Cult Watch
See other Cult Watch Articles
Title: A Suspicious Request form the Goldi El Pee Faro Bank Snookerthon
Source:
TAIPAN
URL Source: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/ ... ArtNum=305524&SC=81&EC=120#C81
Published: Apr 2, 2011
Author: TAIPAN
Post Date: 2011-04-02 05:14:11 by Coral Snake
Keywords: Goldi, CrookedRequest, Pinocchio, Lies, PayToLine, BLANK
Views: 37880
Comments: 50
I found this VERY SUSPICIOUS request concening "snail mail" donations on Goldi's Faro Bank SnookerThon thread at El Pee Where can I send a check? Liberty Post • 9838 Old Baymeadows Road, PMB 296 • Jacksonville, Florida 32256 the Pay to line needs to be left BLANK. Goldi-Lox posted on 2011-04-01 1:13:12 ET Reply Trace The Pay To or more accurately the Pay To The Order of line of a check is the line that tells a bank exactly to give the money that the check represents TO. The recipient of a check with a BLANK pay to line can make it out to literally ANYBODY. What ecactly is Goldi up to with this SnookerThon involving checks with BLANK Pay To The Order Lines???!!! More to come if I find out more. I have never even seen Jim Rob ask for donations in checks with BLANK Pay To The Order lines!!!! This is a NEW LOW in possible dishonesty from the Neo Con forums if my suspicions about the BLANK Pay To The Order line on the Checks is true.
#106. To: Magician (#104)
TAIPAN
(1 image)
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-9) not displayed.
.
.
.
#10. To: We The People (#6)
(Edited)
Funny, that. She is an accountant by trade. Biiiig red flag on the play.
Well, [Yu-klown v. 2.0's] got to do something for attention, his multiple personalities aren't speaking to him any more, and his imaginary friends keep finding excuses not to come over.
Perhaps someone who has sent her a check with the pay to line blank would tell us what payee she fills in?
You have the courage to tell the masses what no politician told them: you are inferior and all the improvements in your conditions which you simply take for granted you owe to the efforts of men who are better than you. Ludwig von Mises in a letter to Ayn Rand
Hopefully the tax attorney you hire can convince them of this. Especially since you acknowledge on a public forum her shady business practices yet still choose to participate.
"http://first-draft-blog.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341c5ced53ef0148c7a28c4b970c-320wi"
Perhaps so! Anyone?
Especially since you acknowledge on a public forum her shady business practices yet still choose to participate. I already have a great tax attorney. Please explain your second remark. How am I participating?
Anyone? Considering what she allows to go on on her site, I think you'd have to be nuts to get your name associated with hers.
"Am I for or against abstinence?" - Sarah Palin
Please explain your second remark. How am I participating? If you have a tax lawyer then you should already know that will be for the IRS to investigate. You acknowledge you deal with shady characters and choose to continue. Dirty hands it's called.
"http://first-draft-blog.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341c5ced53ef0148c7a28c4b970c-320wi"
Is that a problem for a low budget hobby?
Please explain your second remark. How am I participating? If you have a tax lawyer then you should already know that will be up to the IRS to investigate. You acknowledge you deal with shady characters and choose to continue. Dirty hands it's called.
"http://first-draft-blog.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341c5ced53ef0148c7a28c4b970c-320wi"
LOL! I have donated one time to LP in the amount of $50.00 and didn't deduct the donation. Believe it or not, in my country, I'm allowed to spend my net take home pay any way that I'd like to. You would not believe the contact I've had with the IRS over the years and I have no shady dealings. But thanks for your concern.
Is that a problem for a low budget hobby? I don't know, I'm not an accountant or tax attorney and I've never held or ran an internet interest that solicited donations. I'm also not making any allegations, I'm simply engaged in a discussion.
Believe it or not, in my country, I'm allowed to spend my net take home pay any way that I'd like to. You would not believe the contact I've had with the IRS over the years and I have no shady dealings. But thanks for your concern. Yet you admit to participating in what maybe be an enterprise that you admit has unorthodox practices. When they hit her for the bill and she can't pay you might also be called in as a party to it since you participated and received services with full knowledge.
