Health/Medical
See other Health/Medical Articles
Title: GM Feed Toxic, New Meta-Analysis Confirms
Source:
Food Freedom
URL Source: https://foodfreedom.wordpress.com/2 ... ic-new-meta-analysis-confirms/
Published: Sep 5, 2011
Author: Dr Eva Sirinathsinghji
Post Date: 2011-09-06 12:15:19 by lucysmom
Keywords: None
Views: 5046
Comments: 12
EXTRACTS: A meta-analysis on 19 studies confirms kidney and liver toxicity in rats and mice fed on GM soybean and maize, representing more than 80 percent of all commercially available GM food; it also exposes gross inadequacies of current risk assessment.
A team of independent scientists led by Gilles-Eric Séralini at Caen University in France carried out a meta-analysis combining the results of 19 previous studies [1], and their report concluded:
“From the regulatory tests performed today, it is unacceptable to submit 500 million Europeans and several billions of consumers worldwide to the new pesticide GM-derived foods or feed, this being done without more controls (if any) than the only 3-month-long toxicological tests and using only one mammalian species, especially since there is growing evidence of concern.”
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: A K A Stone, Fred Mertz, Godwinson, go65, war, no gnu taxes, Skip Intro, ferret mike, jwpegler, mininggold, brian s, mcgowanjm (#0) (Edited)
Multiple organ abnormalities revealed on re-analysis
Obviously what we need is less deregulation, not more.
"...all of the equations in neoclassical economics are rubbish. The differential equations describe nothing. Economics is not about mathematics, it is about the human being." Sandeep Jaitly
#2. To: lucysmom (#1)
Obviously what we need is more deregulation, not more.
That's why we need to only elect Republicans, or Democrats like Obama.
#3. To: lucysmom (#1)
Obviously what we need is more deregulation, not more.
Say what? How do you need more of something but not need more of something?
#4. To: Happy Quanzaa (#3)
Say what? How do you need more of something but not need more of something?
Thank you, I fixed it.
"...all of the equations in neoclassical economics are rubbish. The differential equations describe nothing. Economics is not about mathematics, it is about the human being." Sandeep Jaitly
#5. To: lucysmom (#1)
Obviously what we need is less deregulation, not more.
No, repeal all of the legislation protecting Monsanto and other corporations.
Less government meddling = good
Legislation passed as a result of bribes (most of it) = bad
Twain: 'No man's life, liberty, or property is safe, while Congress is in session.'
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
Obama's watch stopped on 24 May 2008, but he's been too busy smoking crack to notice.
#6. To: lucysmom (#1)
Obviously what we need is less deregulation, not more.
Or demanding regulations making the growing of non GM varieties illegal. Big Ag has both ends already covered.
#7. To: lucysmom (#0)
And Palmer Amaranth just keeps on adapting to and even seems to thrive on every new herbicide.
#8. To: mininggold (#7)
I guess that's an example of things DON'T evolve...
America...My Kind Of Place...
"I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..."
--GW Bush
"THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!"
--Sarah Palin's version of "The Midnight Ride of Paul revere"
I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything...
#9. To: mininggold (#6)
Or demanding regulations making the growing of non GM varieties illegal.
That can be accomplished by law suits, the free market solution.
"...all of the equations in neoclassical economics are rubbish. The differential equations describe nothing. Economics is not about mathematics, it is about the human being." Sandeep Jaitly
#10. To: lucysmom (#9)
That can be accomplished by law suits, the free market solution.
That's how the drug companies do it. Threaten doctors with malpractice suits if they don't prescribe the latest drug.
#11. To: mininggold (#7)
And Palmer Amaranth just keeps on adapting to and even seems to thrive on every new herbicide.
Crop eating insects aren't far behind.
"...all of the equations in neoclassical economics are rubbish. The differential equations describe nothing. Economics is not about mathematics, it is about the human being." Sandeep Jaitly
#12. To: lucysmom (#11)
Crop eating insects aren't far behind.
We now have the Spotted Wing Drosophila or Japanese Fruit Fly, which is infecting the wine grape crop among others as I post. Not resistant but the larvae from eggs the female deposits in fruit just before it ripens are shielded from pesticides, of which Spinosad formulas even with it's short duration of effectiveness is considered the most effective.
We need about 10 days of temps around ninety to stop the reproduction cycle, as the males go sterile during heat waves.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]