Opinions/Editorials
See other Opinions/Editorials Articles
Title: So What If Trayvon Martin Killed Zimmerman (warning extremely graphic images contained in thread)
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jul 15, 2013
Author: A K A Stone
Post Date: 2013-07-15 00:33:13 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 21727
Comments: 56
What if the Trayvon Martin had a different ending.
What if Trayvon Martin was going to the store one day. He was going to get some skittles and something to drink. He got some skittles and some Arizona fruit punch. He was walking home and he saw this guy following him. The guy followed him into the dark. Trayvon got scared. Thought a crazy ass cracker was stalking him. So he ran into the dark to hide and watch. The guy was still there walking around. Trayvon fearing for his life attacks Zimmerman and kills him. Zimmerman is found with a gun. If those of us who support the verdict are consistent. Would we have to say Trayvon would have been not guilty as well? I have a bit of mixed feelings on this.
Put it this way. Say Clint Eastwood was going to get something to eat one day. He saw some Mexican looking guy following him. He leads the man following him into the dark then runs and disappears. He then attacks and kills the man following him. Would you cheer?
I know Trayvon isn't Clint Eastwood. Just something to think about.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
You need to get laid.
#2. To: (#0)
#3. To: A K A Stone (#0)
Maybe Clint only wanted to know if there was a decent mexican diner in the area and the spic took offense? Then what?
Ever been punched in the nose, Stone? I have. It stuns you. You literally see stars. GZ didn't know his assailant was 17. All he knew was that he was in a vulnerable position and getting his head beat in. The boy should have kept his hands to himself and gone home.
#4. To: Logsplitter (#3)
Ever been punched in the nose, Stone? I have. It stuns you. You literally see stars. GZ didn't know his assailant was 17. All he knew was that he was in a vulnerable position and getting his head beat in. The boy should have kept his hands to himself and gone home.
I agree with you.
Also I've been punched in the nose and i've punched in the nose. I've won more fights then i've lost by a lot. I don't start fights.
#5. To: Fred Mertz, A K A Stone (#1)
You need to get laid.
Jeez Stone, it sounds like Fire Island Freddie is propositioning you.
/lmao
#6. To: A K A Stone (#4)
Also I've been punched in the nose and i've punched in the nose. I've won more fights then i've lost by a lot.
You are so full of it, your eyes are brown.
#7. To: A K A Stone, Logsplitter (#4)
[Logsplitter] Ever been punched in the nose, Stone? I have. It stuns you. You literally see stars.[A K A Stone] I've been punched in the nose and i've punched in the nose.
Perhaps one of you can explain a point about the Trayvon Martin case evidence. Accept as true that Trayvon bopped Zimmerman in the nose and that Zimmerman suffered a broken nose. Accept that the broken nose bled profusely. Accept that Zimmerman was on his back so gravity took the blood up his nose and he was choking on it and swallowing it. Accept that by some unexplained means, Zimmerman reached his gun, unholstered it, aimed and fired it, killing Trayvon Martin. Accept that Zimmerman climbed on top of Trayvon and spread out Martin's arms, not realizing Martin was dead or dying, as claimed by Zimmerman. When Zimmerman climbed on top of Trayvon with a snootful of blood, why did he not spray or pour blood all over the front of himself and down on Trayvon Martin? I have never heard anyone address this point.
#8. To: nolu chan (#7)
Did you see the picture of dead Trayvon Martin? On the ground with his shoes with no socks on? From the scene. He didn't seem to have much blood on him. I used to watch Dexter but a blood splatter expert I am not.
#9. To: A K A Stone (#8)
I used to watch Dexter but a blood splatter expert I am not.
Your ignorance is cracking me up right now.
#10. To: Fred Mertz, nolu chan (#9)
Do you see much blood on Trayvon?
#11. To: A K A Stone (#10)
Not much at all, from either the gunshot or Georges bloody nose.
"Those who don't know history are destined to repeat it."
