddling 'in a class to itself'

International Criminal Court hits Putin with arrest warrant

Biden tries to boost pay for federal bureaucrats by highest rate since Carter

It was 20 years ago but the Iraq War folly could be our fate


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

BANNED AT LIBERTYPOST
See other BANNED AT LIBERTYPOST Articles

Goldi banned censored delete elpee

Title: Clarification requested if needed
Source: libertypost
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jan 12, 2015
Author: sysadmin LP
Post Date: 2015-01-12 10:44:49 by tpaine
Keywords: None
Views: 29938
Comments: 61

To: tpaine

Subject: Clarification requested if needed

>> sysadmin-LP -- It has come to light that I may have misinterpreted some part of your offer. If so this was not intentional on my part, I was piecing together parts of several emails to arrive at a cogent description of the entire package.

----- I asked you in my 'offer' emails to post them at LP, because you refused to allow me to comment there. --- Instead, you pieced together parts, which in my opinion led to an non cogent description of the entire email exchange.

>> Information short, what I gathered from your emails and what I have attempted to represent: --- Your accepting ownership of LP is contingent on the following conditions: --- 1. If 25% or more of LP active users indicate they do not want you as owner, (that is, do not vote for you) the offer is withdrawn and you do not accept ownership. (This logically translates to 75% approval. A vote for another option is counted toward the 25% figure.) ---- 2. You will not take ownership until a suitable moderator is selected with a 75% approval rate from LP members. --- (If you have been following the discussion thread on LP of course you already know this but I wanted to put it on the table as accurately as possible.)

------- I have been attempting (like others) to follow your comments on those threads, and and like the others, I find them confusing. Why don't you just post our original email exchange, in its entirety, and then try to explain why you decided to make this a complicated four choice election instead of simply asking the members if they wanted me as an owner? ----- If 25 individuals had voted no, that would have been the end of it for me.

>> If I am mistaken in any of this please provide a precise statement of the contingencies which I will post in its entirety on your behalf. If there are any significant errors in my reporting of your offer I will publicly apologize for my error in interpretation and take whatever action is necessary to insure a fair vote, including invalidation of current votes and starting the process over if it comes to that. Despite our differences you made a bona fide offer and it is my desire to give you a fair shake. ------ sysadmin posted on 2015-01-12 9:11:42 ET

-------- The way you put on a four part 'election' did not make it a fair shake for anyone, imho. --- But it did indicate that my ownership of the site was not acceptable for at least 25 out of the 100 or so active members. So be it...

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 37.

#18. To: tpaine (#0)

Good Lord. For being such a massive windbag, you can't effectively communicate a simple point.

Try paring down your novel by about 10,000 characters. Simplicity can be your friend.

LP is dead anyway. All of your goofball pals will be over here soon laying this place to waste.

Kind of funny that you were such a poor choice the place votes to commit Hari-Kari rather than have you in charge.

Nexus6  posted on  2015-01-12   12:41:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Nexus6 (#18)

Kind of funny that you were such a poor choice the place votes to commit Hari-Kari rather than have you in charge.

Quit lying, liar.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2015-01-12   12:44:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Fred Mertz (#19)

Neil --- With 83 comments posted, I count 43 voters with the following breakdown.

TPaine: 23

Perciles: 6

Status Quo: 24

Shutdown: 11

With supposedly 64? votes counted, 11 were for Hari-Kari.

Hardly a consensus.

tpaine  posted on  2015-01-12   12:58:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: tpaine (#21)

With supposedly 64? votes counted, 11 were for Hari-Kari.

Hardly a consensus.

11 of 43 voters selected a shutdown as acceptable. The 64 figure is not significant.

Pinguinite  posted on  2015-01-12   17:22:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: Pinguinite (#34) (Edited)

With supposedly 64? votes counted, 11 were for Hari-Kari. Hardly a consensus.

11 of 43 voters selected a shutdown as acceptable.

Still, hardly a consensus.

The 64 figure is not significant.

You're entitled to your opinion, and my best to you sir.

tpaine  posted on  2015-01-12   17:32:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 37.

        There are no replies to Comment # 37.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 37.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com