[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Parody ... Jump / Trump --- van Halen jump

"The Democrat Meltdown Continues"

"Yes, We Need Deportations Without Due Process"

"Trump's Tariff Play Smart, Strategic, Working"

"Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts"

"Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands

"Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies"

"Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk"

KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel

"Trade should work for America, not rule it"

"The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP"

"How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap"

‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’

Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible"

"Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!"

"If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think"

"Ending EPA Overreach"

Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built

Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew

The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED!

Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing!

Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy?

Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia)

"Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department"

Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent

"Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail"

Any suggestion that the USA and NATO are "Helping" or have ever helped Ukraine needs to be shot down instantly

"Real problem with the Palestinians: Nobody wants them"

ACDC & The Rolling Stones - Rock Me Baby

Magnus Carlsen gives a London System lesson!

"The Democrats Are Suffering Through a Drought of Generational Talent"

7 Tactics Of The Enemy To Weaken Your Faith

Strange And Biblical Events Are Happening

Every year ... BusiesT casino gambling day -- in Las Vegas

Trump’s DOGE Plan Is Legally Untouchable—Elon Musk Holds the Scalpel

Palestinians: What do you think of the Trump plan for Gaza?

What Happens Inside Gaza’s Secret Tunnels? | Unpacked

Hamas Torture Bodycam Footage: "These Monsters Filmed it All" | IDF Warfighter Doron Keidar, Ep. 225

EXPOSED: The Dark Truth About the Hostages in Gaza

New Task Force Ready To Expose Dark Secrets

Egypt Amasses Forces on Israel’s Southern Border | World War 3 About to Start?

"Trump wants to dismantle the Education Department. Here’s how it would work"

test

"Federal Workers Concerned That Returning To Office Will Interfere With Them Not Working"

"Yes, the Democrats Have a Governing Problem – They Blame America First, Then Govern Accordingly"

"Trump and His New Frenemies, Abroad and at Home"

"The Left’s Sin Is of Omission and Lost Opportunity"

"How Trump’s team will break down the woke bureaucracy"

Pete Hegseth will be confirmed in a few minutes

"Greg Gutfeld Cooks Jessica Tarlov and Liberal Media in Brilliant Take on Trump's First Day"


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Creationism/Evolution
See other Creationism/Evolution Articles

Title: Cosmos: A Series Created to Counter Creation
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.icr.org/article/8131/
Published: Oct 27, 2014
Author: Brian Thomas, M.S.
Post Date: 2014-10-27 00:06:54 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 4451
Comments: 12

“The universe is all that is, or was, or ever will be.” Does this statement raise any red flags? It was the opening line of the popular 1980 TV series Cosmos and was repeated in its current incarnation. The statement crystallizes the philosophy of the late Carl Sagan, one of the 20th century’s best communicators of science and naturalism. It imagines a reality that excludes God, essentially replacing Genesis 1’s “In the beginning God” with “In the beginning…hydrogen.” Matter pops into existence without a cause? Now that’s a red flag.

The current Cosmos series raises so many such flags—mingling some good science with historical falsehoods, scientific errors, oversimplifications, and logical lapses—that one article cannot manage them. Its makers’ beliefs reveal a common source for all these problems.

Consider Cosmos’ award-winning producer, Seth MacFarlane, a brilliant artist, outspoken atheist, and creator of debauched cartoon shows like Family Guy. Los Angeles Times asked him, “What are you hoping to get out of [Cosmos]?” MacFarlane replied, “We’ve had a resurgence of creationism and intelligent design quote-unquote theory. There’s been a real vacuum when it comes to science education.”1 In Cosmos, he applied his creative skills in an attempt to eradicate creation thinking from popular thought.

How about Cosmos writer Ann Druyan?2 In 2004 she won the Richard Dawkins Award, granted by Atheist Alliance International for raising public consciousness of atheism. Druyan told the Skeptical Inquirer:

I think the roots of this antagonism to science run very deep. They’re ancient. We see them in Genesis, this first story, this founding myth of ours, in which the first humans are doomed and cursed eternally for asking a question, for partaking of the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge.3

Only tortured atheistic reasoning could twist the Genesis account into a tale of mankind being unfairly cursed for simple curiosity, a trait God graciously gave us, instead of being cursed for disobeying and distrusting Him. Why else would Druyan render the “Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil” as merely “the Tree of Knowledge,” as though God desires His children be ignorant of everything, instead of just ignorant of experiencing evil?

But surely Cosmos host Dr. Neil deGrasse Tyson, a scientist, is more objective than his cohorts? Though careful to not disclose his personal beliefs, Tyson has let slip statements that reveal his God-omitting way of thinking. How could this trio not bring their atheistic religious beliefs into the series?