"http://first-draft-blog.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341c5ced53ef0148c7a28c4b970c-320wi"
I admitted to donating $50.00 to LP, which I did. I in no way 'participated in what maybe be an enterprise that I admit has unorthodox practices', nor did I admit LP in fact has unorthodox practices. I am simply musing since I have no direct knowledge of LP's business dealings. Donating $50.00 to anything is not participating in an enterprise, it is a donation. You are trying to convince me that I've somehow implicated myself in some imaginary shady dealing because I donated $50.00? Are you serious? And what services did I receive for my donation? Your argument is ridiculous, and I urge you to stop it.
I have never read where she said that ... she may have. I have read where she said that she cannot deposit a check made out to LP.
Perhaps someone who has sent her a check with the pay to line blank would tell us what payee she fills in? Perhaps so! Anyone? Smart ... yes.
I in no way 'participated in what maybe be an enterprise that I admit has unorthodox practices', nor did I admit LP in fact has unorthodox practices. I am simply musing since I have no direct knowledge of LP's business dealings. Donating $50.00 to anything is not participating in an enterprise, it is a donation. You are trying to convince me that I've somehow implicated myself in some imaginary shady dealing because I donated $50.00? Are you serious? And what services did I receive for my donation? Your argument is ridiculous, and I urge you to stop it. You participated in the forum, so you received services. Donations are optional, yet you gave by your admission, so you felt that your participation had monetary value. And yet you have no idea how the forum enterprise is actually set up, as you don't even know the full name of the owner. It could be laundering money, as it's definitely in the right location. And you publicly acknowledge your suspicions regarding her unorthodox donation collection processes, yet give tacit approval by continuing your posting there with a history of donations.
"http://first-draft-blog.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341c5ced53ef0148c7a28c4b970c-320wi"
as the message boards turns, you silly little drama queen
Why does Godwinson try to hide the fact that he is DESTRO?
she must be hiding 10's of dollars, i'd turn her into the irs, but the snitch fee would probably be only .50 to 1.00, it amazes me the crap you people get all excited about.
Why does Godwinson try to hide the fact that he is DESTRO?
And you publicly acknowledge your suspicions regarding her unorthodox donation collection processes, yet give tacit approval by continuing your posting there with a history of donations. I've regretfully come to the conclusion that you are an idiot. I urge you to contact any authorities you deem necessary and report any illegal activities that you suspect I am engaged in.
You probably would, I'm sure.
You may not have noticed this, but as one reads through these threads, I appear to remain amazingly calm, while you on the other hand appear a bit 'excited'.
Let me think about this. If I was asking for donations for this site. I wouldn't want anyone to know my real name. If I used paypal would people be able to get my real name? I don't know as I never used paypal. I heard her name is Sally. I don't recall if her last name is out. I would have to cut her some slack on this one. I know she has done it this way for years. The person sending the check will receive a canceled check or an image of it. So they will be able to see where the money went to. They could post that information if they wanted to.
it's called drunken stupor
Why does Godwinson try to hide the fact that he is DESTRO?
it's called drunken stupor Shouldn't your shift at Taco Bell be starting right about now? Don't be late!
Don't be late! I was just signing off and this popped up on my screen. You jumped my ass this morning ... about these type comments. You said (words to the affect): "In the yukon mold" when referring to my post. I must say to you now: that yukon would have been proud to make such a snarky comment ... don't cha agree? Com' on ... WTP ... Really? I will go now ...
You said (words to the affect): "In the yukon mold" when referring to my post. I must say to you now: that yukon would have been proud to make such a snarky comment ... don't cha agree? Com' on ... WTP ... Really? I will go now ... Now you're seeing the real "Gatlin." He's got to have the last word. And he sure didn't appreciate getting rebuked for condoning Yukon's gutter language and behavior. And sounding like him. What's telling about his rebuke of your dig into calcon is a matter of degree. Yours was far more of a tweak, whereas Gatlin/Tater's digs were...NASTY. Gatlin, there is a different between "snarky," and "nasty" or "filthy." "Com' on, WTP" - My ass. Go back home to yukon's waiting arms.
