[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"The Democrat Meltdown Continues"

"Yes, We Need Deportations Without Due Process"

"Trump's Tariff Play Smart, Strategic, Working"

"Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts"

"Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands

"Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies"

"Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk"

KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel

"Trade should work for America, not rule it"

"The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP"

"How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap"

‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’

Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible"

"Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!"

"If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think"

"Ending EPA Overreach"

Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built

Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew

The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED!

Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing!

Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy?

Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia)

"Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department"

Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent

"Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail"

Any suggestion that the USA and NATO are "Helping" or have ever helped Ukraine needs to be shot down instantly

"Real problem with the Palestinians: Nobody wants them"

ACDC & The Rolling Stones - Rock Me Baby

Magnus Carlsen gives a London System lesson!

"The Democrats Are Suffering Through a Drought of Generational Talent"

7 Tactics Of The Enemy To Weaken Your Faith

Strange And Biblical Events Are Happening

Every year ... BusiesT casino gambling day -- in Las Vegas

Trump’s DOGE Plan Is Legally Untouchable—Elon Musk Holds the Scalpel

Palestinians: What do you think of the Trump plan for Gaza?

What Happens Inside Gaza’s Secret Tunnels? | Unpacked

Hamas Torture Bodycam Footage: "These Monsters Filmed it All" | IDF Warfighter Doron Keidar, Ep. 225

EXPOSED: The Dark Truth About the Hostages in Gaza

New Task Force Ready To Expose Dark Secrets

Egypt Amasses Forces on Israel’s Southern Border | World War 3 About to Start?

"Trump wants to dismantle the Education Department. Here’s how it would work"

test

"Federal Workers Concerned That Returning To Office Will Interfere With Them Not Working"

"Yes, the Democrats Have a Governing Problem – They Blame America First, Then Govern Accordingly"

"Trump and His New Frenemies, Abroad and at Home"

"The Left’s Sin Is of Omission and Lost Opportunity"

"How Trump’s team will break down the woke bureaucracy"

Pete Hegseth will be confirmed in a few minutes

"Greg Gutfeld Cooks Jessica Tarlov and Liberal Media in Brilliant Take on Trump's First Day"

"They Gave Trump the Center, and He Took It"


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Opinions/Editorials
See other Opinions/Editorials Articles

Title: So What If Trayvon Martin Killed Zimmerman (warning extremely graphic images contained in thread)
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jul 15, 2013
Author: A K A Stone
Post Date: 2013-07-15 00:33:13 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 21441
Comments: 56

What if the Trayvon Martin had a different ending.

What if Trayvon Martin was going to the store one day. He was going to get some skittles and something to drink. He got some skittles and some Arizona fruit punch. He was walking home and he saw this guy following him. The guy followed him into the dark. Trayvon got scared. Thought a crazy ass cracker was stalking him. So he ran into the dark to hide and watch. The guy was still there walking around. Trayvon fearing for his life attacks Zimmerman and kills him. Zimmerman is found with a gun. If those of us who support the verdict are consistent. Would we have to say Trayvon would have been not guilty as well? I have a bit of mixed feelings on this.

Put it this way. Say Clint Eastwood was going to get something to eat one day. He saw some Mexican looking guy following him. He leads the man following him into the dark then runs and disappears. He then attacks and kills the man following him. Would you cheer?

I know Trayvon isn't Clint Eastwood. Just something to think about.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 41.

#3. To: A K A Stone (#0)

Maybe Clint only wanted to know if there was a decent mexican diner in the area and the spic took offense? Then what?

Ever been punched in the nose, Stone? I have. It stuns you. You literally see stars. GZ didn't know his assailant was 17. All he knew was that he was in a vulnerable position and getting his head beat in. The boy should have kept his hands to himself and gone home.

Logsplitter  posted on  2013-07-15   16:55:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Logsplitter (#3)

Ever been punched in the nose, Stone? I have. It stuns you. You literally see stars. GZ didn't know his assailant was 17. All he knew was that he was in a vulnerable position and getting his head beat in. The boy should have kept his hands to himself and gone home.

