[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
The Water Cooler Title: House Gop Lawmakers Worry Voters' Anger Over Economy Could Sting Them House Republican lawmakers worry the sputtering economy will be a problem not only for President Obama but could sweep them out of office next year as well. Nervous House Republicans have filled their schedules with constituent meetings this month to assuage bubbling frustrations over the economy and gridlock in Washington. Fearing angry protests, some GOP lawmakers have decided to skip public town-hall meetings. Others have mustered courage to face constituents in unpredictable settings, sometimes with uncomfortable results. “I’ve never seen people as angry as they are right now. They’re angry at the whole system and evidencing that in their comments to me,” said Rep. Timothy Johnson (R-Ill.), who has crisscrossed his district attending chicken dinners and state fairs. “Being an incumbent in either chamber in either party is an unpopular brand. I’m trying to show people that I’m different, that I listen and don’t engage in a lot of partisanship,” said Johnson, who plans to redouble his efforts as a member of the Congressional Center Aisle Caucus to promote bipartisan cooperation in the fall. On Aug. 16, Gallup announced that Congress had matched its lowest approval rating of all time, falling to the 13 percent mark reached in December, shortly after Republicans captured the House. A few days earlier, Gallup released its first measure of the 2012 congressional elections, showing Democrats ahead of Republicans by seven points on the generic ballot. “Given the approval rating of Congress, everyone has to be on their toes, in either party,” said Glen Bolger, a leading GOP pollster and founder of Public Opinion Strategies. House Republicans have some explaining to do after last month’s standoff over raising the debt limit. House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) declared, “I got 98 percent of what I wanted” in the debt-limit deal. “I’m pretty happy,” he said. But much of the country has not been pleased with the aftermath. Standard & Poor’s concluded the debate raised serious questions about Congress’s ability to address its long-term debt and downgraded the nation’s credit rating, sending markets into a tailspin. Democrats quickly blamed Republicans for what they called the “Tea-Party downgrade.” House GOP lawmakers dispute they’re to blame for the downgrade. But GOP freshmen concede they could suffer politically because of widespread sentiment that Washington is not doing enough to fix the economy. “I think the economy is going to affect everybody in government,” said Rep. Patrick Meehan, a freshman Republican from the outskirts of Philadelphia. “People’s frustrations can be focused at the ballot box. I’ve been spending a lot of time working on issues important to local constituencies. “You hope you can send a message that you understand their frustration over the big picture, but in the meantime I’m working on things that will directly affect jobs,” he said. Meehan has spent much of August meeting with employers in his district, such as Siemens, Home Depot and Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. His constituents have broad concerns about the economy but also specific worries about federal cuts in research and healthcare spending. Children’s Hospital depends on federal funding for its research on improving automobile child safety, for example. This month, Meehan is helping to negotiate a potential airport expansion with two local government authorities, which he hopes will create hundreds of new jobs. The freshman lawmaker says it helps to have a thick skin when confronted by protesters at public events. “I used to be a professional hockey ref. I’m used to having 15,000 people booing me,” he said. Rep. Paul Gosar, a freshman Republican from Arizona, has held town-hall meetings and met with local chambers of commerce. “They’re very angry,” he said of his constituents. “They want to get back to work and they feel government is in the way with rules and regulations.” Gosar says it’s “always a possibility” that voters upset over the economy will throw him out of office. He’s making the case that House Republicans have been “talking about jobs from day one," citing efforts to roll back regulations and lower deficits. Gosar has pushed his local jobs agenda at home by promoting aggressive development of natural resources in his district, specifically a major copper deposit three miles east of Superior, Ariz. He’s trying to broker a federal land exchange that will open up 2,400 acres to mining. Rep. Rick Berg, a freshman Republican running for Senate in North Dakota, is the rare incumbent running in a state with low unemployment numbers. He said North Dakota lowered its unemployment rate to 3.2 percent by balancing its budget and creating a pro-business environment. But he said it will be hard to change the regulatory environment in Washington while Democrats control the Senate, where House GOP initiatives, such as the "cut, cap and balance" measure, have died. “Whenever you have a high unemployment and a struggling economy, it makes elections difficult for any incumbent,” Berg said. “Having said that, I think this next election is a debate on how we get this economy turned around.” He said the election will come down to two competing views: The Keynesian view, held by many Democrats, that government needs to spend more to increase aggregate demand. And the limited-government philosophy, favored by Republicans, which holds that governments should operate as businesses and family households. Rep. Lou Barletta, a freshman Republican from Hazelton, Pa., said jobs and the economy are the top priorities at home. “They want to talk about jobs and how we’re going to get America back to work again. I explained to them as a former entrepreneur that I think America has one of the least