[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Opinions/Editorials Title: Rand Paul's signal to the GOP Mitt Romney won a valuable seal of approval Thursday night when Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul endorsed him for president – even though Paul’s father, Ron Paul, has not formally withdrawn from the presidential race. The younger Paul’s support could be a boon to Romney as he tries to rally one of the more elusive parts of the GOP coalition: the youthful, disaffected, libertarian-leaning activists who powered Ron Paul’s presidential run. But the upside goes both ways on this one: while Paul is a helpful validator for Romney, endorsing Romney also gives Paul a level of mainstream credibility he lacked during his 2010 Senate campaign. It shows he’s willing to be a team player when it counts, and puts him on the safe side of any speculation over a third-party libertarian push. And that could be crucially important or Paul if he decides to seek the White House himself in 2016 or beyond – as any number of operatives believe he hopes to do. “Rand’s endorsement of GOP nominee Mitt Romney clearly shows that in spite of those who try to marginalize him, he has keen set of political instincts and is very much aware that a successful national run will require more than just his father’s loyal following,” said one Republican strategist close to Paul-world. So if Romney wins, Paul will be in a position to act as a voice of accountability on the right without being accused of sour grapes, or of having worked to undermine Romney from the start. And if Romney were to lose, Paul would be able to tell the party in 2016 that whatever insurgent instincts he may have, he got on board with an establishment nominee at a moment when it mattered. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 1. #1. To: Ferret Mike, *Yukon neo-Progressive Vermin* (#0) It shows he’s willing to be a team player The problem is that he's switched teams, and is now playing for the D&R global elitists. The vast majority of liberty minded folks are pissed off, and even less likely to vote for Mitt now. Gary Johnson (L), and Virgil Goode (Constitution Party) are starting to look a whole lot better. And then there's the possibility of just writing in Ron Paul. Any of those options are better than endorsing evil by voting for Mitt or Obama.
Replies to Comment # 1. Any of those options are better than endorsing evil by voting for Mitt or Obama. Someone around these here parts of the Internet knows how to send a strong signal to the power elite and that be you, hondo68. I received a phone call from the GOP just the other day. They asked me to listen to the rant of Mitt Romney. When the pre-recorded rant was all over a lady asked me if I was willing to donate money. I said, "yes." She quickly said, good news and said her supervisor would be on the tele-line in a jiffy. I was asked how much I would enjoy in a one-time donation. I asked, "what am I going to get out of the deal?" I was told to remove 0bama. I told the supy, that he can go to HELL because I wouldn't send a buck to anyone that supports 0bama. He said, oh you missed the point. I said, "no I didn't. Romney is nothing more than 0bama lite." I hung up after saying, "I wouldn't send you a buck to save your life."
End Trace Mode for Comment # 1. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|