#12. To: A K A Stone (#10)
I invite you to follow a line of questioning not pursued at trial, indeed, I have not heard it pursued at all. Perhaps my cousin Vinny can ask a question for you to consider.
Following Zimmerman statements and assertions, assume the following to be the gospel truth:
Z encountered TM.TM bopped Z in the nose.
Z suffered a broken nose which bled profusely, as broken noses tend to do.
Z fell to the ground and TM gained the "mounted" position. This was above the hips, in the belly button area. After some sliding about, TM's knees approached Z's armpits.
TM put his hands over Z's nose and mouth. As Z was on his back, the profuse flow of blood followed gravity and flowed up Z's nose. Z was choking on, and swallowing, the blood. This accounts for the scarcity of blood on Z and TM.
Z somehow (not important) reached his weapon, unholstered it, aimed it, and shot TM with the gun in contact with TM's shirt and from 2 to 4 inches from TM's body. The hollow point bullet fragmented, striking TM's heart and lung. It caused very severe internal bleeding resulting in rapid loss of blood pressure and very little external bleeding from the chest wound.
Z did not immediately realize that TM was dead or dying, or even seriously wounded. To ensure his own safely, Z climbed on top of TM and spread out his arms on the ground.
[Vincent Laguardia Gambini] So, the defendant was bleeding profusely up his nose. He had a snootful of blood. Where did the snootful of blood go when Z reversed position and climbed on top of TM? Were the laws of physics suspended in Sanford? Does gravity work differently in Z's gated community?
It's not all over the front of Z and none appears to have landed on TM.
#13. To: nolu chan (#12)
Can't you push someone off of you from underneath kind of sideways.
#14. To: nolu chan (#12)
NONE of that means anything now.
Any civil or feral charges will be laughed out of court.
While the race pimps whores and hustlers scream in bloody angst.
NONE of this had shit all to do with justice.
Saint Skittles won't be jumping anybody anymore will he?
BAN ME NOW! BAN ME FOREVER!
#15. To: A K A Stone (#13)
What the fuck do you know about being attacked in the street little boy?
When was the last time your actual life was on the line in an attack pussy?
When did you ever have to make THAT decision in an instant as your head was being banged into the concrete?
You'd piss yourself and give up and DIE.
Zimmerman did the right thing to save his own life.
Saint Skittles won't be jumping anybody else EVER again will he?
Cunts like you know nothing about violence.
..and you pretend to know what you are talking about AFTER the fact.
YOU and your ilk are exactly what's wrong with this country today.
A bunch of sniveling pussies pretending to be actual men.
BAN ME NOW! BAN ME FOREVER!
#16. To: A K A Stone (#13)
Can't you push someone off of you from underneath kind of sideways.
I suppose so, but according to the story, TM did not fall on top of Z. He said something like "you got me" and fell backwards.
Precisely determining the precise location of the altercation proved difficult as blood was not found and identified anywhere but for the droplets on Z.
While one could push off TM any which way, he almost immediately climbed on top. Had his allegedly broken nose already stopped bleeding? It was threatening to choke him seconds before. A broken nose is usually pretty messy.
There was no conclusive diagnosis of a broken nose. The doctor observed no septal deviation. Z refused to see an ENT for imaging to confirm whether or not he had received a broken nose.
#17. To: nolu chan (#12)
[Vincent Laguardia Gambini] So, the defendant was bleeding profusely up his nose. He had a snootful of blood. Where did the snootful of blood go when Z reversed position and climbed on top of TM? Were the laws of physics suspended in Sanford? Does gravity work differently in Z's gated community?
When I read stuff like this I've got to wonder whether the liberal ass-hat who wrote it would like a practical demonstration. We'll measure how much blood spurts out of his nose after I punch him, determine what role 'gravity' plays in how it spatters, etc etc.
In other news it was raining that night in Sanford and Trayvon Martin was laid out uncovered for almost 30 minutes. Furthermore, as pointed out by the defense expert, Martin's wound seems to have been cleaned up some between the scene and the autopsy table. Couple this with the wet clothes being bagged in plastic and the expectation for useful analysis decreases precipitously.
