Cult Watch
See other Cult Watch Articles
Title: A Suspicious Request form the Goldi El Pee Faro Bank Snookerthon
Source:
TAIPAN
URL Source: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/ ... ArtNum=305524&SC=81&EC=120#C81
Published: Apr 2, 2011
Author: TAIPAN
Post Date: 2011-04-02 05:14:11 by Coral Snake
Keywords: Goldi, CrookedRequest, Pinocchio, Lies, PayToLine, BLANK
Views: 37860
Comments: 50
I found this VERY SUSPICIOUS request concening "snail mail" donations on Goldi's Faro Bank SnookerThon thread at El Pee Where can I send a check? Liberty Post • 9838 Old Baymeadows Road, PMB 296 • Jacksonville, Florida 32256 the Pay to line needs to be left BLANK. Goldi-Lox posted on 2011-04-01 1:13:12 ET Reply Trace The Pay To or more accurately the Pay To The Order of line of a check is the line that tells a bank exactly to give the money that the check represents TO. The recipient of a check with a BLANK pay to line can make it out to literally ANYBODY. What ecactly is Goldi up to with this SnookerThon involving checks with BLANK Pay To The Order Lines???!!! More to come if I find out more. I have never even seen Jim Rob ask for donations in checks with BLANK Pay To The Order lines!!!! This is a NEW LOW in possible dishonesty from the Neo Con forums if my suspicions about the BLANK Pay To The Order line on the Checks is true.
#106. To: Magician (#104)
TAIPAN
(1 image)
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 25.
#3. To: Coral Snake (#0)
oh my god, you need to contact the NY times and let them know of this, it's your solemn duty to inform the nation of this,s people out of work, losing homes, oil and food prices zooming certainly aren't important when compared to a big issue like this.
It would be ridiculous for ANYONE to send ANYONE a blank check. The fact is that Goldi COULD do as described above. I'm not saying she would, but a blank TO: line is ridiculous. She could make it out to the phone company, the cable company or the RNC for that matter. She could make it out to herself. Does she not keep a separate account just for LP? She stated she cannot "cash" a check made out to LP. Why would SHE be cashing these checks at all? She should be depositing them into a separate account to pay the bills of LP. Why is she 'cashing' them? It appears that she may in fact be making these check out to herself and operating LP from her personal checking account.
You need to ask her to ban you and discard your email address, before the IRS comes to collect them.
I have nothing to hide from the IRS.
Hopefully the tax attorney you hire can convince them of this. Especially since you acknowledge on a public forum her shady business practices yet still choose to participate.
Especially since you acknowledge on a public forum her shady business practices yet still choose to participate. I already have a great tax attorney. Please explain your second remark. How am I participating?
Please explain your second remark. How am I participating? If you have a tax lawyer then you should already know that will be for the IRS to investigate. You acknowledge you deal with shady characters and choose to continue. Dirty hands it's called.
LOL! I have donated one time to LP in the amount of $50.00 and didn't deduct the donation. Believe it or not, in my country, I'm allowed to spend my net take home pay any way that I'd like to. You would not believe the contact I've had with the IRS over the years and I have no shady dealings. But thanks for your concern.
Believe it or not, in my country, I'm allowed to spend my net take home pay any way that I'd like to. You would not believe the contact I've had with the IRS over the years and I have no shady dealings. But thanks for your concern. Yet you admit to participating in what maybe be an enterprise that you admit has unorthodox practices. When they hit her for the bill and she can't pay you might also be called in as a party to it since you participated and received services with full knowledge.
I admitted to donating $50.00 to LP, which I did. I in no way 'participated in what maybe be an enterprise that I admit has unorthodox practices', nor did I admit LP in fact has unorthodox practices. I am simply musing since I have no direct knowledge of LP's business dealings. Donating $50.00 to anything is not participating in an enterprise, it is a donation. You are trying to convince me that I've somehow implicated myself in some imaginary shady dealing because I donated $50.00? Are you serious? And what services did I receive for my donation? Your argument is ridiculous, and I urge you to stop it.
I in no way 'participated in what maybe be an enterprise that I admit has unorthodox practices', nor did I admit LP in fact has unorthodox practices. I am simply musing since I have no direct knowledge of LP's business dealings. Donating $50.00 to anything is not participating in an enterprise, it is a donation. You are trying to convince me that I've somehow implicated myself in some imaginary shady dealing because I donated $50.00? Are you serious? And what services did I receive for my donation? Your argument is ridiculous, and I urge you to stop it. You participated in the forum, so you received services. Donations are optional, yet you gave by your admission, so you felt that your participation had monetary value. And yet you have no idea how the forum enterprise is actually set up, as you don't even know the full name of the owner. It could be laundering money, as it's definitely in the right location. And you publicly acknowledge your suspicions regarding her unorthodox donation collection processes, yet give tacit approval by continuing your posting there with a history of donations.
#28. To: Rek (#25)
And you publicly acknowledge your suspicions regarding her unorthodox donation collection processes, yet give tacit approval by continuing your posting there with a history of donations. I've regretfully come to the conclusion that you are an idiot. I urge you to contact any authorities you deem necessary and report any illegal activities that you suspect I am engaged in.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#6. To: calcon (#3)
(Edited)
oh my god, you need to contact the NY times and let them know of this,
#8. To: We The People (#6)
She stated she cannot "cash" a check made out to LP. Why would SHE be cashing these checks at all? She should be depositing them into a separate account to pay the bills of LP. Why is she 'cashing' them?
#9. To: Rek (#8)
#12. To: We The People (#9)
I have nothing to hide from the IRS.
#14. To: Rek (#12)
Hopefully the tax attorney you hire can convince them of this.
#16. To: We The People (#14)
I already have a great tax attorney.
#19. To: Rek (#16)
If you have a tax lawyer then you should already know that will be for the IRS to investigate. You acknowledge you deal with shady characters and choose to continue. Dirty hands it's called.
#21. To: We The People (#19)
have donated one time to LP in the amount of $50.00 and didn't deduct the donation.
#22. To: Rek (#21)
Yet you admit to participating in what maybe be an enterprise that you admit has unorthodox practices. When they hit her for the bill and she can't pay you might also be called in as a party to it since you participated and received services with full knowledge.
#25. To: We The People (#22)
(Edited)
admitted to donating $50.00 to LP, which I did.
Replies to Comment # 25. You participated in the forum, so you received services. Donations are optional, yet you gave by your admission, so you felt that your participation had monetary value. And yet you have no idea how the forum enterprise is actually set up, as you don't even know the full name of the owner. It could be laundering money, as it's definitely in the right location.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 25.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]