Other
See other Other Articles
Title: I want to know your thoughts
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Nov 17, 2011
Author: A K A Stone
Post Date: 2011-11-17 09:54:55 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 75521
Comments: 102
I want to know your thoughts.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-36) not displayed.
.
.
.
#37. To: Capitalist Eric (#35)
dingbat, you are the ultimate in hypocrisy, on this forum.
There you go again.
Perhaps someday you'll lean the difference between debate and a temper tantrum.
Wall Street owns the country…Our laws are the output of a system which clothes rascals in robes and honesty in rags. The [political] parties lie to us and the political speakers mislead us…Money rules. Mary Elizabeth Lease, 1890
#38. To: mininggold (#36)
You proved nothing, you refused to show the evidence or else you would have been able to post from LP. If you truly got bounced it's because YOU deserved it.
You're a lying cunt, as I proved. I'd post the links- again- but it's really beside the point...
You're a lying bitch. I proved it, you KNOW it, and that's the end of the story.
DUMMY DwarF: ...I'm eating a meatball...
Capitalist Eric: Foreplay before the president's staff?
"Whenver the dwarf sees something negative about a Democrat, he tries to change the topic of the thread to something else. Usually a personal attack, followed by mutterings about correct 'grammar' 'spelling' whatever. Anything he can think of to avoid a discussion about a Democrat screwing up or looking bad. It's a decade long pattern." --Badeye observation--
#39. To: Capitalist Eric (#38)
You're a lying cunt, as I proved. I'd post the links- again- but it's really beside the point...You're a lying bitch. I proved it, you KNOW it, and that's the end of the story.
All you have to do is post from LP.
"ROTFLMAO... Perfect! She longs... for someone to Teabag her. a man that squats on top of a women's face and lowers his genitals into her mouth during sex, known as "teabagging" She aches for it"... ~~~JWpegler. Head Tea Bagger and Tea Party supporter extraordinaire, explicitly expressing his fantasies in public about other posters.
#40. To: mininggold (#39)
It's beside the point.
You claimed I was banned. You lied.
I opused out. I not only told you, I LINKED to it.
No amount of twisting will change the fact that YOU LIED, AND I PROVED IT.
DUMMY DwarF: ...I'm eating a meatball...
Capitalist Eric: Foreplay before the president's staff?
"Whenver the dwarf sees something negative about a Democrat, he tries to change the topic of the thread to something else. Usually a personal attack, followed by mutterings about correct 'grammar' 'spelling' whatever. Anything he can think of to avoid a discussion about a Democrat screwing up or looking bad. It's a decade long pattern." --Badeye observation--
#41. To: mininggold (#29)
You didn't ask for constructive criticism, you asked for poster's thoughts.Looks like you were either lying again or looking for lame excuses to ban the few that are left.
I'm not looking to ban anyone. I'm trying to make it clear that constantly attacking the host is no longer acceptable.
That when a member comes in and makes a comment. That going straight to calling people names is no longer acceptable.
If you want to say to someone that they are a dumbass because they think that the Citizens United case was decided incorrectly. That is still ok.
I don't agree with your politics. But if people behaved like you do they would never get 1 day suspensions. You like Lucy can be tough but you don't go to far with the insults.
Hope you understand where I am coming from. I also think that you would like the forum better if there was more debate and less personal attacks.
I know I am guilty of the same thing. I admit that. But I am looking for a more serious place to discuss issues now.
Have a good day.
#42. To: Capitalist Eric (#38)
You're a lying cunt, as I proved. I'd post the links- again- but it's really beside the point...You're a lying bitch. I proved it, you KNOW it, and that's the end of the story.
Eric you can get your point across without calling her the C word.
I think I might enact the filter for a while.
#43. To: buckeroo (#25)
Stone doesn't reveal much data about himself other than the JEWS are the GREATEST PEOPLE on the Planet and he wants to become a RICH_MAN because he believes that heaven shall open up for him.How come Stone has never introduced his wife or resume to HIS own channel? IS he hiding stuff?
The Jews were the chosen people. That doesn't mean that today they are the greatest. I think that they have a right to Israel though.
Yes I am hiding stuff. My identity. Someone might want to harm me for some of the things I have said.
#44. To: A K A Stone (#43)
The Jews were the chosen people.
They claim that perspective, don't they? But, is it because of being a culture based on religious creeds and precedents or because they wrote the parts of the Bible called the Torah?
That doesn't mean that today they are the greatest.
So, what does it mean? They are not humbled for crucifying Jesus Christ? Because he is denounced as the coming messiah?
I think that they have a right to Israel though.
