Title: AP Reporter’s Brutal Syria Question for State Department Spokeswoman Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Sep 5, 2013 Author:Becket Adams Post Date:2013-09-05 21:27:44 by A K A Stone Keywords:None Views:658
Associated Press reporter Matt Lee does not mince words.
At a Thursday press briefing, Lee struggled to understand why Secretary of State John Kerry keeps referring to President Barack Obamas decision to seek congressional authorization for a military strike on Syria as courageous.
And his argument is simple: How is it courageous to seek permission for something he believes he can do anyway?
I dont understand why he is so full-throatedly in favor of this, Lee said. He over the weekend said the president was acting courageously by taking this to Congress, and I dont understand what is courageous about asking permission for something that you say you dont need and to do what you believe to be the right thing not just morally but in general.
Can you explain why this is a courageous move, and why the secretary would call it a courageous move? he asked.
State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki responded with the regular White House talking point about how Secretary Kerry believes military action in Syria should be limited and that securing congressional approval is a step in the right direction.
But Lee wasnt satisfied with this response: Was there some kind of, like, group spine-removal procedure at the White House over the weekend? I dont understand. How is this courageous?
Psaki responded to his remark by reiterating that the White House believes it can go it alone but wants the backing of Congress:
Lee has become known for his pointed and blunt questions during State Department press briefings.
In November 2012, Lee demanded to know why the White House had not rebuked Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan for referring to Israel as a terrorist state.
Further, in April 2013, Lee let State Department Deputy Spokesman Patrick Ventrell know in no uncertain terms that hes really not impressed with political jargon and non-answers.