Opinions/Editorials
See other Opinions/Editorials Articles
Title: New OBL video
Source:
N/A
URL Source: http://N/A
Published: May 5, 2011
Author: CZ82
Post Date: 2011-05-05 15:52:30 by CZ82
Keywords: None
Views: 37588
Comments: 73
Anybody want to guess what might happen if a new Osama bin Laden video pops up outta nowhere in another week or so saying "HA HA you Missed"?????
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-33) not displayed.
.
.
.
Prove your contention just like you sided with ALL those LP assholes: WhiteSands, Gatlin and Harrowup defending the password conspiracy theory about "yukon" or Ibluafartsky.
You can't prove anything, pal. Here is why: I didn't do it.
#35. To: A K A Stone (#31)
You are clyven the mouse.
Where's the BEEF? PROVE your conjecture, punk.
#36. To: A K A Stone (#31)
No proof? OK. You lose, pal.
#37. To: NewsJunky (#20)
It was all part of a secret plot by Bush to let Obama (who he knew was going to take his place) take credit for killing him. It makes a lot of sense if you think about it long enough...
It certainly does, especially when you consider that Obama was cunning enough to place a fake birth announcement in the paper when he was 0 years old.
"We need to counter the shockwave of the evildoer by having individual rate cuts accelerated and by thinking about tax rebates." — George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Oct. 4, 2001
#38. To: buckeroo (#36)
Hey even if you ain't Clyven. Take it easy on the poor old mouse. I kind of liked the fella while he lasted. How can ya not like a talkin mouse,
#39. To: A K A Stone (#19)
It is my opinion based on the evidence I've accumulated over the years.
Please tell me a comet brought this evidence to you.
But no evidence has been presented.
AQ stated he is dead. Pakistan is pissed that he is dead.
That's more evidence than you have.
America...My Kind Of Place...
"I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..."
--GW Bush
#40. To: war (#39)
AQ stated he is dead. Pakistan is pissed that he is dead.
Who in AQ said that?
What is the website name?
Who owns the domain?
#41. To: CZ82 (#24)
Steeler colors dude...you know the team...they've "owned" every team in Ohio for the last forever...
America...My Kind Of Place...
"I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..."
--GW Bush
#42. To: war (#15)
FWIW, mine is around a long neck Bud...
LaBatt Blue
#43. To: A K A Stone (#40)
Let me guess...AQ doesn't exist either.
That said, let's see you "evidence" that he has been dead for years.
Thanks.
America...My Kind Of Place...
"I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..."
--GW Bush
#44. To: Bartcoprules (#42)
Any Canadian beer is okay with me. My son drinks Bud so it's in the house and the Coors Lite needs to be replenished,
America...My Kind Of Place...
"I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..."
--GW Bush
#45. To: CZ82 (#21)
Aha...
America...My Kind Of Place...
"I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..."
--GW Bush
#46. To: war (#43)
Let me guess...AQ doesn't exist either.
The word Al Qaueda didn't come into existance until 911.
Can you find me the word in an article pre 911?
#47. To: war (#43)
I'm still waiting on a response to number 40.
Or is it that you can't answer because you took the word of the lying Kenyan?
Lips flapping isn't proof.
The claims would be laughed out of any courtroom, and it isn't scientific.
#48. To: war (#45)
Aha...
And.............. What?????
"I love the 45 caliber M1911, I respect the 9MM M9 Beretta but I only carry a CZ for my own personal protection". Quote courtesy of Lt Col John Dean Cooper, recognized as the Father of Modern Handgunning (_*_)
#49. To: war (#41)
Steeler colors dude...you know the team...they've "owned" every team in Ohio for the last forever...
I can't remember the last time I watched a football game that had an Ohio team in it..... sometime back in the 70s if I remember correctly..... Then again I don't watch the Steelers either.....
"I love the 45 caliber M1911, I respect the 9MM M9 Beretta but I only carry a CZ for my own personal protection". Quote courtesy of Lt Col John Dean Cooper, recognized as the Father of Modern Handgunning (_*_)
#50. To: A K A Stone (#47)
Sorry Stone...my degree is in Poli Sci not psychology.
You need to PING someone else to your "issues"...
America...My Kind Of Place...
"I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..."
--GW Bush
#51. To: war (#50) (Edited)
You said AQ said it.
You don't even know where their website is.
You don't even know who owns the domain.
You don't know who said it.
All you have is what you were spoon fed.
You aren't up to the task.
Hint. Someone flapping their lips isn't proof of anything.
#52. To: A K A Stone (#51)
And yet you claim he's been dead ten+ years...and your "proof" is that I don't know AQ's domain.
As I said...Poli Sci...
America...My Kind Of Place...
"I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..."
