[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

REPORT: Mask Mandates Causing Over 350% Surge In Childhood Speech Delays.

Serbia revokes Rio Tinto's licences - $2.4 BILLION investment gone. after Australia takes a dump on their national tennis star

NYPD Nazi pricks arrest 9 year old for not having Vax card.

A Shockingly High Percentage Of The U.S. Population Actually Wants An Authoritarian “Big Brother” Police State

Video Shows Pennsylvania Official Admitting Election Laws Were Broken In 2020

Durham vs. HorowiTz ... Tension Over Truth - Consequences --- Grips The FBI's Trump-Russia Reckoning

LibertysFlame Server Maintenance Complete (for today)

The Last Days of the Covidian Cult

Remember the Service Station?

Substitute teacher was FIRED for refusing to “meow” to a student who claims to self-identify as a CAT

LibertysFlame Server maintenance

Geddy Lee-Dan Rather Interview

Chinese Yell N word at NBA Players

Army Conducting Two-Week 'Guerrilla Warfare Exercise' in Rural North Carolina Focused On Battling 'Freedom Fighters'

It Doesn’t Matter That Voters Hate Joe Biden If Democrats Can Rig Elections

And there you have it - they want to “prevent people from exercising their fundamental rights.”

Snarky Puppy - Lingus (We Like It Here)

Larnell Lewis Hears "Enter Sandman" For The First Time

Time to boycott Carhartt…

Wisconsin Judge Bans Ballot Drop Boxes, Says Election Officials Broke The Law

Democrats Are Priming Themselves To Refuse To Accept Any Election Defeats

The Left is trying to erase the meaning of citizenship

iT would Take abouT a full year for ... The double-vaxxed FrankensTein geneTically alTered freaks --- To sTarT konking off like flies.

12 Charts Explain Why President Biden's Ratings Are On Life Support

Latinos Are Saying ¡Adios! to Joe Biden In Large Droves According to New Poll

DESPITE MASS CENSORSHIP THERE IS CONSENSUS AMONG TOP SCIENTISTS: C19 AND C19 JABS ARE BIOWEAPONS

DR. ZELENKO REVEALS HORRIFIC MARK OF THE BEAST BANKERS TECHNOLOGY ENGINEERED TO CONDEMN HUMANITY

YouTube star who suffered from real-life Benjamin Button disease dies at the age of 15 after inspiring millions with her videos: Family pays tribute to teen and says she 'is no longer in pain'

New Poll Shows Trump Would Beat Biden if Election Were Held Today

The video of German pathologists and claims for what is in the mRNA shots

Why Republicans aren't likely to lose any Senate seats in 2022

USA Today supports Pedophiles

Biden’s “Voting Rights” Scam Would Make It Easier To Steal Elections

James O'keef Documents-story of what happened and how and why the ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine work.

James O'keef Documents-story of what happened and how and why the ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine work.

One Year Ago, Big Tech Declared Open War On America. Here’s What’s Next

Ventusky weahter site

This Clown wants to rule the world

Disgraced FBI No. 2 Andrew McCabe Calls For Feds To Treat ‘Mainstream’ Conservatives Like Domestic Terrorists

A solution they DO NOT want you to know.

This trans-humanist tech was exposed for decades.

WARNING: NAZI EXPERIMENTS - DR MIKE YEADON INTERVIEW WITH JAMES DELINGPOLE

Democrats’ Top Priority Before Fall Elections Is Rigging U.S. Voting Rules

Four Deadly Parasites Found in Vaccines

Japan finds black particles in Moderna vaccine

5G Weaponized Cell Tower Transmitter Box Contains Cov-19 Chip (Youtube Banned This!)!!

The Patriot Front caravan departs in vehicles with taped-over license plates here in Chicago

Alec Baldwin's Get Out of Jail Free Card

New York City Mayor Eric Adams supports Vaccine mandate for kids

Baseball bats being handed out from the Capital building to people outside through the windows.


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

BANNED AT LIBERTYPOST
See other BANNED AT LIBERTYPOST Articles

Goldi banned censored delete elpee

Title: Clarification requested if needed
Source: libertypost
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jan 12, 2015
Author: sysadmin LP
Post Date: 2015-01-12 10:44:49 by tpaine
Keywords: None
Views: 27905
Comments: 61

To: tpaine

Subject: Clarification requested if needed

>> sysadmin-LP -- It has come to light that I may have misinterpreted some part of your offer. If so this was not intentional on my part, I was piecing together parts of several emails to arrive at a cogent description of the entire package.

----- I asked you in my 'offer' emails to post them at LP, because you refused to allow me to comment there. --- Instead, you pieced together parts, which in my opinion led to an non cogent description of the entire email exchange.

>> Information short, what I gathered from your emails and what I have attempted to represent: --- Your accepting ownership of LP is contingent on the following conditions: --- 1. If 25% or more of LP active users indicate they do not want you as owner, (that is, do not vote for you) the offer is withdrawn and you do not accept ownership. (This logically translates to 75% approval. A vote for another option is counted toward the 25% figure.) ---- 2. You will not take ownership until a suitable moderator is selected with a 75% approval rate from LP members. --- (If you have been following the discussion thread on LP of course you already know this but I wanted to put it on the table as accurately as possible.)

