[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Cult Watch Title: Sarah Palin To Meet With Donald Trump In Manhattan Tonight (Tweet)
Just when it appeared Sarah Palin's road trip for America couldn't confound reporters any further, she has decided to take a significant detour straight into the heart of Manhattan-- no, not to visit Grant's Tomb or get an autograph from the Naked Cowboy, but to meet with (still) potential challenger Donald Trump. ABC News' Michael Falcone was the first to tweet the meeting of the minds, quickly followed by a blog post that does little to elucidate the thinking behind the meeting. According to Falcone's report, the meeting was Palin's idea, and the two have agreed to convene at Trump Tower before heading out for a "low-key" dinner:
What to make of it? Both potential candidates have been extremely coy about the possibility of running-- though Trump has at least ruled out a run on the Republican ticket. Yes, they are both conservatives with big ideas for little government, and have the highest profile of anyone even remotely considered for the 2012 field. They stand nothing to lose by meeting, and the the media fascination with the two may end up becoming far greater together than the sum of its parts. As Palin has not exactly been forthcoming with the press on what her tour is about, one can expect she will be as mum about what this meeting is about as she has been about the entire adventure, leaving the primetime pundits to figure it out. (1 image) Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
If it's Godfathers Pizza, they're endorsing Herman Cain.
Obama's watch stopped on 24 May 2008, but he's been too busy smoking crack to notice. #2. To: hondo68 (#1) A chicken in every pot and a car in every garage – Herbert Hoover, circa 1928 A Pizza on every table!
#3. To: hondo68 (#0) So I guess she's going to be on Celebrity Apprentice next season. That's a good place for her.
#4. To: hondo68 (#0) Sarah Palin would beat Obama in an election. I wonder if she is going to go for the nomination.
#5. To: A K A Stone (#4) Sarah Palin would beat Obama in an election. I wonder if she is going to go for the nomination. Care to put some real money on that, Stone? $100 says she won't go for the nomination.
#6. To: A K A Stone (#4) Sarah Palin would beat Obama in an election. She hasn't got a prayer of a chance. Did you notice how she dumped her family members? It's part of her strategy to appear as an independent woman. It makes sense.
#7. To: Fred Mertz, A K A Stone (#6) So, do you think Stone will take my bet? Did I make it too high at $100?
#8. To: Skip Intro (#5) Sarah Palin would beat Obama in an election. I wonder if she is going to go for the nomination. I just said i wonder if she ill go for the nomination. So exactly why would I want to bet you on that? Why would I want to potentially reveal my identity to a liberal?
#9. To: Skip Intro, A K A Goldi (#7) No, he won't take that bet. Palin's handlers have her breaking away from her family; or downplaying them for PR reasons.
#10. To: Fred Mertz (#6) Sarah Palin would beat Obama in an election. We both have different opinions. None of actually know the truth of that. Question for you Fred. Do you think she is more like Ronald Reagan than any other candidate currently in the race?
#11. To: A K A Stone (#10) Question for you Fred. Do you think she is more like Ronald Reagan than any other candidate currently in the race? Reagan didn't quit his job in mid term. But she might like signing another amnesty bill.
#12. To: mininggold (#11) OMG...LOL
#13. To: A K A Stone (#10) You can't be serious, can you?
#14. To: A K A Stone (#8) No, what you said first was "Sarah Palin would beat Obama in an election." I'll bet you $1,000 that won't happen. As far as "revealing" yourself, there's this thing called PayPal that will protect your identity. Since you already know more about me than I do about you, what's the problem?
#15. To: Fred Mertz (#13) I know Kentucky has wild turkeys. But are you a chicken to answer the question?
#16. To: Skip Intro (#14) No, what you said first was "Sarah Palin would beat Obama in an election." Go back and read what you wrote numb nuts. Here is the quote numb nuts. "Stone? $100 says she won't go for the nomination. "
#17. To: A K A Stone (#15) The answer is no. She's out to make some bucks fleecing the hayseeds.
#18. To: A K A Stone (#16) I know what I wrote. This is a different bet.
#19. To: Skip Intro (#18) Are you going for an exacta?
#20. To: Fred Mertz (#17) She's out to make some bucks fleecing the hayseeds. And she's doing quite well at it.
#21. To: Fred Mertz (#19) Are you going for an exacta? I'm just trying to make it easy for Stone to put his money where his mouth is.
#22. To: Skip Intro (#18) I know what I wrote. This is a different bet. Ok you're honest. You acknowledged this is a different bet. So in this bet. If she doesn't get the nomination does that meant I lose? Because I wouldn't make that bet. But I do believe if she got the nomination she would easily defeat Obama the usurper.
#23. To: Fred Mertz (#17) The answer is no. You're courageous. Now here is another harder question. Which candidate do you think is most like Reagan?
#24. To: A K A Stone (#22) So in this bet. If she doesn't get the nomination does that meant I lose? Because I wouldn't make that bet. But I do believe if she got the nomination she would easily defeat Obama the usurper. So if I understand you, you're rejecting the $100 bet, but would accept the $1000 one provided she gets the nomination.
#25. To: A K A Stone (#23) That guy, what's his name, oh yeah, Mitt Romney. He has hollywood looks. The only problem is that he wears those superman underwear.
#26. To: Skip Intro (#24) So if I understand you, you're rejecting the $100 bet, but would accept the $1000 one provided she gets the nomination. I am saying. It would be stupid to make a bet where it is a sure thing Obama is running. And it isn't sure if she is running. I would have 3 hurdles to jump. First she would have to run. Then she would have to win nomination. Then she would have to beat Obama. Besides I don't make bets like that. I could be wrong and she gets creamed. Yeah I could be wrong it happens.
#27. To: Fred Mertz (#25) Did you like Reagan? Would you possibly vote for Mitt over Obama? What about other Republicans. Anyone you would potentially vote for? One thing that I don't understand about you. Is that you like Obama and you like Rand Paul. They are like 180 degrees apart.
#28. To: A K A Stone (#27) (Edited) I honestly don't like any politicians. They are mostly whores and liars.
#29. To: hondo68 (#0) Filming 'Nail'n Palin 3' perhaps? ;) Never swear "allegiance" to anything other than the 'right to change your mind'! #30. To: Fred Mertz (#28) I honestly don't like any politicians. They are mostly whores and liars. I see you and I have at least one thing in common...
#31. To: Murron, Fred Mertz (#30) Two...you live in Kentucky Three...You voted Rand Paul?
#32. To: Brian S (#29) No surprise you are familiar with that....lol Proxy IP's are amusing.....lmao #33. To: A K A Stone (#26) Then she would have to beat Obama. Well, pardon me for not understanding you, but that's exactly what you predicted would happen. Backing down now, are you?
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|