[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Leak a document Title: Lucysmom and mininggold are the same poster beware They are the same poster. Proof here on ths thread libertysflame.com/cgi-bin...?ArtNum=21416&Disp=63#C63 You see minningold posted this #63. To: Wood_Chopper (#62) You little sweetheart you, re-writing the pledge are you? So now its worded, "I pledge allegiance to the government" according to you. I see you've even resorted to changing my posts in order to try to make YOUR point. But I see you can't refute anything...... again. mininggold posted on 2011-06-21 12:41:38 ET Reply Trace Private Reply Edit
You see the only problem is that it was a post from Lucysmom. Here is her post #62. To: lucysmom (#53) Imagine how they would scream if government schools decided not to have children begin their day by pledging allegiance to the government You little sweetheart you, re-writing the pledge are you? So now its worded, "I pledge allegiance to the government" according to you. Wood_Chopper posted on 2011-06-21 12:38:34 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply Edit #63. To: Wood_Chopper (#62) You little sweetheart you, re-writing the pledge are you? So now its worded, "I pledge allegiance to the government" according to you. I see you've even resorted to changing my posts in order to try to make YOUR point. But I see you can't refute anything...... again. mininggold posted on 2011-06-21 12:41:38 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply Edit Replies to Comment # 63. #65. To: mininggold, A K A Stone (#63) (Edited) You little sweetheart you, re-writing the pledge are you? So now its worded, "I pledge allegiance to the government" according to you. I see you've even resorted to changing my posts in order to try to make YOUR point. But I see you can't refute anything...... again. Hey yukon, you're answering a post I made to lucysmom and claiming it as yours. Too many windows open??? Are you and lucysmom one and the same? Wood_Chopper posted on 2011-06-21 12:56:52 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply Edit In case someone thinks I edited it like the liberal trash here is trying to say. That isn't the case or someone would have noticed it at the time. Also anyone is free to contact pinguinite to have him confirm that nothing has been edited. So what we have here is a liberal who needs 2 screen names to back themselves up. That poster is such a lightweight that they try to make up for it by having 2 screen names. That is against the rules. The poster in question could never "man" up and answer the question. So a warning to all forums these people are one in the same. [Thread Locked] Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Comments (1-55) not displayed.
#56. To: Capitalist Eric (#55) :) I actually don't wander around too much either. Perhaps someone will send each of us a note. :)
#57. To: harrowup (#51) if there is a simple explanation why don't you calm down and just explain why mininggold answered a post directed to you? You would need to ask mininggold about that. Anyone claiming to be an expert is selling something. I brandish my ignorance like a crucifix at vampires. Aaron Bady #58. To: Capitalist Eric (#52) Generally, I have a positivist mindset, though post-positivism allows more leeway in dealing with "what is truth?" type of questions. I can't say with 100% certainty, and it's just not worth my time to know... That's all very interesting, and you are still 100% wrong. Anyone claiming to be an expert is selling something. I brandish my ignorance like a crucifix at vampires. Aaron Bady #59. To: lucysmom, mininggold (#58) That's all very interesting, and you are still 100% wrong. This thread is hilarious. All the Sherlock Holmes wannabes - aren't. LOL
#60. To: lucysmom (#58) (Edited) That's all very interesting, and you are still 100% wrong. Are they still going at it? If they want my answer then they need to ask ME the question, but then they need to blame Stone and my 7 posts per day limit for any untimely reply. But not a one has the balls to do so. Personally I'm not wasting my time on it anymore, because this bunch sure can't shoot straight and I have nothing further to offer that hasn't already been said. Almost every country in the Middle East is awash in oil, and we have to side with the one that has nothing but joos. Goddamn, that was good thinkin'. Esso posted on 2012-01-13 7:37:56 ET #61. To: mininggold, lucysmom, A K A Stone (#60) If they want my answer then they need to ask ME the question, but then they need to blame Stone and my 7 posts per day limit for any untimely reply. But not a one has the balls to do so. Well, why did you answer a post directed to lucysmom with such drama and then claim Stone changed the text? You've been copied on every one of my posts.
#62. To: Fred Mertz, mininggold, A K A Stone, lucysmom (#59) This thread is hilarious. All the Sherlock Holmes wannabes - aren't. LOL What's hilarious is the tag team avoidance. I have quoted comments directed to someone else and stated a position but I've never claimed the quoted reference was mine. That issue is what is so puzzling.
#63. To: Fred Mertz (#59) All the Sherlock Holmes wannabes - aren't. LOL The least talented have the biggest egos. Anyone claiming to be an expert is selling something. I brandish my ignorance like a crucifix at vampires. Aaron Bady #64. To: mininggold (#60) Personally I'm not wasting my time on it anymore, because this bunch sure can't shoot straight and I have nothing further to offer that hasn't already been said. They are completely invested in the rightness of their theory and will not be dissuaded - true believers in a false reality. Anyone claiming to be an expert is selling something. I brandish my ignorance like a crucifix at vampires. Aaron Bady #65. To: mininggold (#60) Your time to address the question is running out. You know the question. Tick tock tick tock
#66. To: lucysmom, Murron, Wood_Chopper, A K A Stone, Fred Mertz, mininggold, (#64)
And of course the problem is that nothing has been said, (by mininggold or lucysmom)that answered the question. If anyone has a simple explanation then let's hear it and stop the juvenile resort to kicking the sand out of the box. The 'false reality' is of your own devise, lucy.
