Title: Boehner Extends Olive Branch on 'Fiscal Cliff' (tax increases) Source:
CNBC URL Source:http://www.cnbc.com/id/49731550 Published:Nov 7, 2012 Author:Reuters Post Date:2012-11-07 17:54:49 by Hondo68 Ping List:*The Two Parties ARE the Same*Subscribe to *The Two Parties ARE the Same* Keywords:want you to lead, a balanced approach, will include higher taxes Views:97963 Comments:133
House Speaker John Boehner offered Wednesday to pursue a deal with a victorious President Barack Obama that will include higher taxes "under the right conditions" to help reduce the nation's staggering debt and put its finances in order.
Getty Images
Speaker of the House John Boehner
"Mr. President, this is your moment," Boehner told reporters, speaking about the "fiscal cliff" that will hit in January. "We want you to lead."
Boehner said House Republicans are asking Obama "to make good on a balanced approach" that would including spending cuts and address government social benefit programs.
"Let's find the common ground that has eluded us," Boehner said while congratulating the president on winning a second term. (Read more: Obama Re-elected as Crucial Ohio Goes His Way.)
The Ohio Republican spoke a day after the president's clear re-election victory. He said conditions on higher taxes would include a revamped tax code to make it cleaner and fairer, fewer loopholes and lower rates for all.
The speaker noted that during one-on-one budget talks with the president in the summer of 2011, Obama had "endorsed the idea of tax reform and lower rates, including a top rate of lower than 35 percent," the present top rate.
Boehner did not specify what loopholes House Republicans might consider trimming. Nor did he take questions.
His comments were generally along the lines of proposals by vanquished Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney that also were vague on specifics. Still, the speaker's comments signaled a willingness to enter into talks. He suggested Congress could use its upcoming lame-duck session to get the ball moving on such a compromise.
"We can't solve the problem of our fiscal imbalance overnight...This is going to take time," he said.
Poster Comment:
He's ready to be lead to Obama's lame duck a$$, so he can kiss it.
The election is over,so they can now go back to business as usual.
That is unfortunate. If more people didn't sit on the sidelines we could have had some unusual business. But the sex perverts, moochers, baby killers, and stupid people voted for Obama. Then there are the simpletons like you that sat on the sidelines. You got what you wanted Peter. So shut up and don't complain.
Then there are the simpletons like you that sat on the sidelines.
Yeah,it is MY fault your asshole buddy RINO's picked a fucking communist as a candidate that MAY be to the left of Obama. Since Obummer already had the Dim vote locked up,that left it to "conservatives" like you to vote Mass Mitt into office,and there just aren't that many stupid conservatives.
Good thinking,Stone! Who are you going to vote for next time,Hillary Clinton or JEB Bush?
I saw this site Willard had drawn up in a hubris filled notion he could not lose.
The Republicans have a problem in that in terms of popular vote, they have lost five of the last six elections.
Until they learn to offer a real choice that is meaningful and serves the public interest, they are doomed to continue to be a marginalized entity.
The only thing I appreciate about this is it helps show what a joke the popular election of a true leader of the people is in this country. Those in the 'club' run things, and not the simulated leader in the fishbowl called the oval office.
Romney is out of touch and delusional, Obama is strange and an egomaniac.
And neither is meant to be true leaders in any sense of pulling the real strings of power.