DETROIT (Talk Radio 1270) President Barack Obama doesnt need to pay back Detroit for his re-election victory as Councilwoman JoAnn Watson claimed because the city played no role in his win, according to political consultant Steve Hood. It reveals an inconvenient and unfortunate truth, Hood said about the election numbers. President Obama didnt need Detroit to win the state. Let me explain it to you, Mr. Obama got 2,564,569 votes, Mitt Romney got 2,115,256 votes.
Detroits vote was about 285,000 if you subtract that from Mr. Obamas total statewide, its 167, 931 (he would have won by) So if all of Detroit had stayed home, Mr. Obama would have still won the state, Hood said.
Obama won Michigans 16 electoral votes, along with crucial states including Ohio, Illinois, California and Florida, adding up to his 332 electoral votes; Mitt Romney carried 206 electoral votes with states including Texas, West Virginia and North Carolina.
Detroit Councilwoman Watson made headlines around the country when she announced during nail-biting budget discussions for deep-in-debt Detroit that President Barack Obama should re-pay Detroiters for voting for him with a federal bailout.
Our people in an overwhelming way supported the re-election of this president and there ought to be a quid pro quo, and you ought to exercise leadership on that, Watson said. Of course, not just that, but why not?
She added: After the election of Jimmy Carter, the honorable Coleman Alexander Young, he went to Washington, D.C. He came home with some bacon, said Watson. Thats what you do.
In tony Oakland County the wealthiest county in the state with a majority white population Obama garnered 349,002 votes and Mitt Romney got 296,513.
Hood said that means Oakland County Executive L. Brooks Patterson should tell Obama Oakland County elected him, so dont tax my rich people, we put you in office.
If you bail out Detroit youve got to cascade west, youve got to bail out Chicago, it you bail out Chicago, youve got to bail out L.A you cant do it, Hood said.