Other
See other Other Articles
Title: Coral Snake's Bites of the Week 2007-9 (More weekly treason and corruption)
Source:
00 - Hotherp reports
URL Source: [None]
Published: Mar 5, 2007
Author: Coral Snake
Post Date: 2007-03-05 01:14:11 by Coral Snake
Keywords: ClownPosse, Kaput, TOAK, Freerepublic, Gun Grabbers, Deception
Views: 739
Comments: 1
Coral Snake's Bites of the Week 2007-9 (More weekly treason and corruption) Due to the demise of ClownPosse covered in this edition the bites will be returning to a policy of AntiFreeping starting with this eddition, particularly involving Rydybots like nopardons and Al Simmons. Also as a New Policy the bites will be policing what is probably the WORST gun grabbing site on the Internet, Gun Guys and posting snippets from their moust OUTRAGIOUS article of the week. As always Remember the KEY and enjoy. After a long history of stalking, hacking personal insult AND legitimate exposure of the dark side of Jim Robinson and his FreeRepublic forum/website that began when its original founder Mojo was banned from FreeRepublic it appears that the site formerly known as Anti-Freeping and Anti-Kooking but most recently known as ClownPosse has finally given up the ghost and gone dark on its own accord this week. It seems that the main reason for this was another site called Tears of a Kloughn (TOAK) that basically did the same thing to Posse members that Posse members did to others and the Posse could not take the heat. This TOAK site also went offline at the same time the Posse did so it seems that its only point to existence was to bring the Posse to shut down. Weather TOAK was a project of Jim Rob, Goldi or other webmasters interested in having the Posse shut down is unknown at this time and it will probably take some investigative reporting on the part of Posse members who have investigative experience to determine if it was so. I hope that such an investigation does come about and the results are published on one of the free speech (FreedomUndergeound, Freedom4um, Liberty's Flame) forums still remaining on the Internet. This should be dome because the TOAKers even though they appear to be offline could constitute a danger to other forums whose policies they disagree with. Tears of a Kloughn (TOAK) was a forum/website that went on line on a Free Forum service about a month ago with the intent of giving ClownPosse some of its own ridicule and investigative reporting medicine. It appears to be the reason for the latest ClownPosse shutdowm. While the people behind the TOAK forum are currently unknown my guess is that because of its decidedly Freeper based membership according to those who have seen the site (Like ClownPosse TOAK is currently shut down) that the TOAK site was set up by Jim Robinson and other highly placed Freepers to shut down continued investigation of FreePepublic's fraudulent activities and Jim Robinson's dark pre FreeRepublic past. There is simply no reason for a Freeper laden anti CP site to show up a month ago and then suddenly shut down itself when its mission is accomplished. (The Anti-Freepers under whatever official name are well known for starting up new sites after shutting down old ones and excusing the members who no longer want to be involved for whatever reason and I would expect another Anti-Freeping site probably under a new name and management to be up sometime before the year is out.) However if Jim Robinson authorized the TOAK forum as a temporary base of attack against the Anti-Freepers to force them to shut down then TAOK's short existence makes sense. Actually weather TOAK was in independent Anti Anti-Freeping site that shut down for lack of a further purpose with the ClownPossee shutdown or weather it was the temporary product of Jim Robinson and the highly placed Freepers Like Doug From Upland, Bob J. and Jim Robinson to force that shutdown would be a very good subject for a ClownPosse style investigative reporting job that could well lead to the shutdown of FreeRepublic itself as TOAK was basically using ClownPosse's tactics of hacking, stalking and personal insult against ClownPosse. Therefore if FreeRepublic were ultimately behind TOAK that would prove that the highly placed Freepers are as much computer criminals as the worst of the Clowns themselves. The Bites is calling for such an investigation in to the origins of TOAK by any remaining internet active Anti-Freepers remaining out there and for the results to be published on one of the Free Speach Forums (FreedomUnderground, Freedom4um or Liberty's Flame). nopardons continues her attempt to be the new female leader of the FreeRepublic harpies replacing Howlin by going one on one with Jim Robinson himself on this week's main Al Simmons Rudybot thread. (Jim Robinson has taken the stance of not being a Rudybot until the gun grabbing creep is actually elected much as he did with Shrubya.) Here are some of the nopardons posts to the Rudybot thread: {[To: Jim Robinson Are you saying that if Hunter drops out of the primary, that you will vote for whichever bottom tier person remains, in the race? Are you saying that if Rudy is the GOP presidential candidate in '08, that you won't support him? 139 posted on 03/04/2007 1:43:17 PM PST by nopardons [To: stockpirate No, he isn't a SOCIALIST and neither is he a RINO. Words have meanings, which ARE "set in stone", so to speak and all the misuse and abuse of words, now being done on this forum will not change the meaning of words or terms. As mayor, WHAT did Rudy "socialized"? Please state them all and in detail. 