[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

The Victims of Benny Hinn: 30 Years of Spiritual Deception.

Trump Is Planning to Send Kill Teams to Mexico to Take Out Cartel Leaders

The Great Falling Away in the Church is Here | Tim Dilena

How Ridiculous? Blade-Less Swiss Army Knife Debuts As Weapon Laws Tighten

Jewish students beaten with sticks at University of Amsterdam

Terrorists shut down Park Avenue.

Police begin arresting democrats outside Met Gala.

The minute the total solar eclipse appeared over US

Three Types Of People To Mark And Avoid In The Church Today

Are The 4 Horsemen Of The Apocalypse About To Appear?

France sends combat troops to Ukraine battlefront

Facts you may not have heard about Muslims in England.

George Washington University raises the Hamas flag. American Flag has been removed.

Alabama students chant Take A Shower to the Hamas terrorists on campus.

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

Deadly Saltwater and Deadly Fresh Water to Increase

Deadly Cancers to soon Become Thing of the Past?

Plague of deadly New Diseases Continues

[FULL VIDEO] Police release bodycam footage of Monroe County District Attorney Sandra Doorley traffi

Police clash with pro-Palestine protesters on Ohio State University campus

Joe Rogan Experience #2138 - Tucker Carlson

Police Dispersing Student Protesters at USC - Breaking News Coverage (College Protests)

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Business
See other Business Articles

Title: Durable Goods Orders Rebound In May; GDP Revised Up
Source: USA TODAY/AP
URL Source: http://www.usatoday.com/money/econo ... -06-24-durable-goods-gdp_n.htm
Published: Jun 24, 2011
Author: Martin Crutsinger
Post Date: 2011-06-24 11:43:56 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 34490
Comments: 67

WASHINGTON — Businesses boosted their orders for machinery, electronics products and airplanes in May. The pickup suggests manufacturing is rebounding after the Japan crises made parts scarce and slowed production of some factory goods temporarily.

Orders long-lasting manufactured products increased 1.9% in last month, the Commerce Department said Friday. A key category that signals business investment plans rose 1.6%.

The stronger demand follows a revised 2.7% decline in April that was largely the result of supply disruptions caused by Japan's March 11th earthquake and tsunami. The inability to get critical component parts in such industries as autos and electronics slowed U.S. manufacturing.

Orders for autos and auto parts rose 0.6% in May after having fallen 5.3% in April. The rebound in May in both autos and broader categories supports the view that the April lull was temporary.

Separately, the Commerce Department said the economy grew at a 1.9% annual rate in the January-March quarter. That's not much better than the 1.8% rate estimated a month ago. The small upward revision reflected stronger exports and more business spending on stockpiles.

The bulk of the strength in the durables report came across a wide range of industries. Businesses boosted their orders for machinery 1.2% and demand for computers rose 1.3%. Communications equipment jumped 3.6% increase.

Businesses boosted demand for transportation products 5.8%. Much of that increase reflected a 36.5% surge in orders for commercial aircraft, a very volatile industry that had reported a big decline in production in April. Excluding the volatile transportation category, orders would have risen 0.6% in May after dropping 0.4% in April.

The capital goods category excluding aircraft is viewed as a proxy for business investment. It rose 1.6% after a 0.8% drop in April. Economists believe this category will show strength as companies respond to a one-year tax break aimed at spurring capital spending.

Manufacturing has been one of the strongest sectors of the economy since the recession official ended two years ago. However, there are concerns that the production pace could slow in coming months as businesses decide to scale back their restocking of inventories.

A closely watched gauge of manufacturing activity from the Institute of Supply Manage showed manufacturing dipped to 53.5 in May from 60.4 in April. Readings above 50 indicate manufacturing is continuing to expand. Regional manufacturing surveys put out by the Federal Reserve Banks of New York and Philadelphia also showed recent weakness.

But as production returns to more normal levels in Japan, economists are forecasting that disruptions to factory production in the United States will ease in coming months.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 28.

#1. To: Brian S (#0)

Under 2% is basically 'running in reverse'.

Badeye  posted on  2011-06-24   11:52:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Badeye (#1)

Under 2% is basically 'running in reverse'.

Not hardly, Badlie. The economy is slowly improving despite your best efforts to suggest otherwise.

Thunderbird  posted on  2011-06-24   12:31:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Thunderbird (#4)

A growth of under 2% 2 years after the recession supposedly ended is pathetically anemic growth.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2011-06-24   12:34:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: no gnu taxes (#5) (Edited)

A growth of under 2% 2 years after the recession supposedly ended is pathetically anemic growth.

