Corrupt Government
See other Corrupt Government Articles
Title: Serial Bitching: Obama employee & Cain accuser has made a career out of filing complaints
Source:
Yahoo News
URL Source: http://news.yahoo.com/ap-exclusive- ... plaint-next-job-080946066.html
Published: Nov 9, 2011
Author: BRETT J. BLACKLEDGE & SUZANNE GAMBOA
Post Date: 2011-11-09 08:12:32 by Happy Quanzaa
Keywords: Obama-doma-ding-dong, serial bitch, accuser, Democra, Obama employee
Views: 8590
Comments: 26
WASHINGTON (AP) — A woman who settled a sexual harassment complaint against GOP presidential candidate Herman Cain in 1999 complained three years later at her next job about unfair treatment, saying she should be allowed to work from home after a serious car accident and accusing a manager of circulating a sexually charged email, The Associated Press has learned. Karen Kraushaar, 55, filed the complaint while working as a spokeswoman at the Immigration and Naturalization Service in the Justice Department in late 2002 or early 2003, with the assistance of her lawyer, Joel Bennett, who also handled her earlier sexual harassment complaint against Cain in 1999. Three former supervisors familiar with Kraushaar's complaint, which did not include a claim of sexual harassment, described it for the AP under condition of anonymity because the matter was handled internally by the agency and was not public. To settle the complaint at the immigration service, Kraushaar initially demanded thousands of dollars in payment, a reinstatement of leave she used after the accident earlier in 2002, promotion on the federal pay scale and a one-year fellowship to Harvard's Kennedy School of Government, according to a former supervisor familiar with the complaint. The promotion itself would have increased her annual salary between $12,000 and $16,000, according to salary tables in 2002 from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management. Kraushaar told the AP she considered her employment complaint "relatively minor" and she later dropped it. "The concern was that there may have been discrimination on the job and that I was being treated unfairly," Kraushaar said. Kraushaar said Tuesday she did not remember details about the complaint and did not remember asking for a payment, a promotion or a Harvard fellowship. Bennett, her lawyer, declined to discuss the case with the AP, saying he considered it confidential. Kraushaar left her job at the immigration service after dropping the complaint in 2003, and she went to work at the Treasury Department. Details of the workplace complaint that Kraushaar made at the immigration service are relevant because they could offer insights into how she responded to conflicts at work. She now works as a spokeswoman in the office of the Treasury Department's inspector general for tax administration. Kraushaar's complaint was based on supervisors denying her request to work full time from home after a serious car accident in 2002, three former supervisors said. Two of them said Kraushaar also was denied previous requests to work from home before the car accident. The complaint also cited as objectionable an email that a manager had circulated comparing computers to women and men, a former supervisor said. The complaint claimed that the email, based on humor widely circulated on the Internet, was sexually explicit, according to the supervisor, who did not have a copy of the email. The joke circulated online lists reasons men and women were like computers, including that men were like computers because "in order to get their attention, you have to turn them on." Women were like computers because "even your smallest mistakes are stored in long-term memory for later retrieval." Kraushaar told the AP that she remembered the complaint focusing on supervisors denying her the opportunity to work from home after her car accident. She said other employees were allowed to work from home. Kraushaar, who is married and lives in suburban Maryland, was among two women who formally settled harassment complaints against Cain in exchange for severance payments in the late 1990s when they worked at the restaurant association. Bennett has said Kraushaar settled her claim during the summer of 1999, shortly after Cain left the organization. Neither Kraushaar nor Bennett have described exactly what Cain was accused of saying or doing to Kraushaar when she worked there, although Bennett said Kraushaar wants to conduct a joint news conference with all the women who have accused Cain. The New York Times reported previously that Kraushaar received $45,000 in the settlement with the restaurant association. Kraushaar agreed to discuss some aspects of the complaint at the immigration service if the AP agreed to protect her privacy, as it did in previous accounts of her complaint against Cain. She subsequently waived her privacy by confirming for news organizations her identity as one of two women who settled complaints against Cain, so the AP no longer is protecting Kraushaar's identity. Cain has denied that he sexually harassed Kraushaar and others who have accused him of inappropriate behavior. In a news conference Tuesday evening, Cain said allegations of sexual harassment by Kraushaar — whom Cain identified by name for the first time — were determined to be "baseless," but he did not explain who made this determination and Kraushaar has disputed this. Cain said that after negotiations between Bennett and the restaurant association's outside counsel she received money under an employment agreement, which Cain said was different from a legal settlement. "When she made her accusations, they were found to be baseless and she could not find anyone to corroborate her story," Cain said. Cain said he remembered gesturing to Kraushaar and noting that she was the same height as Cain's wife, about chin-high to Cain. The Georgia businessman said Kraushaar did not react noticeably, but he said the restaurant association lawyer later told him that was the most serious claim that Kraushaar made against him, "the one she was most upset about." "Other things that might have been in the accusations, I'm not aware of, I don't remember," Cain said. Sharon Bialek, a Chicago woman who once worked for the restaurant association's education foundation, accused Cain in a nationally televised news conference this week of groping her and attempting to force himself on her inside a parked car after they had dinner in 1997. Another woman told the AP that Cain made unwanted sexual advances to her while she worked for the association, and a pollster said he witnessed Cain sexually harass another woman after an association dinner. Kraushaar's complaint at the immigration service prompted managers to use caution when writing and speaking to Kraushaar while the complaint was being investigated, another former supervisor told the AP. Two supervisors said Kraushaar asked a colleague to act as a witness when she had conversations with one manager after she filed her complaint. The complaint at the immigration service was "nobody's business," Kraushaar said, because it was irrelevant to her sexual harassment settlement with Cain years earlier. "What you're looking for here is evidence of an employee who is out to get people," she said. "That's completely untrue." Kraushaar, who started her career in Washington as a reporter, was praised for her work in 2000 when she traveled to Miami to help agency officials during the coverage of the Elian Gonzalez case, when federal agents seized the boy from relatives to return him to his father in Cuba. "Ms. Kraushaar's assistance was invaluable and her performance extraordinary," wrote Robert A. Wallis, the immigration service district director in Miami. Kraushaar provided seven such letters of recommendation to show that her performance was commendable while working at the Consumer Product Safety Commission, the restaurant association and the immigration service.
