Title: Lets Name The Bad Bad People Of The Internet! Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Dec 28, 2011 Author:A K A Stone Post Date:2011-12-28 18:56:35 by A K A Stone Keywords:None Views:97627 Comments:156
There are a lot of asshole douche bags on the internet. I will start naming them soon and some of the reasons why they are internet assholes/douchebags.
Douches only post on other sites. So don't talk crap about anyone here. :)
What you dismiss is the management of the LP forum over&above Tater. It is not his fault he is a loose canon; he is allowed to be that way from Sally@LP.
The place is a wreck and needs more prolific posters. I was banned years ago because of my incendiary opinions concerning our nation's borders; on LP, the last time I saw the threads) the LP Kloughns despise Ron Paul.
You are a poster on LP, correct? Go there, tell them your astute opinions.
I have a nine year old niece who has better debating skills.
Seriously, why don't you ever discuss issues? It seems that you can't discuss anything except other posters. You have to make it personal, or you can't compete. Hell, you can't even engage without making it personal.
That's just embarrassing! You're a grown man for Christ's sake.
We The People posted on 2011-07-30 17:18:28 ET Reply Trace
You can't harass mommy's little boy without consequences. Or, evidently you can't try to get him to stop the kid stuff and discuss issues. That's a major infraction.
I have a nine year old niece who has better debating skills.
Seriously, why don't you ever discuss issues? It seems that you can't discuss anything except other posters. You have to make it personal, or you can't compete. Hell, you can't even engage without making it personal.
That's just embarrassing! You're a grown man for Christ's sake.
Wow...banned for such a civil and non-confrontational statement of fact?
No name calling, just a simple rebuttal?
Goldi is anything but consistent in her treatment of posters there.
Just recently, Goldi has limited my posting to 5 per day for supposedly posting too many pro-Ron Paul articles. I posted perhaps 3, all from MSM news sources.
I've stated over and over and over and over until I'm sick and tired of writing it.
I do NOT want a zillion BS articles on LP about RPaul. ACTUAL NEWS ONLY.
You ignored me.
Thus, since you suffer from the delusion that your s**t doesn't stink...that you are "special" and can do whatever you want, whenever you want, whereever you want....now you have to wake up to reality. YOU are WRONG. You are worse than a cult member, O stinky poo!
RP article explosions are NOT tolerated here.
NOT HERE.
Post your BS on RPaul someplace else. WE DON'T WANT TO READ IT OR SEE IT!!!
You either adhere to the rules here, or you lose privileges. Been stated. Over and over.
So quit your bitchin and MAN UP!
Goldi-Lox posted on 2011-12-16 14:13:00 ET ReplyTrace
Unless a candidate freaks and rips off his/ her clothes, then does something unusual...there should NEVER BE MORE THAN 2 ARTICLES PER CANDIDATE PER DAY...FROM A RELIABLE NEWS SOURCE.
Henceforth, until the election, NO BLOGS ON PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES.
Goldi-Lox posted on 2011-12-15 16:15:57 ET ReplyTrace
Apparently the same rules don't apply to the Gatlins, and Byteshredders there...they post from blogs, liberal sources, Stormfront and other dubious sites, spamming the site with these articles in direct violation of Goldi's edict.
What she really meant to say was that any articles that are positive about Ron Paul, any articles that are not blatant hit-pieces or any posts that stick to FACTS about Ron Paul will NOT be allowed, but if you want to post slurs, lies, disinformation, play the racist and anti-Semite "cards", post childish and obscene graphics and completely disregard her rules of civility...then you have free reign.
Just like good little liberals, they think that they are special, that the rules are for other people, or so they believe.
Tell you what...I'd love to draw the good posters away from there, and bring them here, and let the dumbasses stew in their own juices over there.
That would be fine with me. One drawback to that idea is the fact that there is no private mail at that site, which might make it difficult to "recruit" others to come here.
That would be fine with me. One drawback to that idea is the fact that there is no private mail at that site, which might make it difficult to "recruit" others to come here.
Any ideas?
I'd say, let's just make this one fine forum, and they will come automatically.
"Build it and they will come".
Hopefully. I think Refinersfire just signed up recently. Hopefully others will follow.
I'd say, let's just make this one fine forum, and they will come automatically.
LF is genuinely improving. The quality of posts by those who are here day-to-day have genuinely showed original character and startling comments from respective individual perspectives.
Stone has even "loosened up" which has been rare. Maybe some of the earlier posters will come back stimulating unique perspectives from across the political spectrum again.