You jumped my ass this morning ... about these type comments. You may not realize this, but calcon and I have a history of exchanging posts exactly like this, because we enjoy each others humor. Calcon is a funny guy. I ROARED at laughter when he started calling Ron Paul, bong paul. I have nothing against calcon, have told him so many times, and have teased him about working at Taco Bell for a couple years now. He has teased me about being an alcoholic for quite awhile also. We are 'playing'. You are not. There is a marked difference. (I have no idea where calcon works and he could have no idea what my alcoholic beverage consumption is.) If you want something to throw back at me, search posts from me to 'Rek'. If you pointed out that remark, you would be correct.
Ping to 36
and i must admit was a pretty good one, hardly a nasty comment
Why does Godwinson try to hide the fact that he is DESTRO?
I thought you said you were a father. Males don't like the type of teasing you are describing.
"http://first-draft-blog.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341c5ced53ef0148c7a28c4b970c-320wi"
bong paul! I still lmao over that, even when I type it!
He has teased me about being an alcoholic for quite awhile also. We are 'playing'. You are not. There is a marked difference. these guys are all a bunch of drama queens and don't have any concept of what's funny this messages boards wouldn't be any fun at all without some good natured ribbing back and forth, i think you're a funny guy and you always get some good shots on me
Why does Godwinson try to hide the fact that he is DESTRO?
You see? Tweaking each other is sport and faaaar different than nastiness and filthiness. (Thanks for your take, cal.)
I can verify the above as true. In my case it was made out to her old ISP, tho.
the ones who are secure in their masculinity do however, once you finally get laid you'll understand
Why does Godwinson try to hide the fact that he is DESTRO?
I apologize for calling you an idiot, but still maintain that your argument is ridiculous. I am a father, and a damned good one. My children are polite, courteous, intelligent, self sustaining and doing quite well. My son is getting ready to start his first business, and is doing so with absolutely no help from me. I'd help if he asked, but he hasn't. I'm very proud of him for that. Males don't like the type of teasing you are describing. That statement is just creepy and given the latest happenings, I'm not even sure if I want to address it.
You can't have it both ways. It's income and unless you have an LLC, non profit or similiar to which it can be donated it will be considered YOUR income. If I'm contributing to YOUR income I need to know YOUR name.
"http://first-draft-blog.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341c5ced53ef0148c7a28c4b970c-320wi"
No you don't. Your argument is hogwash.
The rubes that are left posting there, the brain-dead morons like yukon, 22rifle, Gatlin and the other fascist pricks are too fucking stupid to realize that Goldi-Schmuck is scamming them. Good! these pathetic bastards deserve to be bilked of their cash.
Then she should find a way to set up a separate account for Liberty Post then. I just would never send a check with an important line BLANK to someone I never met except over the internet PERIOD. That kind of request just sets my CROOKdar running at high speed.
Not saying you are wrong Snake.
Does she not keep a separate account just for LP?
#11. To: We The People (#6)
The fact is that Goldi COULD do as described above. I'm not saying she would, but a blank TO: line is ridiculous. She could make it out to the phone company, the cable company or the RNC for that matter.
#12. To: We The People (#9)
I have nothing to hide from the IRS.
#13. To: lucysmom, All (#11)
Perhaps someone who has sent her a check with the pay to line blank would tell us what payee she fills in?
#14. To: Rek (#12)
Hopefully the tax attorney you hire can convince them of this.
#15. To: We The People (#13)
Perhaps so!
#16. To: We The People (#14)
I already have a great tax attorney.
#17. To: We The People (#6)
It appears that she may in fact be making these check out to herself and operating LP from her personal checking account.