The caustic threads of this philosophy wind through the tapestry of Cosmos’ imaginative illustrations, visual feasts, and carefully crafted scripts. For example, in Episode Five Tyson said, “Give me a star’s spectrum, and I’ll tell you what it’s made of.”4 He then described other aspects that starlight reveals before saying, “In microwave light, we can see all the way back to the beginning of our universe.” Experts can discern elements in a star by its starlight; repeatable science reveals this. However, light does not necessarily show the past, and certainly does not show the beginning. By wrapping scientific statements around false philosophy, the series’ craftsmen weave a beginning without a Beginner.

MacFarlane told Los Angeles Times, “I thought we solved this whole evolution thing years and years ago but I guess not, I guess it still needs to be explained.”1 The purpose of Cosmos is not to explore God’s wondrous cosmos with objective science but to more convincingly retell the tattered evolutionary story. Viewers beware: Cosmos was created to counter creation.

References

  1. Blake, M. Seth MacFarlane hopes ‘Cosmos’ counteracts ‘junk science,’ creationism. Los Angeles Times. Posted on la-times.com March 7, 2014, accessed March 18, 2014.
  2. Ann Druyan co-wrote the 1980 Cosmos series and was Carl Sagan’s third wife.
  3. Druyan, A. November/December 2003. Ann Druyan Talks About Science, Religion, Wonder, Awe...and Carl Sagan. Skeptical Inquirer. 27 (6).
  4. MacFarlane, S. et al, executive producers. 2014. Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey. DVD. 20th Century Fox.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: A K A Stone (#0)

The creation game ... God is the fastest chess player --- it's always your move !

Liberals are playing ouiji board games with themselves !

If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons - question marks are for girlie boys !

BorisY  posted on  2014-10-27   6:41:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: A K A Stone, ALL (#0)

“I had motives for not wanting the world to have meaning; consequently assumed it had none, and was able without any difficulty to find satisfying reasons for this assumption…. The philosopher who finds no meaning in the world is not concerned exclusively with a problem in pure metaphysics; he is also concerned to prove there is no valid reason why he personally should not do as he wants to do…. For myself, as no doubt for most of my contemporaries, the philosophy of meaninglessness was essentially an instrument of liberation. The liberation we desired was simultaneously liberation from an certain political and economic system and liberation from a certain system of morality. We objected to the morality because it interfered with our sexual freedom..” Aldous Huxley, “Confession of a Professed Atheist,”

Report: Perspective on the News, vol. 3 (June 1966), p. 19. From an article by Helming, “An Interview with God.”

GarySpFC  posted on  2014-10-30   8:44:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: GarySpFC (#2)

One only has to read Huxley fiction to get at his worldview.

But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name (John 1:12)

redleghunter  posted on  2014-10-30   11:19:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: A K A Stone, GarySpFC, redleghunter, Ferret Mike, Orthodoxa, Pinguinite, 4 givan 1, don, CZ82, out damned spot (#0)

Consider Cosmos’ award-winning producer, Seth MacFarlane, a brilliant artist, outspoken atheist, and creator of debauched cartoon shows like Family Guy.

MacFarlane: “We’ve had a resurgence of creationism and intelligent design quote-unquote theory. There’s been a real vacuum when it comes to science education.”

In 'Cosmos,' he applied his creative skills in an attempt to eradicate creation thinking from popular thought.

But...but...Can't militant atheist Nazis and homo-fascists like MacFarlane merely lobby the courts or call on 0buma himself to "eradicate Creation-Thinking from popular thought"?

Cosmos writer Ann Druyan [Carl Sagan's wife] in 2004...won the Richard Dawkins Award, granted by Atheist Alliance International for raising public consciousness of atheism. Druyan told the Skeptical Inquirer:

"I think the roots of this antagonism to science [promoting the myth of "Evolution"] run very deep. They’re ancient. We see them in Genesis, this first story, this founding myth of ours, in which the first humans are doomed and cursed eternally for asking a question, for partaking of the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge."

More insight into the hopelessness of stone-cold Atheists who resent Genesis and believe in their myth that "science" is but the realm of Atheism by default....

Ann Druyan [Carl Sagan's wife]:

"Carl faced his death with unflagging courage & never sought refuge in illusions [of Heaven or Hell.] The tragedy was that we knew we would never see each other again. I don’t ever expect to be reunited with Carl. But, the great thing is that when we were together, for nearly twenty years, we lived with a vivid appreciation of how brief & precious life is. We never trivialized the meaning of death by pretending it was anything other than a final parting."

