[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Mexican Invasion Title: The Invasion of Hispanics in 1993 there were 191 million Whites and 22 million Hispanics, or 89.7% Whites and 10.3% Hispanics, who had a combined homicide rate of 3.6. Do you know of any reason that American Whites should have committed homicide rate higher than mostly White North Dakota or 0.2, or at most Ireland at 0.6? I don't either, but let's be conservative and use 0.6. 89.7% x 0.6 + 10.3% x X = 3.6 0.5382 + .103X = 3.6 .103X = 3.062 X = 29.7 = Homicide rate of Hispanics Such a homicide rate for Hispanics is half their rate in Colombia of 60, but consistent with Venezuela and Los Angeles of 30. Los Angeles is unique because it's the only American city which had the distinction of being the Murder Capitol of the World which wasn't due to blacks--instead, it was due to Hispanics. So you see, most of the "White on White" homicides were actually Hispanic on Hispanic. Just for kicks, here's the calculation if Whites actually have a homicide rate of 0.2: 89.7% x 0.2 + 10.3% x X = 3.6 0.1794 + .103X = 3.6 .103X = 3.42 X = 33.2 = Homicide rate of Hispanics [(191 million x 0.6) + (22 million x 29.7)]/100,000 = 1,146 + 6,534 = 7,680 http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A5619-2001May9.html What does such a dramatic increase in the population of Mexicans, to 7.2% of the American population, mean to the average American? Most people don't even think about it because the facts are concealed from them. You wouldn't known from the media, for example, that the presence of Mexicans already reduces the nation's average SAT scores by 19 points. Most people don't even know that their SAT scores are 131 points lower than Whites and only 86 points higher than blacks. The Bureau of Justice Statistics expertly conceals the fact that they are almost 7 times more likely than Whites and 62% as likely as blacks to be murderers. And the Bureau of Labor Statistics is just as good at concealing that they earn 78% as much as Whites but 27% more than blacks. Why the shell game with Mexicans? In many government statistics, this 7.2% of the American population is counted as "White". The most detailed breakdown by race seems to be when they are included as Hispanics, versus "non-Hispanic White", which conceals the fact that Mexicans have hardly any Hispanic blood in them at all. They are so close to Indians in SAT (426 vs 428) and GRE (475 vs 479) scores, and incomes ($33,750 vs $30,784) that they are clearly Indians, not Hispanics. Those who consider themselves to be "other Hispanics", who are 3.5% of the population, score only 6 SAT points higher than Mexicans and 56 points higher than blacks, compared to 58 points lower than Whites and 86 points lower than Asians, which suggests that the amount of Hispanic blood is low to nonexistent. Spain consistently scores higher than the US in IAEP (432 vs 420, and 495 vs 494 for 9 and 13 year olds), so you would expect that true "Hispanics" would score much closer to Whites than to blacks. If all blacks and Hispanics had SAT verbal scores equivalent to Whites and SAT math scores equivalent to Asians, the nation's average SAT scores would be 51 points higher. If they committed murder at a rate equivalent to Whites, the murder rate would be two thirds lower than it is. If they earned as much as Whites, average incomes would be 8% higher. It can be seen from the following graphs that Mexicans and Indians are not only the same race, but they are a race which is separate and distinct from Caucasoids, Negroids, and Asians. Even though there is no data available regarding their cranial capacity, their incomes, test scores, and crime rates suggest that the cranial capacity of Mexicans should be 1,313 cc's and that for Indians should be 1,314. This puts them in a range which is 3.55% larger than blacks and 3.73% smaller than Whites. This might not seem like a big difference, but it represents 300 million cortical neurons. When you consider the vast differences between Asian, European, Indian, and African societies, these cortical neurons are literally the difference between life versus death, wealth versus poverty, justice versus crime, and technological achievements versus living in mud huts with mud floors. It's the difference between being productive members of an economy, versus being an annual net drain of $128.2 billion as American Mexicans are, and $603 billion as American blacks are. It's the difference between living in a stable society versus living as a refugee, as half the citizens of Liberia now do. Many of the characteristics which distinguish one of the hundreds of species of snakes, or one of the 32,000 species of orchids, from one another almost require a microscope to detect. But the characteristics of human "races" which distinguish one from another stick out like a sore thumb. Nobody has any trouble identifying a Negroid, nor an Asian, nor a White European (Caucasoid), nor an Indian [American style]. These four groups [at least four] are SO different from one another other that it's literally misleading to call them "races". These four different "races" should be considered by biologists to be four different species. Mexicans have a 3.5% larger cranial capacity than blacks, Indians have an almost identical cranial capacity to Indians, Whites have a 3.7% larger cranial capacity than Indians and Mexicans, and Asians have a 3.8% larger cranial capacity than Whites. So what? Well, having a few hundred million extra cortical neurons helps quite a bit when doing standardized tests. Mexicans score 13.3% higher in SAT and 14.2% higher in GRE than blacks. Indians score almost identical to Mexicans.Whites score 14.5% and 12.7%, respectively, higher than Mexicans, and Asians score 5.7% and 