#18. To: We The People (#14)
I already have a great tax attorney.
#19. To: Rek (#16)
If you have a tax lawyer then you should already know that will be for the IRS to investigate. You acknowledge you deal with shady characters and choose to continue. Dirty hands it's called.
#20. To: 22rifle (#17)
It appears that she may in fact be making these check out to herself and operating LP from her personal checking account.
#21. To: We The People (#19)
have donated one time to LP in the amount of $50.00 and didn't deduct the donation.
#22. To: Rek (#21)
Yet you admit to participating in what maybe be an enterprise that you admit has unorthodox practices. When they hit her for the bill and she can't pay you might also be called in as a party to it since you participated and received services with full knowledge.
#23. To: We The People (#6)
She stated she cannot "cash" a check made out to LP.
#24. To: We The People (#13)
#25. To: We The People (#22)
(Edited)
admitted to donating $50.00 to LP, which I did.
#26. To: Rudgear (#4)
#27. To: We The People (#6)
It appears that she may in fact be making these check out to herself and operating LP from her personal checking account.
#28. To: Rek (#25)
You participated in the forum, so you received services. Donations are optional, yet you gave by your admission, so you felt that your participation had monetary value. And yet you have no idea how the forum enterprise is actually set up, as you don't even know the full name of the owner. It could be laundering money, as it's definitely in the right location.
#29. To: calcon (#27)
i'd turn her into the irs, but the snitch fee would probably be only .50 to 1.00,
#30. To: calcon (#27)
it amazes me the crap you people get all excited about.
#31. To: Coral Snake (#0)
#32. To: We The People (#30)
I appear to remain amazingly calm,
#33. To: calcon (#32)
I appear to remain amazingly calm,
#34. To: We The People (#33)
Shouldn't your shift at Taco Bell be starting right about now?
#35. To: Tater, aka Gatlin, We The People (#34)
(Edited)
You jumped my ass this morning ... about these type comments.
#36. To: Tater (#34)
I was just signing off and this popped up on my screen.
#37. To: calcon (#36)
#38. To: Liberator, we the people (#35)
What's telling about his rebuke of your dig into calcon is a matter of degree. Yours was far more of a tweak, whereas Gatlin/Tater's digs were...NASTY.
#39. To: We The People (#36)
He has teased me about being an alcoholic for quite awhile also. We are 'playing'. You are not. There is a marked difference.
#40. To: calcon (#38)
#41. To: We The People (#36)
I have nothing against calcon, have told him so many times, and have teased him about working at Taco Bell for a couple years now.
#42. To: calcon, we the people, tater, aka Gatlin (#38)
and i must admit was a pretty good one, hardly a nasty comment
#43. To: Bartcoprules (#2)
#44. To: Rek (#39)
I thought you said you were a father. Males don't like the type of teasing you are describing.
#45. To: Rek (#39)
(Edited)
#46. To: A K A Stone (#31)
Let me think about this. If I was asking for donations for this site. I wouldn't want anyone to know my real name. If I used paypal would people be able to get my real name? I don't know as I never used paypal. I heard her name is Sally. I don't recall if her last name is out. I would have to cut her some slack on this one. I know she has done it this way for years. The person sending the check will receive a canceled check or an image of it. So they will be able to see where the money went to. They could post that information if they wanted to.
#47. To: Rek (#46)
If I'm contributing to YOUR income I need to know YOUR name.
#48. To: Coral Snake (#1)
I dont care what excuse she gives for this. (For sime mysterious reason she claims she can't cash checks can't made out ot LP.) Anyone who sends a check with a BLAMK PAy to the Order Line to ANYONE is a complete idiot.
#49. To: A K A Stone (#31)
The Fed EXPOSED!!! The FARO RESERVE BANK!!!
#50. To: Coral Snake (#49)
Then she should find a way to set up a separate account for Liberty Post then. I just would never send a check with an important line BLANK to someone I never met except over the internet PERIOD. That kind of request just sets my CROOKdar running at high speed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]