[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Creationism/Evolution Title: EVOLUTION IMPOSSIBLE!
We’re sure you’ve heard this claim before, probably hundreds of times: “Science has proven evolution is fact.” It’s like a strange Darwinian chant that emanates from atheist blogs and secular universities. Too bad (for them) it’s not true. In fact, refuting evolution doesn’t require complicated equations or lab experiments—though those do the job, too. Just remember the two fundamental flaws we can use to show evolution to be, well, not even scientifically viable. Where’d You Get Your Information, Bub? Everything that makes up your body requires genetic information. You’ve got hands and feet because your genes code for it. The same is true for any creature—dogs, camels, you name it. The genetic information in humans varies from the information in animals, plants, and so on. Seems obvious, so why point it out? Because for animal kind A to somehow “presto-change-o” into animal kind B, the information’s got to change. A fish doesn’t just morph into an amphibian without something changing in the genes. It would have to gain some new information. Check This Out! Get the full DVD. Here’s the clincher: when we use operational science—the kind involving observable, repeatable, testable results—we have never observed, repeated, or been able to test animal kind A turning into animal kind B—at all. Sure, there’s some genetic “do-si-do” going on through mutations and gene drift, but there’s no way fish are going to sprout hair and opposable thumbs. Just in case you think by “no way” we mean there’s still a chance, there’s not—none, zilch, nada, not going to happen. What if we add billions of years and cool artistic renderings? Still no. Original Recipe That first point is devastating enough. But here’s how evolution gets buried even more. You’ve probably heard news accounts about how life could have started on earth “gazillions” of years ago in volcanoes, slush pools, crystals, rocks, you name it. Maybe you’ve heard something about “artificial” life or test-tube life or rotten-food-in-the-refrigerator life (okay, maybe not the last one). Those are interesting speculations, but they overlook one important rule in biology: life doesn’t, cannot, and will never come from non-life. Life comes from life. Always. That’s the law—the Law of Biogenesis, to be exact. All these failed experiments, like the Miller-Urey experiment, really show is just how much intelligence is required for life to begin in the first place. (That is, way smarter than us.) And Yet We’re Here So, if evolution can’t explain how humans came to be (or any other living thing, for that matter), what can? The Bible. Yep, God’s Word. The Bible provides an eyewitness account of how the universe and all life came to be. There’s no speculation or strange interpretation needed. You can just read how God created everything in six days a few thousand years ago. Simple. Factual. Pick it up, dust it off if you need, and read it. There’s even some good news in there for you. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Sure, there’s some genetic “do-si-do” going on through mutations and gene drift “do-si-do” is the accepted scientific term? Republicans hate science but they love square dancing...... With the economy still in the dumper -- maybe permanently? -- and full-time jobs becoming as scarce as rain during a drought, huge percentages of Americans have had their (misplaced) faith in the American dream shaken, the upper-middle-class consumerist lifestyle is exposed as a mirage for anybody who plays by the rules. Capitalism and the America that embraced it as a way of life is now and forever more a failure. It does me good to know that the generation that voted in Reagan and his ideology will see their America die from that ideology before their very own eyes and knowing they had a hand in its destruction. #2. To: A K A Stone (#0) The Bible provides an eyewitness account of how the universe and all life came to be. Actually, the authors of the Bible did not witness the creation of the Universe nor any event depicted in the Bible since the Bible was only written down hundreds of years after the events described. With the economy still in the dumper -- maybe permanently? -- and full-time jobs becoming as scarce as rain during a drought, huge percentages of Americans have had their (misplaced) faith in the American dream shaken, the upper-middle-class consumerist lifestyle is exposed as a mirage for anybody who plays by the rules. Capitalism and the America that embraced it as a way of life is now and forever more a failure. It does me good to know that the generation that voted in Reagan and his ideology will see their America die from that ideology before their very own eyes and knowing they had a hand in its destruction. #3. To: Godwinson (#2) Actually, the authors of the Bible did not witness the creation of the Universe nor any event depicted in the Bible since the Bible was only written down hundreds of years after the events described. That is true. But since God witnessed his own creation and since he divinely inspired people to write about it.......