--GW Bush
#53. To: war (#52)
And yet you claim he's been dead ten+ years...and your "proof" is that I don't know AQ's domain.As I said...Poli Sci...
That is my opinion. It is not a fact.
But since there were videos with different Bin Ladens.
Since there has been no activity by him (except before elections).
Since he was reported to be getting Kidney treatment.
And lots of other stuff
I think it is a fair conclusion.
#54. To: NewsJunky, A K A Stone (#38) (Edited)
Hey even if you ain't Clyven. Take it easy on the poor old mouse. I kind of liked the fella while he lasted. How can ya not like a talkin mouse
I haven't seen him/her post for awhile. The truth is, that monicker showed up right after the GREAT PASSWORD CT occurred. The only reason why I remember its posts is because of its tagline which by LF's own standards was not only funny but impressive besides being well-built. I don't have a tagline; it clutters up the screen and wastes BW.
Another thing that was impressive (to me) was that monicker was too fuckin' nice in its posts for a chit-chat political channel. What is the point of being "nice" and semi-formal in discussion when the goal is to get right into a food fight and state an opinion and sling it out thereafter?
I love these barroom brawls; the more I see the sparks going off, the chairs smashing the windows and mirrors, the guns blazing and the whiskey bottles flung; the fist fights and so forth ... the better; sometimes, for hours, I am in such riveted belly-laffter that I can't type; although, admittedly I rarely contribute posting to them.
But that Clyven was sneaky about something because it appeared right when "yukon" lost his password. It appeared on two different channels that I know of, here and 4um. I was accused of being Clyven there too, although it was never PROVEN; in fact, on 4um, I was already posting AND as I have said before I don't run multiple-clients.
When Stone kept limiting my posts on LF or screwing around with the titles of threads or deleting comments of threads, I joined TBF because nolu-chan was posting some good analysis about this "yukon" issue. I have only made a few posts there as it is a rather subdued chit-chat channel and the keen analysis (although refreshing and well received on several topics of interest) is limited in barroom brawl content that I really enjoy. There is a monicker there, "the talking mouse" which I assume is whom A K A Stone makes reference towards, as well. Again, I don't run multiple-clients; that person is completely unique and is not myself posting.
Stone, can YOU GET IT THROUGH YOUR FAT SKULL that I don't run multiple-clients? If you can CATEGORICALLY PROVE THAT I AM DOING THAT, SHOW THE DATA OR DROP THE SUBJECT.
#55. To: buckeroo (#54)
What did you say John Hancock?
#56. To: A K A Stone (#55)
You banned me, I came back time after time after time with other monickers one after the other. Then, you finally gave up and renewed my standard "buckeroo" monicker.
But your suggestion isn't running multiple clients as you have accused me.
#57. To: buckeroo (#56)
Bucky you are a tricky one.
#58. To: A K A Stone (#57) (Edited)
You are so confused about phrasing that which you want to state, you don't make any sense half the time. Take a minute and use your own forum with purpose and clarity. As an example:
you are a tricky one.
What the HELL does that mean? What are you attempting to state beyond playing around? Use your forum as an opportunity to state an idea with precision and accuracy.
#59. To: buckeroo (#58) (Edited)
What I mean is that you are tricky.
You have 1001 ip numbers that change constantly.
But I like you buckeroo. You do have some good points you make.
Carry on.
#60. To: A K A Stone (#57) (Edited)
"http://first-draft-blog.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341c5ced53ef0148c7a28c4b970c-320wi"
#61. To: A K A Stone (#59)
You have 1001 ip numbers that change constantly.
So PROVE your contention that I was running multiple clients such as "Clyven." You would know if I posted within the same or similar times with the same IP.
#62. To: buckeroo (#61)
I'm not worried about it Buck. It is your posting style that sticks out to me. Christine etc.
#63. To: A K A Stone (#62)
When have EVER been "nice" to anyone? You know, I get a "kick" out of folks that think these political chit-chat forums are about making "friends." They are so far out on the Moon or beyond because of that viewpoint that I frequently ignore them and rarely comment because they don't know what they are suggesting or otherwise eluding to.
Internet political chit-chat forums are not akin to FACEBOOK and "friends" ... this is the WildWest out here.... YEEHA! And I love it.
#64. To: buckeroo (#63)
So, your purpose in life is to prevent a sense of camaraderie on message boards?
I also think you should check your Freudian slip with regards to 'eluding', junior.
war has to do something for entertainment. The voices in his head aren't speaking to him and his imaginary friends have found reasons not to come over anymore.
#65. To: Rudgear (#64)
So, your purpose in life is to prevent a sense of camaraderie on message boards?
I don't make anywhere the total sum of posts that you personally perform in any given time period. And I am not at odds to those that "seek a sense of camaraderie." The truth is, the Internet is NOT a logical place for such relationships; those that aspire towards "camaraderie" should coalesce with their local, political friendly clubs in person that cater towards the orientation and formation of a similar viewpoint.