153 posted on 03/04/2007 1:47:40 PM PST by nopardons [To: Lurker Hunter and Rudy have exactly the same stance on partial birth abortion. How are YOU being "forced to pay" for someone's abortion? You keep misusing the term RINO, to the point where it is meaningless. You're going to have to come up with your own word/term. 190 posted on 03/04/2007 1:59:39 PM PST by nopardons [To: supercat You obviously want an elected official to ignore the laws instituted, long ago, by his city and state and to also permit lawless anarchy. That's an interesting position you have; to say the least. 207 posted on 03/04/2007 2:04:15 PM PST by nopardons [To: Lurker He's talking about welfare, which as mayor, he got 600,000 people off the rolls of. Whether you like it or not, abortions are legal. Whether you like it or not, tax payers fund welfare and have funded it, under several different names, since America was a bunch of colonies. That quote is prior to his being elected mayor, from a lefty paper, and has less than nothing whatsoever to do with what Rudy, as president would do. And FWIW, the nation, as a whole, doesn't see abortion as a top priority, to get worked up about. Since you care so much about it, how many abortions have you stopped? How many pregnant women/girls, have you personally counseled, and how many unwanted babies have you adopted? 227 posted on 03/04/2007 2:10:52 PM PST by nopardons [To: Doohickey That quote was supposedly made in 1989! The year is quite clearly present in the post I was replying to. He was NOT mayor in 1989 and yes, the stated repository of that supposed quote, is quite lefty. This is the problem with the spamming and propaganda, that is being posted to FR, by those who have been launching a concerted effort, since the very first thread about Rudy first appeared on FR..........it is, all of it, 1/2 truths, things taken completely out of context, cherry-picked quotes from the MSM that HATED/HATES Rudy, made up things, and base propaganda. I would have no qualms with people stating, ACCURATE refutations of why they are against Rudy, bit that has, for the most part, NOT been done. Just hit the numbers at the bottom of the posts, to back track to the original post, that I replied to, in order to find that what I stated is true. 279 posted on 03/04/2007 2:27:02 PM PST by nopardons [To: supercat There are many CONSERVATIVES on FR, who will not only send Rudy money, but work for his candidacy; the same is true in the REAL WORLD. And NO, no matter how many times you call us other things, we are Conservatives. 310 posted on 03/04/2007 2:34:46 PM PST by nopardons [To: supercat I suggest that you look into that suit. Manufacturers were flooding the N.Y.C. market with guns. 316 posted on 03/04/2007 2:36:49 PM PST by nopardons [To: stockpirate When did he say that? Please provide a quote. Have you ever seen the movie SOUTH PACIFIC, or read the Mitchner book that the original stage play was based on, which the movie was then made from? In that book, a sailor DRESSES UP AS A WOMAN, in the same way Rudy did, FOR A SKIT ( except Rudy did it for CHAIRTY! ), on a South Pacific island and that character was neither a "cross dresser, nor a homosexual. James Mitchner based the novel on FACTS and was written about things that happened in the 1940s. "HAIRY LEG SHOWS" have a long history in America, from colonial times to the present. Men and boys have taken part in them who are not and never were "cross dressers", in order to raise money. Now, I realize that you imagine that this is going to somehow destroy Rudy's political aspirations, but the truth of the matter is, the more you and your ilk post the pictures/post about this, completely out of context, makes you look like a bunch of very desperate, silly, ultra provincial, uneducated Know Nothings. 351 posted on 03/04/2007 2:49:25 PM PST by nopardons [To: wagglebee But the anti-Rudyites lump EVERYONE who doesn't agree with and post just as they do, into the second group; including such well known and previously highly though of personages as Ted Olsen, into the latter group. I happen to fall into the first group, as do most of the Rudy supporters on this site; yet I have been told that I am in the latter group, or worse. 