------- I have been attempting (like others) to follow your comments on those threads, and and like the others, I find them confusing. Why don't you just post our original email exchange, in its entirety, and then try to explain why you decided to make this a complicated four choice election instead of simply asking the members if they wanted me as an owner? ----- If 25 individuals had voted no, that would have been the end of it for me.

>> If I am mistaken in any of this please provide a precise statement of the contingencies which I will post in its entirety on your behalf. If there are any significant errors in my reporting of your offer I will publicly apologize for my error in interpretation and take whatever action is necessary to insure a fair vote, including invalidation of current votes and starting the process over if it comes to that. Despite our differences you made a bona fide offer and it is my desire to give you a fair shake. ------ sysadmin posted on 2015-01-12 9:11:42 ET

-------- The way you put on a four part 'election' did not make it a fair shake for anyone, imho. --- But it did indicate that my ownership of the site was not acceptable for at least 25 out of the 100 or so active members. So be it...

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 32.

#3. To: tpaine (#0)

sysadmin is wilting under the intense pressure of the poll he constructed.

Oh, it's killing him!

Fred Mertz  posted on  2015-01-12   10:56:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Fred Mertz, Y'ALL, tooconservative (#3)

sysadmin LP --- I understand what you are saying, but this process has all taken place in the open and tpaine has not complained.

Bull, I've complained about his procedure since I've been posting here. And most if not all of those posts have been reposted at LP.

TooConservative--- That's harder to do when he's banned here. You could at least let him comment but not post articles. --- And regardless of whether he complains, he made one proposal only. A single vote for him and for his moderator (assuming he can find one). Not tossing in Pericles, you or shutting LP down.

Obviously, sysadmin, will not hear any criticism of his methods.

Obviously, he is winning hands down already. Only votes for you or for shutdown can exclude him in any fair assessment of the votes cast. ---- Are you really content to hand the forum over to a retread who Goldi banned instead of someone who posted steady for 10 years at TOS and then posted for 8 years here at LP without getting banned? Maybe the record should be allowed to speak somewhat for itself. ---- tpaine should have apologized for posting Volokh. But not everyone knows that WaPo purchased Volokh. I always oppose posting LAT/WaPo articles due to their litigation against TOS. But LP is a non-profit and a very tine forum, not even visible on Google/Yahoo/Bing. So the risk really is quite minimal. There are far better targets for packs of media lawyers to sue than to pick on LP. For instance, the known for-profit aggregators over at TOS. And they get away with excerpts and reach a far larger audience.

Your kicking a dead sysadmin's horse. He's convinced I did something, gasp, illegal...

The point remains: tpaine never proposed taking a vote on anything other than him and his choice of moderator and that alone. So when you keep trying to say these are tpaine's conditions, that isn't true. He never proposed a vote between him and Destro. Or between him and you. Or between him and shutting down LP. tpaine proposed none of that. You can't seriously pretend that he did. If you think he did, post his email here where he suggests anything other than a straight up-down vote on him and a moderator.

Thank you for calling his bluff.

Of course, I'm not even sure that tpaine is still interested. --- TooConservative

Frankly, I'm not. Even with you as a moderator/techie, I can see that it just wouldn't work. -- I hate to see LP go under, but as someone mentioned, LF is an option, among with thousands of others.

tpaine  posted on  2015-01-12   11:20:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: tpaine (#5)

My guesstimate:

- 90 percent want elPee to carry on [Options 1, 2 or 3]

- 10 percent want to shut it down [Option 4]

So, what do they do? They shut it down.

They've chosen the easier wrong.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2015-01-12   11:42:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: Fred Mertz, tpaine (#11)

My guesstimate:

- 90 percent want elPee to carry on [Options 1, 2 or 3]

- 10 percent want to shut it down [Option 4]

So, what do they do? They shut it down.

They've chosen the easier wrong.

Please help me out here. You claim that 90% want LP to continue and 10% wanted shut down - that's 100%. And you are claiming that both positions are wrong with one being easier than the other? I can't wait to hear you logic on this.

SOSO  posted on  2015-01-12   16:55:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 32.

#42. To: SOSO (#32)

Please help me out here. You claim that 90% want LP to continue and 10% wanted shut down - that's 100%. And you are claiming that both positions are wrong with one being easier than the other? I can't wait to hear you logic on this.

Yes, 80 - 90% wanted elPee to remain alive and in operation. Votes for Options [1, 2 or 3].

That would take some funds, effort, time and energy to keep the place going. That is the harder right thing to do IMO.

10 - 20% wanted to shut it down - Option 4. That's easy to do with the one time effort...and wrong IMO.

I don't know why you didn't get it. Do you get it now?

Fred Mertz  posted on  2015-01-12 19:22:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 32.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com