#67. To: harrowup (#66) Read my post on this thread. I know for a fact that they are two different people. FACT. It's impossible to be in two places at the same time or for one person to be in one place as two people. IMPOSSIBLE. You folks are fucking loons. And the fact that you would pick on two very sweet and likeable ladies, well, you should be ashamed of yourselves as "men". I'll believe that a corporation is a person 1 second after Texas executes one... #68. To: war (#67) War anyone can get on the internet and make the statement you made. It may be proved to you. That could be true. But that isn't proof for us. I don't mean to start an inquisition. But it isn't fair when someone uses two screen names to back themselves up. mininggold clearly talked about her post being changed. That is an indisputable fact. Another fact is that Lucysmom made that post. Another fact. Those have never been addressed. Just dodged. To tell you the truth I wish I knew they were different people. Then I wouldn't have to go asking these questions of people here.
#69. To: war, mininggold, lucysmom (#67) Read my post on this thread. I did read it and was curious why April 2011 was the time you chose as the epiphany. I don't recall either of them engaging with me during that month of horrors but do note that they both were interested in goats in June and you were not. Outside of this conundrum I've seen no similarity in their style in that mininggold sometimes has a sense of humor and lucy never. The conclusion drawn from that could go either way. Hence my dilemma.
#70. To: ALL (#0) Good Grief, i can't believe you folks have kept this silliness going for days. Who really gives a RAT'S ASS.
#71. To: war (#67) http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=19500&Disp=9
#72. To: calcon (#70) Who really gives a RAT'S ASS. Those of us who find false charges odious.
#73. To: A K A Stone (#68) (Edited) I don't mean to start an inquisition. You started the thread, Stone. You look like a loon now that you're suddenly denying what your intent was. I know for a fact that they are two different people. Period. End. Finis. TWO DIFFERENT PEOPLE. You've put them both in a position where the only "proof" is for them to reveal themselves to eveyone here which neither of them SHOULD be forced to do. Repeat this until it sinks in: I know for a fact that they are two different people. I know for a fact that they are two different people. I know for a fact... You used to have a political website. I told you the moment that you allowed Boofer on here that it would die. He posted here and then went and shit on you everywhere else - as he always did and does. I told you that if you did not control Padlock/no gnu and his *nigger* compulsion, you'd never attract any significant posters. So what did you do? You joined in. Look at this place, Stone. So much potential that ran at its best when you were nowhere to be found. I'll believe that a corporation is a person 1 second after Texas executes one... #74. To: war (#73) Sorry but your word isn't good enough.
#75. To: A K A Stone (#74) I don't give a shit whether you *think* it's good enough or not. You're hardly a man of honor. I'll believe that a corporation is a person 1 second after Texas executes one... #76. To: war, A K A Stone (#73) I know for a fact that they are two different people. I know for a fact that they are two different people. I know for a fact... And I know for a fact that you repeatedly lied to me in pm's so where does that leave the question of your credibility?
#77. To: harrowup, A K A Stone (#66) If anyone has a simple explanation then let's hear it and stop the juvenile resort to kicking the sand out of the box. Sometimes it's helpful to go back to original material - look what I found: #67. To: Wood_Chopper (#65) (Edited)
Hey yukon, you're answering a post I made to lucysmom and claiming it as yours. Too many windows open???
Are you and lucysmom one and the same?
Sorry, I forgot someone as perfect as yourself never makes mistakes. I see you put a call in to your mommy to help you out.
