BANNED AT LIBERTYPOST
See other BANNED AT LIBERTYPOST Articles
| Goldi banned censored delete elpee |
Title: Mark Levin calls Gingrich a "has-been", "pseudo-conservative" +more
Source:
Mark Levin
URL Source: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi ... h_as_a_phony_and_has-been.html
Published: Jun 8, 2009
Author: Mark Levin
Post Date: 2012-02-05 10:07:04 by thoughtomator
Keywords: marklevin, gingrich
Views: 5302
Comments: 11
Click the link to hear the audio + Levin's trademark dripping contempt for the man he now supports for President... posting this got me banned at LP, so obviously it hits a major nerve with the Ging-sheep. Mark Levin criticized former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich as a "pseudo-conservative." This was part of a nearly half-an-hour rant on the nationally syndicated "Mark Levin Show." Colin Powell did not escape criticism from Levin, either. Levin castigated him for voting for Obama. "Powell not only voted for him," Levin said, "he announced it on a liberal news outlet." In doing so, "he held off until the last minute to do the maximum damage he could," said Levin. "It was an utter lack of disloyalty and dishonor," Levin added. Levin went on to criticize Gingrich for supporting Colin Powell and told the former speaker he does not know the same Ronald Reagan that he does. Levin accused Gingrich of having too much personal "baggage" and being "undisciplined" when he makes public comments.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: thoughtomator (#0)
You were banned last night, too?
just this morning
The LATE, GREAT PURGE ON LP IS underway. Sally is putting pressure on yukon. Levin is just another run-of-the-mill "Israel-before-America" neocon who does not have the best interests of the United States or the American people in mind.
Welcome to LF, we have no such thing as bannings, posts being removed, time-outs, threads being locked, modified, titles changed, etc. The secret of this aspiring chit-chat forum is we have voted and approved of two moderators that carefully consider all posts and threads as being "hands-off" zones of their respective opinions. In fact, they are so busy handling all the new sign-ons, it is nearly impossible to get their attention. Nope, this chit-chat channel of the Internet is a bubbling, steaming liberty channel with no disagreements perfect harmony of ideas. We are often considered the "Renaissance" of Internet with the continuous theoretical discussions about the concepts of liberty, freedom, rights and human dignity. BTW, What did you say to maggie?
I am sporting an all new tagline in honour of your vigilance.
i guess that only applies to articles about the newt, you can post all the hate articles attacking romney's religion however.
Sally has created all new enemies because of her own hypocrisy. I am fairely sure even her son, yukon is soon to go now. He has been yammering away at maggie for days with his "NAFTA Newt" response. She apparently has him on ignore, but tater .... err ... spuds shall eventually give Sally the greenlight to pull the lever on him.
i understand maggie and tater have gotten together and plan to become lp's version of the old eurotrash group, milli vanilli. i'm assuming tater will be vanilli
yup and also to spreading false rumors about Ron Paul
#2. To: buckeroo (#1)
#3. To: thoughtomator (#0)
#3. To: Marguerite (#0)
removed comment / GL
Slur
yukon posted on 2012-02-05 1:36:11 ET
#4. To: thoughtomator (#0)
#5. To: thoughtomator (#2)
#6. To: thoughtomator (#0)
#12. To: RWTB (#10)
No bonehead.
I'm deleting articles that are OLD/BIASED/MISLEADING posted in breaking news.
For example, today, one was posted in Breaking News that was 3 years old.
Others have biased commentary that is potentially libelous.
I do it all the time...
But it's gotten worse/more noticable since the Liberals here want to undermine any advances made by any Conservative candidate. It happened with Bachman, with Cain, and now with Newt.
I've had enough of people who only come on this site to annoy me, and post liberal crap to see how long it takes me to remove it. I'm not playing that game. This election is important, and I am not playing any favorites.
ANYONE WHO UNDERMINES A CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATE IS AT RISK OF BEING BANNED.
Those who post DECEPTIVE or Liberal, or outdated articles in a dishonest way are immediately banned.
This is a news forum. When a news item is intentially posted, and is polluted with liberal bias, and outright lies, that person who posted it has to go. This isn't the MSM, and I won't tolerate dishonesty in news reporting.
Goldi-Lox posted on 2012-02-05 10:12:50 ET
Man, you and others got her on the warpath this morning. Normally, she is sitting in a synagogue somewhere reading the Talmud.
#7. To: thoughtomator (#2)
just this morning
ANYONE WHO UNDERMINES A CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATE [NEWT GINGRICH]IS AT RISK OF BEING BANNED ~ Goldi-Lox, eternal mad&angry mistress of LP, circa February 5, 2012
#8. To: buckeroo (#6)
ANYONE WHO UNDERMINES A CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATE IS AT RISK OF BEING BANNED.
#9. To: calcon (#8)
ANYONE WHO UNDERMINES A CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATE [NEWT GINGRICH]IS AT RISK OF BEING BANNED ~ Goldi-Lox, eternal mad&angry mistress of LP, circa February 5, 2012
#10. To: buckeroo (#9)
#11. To: calcon (#8)
i guess that only applies to articles about the newt, you can post all the hate articles attacking romney's religion however.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]