Why? Because they say so? Because the make-believe UN gave them a sense of sovereignty? Isn't that like a thief or rapist that wants to steal into your house and commit massive sexual practices on your wife?
#45. To: buckeroo (#44)
But, is it because of being a culture based on religious creeds and precedents or because they wrote the parts of the Bible called the Torah?
Hi Buck.
I believe that the Bible is from God. Jews used their fingers to write it, but it was inspired by God. That is what I believe.
Is it ok for me to believe that?
#46. To: buckeroo (#44)
So, what does it mean?
It means that they were chosen for God to deliver his message to the world through.
#47. To: buckeroo (#44)
They are not humbled for crucifying Jesus Christ? Because he is denounced as the coming messiah?
They are probably not humbled.
Remember this though. Didn't Jesus say that he gave his life freely? Wasn't that his purpose here? If that hadn't happened would there be any grace?
Since you apparently aren't a believer, you will probably not understand where I am coming from.
#48. To: buckeroo (#44)
Why? Because they say so? Because the make-believe UN gave them a sense of sovereignty? Isn't that like a thief or rapist that wants to steal into your house and commit massive sexual practices on your wife?
Just because the UN (satan) recognized them. Doesn't mean that they created Israel. Say the UN declared Israel a nation. Without the Jews on the ground fighting for the land (and buying it too) that resolution would be meaningless.
And no it is not like a thief or rapist.
We aren't going to solve anything to do with Israel.
What is going to happen is going to happen. We're just going to have to sit back and see what happens.
#49. To: A K A Stone (#45)
I believe that the Bible is from God. Jews used their fingers to write it, but it was inspired by God. That is what I believe.
What Bible? THE CATHOLIC VULGATE HELD IN SECRET FOR A THOUSAND YEARS as the priests had their way with women exerting their POWER (350-1350) OR THE GUTENBERG BIBLE BY ERASAMUS (1455)?
Which one do you prefer? Or do you enjoy someone else's interpretation?
#50. To: A K A Stone (#46)
It means that they were chosen for God to deliver his message to the world through.
How do you really KNOW that?
#51. To: A K A Stone (#47)
Since you apparently aren't a believer, you will probably not understand where I am coming from.
Why should I believe in a myth? How did Jesus' mother Mary give birth to Jesus if she didn't have sex with a man? You believe in faerie tales.
#52. To: buckeroo (#49)
Which one do you prefer? Or do you enjoy someone else's interpretation?
I have always used the King James Bible. Not that I am an expert (You folks claim I claim to be an expert, but i've made no such claim) but I haven't found any contradictions or errors in it.
There is an article here by cz82 that talks about the Geneva Bible. I am going to take a look at it and see what differences there are.
I don't trust the NIV version because I have found many contradictions. If it is truly the word of God there should be no contradictions.
Now a question for you buckeroo.
Do you think there is a God?
If so do you think that the Bible could actually be his word?
#53. To: A K A Stone (#48)
Without the Jews on the ground fighting for the land (and buying it too) that resolution would be meaningless.
They aren't buying anything. They just TAKE IT!
#54. To: buckeroo (#50)
t means that they were chosen for God to deliver his message to the world through.How do you really KNOW that?
Throughtout history many people have tried to destroy the Bible. It didn't happen though.
If you read from Genesis it promises a Messiah to come.
If you continue reading the scriptures you will see that Jesus was born and fulfilled many things that were prophesied to happen.
That is the short version.
Remember that it takes faith too.
#55. To: A K A Stone (#52)
but I haven't found any contradictions or errors in it.
How could you if that is all you read?
Do you think there is a God?
Who cares.
#56. To: A K A Stone (#54)
Throughtout history many people have tried to destroy the Bible. It didn't happen though.
What "Bible" are you talking about? Are you out of your freakin' mind?
#57. To: buckeroo (#51)
Why should I believe in a myth?
You said you believed in evolution. That is a myth. There has never been a person born without the seed of a man and a woman. So how do you explain that from an evolutionary perspective?
#58. To: buckeroo (#51)
How did Jesus' mother Mary give birth to Jesus if she didn't have sex with a man?
It was a miracle. You will have to take it on faith.
If you take the other teachings found in the Bible. Use that as your foundation. It isn't hard to believe that if there really is a God and he created us that he could have impregnated Mary supernaturally.
#59. To: buckeroo (#55)
Do you think there is a God?Who cares.
I care buckeroo. I am interested in what you believe and why you believe it.
We argue a lot. But I see that you are a patriot and care about important issues.
#60. To: buckeroo (#56)
What "Bible" are you talking about? Are you out of your freakin' mind?
