[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
New World Order Title: Obama lawyers: Citizens targeted if at war with US WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. citizens are legitimate military targets when they take up arms with al-Qaida, top national security lawyers in the Obama administration said Thursday. The lawyers were asked at a national security conference about the CIA killing of Anwar al-Awlaki, a U.S. citizen and leading al-Qaida figure. He died in a Sept. 30 U.S. drone strike in the mountains of Yemen. The government lawyers, CIA counsel Stephen Preston and Pentagon counsel Jeh Johnson, did not directly address the al-Awlaki case. But they said U.S. citizens do not have immunity when they are at war with the United States. Johnson said only the executive branch, not the courts, is equipped to make military battlefield targeting decisions about who qualifies as an enemy. The courts in habeas cases, such as those involving whether a detainee should be released from the Guantanamo Bay detention facility in Cuba, make the determination of who can be considered an enemy combatant. Late last year, a judge threw out a lawsuit filed by al-Awlaki's father, saying that the courts do not have the authority to review military decisions by the president aimed at protecting the country from terrorists. The cleric's father, Nasser al-Awlaki of Yemen, was suing to prevent the U.S. from targeting his son. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 10. Your pal, GWBush set the stage for this crap with his beloved US Patriot Act. It only gets worse and worse.
#3. To: buckeroo (#1) This ain't shit compared to every single American's medical record being kept in the DC database that your boy Barry is compiling for ObamaCare.
#4. To: Happy Quanzaa (#3) This ain't shit compared to every single American's medical record being kept in the DC database that your boy Barry is compiling for ObamaCare. How do you propose medical treatments, products, drugs, hospitals, and doctors be evaluated? The problem with the Depuy hip replacement was identified in Europe because they have a registry. We were alerted to the problem because they kept records. Turns out the device has a failure rate of 29%; and 40,000 have been used in the US. Not only does that mean precious medical resources needlessly used to remove and replace the faulty device, but human beings undergoing the risk of surgery and and the down time of recovery. How do human beings make good choices in the free market without good information?
#6. To: lucysmom (#4) How do you propose medical treatments, products, drugs, hospitals, and doctors be evaluated? I would propose the private doctors keep that information if the patient wants that information shared. This is an obvious constitutional violation. The document that liberals pretend to love but obviously hate. Checkmate you lose. “ The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. ”
#8. To: A K A Stone (#6) “ The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. ” How does a medical registry violate the above? How do you feel about your doctor sharing your medical records with your insurance provider, and your insurance provider sharing the details of your medical history with their Indian cohorts?
#10. To: lucysmom (#8) How does a medical registry violate the above? the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects,
Replies to Comment # 10. How does a medical registry violate the above? That answers the question "what?", I'm asking how.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 10. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|