10.5% higher than Whites. All of this helps to become more productive members of economies. Mexicans earn 26.8% more than blacks, Indians earn just about as much as Mexicans, Whites earn 40.6% more than Indians, and Asians earn 12.3% more than Whites. It also has a serious impact on social skills. Mexicans are half as likely to be murderers as blacks, Indians are just about equal to Mexicans as murderers, Whites are 1/7th as likely as Indians or Mexicans to be murderers, and Asians are 1/10th as likely as Whites to be murderers. The relative incarceration rates suggest that these proportions apply across the board to all crimes. If you added up the economic value of all of the characteristics which distinguish 32,000 different species of orchids from one another and hundreds of different species of snakes, they would have a value which is far less than that of one single one of these differences in characteristics between one single "race". Ignoring that point is a very costly proposition. From: "hengist" Date: Thu May 10, 2001 10:42 am Subject: Mexican Invasion: not just your border states anymore Mexican Invasion: not just your border states anymore Mexico To Push US To Legalize Illegal Immigrants (reader) Mexican population in Jersey triples Arizona: State's Hispanic population shows growth overwhelmingly Mexican Latin melting pot (taco tray?): Mexicans lead U.S. Hispanic gains Hispanic growth in U.S. led by Mexicans Wisconson: Mexican growth in state spurs overall Hispanic flood Mexican governor feels at home in Wisconsin Sharp Increase in Mexicans Shifting Portrait of U.S. "Hispanics" U.S. capital among new areas of immigrant influx MEXICO CITY (AP) - Communist Legislators on Tuesday accused President Vicente Fox's administration of being too friendly with the United States and damaging Mexico's long-standing relationship with Cuba. Mexicans to Reconquer the U.S.? - by James E. Garcia, AlterNet The following is from an email I received just the other day. "Dear Mr. Garcia, the illegal immigration invasion originating from Mexico is cancerous and anti-American ... Mexican nationalists on both sides of the border, are working very, very hard for what they refer to as 'La Reconquista' or the take-back of land that 'rightfully belongs to Mexico and was stolen by the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848.'" In the 1930s, President Roosevelt ordered hundreds of thousands of Mexican immigrants, and even some Mexican Americans, shipped on freight trains to Mexico.... "there is no secret guerrilla army of Chicano militants plotting revenge.." American Patrol has been labeled a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center, a national group that tracks such organizations....President Bush celebrated Cinco de Mayo on the White House lawn last week and delivered his first radio address to the nation in Spanish. Apparently, the overthrow has already begun. The aggregate SAT math and verbal scores for all races and sexes in the US is 459 and 418, respectively. If all Americans had the math skills of Asians and the verbal skills of Whites, SAT scores would be 59 and 31 points higher, or 518 and 449. If all Americans had the math skills of Asian men and the verbal skills of White men, SAT scores would be 83 and 35 points higher, or 542 and 453. If all blacks had the math skills of Asians and the verbal skills of Whites, SAT scores would be 18 and 13 points higher than they are. If all Mexicans did, scores would be 7 and 5 points higher. If all Hispanics did they would be 11 and 8 points higher. If all blacks, all Hispanics, and all Indians did they would be 30 and 22 points higher. In other words, this invasion by Hispanics is bound to decrease the quality of education and economic productivity considerably--but not nearly as much as the invasion by blacks already has. Blacks are a net negative contributor to the tax base. SAT Scores by race http://nces.ed.gov/pubs/ce/c9622d02.html Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: All (#0)
I don't agree with everything in this article. But it is interesting.
Why do you hate Hispanics, honey?
Cause they're inbred hicks. anymore questions?
Free David Irving!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Free Gotovina!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Free Eric Rudolph!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You seem to be full of hate too, what the hell is eating you?
I don't hate hispanics. I just want the illegals rounded up and shipped back to Mexico. Where they belong.
Third world countries are 3rd world for a reason. Mexico could be just as prosperous as America use to be if they would just put God first.
You sure got that right Ricky.
I'm full of humor.
Free David Irving!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Free Gotovina!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Free Eric Rudolph!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
What if they're from Guatamala?
I think all the illegals should be deported. Even if from Britain. Wherever. We can't let happen to us what happened to the Indians.
Superstition is half their problem. Overpopulation is the other half, which increases in direct proportion to superstition. Ok, corruption plays a part too, maybe 40%, which knocks superstition down to 10%, with overpopulation still being half the problem.
Damn those poor Mexicans, they're behind all this? Because it seemed like we had laws in place already to prevent illegal immigration...sneaky bastards just sneaked into the Halls Of Justice and changed all our laws in the dead of night, eh? That's funny, it shows moxie, how can I become one of them?
Our so called leaders are also the problem. No doubt.
The problem.
|
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|