I agree with you.

Also I've been punched in the nose and i've punched in the nose. I've won more fights then i've lost by a lot. I don't start fights.

A K A Stone  posted on  2013-07-15   20:17:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: A K A Stone, Logsplitter (#4)

[Logsplitter] Ever been punched in the nose, Stone? I have. It stuns you. You literally see stars.

[A K A Stone] I've been punched in the nose and i've punched in the nose.

Perhaps one of you can explain a point about the Trayvon Martin case evidence. Accept as true that Trayvon bopped Zimmerman in the nose and that Zimmerman suffered a broken nose. Accept that the broken nose bled profusely. Accept that Zimmerman was on his back so gravity took the blood up his nose and he was choking on it and swallowing it. Accept that by some unexplained means, Zimmerman reached his gun, unholstered it, aimed and fired it, killing Trayvon Martin. Accept that Zimmerman climbed on top of Trayvon and spread out Martin's arms, not realizing Martin was dead or dying, as claimed by Zimmerman. When Zimmerman climbed on top of Trayvon with a snootful of blood, why did he not spray or pour blood all over the front of himself and down on Trayvon Martin? I have never heard anyone address this point.

nolu chan  posted on  2013-07-15   23:50:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: nolu chan (#7)

Did you see the picture of dead Trayvon Martin? On the ground with his shoes with no socks on? From the scene. He didn't seem to have much blood on him. I used to watch Dexter but a blood splatter expert I am not.

A K A Stone  posted on  2013-07-15   23:54:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: A K A Stone (#8)

I used to watch Dexter but a blood splatter expert I am not.

Your ignorance is cracking me up right now.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2013-07-16   0:03:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Fred Mertz, nolu chan (#9)

Do you see much blood on Trayvon?

A K A Stone  posted on  2013-07-16   0:06:15 ET  (1 image) Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: A K A Stone (#10)

I invite you to follow a line of questioning not pursued at trial, indeed, I have not heard it pursued at all. Perhaps my cousin Vinny can ask a question for you to consider.

Following Zimmerman statements and assertions, assume the following to be the gospel truth:

Z encountered TM.

TM bopped Z in the nose.

Z suffered a broken nose which bled profusely, as broken noses tend to do.

Z fell to the ground and TM gained the "mounted" position. This was above the hips, in the belly button area. After some sliding about, TM's knees approached Z's armpits.

TM put his hands over Z's nose and mouth. As Z was on his back, the profuse flow of blood followed gravity and flowed up Z's nose. Z was choking on, and swallowing, the blood. This accounts for the scarcity of blood on Z and TM.

Z somehow (not important) reached his weapon, unholstered it, aimed it, and shot TM with the gun in contact with TM's shirt and from 2 to 4 inches from TM's body. The hollow point bullet fragmented, striking TM's heart and lung. It caused very severe internal bleeding resulting in rapid loss of blood pressure and very little external bleeding from the chest wound.

Z did not immediately realize that TM was dead or dying, or even seriously wounded. To ensure his own safely, Z climbed on top of TM and spread out his arms on the ground.

[Vincent Laguardia Gambini] So, the defendant was bleeding profusely up his nose. He had a snootful of blood. Where did the snootful of blood go when Z reversed position and climbed on top of TM? Were the laws of physics suspended in Sanford? Does gravity work differently in Z's gated community?

It's not all over the front of Z and none appears to have landed on TM.

nolu chan  posted on  2013-07-16   16:51:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: nolu chan (#12)

[Vincent Laguardia Gambini] So, the defendant was bleeding profusely up his nose. He had a snootful of blood. Where did the snootful of blood go when Z reversed position and climbed on top of TM? Were the laws of physics suspended in Sanford? Does gravity work differently in Z's gated community?

When I read stuff like this I've got to wonder whether the liberal ass-hat who wrote it would like a practical demonstration. We'll measure how much blood spurts out of his nose after I punch him, determine what role 'gravity' plays in how it spatters, etc etc.

