[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Economy Title: Economic Crisis Fuels Military Intervention As The Chemical Weapons ‘Threat’ Becomes The New Pretext Durban, South Africa: The US economy is sluggish with fears of a new recession. The Democrats and Republicans once more cannot agree on what to do about the alleged “fiscal cliff” that threatens to further unravel the economy, even as analysts say that the whole notion of going over the “cliff “ has been fabricated by the right to force more cuts in social benefits. Consumer confidence is dipping in this festive season of global shopping–not a good sign, since consumption and spending at the malls is an economic driver with 70% of economic activity based on getting consumers to buy even when it means they must go deeper and deeper in debt using credit cards and loans. What can the Obama government do? The political stalemate has blocked new jobs and stimulus programs so reliance on Federal Reserve Bank interventions has grown, but they are not printing enough money to turn things around. This is what’s behind the pressure for new wars that primes the spending pump with national security always used as the pretext. Largely unreported has been a quite escalation of selling arms and advanced weaponry, using threats from terrorists and Iran as the way to get a nervous public on board. The White House has dipped into the Bush Administration Iraq playbook to seek out a new threat that can justify intervention. Non-Existent WMDs were used then to prepare the political/psychological conditions for the taking on Saddam Hussein. Now, the danger of Syria’s alleged use of “chemical weapons” is being trotted out and reinforced daily in briefings happily carried on our media. Buried in the press is a related but unspoken memory: Washington supplied chemical weapons to Saddam Hussein, weapons he later used against civilians challenging his regime and in the Iraq-Iran war. Here’s one report published on Counterpunch back in 2004:
So, let us remind ourselves, Washington’s knowledge of chemical weapons comes in part from its role in manufacturing them. This seeming bogus threat is being invoked as the basis of a new military intervention, now underway, that the Israeli intelligence and propaganda organ, Debka is hyping:
All of this follows efforts by Hillary Clinton, NATO and the Pentagon on a second track to forge a new Syrian “united” opposition that can be presented to the Western press and media as the legitimate heir to the discredited Assad government. (To achieve this, the current coalition is, again, for public consumption, stripping its links to the terrorist groups that have done the most effective fighting, whatever the human rights cost in recent months, even as reports now confirm that the US similar armed terror groups fighting Gadaffy in Libya.) As the New York Times reported,
While US pressure remains in the background, U.S. troops move into the foreground, with arms sales hovering in the shadows, as Nick Turse reports on Tom Dispatch.com. These developments that have been downplayed in the same media outlets hyping the unsubstantiated chemical weapons threat.
While weapons flow outwards, urgently needed money flows in to the U.S., to keep the weapons factories humming and the military industrial complex in command. Other nations like South Africa—from where I am writing have been pressured to cut off oil imports from Iran in favor of pricier petrol from Saudi Arabia. This pumps more money into the Kingdom that it can then use to finance its latest wave of weapons procurement. This formula of “oil out/weapons in” was followed for many years by the deposed Shah of Iran as a way to enrich him and US military suppliers. The Shah is gone, but the game goes on all in the name of geo-political stability. Poster Comment: War is the economic recovery plan. Worked for Bush, sorta. Except the economy is a lot worse now. Crash and burn is more likely at this point, IMO. The D&R crime family is going to have to be a lot more aggressive, with their looting and plundering this time around. They're widening their scope of operations to include Africa, for an increased yield. (1 image) Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest The War of 9/11 is over. This would've been a great article, say, in December 2001.
#2. To: mcgowanjm, *Neo-Lib Chickenhawk Wars* (#1)
You're having a Neville Chamberlain moment, it will pass. ![]() "We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul #3. To: hondo68 (#2) Neville gave Sudetenland to hitler. Said 'Peace in our time'. I've done neither. I'm describing the Stalingrad of the USSA. The War of 9/11 is over. Here comes the Worst Depression following hard on: www.theoilage.com/post67563.html#p67563 [img]www.investmenttools.com/i...fut/crb/bdi_log.gif[/img] All Supports being violated. Depression to get worse in days. AND HERE WE GO
#4. To: All (#3) The exact Timeline of the War of 9/11. You couldn't express it any better than this: IMGwww.zerohedge.com/sites/d...12/12/20121212_BDIY_2.png
#5. To: mcgowanjm (#3) The DHS war of terror is ramping up in the ol' "homeland". You're supposed to be afraid of "Tea Bagger" and OWS "Anonymous" terrorists! Quick... look under your bed for homegrown R-A-C-I-S-T-S !!! If you go shopping and buy lots of stuff made in China, it's mission accomplished, beer summit time.
Ya know, I don't think Americans are interested in race rioting, they'd rather string up a few banksters and politicians, IMO. ![]() "We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul #6. To: hondo68 (#5) If you go shopping and buy lots of stuff made in China, it's mission accomplished, beer summit time. Then your lifestyle is about to be radically altered. And when Joe SixPack can't afford beer and cigarettes, that's when the SHTF....;}
#7. To: hondo68 (#0) WMDs, the same that were not in Iraq, the very same that were sold to Iraq by the USA in the days when Iraq was on first names witht eh USA, when Rumsfeld went personally to sell WMDS to Saddam, so that Saddma could use them on the enemy...IRAN................but instead he used them on his own people, killed 1000s..............and then only weeks before the Bush Baby declared war on Iraq...............yep the on and only Baby who said, you are with us or against us................and many nationed messed their pants at this threat and followed like sheep to the slaughter............Saddam quickly shipped the WMDS off the Syria, where they are now, and causing some concern,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,the USA would not like these weapons to be used on anybody...............well almost................and then the world would find out the truth as to where they came from...................the USA have the biggest stockplies of WMDs
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|