[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
U.S. Constitution Title: Populist American Says US Hijacked By Washington Criminals Populist American Says US Hijacked By Washington Criminals By Greg Szymanski 3-3-6 Bill Gibbons is fed up to his ears with the criminals in Washington. And he's proud to call himself a "Populist American," not willing to compromise his God-given rights of freedom and liberty in the face of what he calls a fascist hijacking of his country and its Constitution. Gibbons is just another example of an average American do above average things while trying desperately to alert his fellow citizens of the neo con takeover before its too late. And to try and get some action and in memory of his wife Betty who died in 2004, Gibbons started an extensive gathering of material on his web site at http://www.gnrevival.com as well as writing two books entitled The American Gestapo and The New American Revolution. "This is a real populist web site and we believe that God Almighty is in command of all the earth," said Gibbons. "We believe in less government, war only in defense of our home and that nobody is above the law. We are against unlimited immigration and believe that all illegal immigrants should be deported immediately." Gibbons, who feels the Constitution and the very future of his country is now at stake, recently wrote the following warning to the American people, trying to wake them up before it's too late: "Let us see if we have this straight: The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land and all federal elected politicians as well as all federal bureaucrats take an oath to uphold the Constitution. Are we right so far? "Of course we are right, because we have a copy of the oath that senators and congressmen take upon assuming office. Our elected representatives and senators break the law, but we do not send them to jail, "Now what happens when these elected persons and bureaucrats do not keep their word? Would I be right in assuming that they have broken the law, because they did not obey the Constitution? If you will remember, the federal government sent Martha Stewart to jail for lying to federal investigators, which is not a crime. "Ms Stewart was not under oath when she was supposed to have lied. I say supposed to have lied, because the government never did prove that she did lie. So, if a business woman like Martha Stewart can go to jail for lying to federal investigators, would it not be right to send congressmen and senators to jail for lying to the public by not keeping their word to obey the Constitution? "They certainly do lie when they swear to do one thing and do the opposite. They take an oath to obey and support the Constitution, but turn around and trash the Constitution every day. George Bush, the highest elected official in the country said, "The Constitution is just piece of paper and pays no attention to his oath of office. Can anyone show me the difference in the two cases? I fail to see any difference myself. "With this thought in mind let us examine the facts for a few minutes. The Constitution is the LAW and breaking any law is a crime. Criminals are supposed to be in jail. Voting for legislation that is directly opposed to the Constitution certainly is breaking the law. We know that the justice department is anxious when it comes to putting people in jail, whether they are guilty or not, or whether they are elected officials or not. Congressman Jim Traficant, democrat from Ohio, comes to mind. Anyone playing with a full deck knows that Traficant was railroaded to prison because he was a "die-hard Constitutionalists". "He always had the highest record concerning votes to uphold the Constitution in congress or the senate. Jim is in jail, while the worst violators of the Constitution, like Teddy Kennedy, are running free in Washington. These two-faced lying hypocrites in the House of Representatives had the gall to expel him from congress as being undesirable. How could anyone vote to oust one of the few honest men in congress as being undesirable and still look at their faces in the mirror? Article Ten of the Constitution is very clear and it does not take a rocket scientist to know what it means: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, not prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, OR TO THE PEOPLE." Do you have any problem understanding that amendment? Of course not, lawyers did not write it. Allow me to throw this little antidote in here. I was watching an old movie, where this black man's kid was before the judge for the fourth time. The judge was browbeating the poor old fellow, because he was thinking. Finally the old gentlemen said, "Yo honor, I can't talk without thinking, I ain't no lawyer." "Everyone should read the Constitution, for it is a simple document. If you did read it you would find that about 95-to99 % of all that the federal government does is unconstitutional. Where does the Constitution mention education, or aid to education, foreign aid, social security, Medicare, aid to children, or any one of hundreds of programs that the federal government is involved in? Any member of congress that votes for federal aid to education or foreign aid is breaking the law, which makes him a criminal and demands that he go to jail with the rest of the criminals. Are we right so far, or are we just being paranoid. "Now comes this thought for you to consider: Ignorance of the law is no excuse and any cop or judge will tell you that. If a congressman or senator says they did not know that the Constitution is the law or that they were breaking the law that is no excuse and they should still go to the slammer with the rest of the criminals. There should be a Committee on the Constitution in each house to see that no legislation even reaches the floor that violates the Constitution. "One final thought: The Bill of Rights is just that "A Bill of Right". We citizens have always had the rights; they were not given to us by a benevolent government. The Bill of Rights was drafted to see that the government does not violate these rights, which are already ours." For more informative articles, go to http://www.arcticbeacon.com
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread |
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|