AP Exclusive: Accuser filed complaint in next job
FILE - This December 1999 image from
video shows then-Immigration and
Naturalization … 
FILE - This March 2000 image from
video shows then-Immigration and
Naturalization …
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Happy Quanzaa (#0)
Chuckles...looks like someone violated the Privacy Act... That said, this information does not exonerate Cain nor is it an indictment of this republcian woman.
I'll believe that a corporation is a person 1 second after Texas executes one...
There is no such thing as sexual harassment. There is rape though. Clinton raped women. Cain talked to women. So what. You're just piling on because you don't like black people.
Why do you feel an extrinsic need to CONVINCE me that you're stupid? No need to read any further. PING me should you ever get *smart*. Thanks...
I'll believe that a corporation is a person 1 second after Texas executes one...
A) 2 complaints over a 30+ year career is not "serial" behavior. B) She's not an Obama employee. C) She IS a republican. I suspect that there's a bit go jealousy going on with you, Gay Quay. Your obsession with Larry Sinclair and Obama's sex life leads to the conclusion that a bit of transference is occurring and that YOU want to be harrassed into having sex with a black man.
I'll believe that a corporation is a person 1 second after Texas executes one...
Gawd, I hope it's that Penn State is HQ's alma mater.
Su-u-u-u-re she is, just like that other gold digger Bialek from Chicago that just happens to live in Axelrod's building and work out in the gym with him.
Chuckles...it's a conspiracy...and some gold digger...guess she dug but forgot to ask for the gold... Here's a hlpful hint, Gay Quay...when you're engaging in character assasination, e.g. calling someone a "Gold Digger", make sure that reality squares to the charge. She never asked Cain or the Nat'l Restaurant Association for ONE BLACK CENT.
I'll believe that a corporation is a person 1 second after Texas executes one...
No..she just asked for a promotion, work from home status, and a scholarship to Harvard. Things she says she 'forgot' about when asked to explain them. As for whether or not she's a Reublican her contributions to the DNC say otherwise. She's a conniving bitch thats for sure.
If she wasn't the source then someone has probably violated the Privacy Act. As we learned with Tripp, a governemt employee's work history/file is protected. That said, let's compare her "forgetting" - assuming that she even did - to Cain's forgetting. Cain said that none of this - right down to the settlements - even happened and then he claimed that he had "forgotten all about them". There is no freaking way that ANY seasoned political pro signing on to run Cain's campaign did not sit down with Cain at the onset and ask, "You were a CEO during the Clinton years...has there EVER been a claim of harrasment or employment discrimination levied against you." My money says that not only was that question asked, Cain LIED when he answered it.
I'll believe that a corporation is a person 1 second after Texas executes one...
Chuckles...she didn't even want to go public. And you know NOTHING about her. As for her "contributions" *YAWN*
I'll believe that a corporation is a person 1 second after Texas executes one...
PS: I TOLD you that there is no such thing as a "1 Week" scandal in politics.
I'll believe that a corporation is a person 1 second after Texas executes one...
Weren't you the one trumpeting the first amendment last week?
He talks out of his ass. So sometimes there are conflicts.
I was referring to the 'demands' she made to drop her harrrassment suit at INS..you know the ones she 'forgot' about making when confronted about them. That makes her a connving bitch..and a democrat.
Speech rights don't trump my privacy right any more than they trump any other right of mine...especially where the government is involved. Or yours... Thatv said, did you "see" that AP cited 3 "unnamed" people inside Immigration and who said that they had to be anonymous because it's violative to make such information public?
I'll believe that a corporation is a person 1 second after Texas executes one...