360 posted on 03/04/2007 2:53:57 PM PST by nopardons [To: kellynch There is a difference, though, from Shakespearian stage performance and the burlesque ( in the original meaning of that word ) of HAIRY LEG SHOWS. Women USED to be actresses PRIOR to just a bit before the time of Shakespeare, when the Church ruled that women could no longer be on stage. When that happened, boys and young men were forced to portray women, in plays and did so in as realistic a manner as possible. OTOH, once girls and women retook the stage, men and boys, from around the mid 1700s, began to do OVER THE TOP burlesques; doing female parts in a way that one knew that they were men and boys doing caricatures of women. The makeup and clothes and gestures being completely nonrepresentational of normal females. Elite boarding schools and Ivy colleges ( all of them, BTW, founded by, for, and with religious affiliations ) were the first to do HAIRY LEG SHOWS! It then filtered down into other social strata. And nobody, NOBODY, until just now, on FR, has EVER taken any of this to be something "peculiar", strange, proving that those who engage in these skits were "cross dressers", homosexual, nor anything else even remotely connected to that world. Any man who has ever gone to boarding school, many public high schools, college, and/or belongs to some club, in this nation, has probably, at some time or another, either been in a similar skit or seen one. The loud protestations, now, on FR, against Rudy, for having dressed up, is either completely disingenuous, or based in abject, mordant, blatant stupidity. 393 posted on 03/04/2007 3:11:38 PM PST by nopardons [To: supercat It was cheap guns and many of those who were selling them, did not send in any proper papers to any department. Go read up on it. 398 posted on 03/04/2007 3:13:21 PM PST by nopardons [To: SeeSalt Newt has a far WORSE personal baggage ( wives and divorce record ) than Rudy has. He also has a 63% negative rating, from the American populace; which is lower than Hillary's. Newt is a GRENNIE.....a tree hugger, repeatedly caved, to Clinton, when Speaker, has spent the last year traveling around with Hillary, helping her push her health care plans, and he is quite taken with Alvin Toffler's crazy books/ideas. Newt has said that if Rudy is doing well, he won't enter the primaries. If Newt was REALLY serious about making a run for the presidency, he would not say, as he did, that he wouldn't even begin to think about it, until next September, which he now has changed to October. By next October, all of the big money and political backing, as well as the best of the lot, for teams, will have long been already swept up. And unlike you, Newt is well aware of all of this. 472 posted on 03/04/2007 4:29:18 PM PST by nopardons [To: wagglebee There's enough tinfoil, on FR, in a single 12 hour period now, to supply every kitchen in America, for a year. Believe what you want to, but posting it to FR, does nobody any good at all. 481 posted on 03/04/2007 4:40:01 PM PST by nopardons [To: Lurker You've just proved, for all the world to see, the hysteria that is perminating FR, these days. I have been a Conservative all of my life. I am not a "fraud", as you claim, and by now, every time one of you post your bilge, I and many others are laughing at you. 485 posted on 03/04/2007 4:42:22 PM PST by nopardons [To: alicewonders There are still a lot of American babies to be adopted and not as you claim, only by the "rich". I know several couples who have adopted babies born here in America. Rather than abortions, the reason why there are fewer babies to adopt here, if that birth control is much more readily available now, the stigma of being an unwed mother has been removed and for the past 35+ years, girls are keeping their bastards ( yes, I know, many object to that word, but that is what they are ), and until rather recently, welfare has allowed girls to keep their babies. There was nothing "cruel" nor "crude" about what I posted. OTOH, what you posted in reply, is patently false! The thing about Africa being the "only" place left to adopt babies from and that class warfare guff about the rich and famous, is hardly Conservative thought. 504 posted on 03/04/2007 5:00:52 PM PST by nopardons [To: Lurker Yes, that is what YOU are...a LIAR! 505 posted on 03/04/2007 5:02:33 PM PST by nopardons [To: stockpirate It doesn't matter what you IQ is, if you are unable to actually USE it. 509 posted on 03/04/2007 5:05:03 PM PST by nopardons [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 411 | View Replies ]] [To: NittanyLion Why don't you go look it up? It certainly was against selling guns to children, which was being done. 511 posted on 03/04/2007 5:06:05 PM PST by nopardons [To: wagglebee I didn't say that, imply that, nor infer that there is a "shortage of heterosexual couples wanting to adopt". It would be nice if you could stop seeing things that are not there. 