The original Greek and Hebrew texts. Which our English version was translated from. Just as God said he would do in the Bible.
Look Buck it is what I believe. If you don't then that is your business.
I'm not an expert on this subject and I'm sure there are others who could answer these questions far better than I could.
#61. To: A K A Stone (#57)
You said you believed in evolution. That is a myth
I never said I "believed" in evolution. Evolutionary Theory is a FACT if you care to consider the elements of not just mankind's existence but all species. But you are too concerned with your eternal battle of Christians vs. Muslims to get your head out of your ass to look around.
What is a myth to you? Adam and Eve eating a apple off the tree of knowledge? Or is that FACT?
#62. To: buckeroo (#55)
How could you if that is all you read?
Because the text does not contradict itself. Like the NIV does.
#63. To: buckeroo (#61)
never said I "believed" in evolution. Evolutionary Theory is a FACT if you care to consider the elements of not just mankind's existence but all species. But you are too concerned with your eternal battle of Christians vs. Muslims to get your head out of your ass to look around.What is a myth to you? Adam and Eve eating a apple off the tree of knowledge? Or is that FACT?
Buckeroo evolution isn't a fact just because you proclaim it to be. It is a laughable discredited theory.
It isn't the purpose of Christians to battle Muslims.
On Adam and Eve eating an apple. That is not a fact.
It doesn't mention the fruit specifically.
#64. To: buckeroo (#61)
Evolutionary Theory is a FACT
You just contradicted yourself. A theory is not the definition of a fact.
#65. To: A K A Stone (#60)
The original Greek and Hebrew texts. Which our English version was translated from. Just as God said he would do in the Bible.
What makes YOU think that even those versions are close to correct? Since you are so well read on Biblical scriptures, where was anyone during Jesus' stay on the planet writing anything about him? There was no documentation until after the crucifixion and that means, the stuff is from someone's foggy memory.
And the same goes for the Torah ( The old testament) which is just a chronology of" begating" this and that person within Jewish folklore. Just like the laffable story of Abraham and Sarah fucking at 100 years old and having a child.
#66. To: A K A Stone (#63)
It is a laughable discredited theory.
By who? YOU?
#67. To: buckeroo (#65)
What makes YOU think that even those versions are close to correct?
Many scholars have read them and confirmed it.
Do you think that those versions were faked?
#68. To: buckeroo (#66)
It is a laughable discredited theory.By who? YOU?
By the majority of Americans.
#69. To: A K A Stone (#63)
It isn't the purpose of Christians to battle Muslims.
So why do you make that issue a strong central theme of your posts and articles?
#70. To: buckeroo (#65)
There was no documentation until after the crucifixion and that means, the stuff is from someone's foggy memory.
The bible documented it.
I'm not sure about your claim that there was no other documentation beforehand.
#71. To: A K A Stone (#68)
By the majority of Americans.
My GOD, man, those assholes can't even vote with careful exercise of principled judgment when given a choice to wave their chad wands on a card.
#72. To: A K A Stone (#70)
The bible documented it.
What Bible are you blabbering about?
#73. To: buckeroo (#69)
So why do you make that issue a strong central theme of your posts and articles?
Actually I don't.
When asked about it I tell you what I think.
I think Israel is for the Jews given to them by God with certain conditions.
So I do support Israels right to exist.
So I believe there is a God and Israel is in his end times plan.
That doesn't mean they need the United States tax money for that plan to be fulfilled. So I don't support any foreign aid save some humanitarian assistance from time to time to help people in natural disasters.
#74. To: buckeroo (#71)
My GOD, man, those assholes can't even vote with careful exercise of principled judgment when given a choice to wave their chad wands on a card.
I really can't argue with that Buck. But that doesn't mean the majority is wrong about everything.
#75. To: buckeroo (#72)
What Bible are you blabbering about?
I use the King James version. But all the versions document it.
#76. To: A K A Stone (#70)
I'm not sure about your claim that there was no other documentation beforehand.
Let us look at Exodus in the Old Testament or the Jewish Torah. What makes you think all that stuff about Moses is true? The Egyptians have no documentation collaborating the myth, yet Ramses was proficient at documentation with his Egyptian priests.
#77. To: buckeroo (#76)
et us look at Exodus in the Old Testament or the Jewish Torah. What makes you think all that stuff about Moses is true?
Becuase it's in the Bible and also this
Biblical Archaeology - Red Sea Video: Remains of Pharoahs Chariots Found
I know you can't see video sometimes. But google it and read about it. Watch the video when you get a chance. That is if you want to.
.
.
.
Comments (78 - 102) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]