Given the depths of the economic downturn, which, btw, the stim stopped dead in its tracks, any positive growth rate is a miracle.

war  posted on  2011-06-24   12:37:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: war (#6)

Not only did the stimulus not work, it actually made the economy worse

no gnu taxes  posted on  2011-06-24   12:46:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: no gnu taxes (#7) (Edited)

Bullshit.

There's not a credible economist out there who can support any conclusion that the stim did not work.

The economy stopped bleeding jobs. Confidence at major corporations increased. Consumer confidence increased. Purchases of big ticket items such as cars and houses stablized or turned up. Just about every aspect of the economy that was targeted in that stim reacted positively to it.

A stim is a pump prime...a crutch...hopefully deep enough to initiate and sustain its own activity until the broader economy turns up...it functions as an innoculation does. Had you a brain you'd know this. YOu don't so you're an ignoramus and, as we saw again today, a racist one at that.

But I'm sure Boofer will be along to agree with you.

[snicker]

war  posted on  2011-06-24   12:55:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: war (#8)

How we know the stimulus didn't work

no gnu taxes  posted on  2011-06-24   13:03:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: no gnu taxes (#10)

That was an assessment made 6months into the stim when 3 months of hard data was available.

Stick to posting rants about ni**ers, Paddy...that's what you're best equipped for...

war  posted on  2011-06-24   13:06:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: war (#11)

stimulus didn't work

no gnu taxes  posted on  2011-06-24   13:12:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: no gnu taxes (#14)

His argument is that that the stim didn't work because it didn't hit the baselines that HE, ex post facto, created for it.

What else you got?

war  posted on  2011-06-24   13:17:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: war (#16)

At least these sources are providing genuine analysis. All you've offered is boilerplate left wing rhetoric on why it SHOULD have worked.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2011-06-24   14:04:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: no gnu taxes (#19) (Edited)

All you've offered is boilerplate left wing rhetoric

There's an old saying in the economic world that states: "When you have to use charts, graphs and statistics instead of words to 'prove' a point...you're probably lying."

That last link was hilarious, btw. Upon further review of Mulligan's work, I nailed EXACTLY what he did, i.e. he simply made up his own baselines, declared them "Keynesian" and then drew his "comparison".

What you call "boilerplate" is actually HOW the effectiveness of a stim gets measured, doofus. The first goal of a stim in a recession is to stop the reccession. It did that. The second goal of a stim in a recession is to initiate nascient growth in some "critical" sectors of the economy of which "sentiment" is a part. The stim did all of that.

The problem with the stim is that while it was BIG enough to stop the recession it was not big enough to jump start, or to use the term that an economist would use, "shock" the economy into a broader based recovery and expansion. In fact, we've only recently "recovered" to the chain weighted value of 4Q 2007 GDP when the recession began. teh stim worked only in its target sectors and nothing more. It just wasn't big enough.

The problem with MouthBreathers such as you and the Boofers of the world is that you beleive the political rhetoric.

Is the economy in good shape? No. But it would have been far worse without the stim.

war  posted on  2011-06-24   14:50:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: war (#21)

instead of words

Bullshit talks.

The stimulus underperformed ALL stated goals and expectations. There is absolutely no evidence that it produced any better results than doing NOTHING. In fact, the unemployment rate exceeded what was predicted if we did do NOTHING.

You think different? Prove it.

And frankly, the money from that was supposed to be used for jobs was simply transferred to local agencies who used it to finance existing projects and pay local employees.

All we got from it was another day older and trillions in debt.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2011-06-24   15:08:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: no gnu taxes (#22)

And frankly, the money from that was supposed to be used for jobs was simply transferred to local agencies who used it to finance existing projects and pay local employees.

Bullshit.

war  posted on  2011-06-24   15:16:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: war (#24)

State governments and the inefectiveness of the Federal stimulus

no gnu taxes  posted on  2011-06-24   15:22:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: no gnu taxes (#26)

"Leakage" is a problem with any inter-government transfer of funds. The article makes that general observation yet offers no tangible evidence beyond that observation.

It might help if you knew what to look for. What you need to do is go back and look at a) what the expectations for the economy were as the stim was being formulated...b) what occurred as the "form" came into being and c) what we ended up with and, finally, d) how wrong the intial projections of exactly how bad Bush had left the economy were going forward from Jan of 2009.

war  posted on  2011-06-24   15:27:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 28.

#29. To: war (#28)

The 800 lb gorilla out there you can't ignore is the sheer number of economists out there who don't speak from a partisan viewpoint (like Krugman or even fairly, the Heritage foundation) who provide frank and unbiased analysis that the stimulus was simply a failure.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2011-06-24 15:35:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 28.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com