[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Kamala Harris, reparations, and guaranteed income

Did Mudboy Slim finally kill this place?

"Why Young Americans Are Not Taught about Evil"

"New Rules For Radicals — How To Reinvent Kamala Harris"

"Harris’ problem: She’s a complete phony"

Hurricane Beryl strikes Bay City (TX)

Who Is ‘Destroying Democracy In Darkness?’

‘Kamalanomics’ is just ‘Bidenomics’ but dumber

Even The Washington Post Says Kamala's 'Price Control' Plan is 'Communist'

Arthur Ray Hines, "Sneakypete", has passed away.

No righT ... for me To hear --- whaT you say !

"Walz’s Fellow Guardsmen Set the Record Straight on Veep Candidate’s Military Career: ‘He Bailed Out’ "

"Kamala Harris Selects Progressive Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as Running Mate"

"The Teleprompter Campaign"

Good Riddance to Ismail Haniyeh

"Pagans in Paris"

"Liberal groupthink makes American life creepy and could cost Democrats the election".

"Enter Harris, Stage Lef"t

Official describes the moment a Butler officer confronted the Trump shooter

Jesse Watters: Don’t buy this excuse from the Secret Service

Video shows Trump shooter crawling into position while folks point him out to law enforcement

Eyewitness believes there was a 'noticeable' difference in security at Trump's rally

Trump Assassination Attempt

We screamed for 3 minutes at police and Secret Service. They couldn’t see him, so they did nothing. EYEWITNESS SPEAKS OUT — I SAW THE ASSASSIN CRAWLING ACROSS THE ROOF.

Video showing the Trump Rally shooter dead on the rooftop

Court Just Nailed Hillary in $6 Million FEC Violation Case, 45x Bigger Than Trump's $130k So-Called Violation

2024 Republican Platform Drops Gun-Rights Promises

Why will Kamala Harris resign from her occupancy of the Office of Vice President of the USA? Scroll down for records/details

Secret Negotiations! Jill Biden’s Demands for $2B Library, Legal Immunity, and $100M Book Deal to Protect Biden Family Before Joe’s Exit

AI is exhausting the power grid. Tech firms are seeking a miracle solution.

If you need a Good Opening for black, use this.

"Arrogant Hunter Biden has never been held accountable — until now"

How Republicans in Key Senate Races Are Flip-Flopping on Abortion

Idaho bar sparks fury for declaring June 'Heterosexual Awesomeness Month' and giving free beers and 15% discounts to straight men

Son of Buc-ee’s co-owner indicted for filming guests in the shower and having sex. He says the law makes it OK.

South Africa warns US could be liable for ICC prosecution for supporting Israel

Today I turned 50!

San Diego Police officer resigns after getting locked in the backseat with female detainee

Gazan Refugee Warns the World about Hamas

Iranian stabbed for sharing his faith, miraculously made it across the border without a passport!

Protest and Clashes outside Trump's Bronx Rally in Crotona Park

Netanyahu Issues Warning To US Leaders Over ICC Arrest Warrants: 'You're Next'

Will it ever end?

Did Pope Francis Just Call Jesus a Liar?

Climate: The Movie (The Cold Truth) Updated 4K version

There can never be peace on Earth for as long as Islamic Sharia exists

The Victims of Benny Hinn: 30 Years of Spiritual Deception.

Trump Is Planning to Send Kill Teams to Mexico to Take Out Cartel Leaders

The Great Falling Away in the Church is Here | Tim Dilena

How Ridiculous? Blade-Less Swiss Army Knife Debuts As Weapon Laws Tighten


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles

Title: Jailhouse Strip Searches Backed by U.S. Supreme Court Ruling
Source: Bloomberg
URL Source: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012- ... cked-by-u-s-supreme-court.html
Published: Apr 2, 2012
Author: Greg Stohr
Post Date: 2012-04-02 12:11:17 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 3028
Comments: 7

The U.S. Supreme Court backed the use of strip searches of newly arrested people, saying jails can take steps to ensure that even those arrested for minor offenses aren’t smuggling in weapons or drugs.

Ruling in a case that pitted security concerns against privacy rights, the justices today said in a 5-4 vote that officials don’t need individualized suspicion before conducting searches that involve close inspection of private body parts.

Two members of the majority -- Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito -- wrote separately to say the decision was a limited one. Roberts said the ruling left open the possibility of exceptions, while Alito said it was limited to newly arrested inmates who are admitted into the prison’s general population.

“Jails are often crowded, unsanitary and dangerous places,” Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote for the court. “There is a substantial interest in preventing any new inmate, either of his own will or as a result of coercion, from putting all who live or work at these institutions at even greater risk when he is admitted to the general population.”

The case split the court along ideological lines, with Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas joining the majority.

Click for Full Text! Subscribe to *Jack-Booted Thugs*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 5.

#1. To: Brian S (#0)

.

Hey brianna, want to show us all where there is a RIGHT to PRIVACY in the US CONSTITUTION or LAW?

I'll wait ...

.

..

...

....

.....

.

..

...

....

.....

a

b

c

d

e

f

g

h

i

j

k

l

m

n

o

p

q

r

s

t

u

v

w

x

y

z

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

M

N

O

P

Q

R

U

S

T

V

W

X

Y

Z

-

--

---

----

-----

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

...

?

STILL waiting brianna.

You know why brianna?

It DOESN'T EXIST!

You ignorant mewling libTURD azzwipe whore.

Mad Dog  posted on  2012-04-02   14:45:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Mad Dog (#1)

I figured you would like this ruling you fascist pile of pig shit.

Brian S  posted on  2012-04-02   18:35:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Brian S, Mad Dog (#2) (Edited)

Fourth Amendment – Protection from unreasonable search and seizure.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Well there is a right to privacy, the 4th amendment but it can't apply to prisoners. We should have a LOT less people in jail, and a much better justice system, IMO. The present system is payola to the correctional officers union, lawyers unions, and court employee's unions, police union, graft, corruption, and fraud.

Oh, I forgot the teachers union, to get them plugged into the system. My bad.

Hondo68  posted on  2012-04-02   18:46:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: hondo68, Brian S (#3)

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Well there is a right to privacy, the 4th amendment

PRIVACY is NOT mentioned anywhere there in the 4th Amendment.

Do you see the word PRIVACY? in the 4th Amendment? In the US CONSTITUTION?

NO, you sure F'ing do NOT.

In fact, no so called federal "right" to PRIVACY has ever been held to spring from what is written ANYWHERE in the founding documents.

The reason that I know this is because the 1959 CONSTITUTION of the State of Alaska contains a RIGHT TO PRIVACY that the US CONSTITUTION does NOT contain.

All that the 4th Amendment does by TRADITION and PRACTICE is to describe exactly how to violate your non existent "right" to PRIVACY by sworn warrants based on so called "probable cause".

Ask ANY educated US CONSTITUTIONAL lawyer, there is no such thing as a right to PRIVACY in the Federal CONSTITUTION.

Sorry that you are so ignorant about basic FACTS about the US CONSTITUTION.

Mad Dog  posted on  2012-04-03   4:41:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 5.

        There are no replies to Comment # 5.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 5.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com