[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Cult Watch Title: Goldi Speaks #22. To: Infowarrior, TIMEOUT (#9) FOR ABUSE OF POSTING GUIDELINES PERSONAL ATTACKS POSTED AS NEWS, AND REPEATED ABUSE OF BREAKING NEWS, YOU HAVE A ONE MONTH TIMEOUT. USE THIS TIME TO RETHINK YOUR PURPOSE HERE ON LP. ANY FURTHER ABUSES DURING THE ONE MONTH TIMEOUT, WILL CAUSE ONE MONTH TO BE PERMANENT. THE ONLY REASON YOU ARE NOT BANNED TODAY, IS THAT YOU HAVE POSTED GOOD ARTICLES IN THE PAST. I HOPE THE NEXT MONTH AWAY FROM LP WILL GET YOU TO FOCUS ON WHAT IS IMPORTANT, AND STOP THE PETTY INFIGHTING THAT HAS TAKEN OVER YOUR ACTIONS AND EMOTIONS. Goldi-Lox posted on 2012-06-09 12:53:14 ET Reply Trace Poster Comment: Funny stuff. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 33. Fred - Goldi is going through the channel today with a fine haired pubic comb but avoiding her tightly wound bed bugs: the LP gay klowns. buckeroo
#4. To: buckeroo, Fred Mertz, *Yukon neo-Progressive Vermin* (#1) ANY FURTHER ABUSES DURING THE ONE MONTH TIMEOUT Huh, say what? Scared straight! The troll bait thread that yukon started re liberator is gone as well as the other yutard ones. The canary plunge protection team is in full jihad mode.
#6. To: hondo68, liberator (#4) I wonder if Salley banned liberator? Any ideas? He overwhelmingly SWOOPED down on LP and created the BEST conditions for reprisal and criticism of the LP junket that I have ever seen. Accolades to liberator on his work as it took a lot of work to pull that off. No question about he is of free mind and spirit.
#9. To: buckeroo, hondo68 (#6) I wonder if Salley banned liberator? Any ideas? Yes, there is a notation of suspension. But it's missing the stamp of skull and cross-bones. I'm....I'm (sob, sniffle) CRUSHED!!! Thanks for your kind words, sir.... The hypocrisy of any owner and forum that supposedly espouses and encourages freedom, the spirit of our Founders, conservative debate under the banner of a so-called "Rules of Civility" MUST be exposed for the sham that it is. It's just too bad so many thoughtful, intelligent, and insightful posters are distracted, disrupted, and abused in the process. Remember: We are ALL Spartacus! :-)
#11. To: Liberator (#9) Yes, there is a notation of suspension. Ah ha, ye olde stealth ban! I feel your pain.
#13. To: hondo68 (#11) Ah ha, ye olde stealth ban! Oh, I'm banned....But Mommy Dearest didn't want the rest of LP to see it apparently. The "pain"? Hey - whomever wants to deal with that asylum of "I wuz hacked" gay CTers has my condolences. The degree of disruption at LP has only gotten worse if you noticed, Hondo.
#17. To: Liberator, hondo68 (#13) Oh, I'm banned....But Mommy Dearest didn't want the rest of LP to see it apparently. Hondo, i got the old stealth ban this am also, I'm betting your next.
#26. To: calcon, liberator (#17) Hondo, i got the old stealth ban this am also, I'm betting your next. calcon, how on Earth did you get banned? You have always offered the best of the best ideas on LP and here on LF. How did you violate the rules of appropriate behaviour on LP?
#29. To: buckeroo (#26) Hmmm, this time i'm sure it's for bad mouthing the closet queen cabal. The first time was for posting 3 negative newt articles in a row immediately after goldi said no more negative articles. I really don't have a problem with either ban. I intentionally broke her rules so I got banned, nothing more to it. I only signed on with a new alias just to give yukie shit. The forum has no interest to me. It's a low end version of free republic.
#33. To: calcon (#29) I only signed on with a new alias just to give yukie shit. The forum has no interest to me. It's a low end version of free republic. Why, would an upstanding citizen of America (such as yourself) perform that dastardly deed? Are you saying that you went out of your way to say something non-compliant to the management rulez that are lessened with their gay regalia and statists? oh, the horrors! Are you saying you provided a new method of viewing themselves in the rear-view-mirror?
Replies to Comment # 33. in the rear-view-mirror? When those guys talk about "rear view" it's not a mirror. I find it particularity funny that the two "conservative" forums have taken themselves out of the general election because of their infatuation with newt. Looks like they're all in for obama's reelection since they would rather support him then that "evil" mormon. Too funny.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 33. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|