[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Opinions/Editorials Title: Libertysflame's Question of the Day: If we ban guns will there be an increase in knife related deaths? So I was thinking about all this talk of banning guns. If they ban guns do you think that there will be an increase in knife violence? I do. I know it If you are going to kill someone you are going to do it. Murder has existed since the first family. It will always exist. It is already against the law to kill someone. So by outlawing guns you are just taking peoples rights away and leaving them defenseless to someone can simply print out a gun and kill you anyways. It is pointless. Or is there an ulterior motive? 1. Would there be an increase in knife violence if guns were banned. (note you are dumb if you think they will stop with the guns currently targeted). 2. What is that ulterior motive? Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 61. #15. To: A K A Stone (#0) (Edited) So you are saying that people with violent tendencies are prone to use guns? I thought all violent criminals were liberals.
And liberals don't own guns.
#20. To: mininggold (#15) So you are saying that people with violent tendencies are prone to use guns? Guns, knives, fists, gasoline, automobiles matches. There are more murders by knife and feet then guns. FBI Crime statistics.
#25. To: A K A Stone (#20) Guns, knives, fists, gasoline, automobiles matches. I never said that there wasn't. BUT the conservative position is that the violent criminal element that prefers guns as it's weapon of choice tends to be more liberal than conservative and that the gun owning public tends to be very much more conservative than liberal. Both fallacies BTW but plenty believe them to be true. Just like you still think I'm Lucy.
#27. To: mininggold (#25) BUT the conservative position is that the violent criminal element that prefers guns as it's weapon of choice tends to be more liberal than conservative I don't recall anyone making that argument. But it is probably true as conservatives have better morals. For example "liberals" see nothing wrong with killing a kid. They think it is a right.
#29. To: A K A Stone (#27) I don't recall anyone making that argument. But it is probably true as conservatives have better morals. For example "liberals" see nothing wrong with killing a kid. They think it is a right. The conservative movement now claims the violent criminal element as their own? LOLOL I must have missed that. Actually the Tea Party's corporate owners have NO morals.
#34. To: mininggold (#29) Actually the Tea Party's corporate owners have NO morals. For example?
#36. To: A K A Stone (#34) For example? CEOs routinely put their morals aside for the good of the corporation and stockholders which in all cases is to return a profit. Making money for the owners is always their primary concern, and their legally bound fiduciary duty.
#44. To: mininggold (#36) CEOs routinely put their morals aside for the good of the corporation and stockholders which in all cases is to return a profit. Kinda like political parties,huh? ESPECIALLY leftist political parties,like the Dims and the Mini-Dims.
#47. To: sneakypete (#44) Kinda like political parties,huh? If you say so. But so far I haven't had to buy stock in either one in order to vote for their candidates.
#61. To: mininggold (#47) If you say so. But so far I haven't had to buy stock in either one in order to vote for their candidates. It really pisses you off that some people make money on their own,doesn't it?
Replies to Comment # 61. There are no replies to Comment # 61.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 61. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|