friendly business environments in the world,” he said of constituents. Barletta makes the case to voters that the House has tried to improve the domestic business environment by passing an ambitious budget-cutting plan and advancing a proposal to implement a balanced-budget amendment. He said only House Republicans have been willing to tackle entitlement programs, which will contribute the most to the debt over the next several decades, and blamed Senate Democrats for refusing to compromise. “I’m proud to say that in the House we’re willing and have the courage to tackle these problems. If we pass bills in House and they die in the Senate, the public needs to know that,” he said. Blaming the Senate is a popular argument in House districts around the country. Rep. Tom Reed, a freshman Republican from upstate New York, has scheduled six town-hall meetings in his district this month. He tells constituents the House has passed legislation to give businesses more certainty, but the Senate has blocked those initiatives. “They don’t realize we passed all this and the Senate didn’t do anything,” he said. “They leave the meetings saying they’re going to call their senators.” Rep. Steve Chabot (R-Ohio) faced angry protesters at a town-hall meeting in Avondale, Ohio, on Monday. He said Think Progress, the liberal political advocacy group, organized the protest. Chabot says people are “frustrated that the economy continues to muddle along and employment continues to be high.” But he says most constituents are upset about federal regulations from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration as well as new rules established by the healthcare reform and Wall Street reform legislation passed in 2010. Chabot said Obama’s administration has put a drag on the economy. But Chabot also recognizes that he may get blamed as well on Election Day. “The main problem has been the policies that this administration have pushed and gotten through over the last couple years,” he said. Even so, Chabot says, “I’m fully aware that when there’s frustration, all incumbents can be held somewhat accountable, whether they were responsible are not. “People expect results,” he said.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Brian S (#0)
The GOP needs to focus on three themes between now and the election. Jobs, Jobs, Jobs. PERIOD. Bohener and McConnell are too stupid to understand this. Obama doesn't get it either. Whether you like him or not, this is where Rick Perry will make a huge difference. His campaign will be about jobs, which is why he has vaulted to the lead in GOP primary. He might be a lying sack of shit, but at least he's lying about the right thing. The rest of the GOP elected officials are just stupid.
Perry is like a Bush Jr. clone. Speech, mannerism, gaffes. Everytime I watch him I swear they could be brothers. The 'morphing' of Perry into Bush jr. images will be a huge hit with the opposition, indeed.
Never swear "allegiance" to anything other than the 'right to change your mind'!
I think you should consider the foundations of his claims for "creating more jobs than all of the USA in Texas." Over 50% of those same jobs were NOT in the private sector.
Superficially yes, but perhaps not where it counts. Bush is an east cost poser like his dad. He was never a real conservative. He never claimed to be. Bush called himself a "compassionate conservative", i.e. another BIG GOVERNMENT type. Bush and Perry don't even like each other. The Bush refugees on Fox network (especially Karl Rove) have done nothing but trash Perry. I hate Bush, his father, his entire administration, and every single thing that he did (except for his two Supreme Court nominees, which were surprisingly good). The fact that Bush's cronies are trashing Perry by itself makes me think that Perry might be someone I can support. Yes, I'm skeptical of Perry. But I am willing to be convinced. The more the Bush cronies trash Perry, the more I like him.
Over 50% of those same jobs were NOT in the private sector. I understand this and I agree. I supported Ron Paul in 1988. I even had the privilege of introducing him at a fund raiser after he spoke at the Detroit economic club. He got less than 1/2 of 1 percent of the vote. I've voted for a lot of 3rd party candidates in my life. Ron Paul in 88, Ross Perot in 92, Ralph Nader in 2004 and Bob Barr in 2008. I happily voted for Reagan in 1980 and unhappily voted for him in 84. I held my nose and voted for Dole in 96 but only because he put Jack Kemp on the ticket. I was so afraid of Al Gore in 2000 that I reluctantly voted for Bush (this is the only vote I ever really regretted). I am so scared of what Barack Obama might do in a second term that I am willing to hold my nose again and vote for Rick Perry. I will note vote for RINO Romney, because he doesn't believe in anything. At least Rick Perry pretends to believe in the free market. When was the last time saw that from a GOP Presidential nominee? It was Ronald Reagan. Unfortunately, Ron Paul cannot get the GOP nomination. The GOP is largely split between economic conservatives (who love Ron Paul) and social conservatives (most of whom could tolerate Ron Paul). But there is a small group of ex- leftist, cold-war militarists (the neo-cons) who have influence in the party far beyond their numbers. They HATE Ron Paul. They will do everything possible, including lie through their teeth to see that Ron Paul is not taken seriously. As Paul moves up in the polls, just watch how ugly the neo-cons become with charges of Antisemitism and everything else. Just watch. Given their influence, they can block his nomination. If he is somehow nominated, they will abandon the GOP, just like they abandoned the Democrat Party when McGovern was nominated. They will all be lining up behind Obama, singing his praises for bin Laden and potentially Kaddafy. Just watch.
|
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|