#4. To: A K A Stone (#3) This Planet Hell. It's ruled by psychopaths. And the gods aren't very nice. Luckily, evil can only destroy itself. The Reality is the Universe and the Universe is Altruistic. Richard Dawkins calls Rick Perry an "uneducated ignoramus" I wonder if Rick Perry, Republican presidential candidate and Texas governor, knows what "ignoramus" means. Probably not. I'll help Perry out in case he stumbles across this blog. Here's the definition, Rick: Utterly ignorant person. Such is how noted evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins describes not only Rick Perry but also the entire leadership of today's Republican party. He's right on. Anyone who doesn't believe in evolution or other unarguable scientific facts indeed is an ignoramus. How is it that they even could be considered for high public office, especially the presidency of the United States?
#5. To: A K A Stone (#0) (Edited) The Bible provides an eyewitness account of how the universe and all life came to be. There’s no speculation or strange interpretation needed. You can just read how God created everything in six days a few thousand years ago. Simple. Factual. The Hindu's believe that the earth was created in a dream of Brahma's over a period of days as well. Those days lasted for millions of years, tho... Anyone who takes the Bible literally in the face of all the contrary science isn't anyone to be taken seriously. And the Far Easterners were far more developed that the Central Asians and Europeans. Funny how "God" waited for the "white" [sic] man to catch up to his brown brothers in the East before revealing Himself as the "true" God... America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." "THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!" I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything... #6. To: war (#5) Anyone who takes the Bible literally in the face of all the contrary science isn't anyone to be taken seriously. What contrary science? There isn't any.
#7. To: A K A Stone (#6) You ***think*** that you're saying something with that question. Well...you are...but not what you ***think***... America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." "THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!" I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything... #8. To: war (#7) You ***think*** that you're saying something with that question. You're spinniung the dirt and offering nothing. How about you give me some examples of what you perceive to be contrary science. Then we can discuss it. Get back with you later, I gotta go now. Have a good day.
#9. To: A K A Stone (#8) (Edited) We've been though this. Your standard response is typical of what you offered above, i.e. to simply deny what is as being what is and then refer to that denial as support for your argument. I trust science. For whatever inexplicable reasons, you don't. So, AFAIC there's nothing to discuss. America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." "THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!" I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything... #10. To: A K A Stone (#0) EVOLUTION IMPOSSIBLE! Except it isn't. Other than that, the article is still pure 100% bullshit.
#11. To: A K A Stone (#0) More snake oil from 'unattributed'.
#12. To: Skip Intro, mininggold, war (#10) EVOLUTION IMPOSSIBLE! Lets start with this. Since none of you offered a single shred of evidence to your cause/religion. Is this bullshit? Everything that makes up your body requires genetic information. You’ve got hands and feet because your genes code for it. The same is true for any creature—dogs, camels, you name it.
#13. To: A K A Stone (#12) (Edited) You can't offer a shred of evidence that a magician conjured us from dust as it avers in Genesis. Again, you trust people whom you've never met trying to explain things they couldn't understand. I don't. America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." "THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!" I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything... #14. To: war (#13) You can't offer a shred of evidence that a magician conjured us from dust as it avers in Genesis. There were no magicians in creation. It is a matter of historical record. The people who WERE there told us about it. The Bible has withstood the test of time. It hasn't been contradicted historically or scientifically. It said that we reproduce after like kind. That is a scientific statement that holds up to this day. It hasn't been contradicted. Evolution on the other hand has NEVER EVER been observed and can't be reproduced in the lab? Because it didn't happen obviously. Not close no cigar.
#15. To: war, skip intro (#13) Everything that makes up your body requires genetic information. You’ve got hands and feet because your genes code for it. The same is true for any creature—dogs, camels, you name it. Do you consider that statement "bullshit" as skip intro ignorantly does?
#16. To: A K A Stone (#14) (Edited) It said that we reproduce after like kind. How did they determine that? If you claim that they were "told" then you lose. America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." "THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!" I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything... #17. To: A K A Stone (#14) Evolution on the other hand has NEVER EVER been observed "God" has never been observed and spare me the "Moses saw him" crap. Moses was a story that the Jews pilfered from several sources including the Sargon and Set and Horace stories from the Egyptians. ON the other hand, fossil records and DNA encoding exist. Mutations have been found and observed. America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." "THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!" I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything... #18. To: war (#17) ON the other hand, fossil records and DNA encoding exist. The fossil record is a big problem for you folks. There are no transitional fossils in the record. The record also says mass extinction in a global event. Something that would cause creatures to be buried in mud laid down by water all over the earth. The flood caused most all of the fossil record. Again you come up empty handed.