513 posted on 03/04/2007 5:08:48 PM PST by nopardons [To: Tarpon Rudy is the antithesis of Hillary, on tax cutting, cutting the size of government, affirmative action, the WOT, terrorism, crime, school vouchers, charter schools, government leaving people alone to make their own choices, the military, health care, judges, dictators ( Rudy put reigns on Arafat; Hillary applauded and kissed Arafat's wife !) and much more. Anyone who claims that there is no difference between these two people, are either lying through their teeth, or are completely devoid of any knowledge about these two people. 525 posted on 03/04/2007 5:20:20 PM PST by nopardons [To: Lurker No, what I think is that you are just a keyboard commando, who is just all talk. Thank you for proving my supposition to be correct. 528 posted on 03/04/2007 5:22:57 PM PST by nopardons [To: aligncare Spot on! 531 posted on 03/04/2007 5:26:45 PM PST by nopardons [To: EternalVigilance Oh EV, your projection complex has reached mammoth proportions, I see. LOL 533 posted on 03/04/2007 5:35:09 PM PST by nopardons You can read this entire FreeRepublic Rudybot thread here: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1795128/posts Big Pharma company Merck lost its lawsuit over Vioxx in a New Jersey court this week. A jury found Merck negligent in not reporting the dangerous heart related sise effects of Vioxx, a drug intended as an arthritis painkiller. This should show that Juries can still be effective against the N W O and its attempts at gun grabbing and sheeple culling. What is needed now is a similar suit against Aspartame and other sheeple culling products that masquerade as "food" and "drugs". You can read the full story about the Vioxx lawsuit here: http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7006633506 Despite the sucessful lawsuit in New Jersey over Vioxx the Food and Drug AAdministration still continues to approve the latest sheeple culling poisons. This time the approval is for using an effective HUMAN antibiotic for ANIMALS thereby reducing its effectiveness to humans. The antibiotic goes by the name of cefquinome and it is basically one of the "last ditch" antibiotics used when a bacterial infection of resistant to conventional antibiotics. It is suspected that its use in animals will create even harder to kill antibiotic resistant "zoonotic" (transferable from animal to man) infections as animal bacteria become more resistant to "last ditch" antibiotics. In all probability the use of human "last ditch" antibiotics in animals to create even more antibiotic resistant infections is a continuation of the sheeple culling program that bagan with Aspartame, Splenda, M S G and other poisons in the food supply. I will not be posting any of this article because of its original publication in the Washington Post, a paper well known for suing small forums for copyright infringement even when postings from it constitute legitimate fair use. I will post a link to the article so that you can read it in its entirety: http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/nation/4600179.html It seems that Alberto Gonzales is not only after our guns and the North American Union, he is also after freedom of speach on the Internet. It seems that he is benind the scenes pressuring Internet Service Providers to hold their information on customers for at least two years. According to an article on the tech nesw site Cnet http://news.com: {[U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and FBI Director Robert Mueller on Friday urged telecommunications officials to record their customers' Internet activities, CNET http://News.com has learned. In a private meeting with industry representatives, Gonzales, Mueller and other senior members of the Justice Department said Internet service providers should retain subscriber information and network data for two years, according to two sources familiar with the discussion who spoke on condition of anonymity. The closed-door meeting at the Justice Department, which Gonzales had requested, according to the sources, comes as the idea of legally mandated data retention has become popular on Capitol Hill and inside the Bush administration. Supporters of the idea say it will help prosecutions of child pornography because in many cases, logs are deleted during the routine course of business.] [n a speech last month at the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, Gonzales said that Internet providers must retain records for a "reasonable amount of time." "I will reach out personally to the CEOs of the leading service providers and to other industry leaders," Gonzales said. "Record retention by Internet service providers consistent with the legitimate privacy rights of Americans is an issue that must be addressed."]