#18. To: who cares (#15)
A bunch of sniveling pussies pretending to be actual men.
Hey tough guy tell the folks about your military service. Oh that's right you were too cowardly to serve.
#19. To: who cares (#15)
Everyone knows your a cowar,d bred from a long line of cowards. It must be a bitch to live in constant fear of the neighborhood kids.
#20. To: Thunderbird (#17)
In other news it was raining that night in Sanford and Trayvon Martin was laid out uncovered for almost 30 minutes. Furthermore, as pointed out by the defense expert, Martin's wound seems to have been cleaned up some between the scene and the autopsy table. Couple this with the wet clothes being bagged in plastic and the expectation for useful analysis decreases precipitously.
The photograph of Trayvon Martin fails to show the gusher of blood that descended upon him, whether it was such to be useful for analysis or not. Later, its presence could not even be detected by chemical analysis. The blanket that was used to cover Trayvon's body was not recorded into evidence and the donut munchers purportedly do not know what happened to it.
Cleaning up the wounds of Zimmerman is irrelevant. His clothes were photographed while the small lacerations were uncleaned, and the potentially deadly bloody nose was still bloody. They did not find much blood anywhere.
The detectives who detected did not detect blood on Trayvon, the concrete, or the ground. They detected droplets of blood on the clothes of Zimmerman.
This blood not only degraded beyond providing a DNA match (except for droplets on Zimmerman's clothes matched to Zimmerman), it degraded to invisibility and non-detectability by chemical tests.
#21. To: nolu chan (#20)
Pat Buchanan says Zimmerman's butt was wet and that Trayvons knees were wet.
#22. To: nolu chan (#20)
I suggest watching the testimony of the defense expert Dr. De Maio for information about the proper handling of blood evidence, gun shot wounds, and general standard autopsy techniques.
If that doesn't convince you that the absence of evidence of a "gusher of blood" is irrelevant let me know.
#23. To: Thunderbird (#22)
If that doesn't convince you that the absence of evidence of a "gusher of blood" is irrelevant let me know.
It is apparent you cannot explain how no blood got on Trayvon.
Moreover,when questioned about Trayvon Martin putting his hands over Zimmerman's mouth and nose with all that blood, in answer to the question of what he would expect to find on Travon Martin's hands, Dr. DiMaio responded "blood." None could be detected.
Apparently, the blood that was was choking Zimmerman, and which he was swallowing, turned on and off in some mysterious fashion.
#24. To: nolu chan (#23)
The Way of the Gun
If a gunshot occured at close range, the victim might have stippling, or burns on his skin from gunpowder. Shots fired at very close range can also cause internal muzzle staining. When this happens, the victim's blood is sucked back into the gun's muzzle by the cooling of the explosive gases that are released when a short is fired. Testing the gun's muzzle for blood can provide an additional clue to solve a case.
science.howstuffworks.com...ain-pattern-analysis2.htm
#25. To: nolu chan (#23)
It is apparent you cannot explain how no blood got on Trayvon.
argumentum ad ignorantiam
#26. To: calcon (#18)
Hey tough guy tell the folks about your military service. Oh that's right you were too cowardly to serve.
I thought he said he personally shot down three MIGs from aboard ship.
Almost every country in the Middle East is awash in oil, and we have to side with the one that has nothing but joos. Goddamn, that was good thinkin'. Esso posted on 2012-01-13 7:37:56 ET
#27. To: mininggold (#26)
I thought he said he personally shot down three MIGs from aboard ship.
I think that was the story with the mad dog alias. The yukon/ibluafartsky alias was exposed as not serving.
#28. To: calcon (#27)
It is my understanding that who cares = mad dog, at least that much is admitted to by the poster. I don't know why he doesn't use Mad Dog Emeritus - I thought that was a bit funny.
#29. To: calcon (#27)
I'd ask BorisY to explain it, but I'd suffer from mental meltdown trying to decipher it.