The real "tragedy": A life punctuated by deception in the end, vanity, hardened hearts, and a disbelief in a spiritual transition and new destination of their soul. Oddly and ironically, they passionately sought exploring ETs and other solar system life while ignoring exploring their own life, purpose, own spirit, inner calling rather than contemplating the Intelligent Designer of all things -- including their beloved "Billions and billions of stars."

Druyan and Sagan were apparently perfectly content with sharing their 20 years on this Earth vs. sharing an Eternity with God in Heaven OR eternity in Hell/separation from God. Very sad. And so counter-intuitive.

Liberator  posted on  2014-10-30   12:46:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: BorisY (#1)

Liberals are playing ouiji board games with themselves !

I can buy that.

But even "Christians" will consult a "seer," the stars, or follow their horoscope.

Liberator  posted on  2014-10-30   12:49:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: redleghunter, GarySpFC (#3)

One only has to read Huxley fiction to get at his worldview.

Aldous Huxley (1894–1963), the brother of the atheistic evolutionist Sir Julian Huxley, advocated a drug-fuelled utopia. He gave the reason for his anti-Christian stance:

“I had motive for not wanting the world to have a meaning … the philosophy of meaninglessness was essentially an instrument of liberation, sexual and political.”

"If most of us remain ignorant of ourselves, it is because self-knowledge is painful and we prefer the pleasures of illusion."

Liberator  posted on  2014-10-30   13:02:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Liberator (#4)

The real "tragedy": A life punctuated by deception in the end, vanity, hardened hearts, and a disbelief in a spiritual transition and new destination of their soul. Oddly and ironically, they passionately sought exploring ETs and other solar system life while ignoring exploring their own life, purpose, own spirit, inner calling rather than contemplating the Intelligent Designer of all things -- including their beloved "Billions and billions of stars."

Druyan and Sagan were apparently perfectly content with sharing their 20 years on this Earth vs. sharing an Eternity with God in Heaven OR eternity in Hell/separation from God. Very sad. And so counter-intuitive.

Tears the heart to see people not acknowledge the Power of God.

But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name (John 1:12)

redleghunter  posted on  2014-10-30   18:52:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Liberator, GarySpFc (#6)

Aldous Huxley (1894–1963), the brother of the atheistic evolutionist Sir Julian Huxley, advocated a drug-fuelled utopia. He gave the reason for his anti-Christian stance:

Seems we are living in Huxley's soma induced Brave New World today.

But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name (John 1:12)

redleghunter  posted on  2014-10-30   18:56:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: A K A Stone (#0)

I suggest expending much effort arguing creationism vs evolution is pointless.

If you want to convince an atheist scientist that God is real, you'll have a much better chance doing so by helping them on the side of the road when their car breaks down than you will by arguing with them about evolution.

We all know people that need friendship, encouragement and such. Effort is much more rewarded in providing such things to them than arguing about how we got here. Somehow, I just can see that our winning purely academic arguments ranks particularly high on God's wish list for us.

My 2c....

Pinguinite  posted on  2014-10-31   4:28:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Pinguinite (#9)

f you want to convince an atheist scientist that God is real, you'll have a much better chance doing so by helping them on the side of the road when their car breaks down than you will by arguing with them about evolution.

I would disagree. Evolution isn't anything close to science.

Can anyone show me life coming from nothing. No one can. They can only speculate. If it happened in the past it would still be happening.

No scientists believe in evolution. At not least if they approach the subject scientifically.

A K A Stone  posted on  2014-10-31   6:42:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Pinguinite (#9)

Attacking evolution is of utmost importance. Fools think that they are actually using scientific methods. When you destroy their foundation of evolution their faith in it. Then and only then can some people be open to the word of God. imo.

So we have to destroy peoples faith in evolution.

And we are winning as most people don't believe in evolution.

A K A Stone  posted on  2014-10-31   6:48:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: A K A Stone (#11)

Can anyone show me life coming from nothing. No one can. They can only speculate. If it happened in the past it would still be happening.

Strictly speaking, life from nothing isn't evolution. It's just the initial spark. Evolution would begin from that point.

But if life was spontaneously started somewhere on the earth once per day or once per century, no one would notice it. Such new life would be assumed to be derived from existing life in some way.

Attacking evolution is of utmost importance. Fools think that they are actually using scientific methods. When you destroy their foundation of evolution their faith in it. Then and only then can some people be open to the word of God. imo.

Debunking evolution does not prove creationism/intelligent design. It just opens the door for some other, yet unproposed theory. A true scientist would need to see Creationism proven on it's own, and a lack of any alternate theories is not proof. Creationism is likely unprovable, which is a problem with it from a scientific perspective.

My opinion is that attacking evolution serves no spiritual purpose. Faith comes from the heart, not the head.

Pinguinite  posted on  2014-10-31   11:56:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com