} Gonzales says that this information retention is to go after child sexual predators. (much better handled with a horse, rope and peacemaker than restrictions on freedom of speach and domestic espionage) Well just look at the KEY for this bite and you will see that Alberto Gonzales should be the LAST person we would want to trust with the safety of our children. You can read the entire CNet http://news.com article here: http://news.com.com/Gonzales+pressures+ISPs+on+data+retention/2100-1028_3-6077654.html Gun Guys a sub site of the rabidly gun grabbing freedom States Alliance continues to be the most deceptive gun grabber site on the Internet and because of this it will be a policy of the bites to post snippets from their most outragous article every week intil the site at least drops the 19th century "cowboy" look and starts showing itself to the public as exactly what it is, A TRAITOR GUNGRABBER AND GENOCIDE SUPPORTING SITE. {[In Minnesota?s Post Bulletin, Bill Boyne lays out a convincing case for a drastic step against our gun violence: only police officers and soldiers should carry firearms.] [Meanwhile, says Boyne, while Americans are dying in vast numbers, the NRA is working to put even more firearms on the streets and make it even easier for more people to get more guns. While we?re experiencing gun violence on almost every corner, the extremist gun lobby is pushing for even more of it. But what we need isn't more guns, not less. And when you follow that truth to its conclusion, what you end up with is something very much like what's already happening in other parts of the world: a society where firearms definitely aren't wanted, and literally just aren't necessary. It is time to cut down on crime and restrict guns to soldiers and police officers. There are other ways to settle disputes. And it is long past time to reduce the tragic toll of 1,460,000 people killed or wounded every year as a result of the unwarranted proliferation of weapons.] [When you compare that number to America (in some of our larger cities alone, the number of gun deaths routinely climbs halfway to 1,000), Boyne?s solution looks extremely appealing. We need to do something about our gun problem? the NRA has been pushing their solution, more guns, for years, and it hasn?t worked. It?s definitely a radial step to reduce gun ownership to only police officers and soldiers. But the time may come, as the violence continues, when that step will be the one we need to take.] This article alone should be considered an act of TREASON against the American Constitution and Republic and this site deserves as much exposure as a TRAITOR GENOCIDE site as it can get on all pro freedom forums, blogs and wikis. Furthermore sites like Gun Guys, Freedom State Alliance, and Bradey Campaign/Million Mom March ought to be told that genuine patriots are ready to practice JURY NULLIFICATION against their Treason and that they had better be ready to win a CIVIL WAR if they wish to carry out the door to door gun confiscation policies mentioned in this article!!!! You can read the entire article here if you have just swallowed poison or for any other reason need to THROW UP!!!! 
Bite One ---> ClownPosse
Bite Two ---> Tears of a Kloughn (TOAK)
Bite Three ---> nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]]
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]]
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]]
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies ]]
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies ]]
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies ]]
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies ]]
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies ]]
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies ]]
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies ]]
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies ]]
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies ]]
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies ]]
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies ]]
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 375 | View Replies ]]
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 402 | View Replies ]]
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 406 | View Replies ]]
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 412 | View Replies ]]
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 416 | View Replies ]]
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 439 | View Replies ]]
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 442 | View Replies ]]
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies ]]
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 490 | View Replies ]]} Bite Four ---> Merck (Big Pharma)
Bite Five ---> Food and Drug Administration
Bite Six ---> Alberto Gonzales
Bite Seven ---> Gun Guys
More next week.
(96 images)
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Coral Snake, (#0)
bump for more bites
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]