#30. To: Thunderbird (#25)
argumentum ad ignorantiam
Typical content free response.
#31. To: A K A Stone (#24)
Shots fired at very close range can also cause internal muzzle staining.
True but I should think minimized in this case as the shot was through two shirts that were a 2-4 inch distance from the point of impact with the body.
I do not recall any evidence in the case about it.
#32. To: A K A Stone (#21)
Pat Buchanan says Zimmerman's butt was wet and that Trayvons knees were wet.
Yes, he did.
[Buchanan] Why was the back of Zimmerman's jacket soaking wet, and the back of Trayvon's dry, if Trayvon was on the bottom? Why were the knees of Trayvon's pants wet, if he was on the bottom?
It is consistent with Zimmerman was on his back and Trayvon in a mounted position. Of course, that does not state that the back of Zimmerman's trousers were soaking wet. It would be consistent with having his legs and butt off the ground, and this position maintained through the gunshot and getting up.
Perhaps problematic is the Zimmerman claim that he was punched and mounted at the "T" and Trayvon's body was about 40 feet from the "T". This travel has been generally attributed to the altercation not being a static one-position fight, but a fluid battle with changing positions relative to each other, during which movement was made away from the "T".
#33. To: nolu chan (#30)
Typical content free response
No just beyond your reasoning ability, as apparently are most of John Locke's observations.
#34. To: calcon, mininggold (#27)
I think that was the story with the mad dog alias. The yukon/ibluafartsky alias was exposed as not serving.
Correct. One alias is a phony decorated war veteran and the other didn't serve and wouldn't be so stupid as to serve. As for Mad Dog....
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=169733&Disp=461#C461
#461. To: vrmc 0915, sneakypete, seen2much, Travis McGee, ALL (#450)[...]
I AM A US NAVY VIETNAM vet, I hold three Combat actions two meritorious unit commendations and the rest of the gee dunks which mean s**t to me.
My weapons systems splashed three (3) migs, 2 ob Parsons and one ob Horne.
I don't owe you or any f**king body an explaination or excuse regarding my VIETNAM service.
For an LF thread, see here.
#35. To: Thunderbird (#33)
No just beyond your reasoning ability, as apparently are most of John Locke's observations.
Go munch a donut.
#36. To: who cares (#14)
+1
#37. To: mininggold (#26)
You "thought" wrong cunt.
Did your shift at the greyhound restroom end already?
BAN ME! BAN ME NOW! BAN ME!
#38. To: calbFAGb (#18)
Hey tough guy tell the folks about your military service. Oh that's right you were too cowardly to serve.
OMG!
You are too stoopid to breathe calFAG!
I am rolling on the floor laughing my ass offf while I point at your pointy little head!
LOL!
ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ROTFLMAOAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
BAN ME! BAN ME NOW! BAN ME!
#39. To: calbFAGb (#19)
You are CRACKING me up calFAG!
Projection MUCH?
ROTFLMAOAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
BAN ME! BAN ME NOW! BAN ME!
#40. To: nolu chan (#34)
I ran your fat cunt lifer ass off when you tried to use so called "documentation" from the NAV to "prove" things about my service.
You even claimed that my rate, (FTM), never even existed!
You never proved or disproved anything you arrogant cunt.
Now throw a bunch of cut and paste garbage at me you fat assed parasite lifer CUNT.
How much time have you spent underway in the zone cunt?
LOL!
Being a yeoman in the admiral's office doesn't make you an actual SAILOR cunt.
I don't even have tio ask you if you ever crossed the line.
No CUNT like you has been initiated into neptune's court, have you WOG?
I PISS on you and your big fat lifer lubber WOG ass. As do ALL actual bluewater squids.
I bet you never even had any sea duty.
Did you WOG?
BAN ME! BAN ME NOW! BAN ME!
#41. To: nolu chan (#35)
Go munch a donut.
Lol..not a fan of John Locke huh?
Carry on libtard.
.
.
.
Comments (42 - 56) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]