I know what you were referring to. Cain, btw, has suddenly remembered what this woman's "complaint" was. As I said, you folks have to find another way to show that the issue with Obama isn't race. This guy is done.
I'll believe that a corporation is a person 1 second after Texas executes one...
Nope...that smell
is my breath, assface...
I'll believe that a corporation is a person 1 second after Texas executes one...
Trumped by the first amendment. They are allowed to make a. any law b. some laws c. no law It is a simple test that you can't pass.
Unless your name is Herman Cain I suppose huh? Pfft.
Cain is being vetted for the position of POTUS. One of the complaints about Obama is that he is allegedly engaging in an ongoing conspiracy to hide his past. Why is this scrutiny okay for Obama but not Cain? That said, Privacy Laws have been upheld at every level of adjudication. Work for their repeal if you don't like them.
I'll believe that a corporation is a person 1 second after Texas executes one...
The information was published. The paper is not violating the law. The people who released the information are. The first amendment's penumbra is broadest in protecting political speech. Her work history isn't political speech. In fact, it's not speech at all. NNor does it negate the fact that she was harrasssed by Herman Cain and his employer at the time was forced to pay this woman money because of his behavior towards her. I supposed that you believe NAMBLA's claim that their publishing and associations and interactions are all protected by the 1st amendment, too? You are wholly incapable of even a modicum of metaphysical thought let alone that required to understand the philosophy of the Founders and Famers in regard to what powers government may exercise and what rights the people enjoy. Why is it that whenever you try to discuss the USCON, its affect is comporable to a dentist's drill working on an unanaesthetized patient while Kenny G plays loudly in the background?
I'll believe that a corporation is a person 1 second after Texas executes one...
The first amendment's penumbra is broadest in protecting political speech. Her work history isn't political speech. Quit spinning. The constitution says no laws prohibiting free speech. It is unconstitutional. Just like when a judge orders a gag order. It is unconstitutional too. If a law contradicts the constitution it isn't a law at all and should be ignored.
Refer back to my previous post. If you need any of the words defined...go here...
I'll believe that a corporation is a person 1 second after Texas executes one...
Why is this scrutiny okay for Obama but not Cain? So the liberal attack on Cain is really part of an ongoing Obama coverup..got it.
I have no idea what leap over logic was required to come up with that response...but I'm sure that it required harming small animals...
I'll believe that a corporation is a person 1 second after Texas executes one...
janet inferno eruptions ! megamoze says: September 30, 2007 (courtesy of ThinkProgress) Here’s another except from Thomas’s book in which he is NOT playing the victim: “‘my worst fears had come to pass not in Georgia, but in Washington, D.C., where I was being pursued not by bigots in white robes but by left-wing zealots draped in flowing sanctimony.’” That’s right. Liberals are the modern KKK. Nope, no victimhood there. http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/09/29/pubic-hair-in-coke-clarence-thomas- lashes-out/ When I was in junior high there was a bad case I saw of acne eruptions !
If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons are for girlie boys !
#2. To: war (#1)
#3. To: A K A Stone (#2)
There is no such thing as sexual harassment.
#4. To: Happy Quanzaa (#0)
(Edited)
#5. To: war (#4)
#6. To: war (#4)
C) She IS a republican.
#7. To: Happy Quanzaa (#6)
(Edited)
#8. To: war (#7)
...guess she dug but forgot to ask for the gold...
#9. To: Thunderbird (#8)
Things she says she 'forgot' about when asked to explain them.
#10. To: Thunderbird (#8)
She's a conniving bitch thats for sure.
#11. To: Thunderbird (#8)
#12. To: war (#9)
If she wasn't the source then someone has probably violated the Privacy Act.
#13. To: Thunderbird (#12)
#14. To: war (#10)
Chuckles...she didn't even want to go public.
#15. To: Thunderbird (#12)
Weren't you the one trumpeting the first amendment last week?
#16. To: Thunderbird (#14)
I was referring to the 'demands' she made to drop her harrrassment suit at INS..you know the ones she 'forgot' about making when confronted about them.
#17. To: A K A Stone (#13)
He talks out of his ass.
#18. To: war (#15)
Thatv said, did you "see" that AP cited 3 "unnamed" people inside Immigration and who said that they had to be anonymous because it's violative to make such information public?
#19. To: war (#15)
Speech rights don't trump my privacy right any more than they trump any other right of mine...
#20. To: Thunderbird (#19)
Unless your name is Herman Cain I suppose huh?
#21. To: A K A Stone (#18)
Trumped by the first amendment.
#22. To: war (#21)
The people who released the information are.
#23. To: A K A Stone (#22)
#24. To: war (#20)
Cain is being vetted for the position of POTUS. One of the complaints about Obama is that he is allegedly engaging in an ongoing conspiracy to hide his past.
#25. To: Thunderbird (#24)
#26. To: Happy Quanzaa (#0)
was praised for her work in 2000 when she traveled to Miami to help agency officials during the coverage of the Elian Gonzalez case
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]