In other news it was raining that night in Sanford and Trayvon Martin was laid out uncovered for almost 30 minutes. Furthermore, as pointed out by the defense expert, Martin's wound seems to have been cleaned up some between the scene and the autopsy table. Couple this with the wet clothes being bagged in plastic and the expectation for useful analysis decreases precipitously.

Thunderbird  posted on  2013-07-16   18:00:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Thunderbird (#17)

In other news it was raining that night in Sanford and Trayvon Martin was laid out uncovered for almost 30 minutes. Furthermore, as pointed out by the defense expert, Martin's wound seems to have been cleaned up some between the scene and the autopsy table. Couple this with the wet clothes being bagged in plastic and the expectation for useful analysis decreases precipitously.

The photograph of Trayvon Martin fails to show the gusher of blood that descended upon him, whether it was such to be useful for analysis or not. Later, its presence could not even be detected by chemical analysis. The blanket that was used to cover Trayvon's body was not recorded into evidence and the donut munchers purportedly do not know what happened to it.

Cleaning up the wounds of Zimmerman is irrelevant. His clothes were photographed while the small lacerations were uncleaned, and the potentially deadly bloody nose was still bloody. They did not find much blood anywhere.

The detectives who detected did not detect blood on Trayvon, the concrete, or the ground. They detected droplets of blood on the clothes of Zimmerman.

This blood not only degraded beyond providing a DNA match (except for droplets on Zimmerman's clothes matched to Zimmerman), it degraded to invisibility and non-detectability by chemical tests.

nolu chan  posted on  2013-07-16   20:28:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: nolu chan (#20)

I suggest watching the testimony of the defense expert Dr. De Maio for information about the proper handling of blood evidence, gun shot wounds, and general standard autopsy techniques.

If that doesn't convince you that the absence of evidence of a "gusher of blood" is irrelevant let me know.

Thunderbird  posted on  2013-07-16   22:00:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Thunderbird (#22)

If that doesn't convince you that the absence of evidence of a "gusher of blood" is irrelevant let me know.

It is apparent you cannot explain how no blood got on Trayvon.

Moreover,when questioned about Trayvon Martin putting his hands over Zimmerman's mouth and nose with all that blood, in answer to the question of what he would expect to find on Travon Martin's hands, Dr. DiMaio responded "blood." None could be detected.

Apparently, the blood that was was choking Zimmerman, and which he was swallowing, turned on and off in some mysterious fashion.

nolu chan  posted on  2013-07-16   23:00:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: nolu chan (#23)

It is apparent you cannot explain how no blood got on Trayvon.

argumentum ad ignorantiam

Thunderbird  posted on  2013-07-16   23:21:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: Thunderbird (#25)

argumentum ad ignorantiam

Typical content free response.

nolu chan  posted on  2013-07-17   13:53:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: nolu chan (#30)

Typical content free response

No just beyond your reasoning ability, as apparently are most of John Locke's observations.

Thunderbird  posted on  2013-07-17   14:36:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: Thunderbird (#33)

No just beyond your reasoning ability, as apparently are most of John Locke's observations.

Go munch a donut.

nolu chan  posted on  2013-07-17   14:58:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: nolu chan (#35)

Go munch a donut.

Lol..not a fan of John Locke huh?

Carry on libtard.

Thunderbird  posted on  2013-07-17   17:55:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 41.

#46. To: Thunderbird (#41)

Lol..not a fan of John Locke huh?

I cannot dispute that saying the name of the father of classical liberalism is evidence of what happened when George Zimmerman and Trayvon encountered each other. Bravo!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Locke

John Locke (29 August 1632 – 28 October 1704), widely known as the Father of Classical Liberalism, was an English philosopher and physician regarded as one of the most influential of Enlightenment thinkers. Considered one of the first of the British empiricists, following the tradition of Francis Bacon, he is equally important to social contract theory. His work had a great impact upon the development of epistemology and political philosophy.

nolu chan  posted on  2013-07-17 23:54:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 41.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com