[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
U.S. Constitution Title: Groundbreaking US Supreme Court Decision on the Tenth and Ninth Amendment Saturday, June 18, 2011 11:40 * Ninth Amendment – Protection of rights not specifically enumerated in the Constitution. The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. * Tenth Amendment – Powers of States and people. The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. Goldwater Institute 6.17.11 Yesterday the U.S. Supreme Court issued one of the best and most important decisions ever on federalism. The Court unanimously held that not just states but individuals have standing to challenge federal laws as violations of state sovereignty under the 10th Amendment. This decision is as radical in the direction of liberty as the New Deal was radical in the direction of socialism. Click here to read the decision. In short, freedom advocates like us just got a green light from the USSC to bring more cases under the 10th Amendment. This will have huge—positive—implications for freedom so long as the current constitution of the court holds. Here is our favorite passage: “Federalism secures the freedom of the individual. It allows States to respond, through the enactment of positive law, to the initiative of those who seek a voice in shaping the destiny of their own times without having to rely solely upon the political processes that control a remote central power.” We will put this precedent to work immediately when we file our opening brief in the Obamacare lawsuit Monday, and also in our defense of Save Our Secret Ballot against the NLRB challenge, and many more cases to come. One other important note: Sometimes little cases make big constitutional law. This case involved a woman who was prosecuted under federal law for harassing her husband’s girlfriend—not the set of facts ordinarily creating an important precedent. Some of our cases, too, are seemingly “little” but with big principles at stake. Freedom is making strides in the courtroom, and we’ll do our best to keep that momentum going. Thank you for your support that makes it possible. Poster Comment: This is good news. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest More evidence that the evil 20th century is finally over. "Everything that can be invented has been invented."-- Charles Duell, Commissioner of US Patent Office, 1899 #2. To: jwpegler (#1) More evidence that the evil 20th century is finally over. The 20th century was no more evil then any other imo. I think this century will make the 20th century look like peace and apple pie.
#3. To: A K A Stone (#2) The 20th century was no more evil then any other imo Let's see, the communists murdered over 100 million. The Nazis and Fascists probably 12 million or so. The left gained strong footholds in Western countries and decimated our liberties creating a nanny state that took away the dignity of work. It was pretty darn awful. Fortunately, things are starting to change. "Everything that can be invented has been invented."-- Charles Duell, Commissioner of US Patent Office, 1899 #4. To: A K A Stone (#2) I think this century will make the 20th century look like peace and apple pie. With derivatives and hedge funds being worth 10 times the entire domestic product of the world and not a thing being done about reining that Ponzi scheme in, I think you are right.
#5. To: jwpegler, A K A Stone (#3) At first, I was tempted to comment similar to yours. But, keeping with the thread article Stone appears to have some optimism for US government. But you are correct: the twentieth century had more devastating wars; calamities, world-wide hunger, genocide and outright crime than any century in human history.
#6. To: A K A Stone (#0) The Court "unanimously" held that not just states but individuals have standing to challenge federal laws as violations of state sovereignty under the 10th Amendment. Now why did the Left Wing Judicial activists on the Supreme Court go along with this????? It makes no sense.... "I love the 45 caliber M1911, I respect the 9MM M9 Beretta but I only carry a CZ for my own personal protection". Quote courtesy of Lt Col John Dean Cooper, recognized as the Father of Modern Handgunning #7. To: mininggold (#4) I think you are right. I might print this out and frame it and put it on my wall. :)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|