[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Creationism/Evolution Title: EVOLUTION IMPOSSIBLE!
We’re sure you’ve heard this claim before, probably hundreds of times: “Science has proven evolution is fact.” It’s like a strange Darwinian chant that emanates from atheist blogs and secular universities. Too bad (for them) it’s not true. In fact, refuting evolution doesn’t require complicated equations or lab experiments—though those do the job, too. Just remember the two fundamental flaws we can use to show evolution to be, well, not even scientifically viable. Where’d You Get Your Information, Bub? Everything that makes up your body requires genetic information. You’ve got hands and feet because your genes code for it. The same is true for any creature—dogs, camels, you name it. The genetic information in humans varies from the information in animals, plants, and so on. Seems obvious, so why point it out? Because for animal kind A to somehow “presto-change-o” into animal kind B, the information’s got to change. A fish doesn’t just morph into an amphibian without something changing in the genes. It would have to gain some new information. Check This Out! Get the full DVD. Here’s the clincher: when we use operational science—the kind involving observable, repeatable, testable results—we have never observed, repeated, or been able to test animal kind A turning into animal kind B—at all. Sure, there’s some genetic “do-si-do” going on through mutations and gene drift, but there’s no way fish are going to sprout hair and opposable thumbs. Just in case you think by “no way” we mean there’s still a chance, there’s not—none, zilch, nada, not going to happen. What if we add billions of years and cool artistic renderings? Still no. Original Recipe That first point is devastating enough. But here’s how evolution gets buried even more. You’ve probably heard news accounts about how life could have started on earth “gazillions” of years ago in volcanoes, slush pools, crystals, rocks, you name it. Maybe you’ve heard something about “artificial” life or test-tube life or rotten-food-in-the-refrigerator life (okay, maybe not the last one). Those are interesting speculations, but they overlook one important rule in biology: life doesn’t, cannot, and will never come from non-life. Life comes from life. Always. That’s the law—the Law of Biogenesis, to be exact. All these failed experiments, like the Miller-Urey experiment, really show is just how much intelligence is required for life to begin in the first place. (That is, way smarter than us.) And Yet We’re Here So, if evolution can’t explain how humans came to be (or any other living thing, for that matter), what can? The Bible. Yep, God’s Word. The Bible provides an eyewitness account of how the universe and all life came to be. There’s no speculation or strange interpretation needed. You can just read how God created everything in six days a few thousand years ago. Simple. Factual. Pick it up, dust it off if you need, and read it. There’s even some good news in there for you. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 34. EVOLUTION IMPOSSIBLE! Except it isn't. Other than that, the article is still pure 100% bullshit.
#12. To: Skip Intro, mininggold, war (#10) EVOLUTION IMPOSSIBLE! Lets start with this. Since none of you offered a single shred of evidence to your cause/religion. Is this bullshit? Everything that makes up your body requires genetic information. You’ve got hands and feet because your genes code for it. The same is true for any creature—dogs, camels, you name it.
#13. To: A K A Stone (#12) (Edited) You can't offer a shred of evidence that a magician conjured us from dust as it avers in Genesis. Again, you trust people whom you've never met trying to explain things they couldn't understand. I don't.
#14. To: war (#13) You can't offer a shred of evidence that a magician conjured us from dust as it avers in Genesis. There were no magicians in creation. It is a matter of historical record. The people who WERE there told us about it. The Bible has withstood the test of time. It hasn't been contradicted historically or scientifically. It said that we reproduce after like kind. That is a scientific statement that holds up to this day. It hasn't been contradicted. Evolution on the other hand has NEVER EVER been observed and can't be reproduced in the lab? Because it didn't happen obviously. Not close no cigar.
#16. To: A K A Stone (#14) (Edited) It said that we reproduce after like kind. How did they determine that? If you claim that they were "told" then you lose.
#20. To: war (#16) Are you in a panic over answering the question I posed at comment number 15? If you are not in a panic why didn't you answer it?
#23. To: A K A Stone (#20) (Edited) Are you in a panic over answering the question I posed at comment number 15? No. First, I never panic. Secondly, if you believe I am in a panic over this discussion please know that I figured out at a very early age that the rabbit was already in the magicians hat. I didn't answer the question because you lied about Skip having addressed it.
#31. To: war (#23) I didn't answer the question because you lied about Skip having addressed it. I don't lie. Post number 10 skip says that this entire article is 100 percent bullshit.
#34. To: A K A Stone, Skip Intro (#31) Post #10 comes before post #15. He couldn't have stated that your question was bullshit BEFORE you asked it. You really suck at debating...do you realize that?
Replies to Comment # 34. There are no replies to Comment # 34.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 34. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|