[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"The 2nd Impeachment: Trump’s Popularity Still Scares Them to Death"

"President Badass"

"Jasmine Crockett's Train Wreck Interview Was a Disaster"

"How Israel Used Spies, Smuggled Drones and AI to Stun and Hobble Iran"

There hasn’T been ... a single updaTe To This siTe --- since I joined.

"This Is Not What Authoritarianism Looks Like"

America Erupts… ICE Raids Takeover The Streets

AC/DC- Riff Raff + Go Down [VH1 Uncut, July 5, 1996]

Why is Peter Schiff calling Bitcoin a ‘giant cult’ and how does this impact market sentiment?

Esso Your Butt Buddy Horseshit jacks off to that shit

"The Addled Activist Mind"

"Don’t Stop with Harvard"

"Does the Biden Cover-Up Have Two Layers?"

"Pete Rose, 'Shoeless' Joe Reinstated by MLB, Eligible for HOF"

"'Major Breakthrough': Here Are the Details on the China Trade Deal"

Freepers Still Love war

Parody ... Jump / Trump --- van Halen jump

"The Democrat Meltdown Continues"

"Yes, We Need Deportations Without Due Process"

"Trump's Tariff Play Smart, Strategic, Working"

"Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts"

"Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands

"Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies"

"Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk"

KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel

"Trade should work for America, not rule it"

"The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP"

"How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap"

‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’

Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible"

"Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!"

"If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think"

"Ending EPA Overreach"

Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built

Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew

The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED!

Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing!

Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy?

Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia)

"Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department"

Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent

"Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail"

Any suggestion that the USA and NATO are "Helping" or have ever helped Ukraine needs to be shot down instantly

"Real problem with the Palestinians: Nobody wants them"

ACDC & The Rolling Stones - Rock Me Baby

Magnus Carlsen gives a London System lesson!

"The Democrats Are Suffering Through a Drought of Generational Talent"

7 Tactics Of The Enemy To Weaken Your Faith

Strange And Biblical Events Are Happening

Every year ... BusiesT casino gambling day -- in Las Vegas


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

politics and politicians
See other politics and politicians Articles

Title: Santorum: Birth Control ‘Harmful To Women’
Source: Washington Post
URL Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs ... 012/02/15/gIQASRukFR_blog.html
Published: Feb 15, 2012
Author: Jennifer Rubin
Post Date: 2012-02-15 18:40:04 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 8072
Comments: 32

Yesterday I speculated on some of the reasons Rick Santorum has problems with women voters. This interview from 2006 sure isn’t going to help Subscribe to *Tea Party On Parade*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 29.

#1. To: All (#0)

Rest of the article:

For starters, does he realize that married women (men too!) use birth control? The impression that Santorum finds the prevalent practice of birth control “harmful to women” is, frankly, mind-numbing. If he meant to focus on teen sexual promiscuity, he surely could have, and thereby might have sounded less out of touch.

Now, he qualifies his religious views by saying he doesn’t vote against contraception “because it’s not the taking of a human life” (in other contexts he has emphasized that as a legal matter he has no problem with contraception). But how does that square with his professed belief that a candidate’s values are essential to understanding and predicting his behavior? Perhaps that’s an abortion-only rule. (And really, where are George Stephanopoulos’s questions on this topic when you need them?)

In any event, this sort of thing undermines Santorum’s electability argument. (Current polling match-ups between President Obama and each of the two frontrunners, before the GOP has a nominee and before Santorum’s record is out there, are virtually useless.) This is how, in part, he lost Pennsylvania — by appearing extreme and schoolmarmish, too far to the right of average voters in a purple state. If he is the nominee in 2012, he might get some blue-collar fellows, but what about those women in Ohio, Pennsylvania, etc.? And what about more secularized suburban communities? Fuggedaboutit.

Brian S  posted on  2012-02-15   18:41:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Brian S (#1)

Santorum > Obama

A K A Stone  posted on  2012-02-16   6:46:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: A K A Stone (#3)

Santorum > Obama

Maybe greater, but still not great.

He'd have a team of armed soldiers peeking in windows making sure you weren't getting a blow job.

Biff Tannen  posted on  2012-02-16   10:10:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Biff Tannen (#4)

Maybe greater, but still not great.

He'd have a team of armed soldiers peeking in windows making sure you weren't getting a blow job.

No he wouldn't.

I don't care if people use birth control by the way. But Catholics and other churches shouldn't be forced to buy them.

A K A Stone  posted on  2012-02-16   10:59:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: A K A Stone (#5)

He thinks the US should orient their laws in line with God's laws.

That's the taliban, dude.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHnu1Ibwb5c

Biff Tannen  posted on  2012-02-16   11:31:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Biff Tannen (#10)

He thinks the US should orient their laws in line with God's laws.

That's the taliban, dude.

The Taliban are satanist muslims. That isn't Gods law.

What is wrong with stealing being wrong. That is Gods law.

Murder is also against Gods law.

What laws of God shouldn't we follow?

A K A Stone  posted on  2012-02-16   12:00:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: A K A Stone (#15)

I don't have much of a problem with having to follow God's laws.

I have a huge fucking problem with someone else telling me what God's laws are and forcing me to follow them.

Again, that's the taliban. And that's what this idiot thinks is right, the government being in charge of setting and enforcing God's laws for the citizens.

Biff Tannen  posted on  2012-02-16   12:07:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Biff Tannen (#21)

I have a huge fucking problem with someone else telling me what God's laws are and forcing me to follow them.

God said murder and stealing is wrong. Do you have a problem with the government telling you that.

What we have right now is a left wing kook satanist. Would you rather follow satans law? You can't possibly get a worse president then this pervert in the white house.

Santorum isn't my first second or third or fourth for fifth or hundredth choice. I don't even really like him. But I would pick him over Obama 365 out of 365 days of the year over the dark skinned murderer. I would agree with you if you had someone saying God said no TV. No more TV.

A K A Stone  posted on  2012-02-16   12:12:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: A K A Stone (#23)

I would agree with you if you had someone saying God said no TV. No more TV.

He'd start out saying we're only saying don't murder and steal and he'd end up putting in laws for whatever he thought was right for our sake, in God's name.

That's what they all do after a while, which is why you can't let them get started.

They get power and control mad.

They wouldn't ban TV though, they'd only restrict the shows that could get aired.

Biff Tannen  posted on  2012-02-16   12:36:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 29.

        There are no replies to Comment # 29.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 29.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com