[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Historical Title: comments posted poll now at Yes 86%, here's some of he comments posted Looks like a prelude to another fine year; Remember the Ides of March! Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 11. I spent some time reading the comments of people at LP over the last couple of days and my how it has changed. As a person who spent many years posting on that site who now hardly has the time to read political forums much less post on them, the change appears stark. It's become a haven for authoritarian leftists and police state Republicans. A Free Republic clone. A far cry from the early days when it was a small government political forum. Sally has finally shown her true colors by allowing those people to take over. As an aside, I find it interesting how much LP's authoritarian leftists have in common with LP's police state Republicans. From the posts I've read they side with each other on just about everything. What gets me is how people who find themselves in agreement on a regular basis with a known Democrat/authoritarian leftist like harrowup can call themselves conservative. There is nothing conservative about their big government views.
#8. To: Fibr Dog (#1) As an aside, I find it interesting how much LP's authoritarian leftists have in common with LP's police state Republicans. From the posts I've read they side with each other on just about everything. What gets me is how people who find themselves in agreement on a regular basis with a known Democrat/authoritarian leftist like harrowup can call themselves conservative. There is nothing conservative about their big government views. They pretend to be conservatives, and it's been that way for quite a long time now. They call themselves conservatives, yet they reject almost every core conservative principle you could list. And that makes perfect sense to them.
#9. To: We The People (#8) They pretend to be conservatives, and it's been that way for quite a long time now. I don't pretend anything.
They call themselves conservatives, yet they reject almost every core conservative principle you could list. And that makes perfect sense to them. As Republicans go they're conservative. As Americans they are core loyalists unlike your anarchist cohorts.
#10. To: harrowup (#9) I don't pretend anything. LOL! It is only your exaggerated sense of self importance that makes you think that I was speaking about you. I wasn't. As Republicans go they're conservative. As Americans they are core loyalists unlike your anarchist cohorts. You're an idiot. Now go argue with the other idiots and leave me to speak with the adults.
#11. To: We The People (#10) LOL! It is only your exaggerated sense of self importance that makes you think that I was speaking about you. Fibr Dog mentioned me incorrectly as a leader of the pack which is ridiculous. My role at LP is simply what it is. An attempt to put a little humor into a nasty mix of mostly crazy Paultards. My role here is simply to point out how despicable you and your lying thugs are. You're such a diva.
Replies to Comment # 11. #12. To: harrowup (#11) (Edited) Fibr Dog mentioned me incorrectly as a leader of the pack which is ridiculous. I-don't-care. The fact that you think you have a 'role' to play, rather than simply exchanging ideas and conversation, speaks for itself. Now please, focus your 'role' in another direction.
#14. To: we the people (#11) a nasty mix of mostly crazy Paultards. that's the straw dog, the statist use to pretend they're conservatives, they harp on ron paul but are the first to say he has a less then 0 chance getting the nominal. no matter what foul crap they do, it's always because of fighting the herds of paultard. what a bunch of assclowns
#21. To: harrowup (#11) a nasty mix of mostly crazy Paultards. My role here is simply to point out how despicable you and your lying thugs are. I find your generalization more than a little hypocritical. In fact, you're a lying bag of shit. You call the movement to limit the government, get rid of the police-state tactics and return to REAL money "despicable." Which means YOU want the police-state, fiat money and a nanny-state government. This logically infers that you are, in fact, a statist, exactly what you were originally described as, and you denied. Check-mate, ass-hole.
#49. To: harrowup (#11) Fibr Dog mentioned me incorrectly as a leader of the pack which is ridiculous. Nowhere did I state that you were the leader of anything. Nor did I infer it. What I stated was, "What gets me is how people who find themselves in agreement on a regular basis with a known Democrat/authoritarian leftist like harrowup can call themselves conservative. There is nothing conservative about their big government views." and "No he's not a conservative. He's an admitted Democrat. I remember him from FR. He was pro-big government and pro-police state so RimJob allowed him to stick around while he was banning conservatives who refused to perform verbal fellatio on the (then) Republican controlled federal government. That is my point. The police state Republicans on LP claim to be conservative yet appear to agree with every position harrowup has, which begs the question how are they conservative?" I see nothing in my comments that indicate you lead anything. Truth be told, I placed my focus more upon the police state Republicans that agree with your leftist positions than I did you. You were nothing more than a tool I used to provide an example of the falseness of their claims of being conservative.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 11. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|