mininggold posted on 2011-06-21 13:01:41 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
Why wasn't mininggold's explanation been included in Stone's "proof"? Do you reject mininggold's explanation? BTW, Wood_Chopper is on my bozo list and has been for a long time - does it make sense to you that I would bozo someone as lucysmom, and not as mininggold? You fearless investigators could check out your theory by reviewing both mininggold's and my posting history over - say - the past year. Anyone claiming to be an expert is selling something. I brandish my ignorance like a crucifix at vampires. Aaron Bady #78. To: A K A Stone (#68) I don't mean to start an inquisition. But it isn't fair when someone uses two screen names to back themselves up. Do you think it's fair to ban someone or limit their posts as you've done with mininggold because some nut with an ax to grind makes a false accusation? Anyone claiming to be an expert is selling something. I brandish my ignorance like a crucifix at vampires. Aaron Bady #79. To: lucysmom (#77) Someone I trust thinks I'm wrong. I still think I'm right but will probably let it pass. I hope you would at least admit the comment is suspicious? Can you admit that much? I've already bumped mings posting limit up. Maybe I will remove it entirely. Let me think on it. I would also hope you agree that it is fair for me to want people to only have one screen name. I will also admit that if someone slips by and has 2 names it is not the end of the world. Buck does it all the time. I zap them as I find them. His are easier as he has the same ip numbers. This wasn't because of your politics which are different then mine. If you remember I took the thread down a while back because I was going to let it pass until I received the message containing the comment in question. Then I opened it back up because my interest stirred. Sincerely A K A Stone
#80. To: A K A Stone (#74) Sorry but your word isn't good enough. and CE's word is good enough for you to start these threads and ban mininggold? Anyone claiming to be an expert is selling something. I brandish my ignorance like a crucifix at vampires. Aaron Bady #81. To: harrowup (#76) Post the PM's and point out the repeated lies. If you don't. I will. I'll believe that a corporation is a person 1 second after Texas executes one... #82. To: lucysmom (#80) and CE's word is good enough for you to start these threads and ban mininggold? When ming said her post was changed. That is called a clue. If Yukon had said that you guys would be all over him.
#83. To: war, harrowup (#81) If you folks want to go down that route. Please do it on a different thread.
#84. To: A K A Stone (#83) He's not going to post them. There's not one lie let alone any that were "repeated". You should rename this site "paranoiacsflame" as they seem to be attacrted to this place like moths... I'll believe that a corporation is a person 1 second after Texas executes one... #85. To: lucysmom, Murron, Wood_Chopper, A K A Stone, Fred Mertz, mininggold, war, calcon (#77) Do you reject mininggold's explanation? Yes because in #63 mininggold wrote:
"I see you've even resorted to changing my posts in order to try to make YOUR point. But I see you can't refute anything...... again. And that has not been explained. But, Stone has said the hell with it so the hell with it.
#86. To: harrowup (#85) "I see you've even resorted to changing my posts in order to try to make YOUR point. But I see you can't refute anything...... again. They are 99 percent likely the same poster. war never said if he met both of them.
#87. To: A K A Stone, war (#83) If you folks want to go down that route. Please do it on a different thread. I have no intention of posting his pm's and if he wishes to post them he can do so on another thread of his choice. He is a lying blivet. Glad to have helped.[:~)]
#88. To: A K A Stone (#79) I still think I'm right but will probably let it pass. Weasel words! I hope you would at least admit the comment is suspicious? Can you admit that much?
mininggold said at the time, she made a mistake, did you bother to read that far before launching your attack, or just ignore what she said? This wasn't because of your politics which are different then mine.
Then funny you should mention it. Anyone claiming to be an expert is selling something. I brandish my ignorance like a crucifix at vampires. Aaron Bady #89. To: lucysmom (#88) mininggold said at the time, she made a mistake, did you bother to read that far before launching your attack, or just ignore what she said? Of course if you fuck up and are caught you are going to say you made a mistake. Mininggold also said I changed the post. Which is it?
#90. To: lucysmom (#77) Why wasn't mininggold's explanation been included in Stone's "proof" Because he's a loon. That is the post I was referring to earlier up-thread as an explanation - she made a mistake. It's crystal clear to me. Thanks for posting it again for the ace detectives to ponder.
#91. To: A K A Stone, mininggold (#89) Of course if you fuck up and are caught you are going to say you made a mistake. Just think, Stone, if I am even half the bimbo CE says I am, how could I have kept up this deception for so long, across two sites, with so few slip ups? Mininggold also said I changed the post. Which is it?
Ask mininggold. Anyone claiming to be an expert is selling something. I brandish my ignorance like a crucifix at vampires. Aaron Bady #92. To: Fred Mertz (#90) That is the post I was referring to earlier up-thread as an explanation - she made a mistake. It's crystal clear to me. I guess "real conservatives" never make mistakes so it is hard for them to imagine. Anyone claiming to be an expert is selling something. I brandish my ignorance like a crucifix at vampires. Aaron Bady #93. To: lucysmom, Murron, Wood_Chopper, A K A Stone, Fred Mertz, mininggold, war, calcon (#77)
#94. To: harrowup (#69) I did read it and was curious why April 2011 was the time you chose as the epiphany. I travel a lot for business. Now go point out my repeated lies. Thanks. I'll believe that a corporation is a person 1 second after Texas executes one... #95. To: war, A K A Stone (#94) Now go point out my repeated lies. Everyone of your pm's to me were lies and you've already posted them. One can assume your lack of character is well known around here and I guess I don't need to point out to anyone that I've never seen anyone post pm's before and wonder if that is why you have such a guilt complex.
#96. To: harrowup (#93) So what's your point? You know I'm really stupid so you'll have to spell it out in simple terms for me. Anyone claiming to be an expert is selling something. I brandish my ignorance like a crucifix at vampires. Aaron Bady . . . Comments (97 - 188) not displayed. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|