The truth is: the goal for me is viewing varied and diversified perspectives to regard the world around us; the larger I see the political spectrum, the better for me. I could care less for clustering in a huddle making palsie-wowsies as LP and FR are famous for.
#66. To: buckeroo (#65)
Honestly, I think you need to get out of your house and get a job. So much of what you purport to seek will become clear once you stop living inside our own head.
war has to do something for entertainment. The voices in his head aren't speaking to him and his imaginary friends have found reasons not to come over anymore.
#67. To: buckeroo (#63)
Buck my feelings are hurt. Under your tough exterior I thought you were my friend. Boo hoo.
#68. To: A K A Stone (#67)
Buck my feelings are hurt. Under your tough exterior I thought you were my friend. Boo hoo.
I know. Look, go suck Palin's left or right teat. You would have a lot more fun.
#69. To: Rudgear (#66)
Honestly, I think you need to get out of your house and get a job.
What makes you think I am not already? You are presumptive based on your own self-declared "honesty." This makes you a GODDAMNED liar.
So much of what you purport to seek will become clear once you stop living inside our own head.
You should reconsider your own remarck and apply the same for yourself.
#70. To: A K A Stone (#59)
I like you buckeroo. You do have some good points you make.
I want to come back to this snide comment on your part. You don't like anyone except the three stooges on LP defending their resident queer.
Why the HELL are you out here on the Internet? You consistently act as a tyrant, actually an obscure, pathetic monster giving platitudes when you can't defend yourself for the lies, deceit and treachery you have personally performed not just against your own beliefs but also in publick humiliation making claims that are far from the TRUTH.
A lot of people across the Internet have you pegged, pal. Now, there is a time in life wherein you can start acting as "manager" of an out-of-the-way Internet chit-chat political forum without your fuckin' EGO involved.
As I said before:
over the past few months the management here (I won't mention any names but their initials are: A K A Stone) has consistently deleted posts, changed thread topic titles, suspended good posters, banned good posters, ensured harm on good poster's LF standing, sought coalition with other posters of another website, timed good LF posters out, spied on good poster's IPs, stated good posters are malicious and harmful to LF because of cheap rumours, caused unnecessary grievance and destruction towards the free and responsible use of the Internet and beyond all of the above, deserves a suspension from management duties so that responsible posters, such as myself can fully achieve the broadcasting power that my pen wields.
You can break the place or make it happen with increasing poster inputs and you see it; I know you see it because I DO. Its upto YOU, pal; not lies, rescission of decision, backtracking, gobble-D-goop, or anything other than your own commitment to understand WHAT YOU HAVE DONE. Don't hurt posters. You owe LF a BIG_APOLOGY.
#71. To: buckeroo (#70)
Lawyers ask to participate in potentially pivotal copyright caseThe attorneys most active in fighting Las Vegas copyright enforcement company Righthaven LLC now want to participate in a potentially pivotal case involving copyright infringement allegations against the Pahrump Life blog.
Attorneys representing Righthaven defendant the Democratic Underground and another group of attorneys representing the Media Bloggers Association asked U.S. District Judge James Mahan in Las Vegas on Friday for permission for the Democratic Underground and the bloggers group to participate as friends of the court in the Pahrump Life case.
They sought to participate by filing briefs and potentially appearing at Pahrump Life hearings.
The Pahrump Life case is important in the Righthaven litigation as Mahan — who has already ruled against Righthaven on fair use grounds in another case — is now threatening to find Righthaven doesn’t have standing to sue over content allegedly misappropriated from the Las Vegas Review-Journal.
Righthaven, meanwhile, has lined up a star attorney from New York to help defend its right to sue.
Based on past experience in the fair use decision, Mahan is likely to allow the Democratic Underground and the Media Bloggers Association to participate in the Pahrump Life case.
(more in link)
Buck, he isn't even on the radar of Righthaven, the law firm suing forums for alleged fair use violations because they allow about four paragraphs if copywritten news pieces to be reposted with links to the source.
And Stone's forum is something those people would have a field day with if they cared to go after it, because not only entire pieces are cut and pasted, but they are altered too.
So I don't know what is more pathetic; the fact Stone does fair use so bad, or that people are being sued on fair use issues who are more responsible in how they comply with the most careful interpretation of the concept.
#72. To: Ferret Mike (#71)
There are none of their articles on this site.
#73. To: A K A Stone (#72)
Righthaven is a law firm that specializes in suing sites like this one for fair use violations.
I wouldn't worry Stone, you don't have a deep enough pocket for them to be interested in trying to sue you.
But if your traffic ever became good enough, that would change.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]