politics and politicians
See other politics and politicians Articles
Title: Ron Paul Second Only To Romney In Obama Match Up
Source:
Infowars
URL Source: http://www.infowars.com/ron-paul-se ... y-to-romney-in-obama-match-up/
Published: Nov 9, 2011
Author: Steve Watson
Post Date: 2011-11-09 14:33:02 by Hondo68
Ping List: *Ron Paul for President* Subscribe to *Ron Paul for President*
Keywords: None
Views: 5838
Comments: 12
Congressman Ron Paul has once again been proven a top tier presidential candidate in a new aggregate survey combining poll results from over twelve different mainstream sources. The comprehensive survey, compiled by Real Clear Politics, reveals that Paul is second only to Mitt Romney when directly pitted against Obama. The RCP survey draws results from polls carried out by Quinnipiac, Rasmussen Reports, Democracy Corps (D), Associated Press, Time, PPP, NBC News, Wall Street Journal, CNN, Washington Post, Reuters and Gallup. Paul scores an average of 41.6% to Obama’s 47.6%, with only Romney bettering that 6% difference. The results of the survey were as follows: 1. Obama vs. Romney: 46.0 (D) 44.3 (R) – Obama +1.7 2. Obama vs. Paul: 47.6 (D) 41.6 (R) – Obama +6 3. Obama vs. Cain: 48.6 (D) 41.2 (R) – Obama +7.4 4. Obama vs. Huntsman: 45.7 (D) 37.0 (R) – Obama +8.7 5. Obama vs. Perry: 49.6 (D) 40.4 (R) – Obama +9.3 6. Obama vs. Gingrich: 48.7 (D) 38.0 (R) – Obama +10.7 7. Obama vs. Bachmann: 51.8 (D) 37.6 (R) – Obama +14.2 Paul vs Obama would represent the establishment’s worst nightmare on every front. These surveys yet again demonstrate that Ron Paul is a competitive candidate, despite what the mainstream media would have us believe. Even without the corporate media-promotion and general name recognition, Ron Paul is competitively matched against the President. The ‘Ron Paul can’t win hoax’ is yet again dispelled by statistical numbers. As we have previously noted, Ron Paul has to look to attracting supporters away from Romney, who is fairing well among moderate/liberal Republicans. It is for this reason that Obama aides have openly admitted they would prefer not to run against Romney. Of course, in line with their corporate media mouthpieces, the White House is still pretending Ron Paul doesn’t exist. Speaking of corporate mouthpieces, a hilarious situation ensued earlier this week when Bill O’Reilly decided to throw a GOP straw poll on his National Town Hall Radio show. When Ron Paul finished up the winner, O’Reilly read out the results, omitting the Congressman’s name and declaring that he had disqualified Paul from the poll for being too popular. O’Reilly claimed that Paul supporters had “slammed” the poll, giving a bumbling technical description comprised of “we have technology guys, we know what you are doing.” O’Reilly went on to declare that Ron Paul “…is not going to be the nominee, there’s no chance in the world that he will be nominated for the Republican run at President Obama.” Listen below:
Subscribe to *Ron Paul for President*
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: hondo68 (#0)
If you guys had half a brain you'd go with Huntsman. But you don't, so you won't.
"Herman Cain's Jobs plan doesn't involve giving you a job. It involves you giving him one... "
Why?
But you don't, so you won't. You're a liberal. We would never vote for the candidate some Obama supporter suggests.
He could beat Obama. He's got ideas, is articulate, and has some stature. He could draw in the independents who are scared shitless of the current crop of crazies out there.
"Herman Cain's Jobs plan doesn't involve giving you a job. It involves you giving him one... "
I'm an independent. You're an idiot. Keep going with your gut, Stone, and it will be four more years of Obama.
"Herman Cain's Jobs plan doesn't involve giving you a job. It involves you giving him one... "
You support Obama. You have been rude lately. Your posting privileges reflect that.
He sucks on illegal immigration, he's a flat taxer, he called for federal stimulus in 08 and is much too moderate in general. Conservatives would never support him.
Ron Paul will NOT win the GOP nomination. More importantly, the latest poll has Paul at 18%, Obama at 44% and Romney at 32% in a three way race. Perot decimated clueless, RINO Bush in 92. I want Paul to decimate clueless RINO Romney next year. Maybe then, the retarded GOP establishment might understand that there are people who really care about the future of this country. On second thought, the GOP is to stupid to understand anything at all... So, they need to be replaced...
No offense Skip Intro, but you deserved that. As a matter of fact, the lack of respect and simple human decency here is why I don't post much. And if the rest of you have so much contempt for the site owner and his views, why don't you post elsewhere? Coming here with all you spoiled children, trying to out do the other to see who can be the most disrespectful, is like walking into some idiotic, drunken frat party. Grow the fuck up.
Huntsman just said that he agrees, there are banks too big to fail, yet he's against the bailouts. ??
As a matter of fact, the lack of respect and simple human decency here is why I don't post much. And if the rest of you have so much contempt for the site owner and his views, why don't you post elsewhere? Coming here with all you spoiled children, trying to out do the other to see who can be the most disrespectful, is like walking into some idiotic, drunken frat party. Grow the fuck up. HEAR HEAR! Well stated. These pricks and self-proclaimed "independents" routinely rip and ridicule their host and his views... then whine "CENSORSHIP!!" when he's had enough of their puerile hypocrisy. They display the typical liberal-Leftist entitlement.
That too, but Huntsman is fundamentally a Dem in RINO clothing and an effete statist tool. Of course LF's liberals would endorse his ilk.
#2. To: Skip Intro (#1)
If you guys had half a brain you'd go with Huntsman.
#3. To: Skip Intro (#1)
If you guys had half a brain you'd go with Huntsman.
#4. To: We The People (#2)
(Edited)
Why?
#5. To: A K A Stone (#3)
You're a liberal.
#6. To: Skip Intro (#5)
I'm an independent. You're an idiot
#7. To: Skip Intro (#4)
He could beat Obama. He's got ideas, is articulate, and has some stature. He could draw in the independents who are scared shitless of the current crop of crazies out there.
#8. To: hondo68 (#0)
(Edited)
In general, the art of government consists of taking as much money as possible from one party of the citizens to give to the other. - Voltaire (1764)
#9. To: A K A Stone, Skip Intro, All (#6)
You have been rude lately. Your posting privileges reflect that.
#10. To: Skip Intro (#4)
(Edited)
#11. To: We The People, A K A Stone, Skip Intro, All (#9)
No offense Skip Intro, but you deserved that.
#12. To: We The People (#7)
He sucks on illegal immigration, he's a flat taxer, he called for federal stimulus in 08 and is much too moderate in general. Conservatives would never support him.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]