#19. To: war (#17) Mutations have been found and observed. Mutations are always bad. Go show me a mutation where an apple tree turns into something else. Show me a species that mutates and changes into something else. You can't because it don't All you have done so far is reinforce my position, the truth. Thank You.
#20. To: war (#16) Are you in a panic over answering the question I posed at comment number 15? If you are not in a panic why didn't you answer it?
#21. To: A K A Stone (#19) Mutations are always bad. Bzzzzt... You lose. America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." "THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!" I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything... #22. To: A K A Stone (#18) There are no transitional fossils in the record. Bzzzzt... You lose again. America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." "THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!" I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything... #23. To: A K A Stone (#20) (Edited) Are you in a panic over answering the question I posed at comment number 15? No. First, I never panic. Secondly, if you believe I am in a panic over this discussion please know that I figured out at a very early age that the rabbit was already in the magicians hat. I didn't answer the question because you lied about Skip having addressed it. America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." "THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!" I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything... #24. To: war (#21) Mutations are always bad. You saying so doesn't mean so. Put something on the table. You are still avoiding number 15.
#25. To: war (#23) Are you in a panic over answering the question I posed at comment number 15? I don't want to dance with you. Just answer number 15.
#26. To: A K A Stone (#24) You saying so doesn't mean so. I didn't make the statement. You did. I know better than to believe it. Support it. America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." "THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!" I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything... #27. To: war (#22) There are no transitional fossils in the record. Again just because you say so doesn't make it so. Again put something on the table that you think is a transitional fossil. You can't as there are none.
#28. To: war (#26) I made the statement way back at number 15. The one you are afraid to address.
#29. To: war (#26) There are no transitional fossils in the record. Yes I said there were no transitional fossils and no mutations that are good. You disagreed. I can't post something that doesn't exist (mutations that are good, transitional fossil). That would be up to you if you believe they exist. It's ok though. I asked you to do something impossible. You're just afraid to admit it.
#30. To: A K A Stone (#29) YOU claimed that ALL mutations are bad. SUPPORT THE STATEMENT. YOU claimed that there are no transitional fossils. SUPPORT THE STATEMENT. America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." "THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!" I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything... #31. To: war (#23) I didn't answer the question because you lied about Skip having addressed it. I don't lie. Post number 10 skip says that this entire article is 100 percent bullshit.
#32. To: war (#30) YOU claimed that ALL mutations are bad. There are no transitional fossils. That statement is supported by the fact that you can't contradict it by posting transitional fossils. You wont post any because I you will get smacked down because there are none. There are no good mutations. If there was you would post them. You liberals can't debate for shit.
#33. To: A K A Stone, Skip Intro (#32) There are no transitional fossils. You stated that. Where is your proof? This is EXACTLY what I claimed would happen in this discussion: You make a statement and your only support for it is for you to continually refer back to it. America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." "THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!" I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything... #34. To: A K A Stone, Skip Intro (#31) Post #10 comes before post #15. He couldn't have stated that your question was bullshit BEFORE you asked it. You really suck at debating...do you realize that? America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." "THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!" I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything... #35. To: A K A Stone (#32) There are no transitional fossils. Yes, there are, as ten seconds of research on the net would show you. Your repeated use of this statement shows us all what a total dumbshit you are.
#36. To: war (#33) You are such a pussy you are afraid to answer number 15. You can't find any transitional fossils. You lose. You can't find any mutations that are positive. You lose.
#37. To: Skip Intro (#35) There are no transitional fossils. You said the entire articled is 100 percent bullshit. I posted to you in number 15 if that is bullshit. You like war are afraid of the first claim in the article. The very first one stumps you. If you think there are transitional fossils post an example and I will shoot it down. You only have claims of transitional fossils. No proof whatsoever. You are the dumbshit, certainly not I.
#38. To: A K A Stone (#36) Thanks for living up to my expectations of your ability to argue your point. For the record, I had NONE. Then again, you had nothing to work with. America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." "THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!" I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything... #39. To: war (#38) You are such a pussy you are afraid to answer number 15. You can't find any transitional fossils. You lose. You can't find any mutations that are positive. You lose.
#40. To: A K A Stone (#37) Where did god come from, Stone?
. . . Comments (41 - 69) not displayed. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|