[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!

The GOSPEL of the ALIENS | Fallen Angels | Giants | Anunnaki

The IMAGE of the BEAST Revealed (REV 13) - WARNING: Not for Everyone

WEF Calls for AI to Replace Voters: ‘Why Do We Need Elections?’

The OCCULT Burger king EXPOSED

PANERA BREAD Antichrist message EXPOSED

The OCCULT Cheesecake Factory EXPOSED

Satanist And Witches Encounter The Cross

History and Beliefs of the Waldensians

Rome’s Persecution of the Bible

Evolutionists, You’ve Been Caught Lying About Fossils

Raw Streets of NYC Migrant Crisis that they don't show on Tv

Meet DarkBERT - AI Model Trained On DARK WEB

[NEW!] Jaw-dropping 666 Discovery Utterly Proves the King James Bible is God's Preserved Word

ALERT!!! THE MOST IMPORTANT INFORMATION WILL SOON BE POSTED HERE


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Satans Mark/Cashless
See other Satans Mark/Cashless Articles

Title: John Boehner And The Republicans Didn't Threaten Bush Over Abortion
Source: businessinsider.com
URL Source: http://www.businessinsider.com/john ... aten-bush-over-abortion-2011-4
Published: Apr 11, 2011
Author: Gary Anderson
Post Date: 2011-04-11 19:33:24 by Ferret Mike
Keywords: None
Views: 1948
Comments: 3

John Boehner is threatening to shut the government down over abortion. But these same Republicans didn't threaten George Bush with government shutdown over the same issue, even though they controlled congress for much of Bush's reign. Did people really think they were getting this when they voted Republican during the last election?

I have been no fan of the Democrats in the past, holding them responsible for the housing crisis along with the Republicans. Both parties were beholden to the international banker cartel. Both parties allowed the repeal of Glass-Steagall. Both parties looked the other way while the easy money machine artificially drove up prices on real estate and ruined many with the ensuing crash.

But with regard to the government shutdown over abortion, it seems to show the height of irresponsibility on the part of the Republicans. The Democrats exceeded the dollar amount of cuts required by the Republicans. They got what they wanted. The Democrats compromised.

Even Indiana governor Mitch Daniels, a Republican, says social bills should be separate from spending bills. I think Wall Street types must be uncomfortable with social Republicans who are, frankly, an embarrassment to the conservative economic movement more times than not. They want to pry into private lives, and Wall Street would not want that! What happens in New York, after all, stays in New York!

And I am not a defender of the conservative economic movement because it seeks bigger cuts than we are talking about now. Congressman Ryan wants cuts that could actually implode the GDP of the nation, causing a decline of revenues, as we see happening in Ireland. If you cut too much, you then need to make up for it by more ponzi bubbles. The conservative economic movement didn't want more bubbles and more too big to fail situations I thought. Or am I just being naive?

Certainly, Spencer Bachus of Alabama (who spoke out against the Volcker Rule) and Jim Sensenbrenner of Wisconsin want more ponzi schemes, as they are totally against the Volcker Rule that sought to bring sanity to the banking system. Sensenbrenner and Michelle Bachmann, among others, are cosponsors of HR1081 to delay Dodd Frank, which contains the Volcker rule. So, perhaps cutting food to seniors is what Republicans want in exchange for the opportunity to attack mainstreet with more immoral lending schemes? I think so. Talk about morality!

So, before we go too far in praising the Republicans as the party of morality, we can see that they want ponzi lending, immoral recklessness, gambling with depositors money, more wars for resources, desire for your social security money in order to generate needless fees, etc. They even want to bet on your death with insurance policies!

And as far as abortion is concerned, I could live with either policy. I don't particularly like my tax money going to fund abortion. But unlike drones, the money doesn't actually kill. And that money may even prevent more abortions with other programs than cutting it would do. And drones kill irresponsibly, unlike money, and I would much rather see those banned.

But I also believe personal religion is a matter that should be left to the individual, without government intrusion. We can go round and round on these issues of abortion and definitions of death and the like until the cows come home, but we shouldn't threaten the government shutdown because of an issue that is at the heart of separation of church and state versus people who want to tell us how to live our lives. I think we have a moral responsibility to tell government how we feel.

But government does not have the moral responsibility to tell us how to live our lives. That gets dangerous, as the history of inquisitions, crusades and the like show. Didn't Christ say his kingdom was not of this world? I think people who equate religion with government are making a big mistake. But I guess Gingrich had a hero in the Puritan Oliver Cromwell. Turns out Cromwell murdered the King of England to replace one state religion with another. Do we want to go back to those days? I don't think so. Makes you wonder about Gingrich doesn't it?

Perhaps Boehner, who never saw a tanning bed that he didn't like, cannot see the forest for the trees, and has a misplaced populism at work here. If he really wants to do something moral for the country, he could restrain credit attacks on mainstreet, because, as we all know, money is the root of evil.

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/john-boehner-and-the-republicans-didnt-threaten-bush-over-abortion-2011-4#ixzz1JGDQZ9aH

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Ferret Mike (#0)

Mike,

I wouldn't take any investment advice from Gary. He is more than late; he didn't read the memo. Nobody has to worry about abortion except Planned Parenthood who would be out of business if the damn Vatican would allow birth control.

harrowup  posted on  2011-04-11   20:06:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Ferret Mike (#0)

social bills should be separate from spending bills.

Why do we need "social bills"? How did we as a nation survive before we ever had them?

yukon  posted on  2011-04-11   20:11:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: yukon (#2)

We had slavery, children working 'round the clock, women couldn't vote and, as it pertains to you, gays couldn't marry.

So, you tell me...

America...My Kind Of Place...

war  posted on  2011-04-13   10:11:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com