[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!

The GOSPEL of the ALIENS | Fallen Angels | Giants | Anunnaki

The IMAGE of the BEAST Revealed (REV 13) - WARNING: Not for Everyone

WEF Calls for AI to Replace Voters: ‘Why Do We Need Elections?’

The OCCULT Burger king EXPOSED

PANERA BREAD Antichrist message EXPOSED

The OCCULT Cheesecake Factory EXPOSED

Satanist And Witches Encounter The Cross

History and Beliefs of the Waldensians

Rome’s Persecution of the Bible

Evolutionists, You’ve Been Caught Lying About Fossils

Raw Streets of NYC Migrant Crisis that they don't show on Tv

Meet DarkBERT - AI Model Trained On DARK WEB

[NEW!] Jaw-dropping 666 Discovery Utterly Proves the King James Bible is God's Preserved Word

ALERT!!! THE MOST IMPORTANT INFORMATION WILL SOON BE POSTED HERE


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The Water Cooler
See other The Water Cooler Articles

Title: Is Marco Rubio a "Natural Born Citizen"?
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://libertysflame.org
Published: Nov 12, 2010
Author: Me
Post Date: 2010-11-12 19:40:56 by Skip Intro
Keywords: None
Views: 69892
Comments: 74

There has been talk on other sites (hint: Goldi-Lox and LP) about the desirability of Marco Rubio running for president.

Since these sites are also by and large "birther" sites, I want to know if Rubio is considered a "natural born citizen" and if so, why.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-14) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#15. To: go65 (#12)

isn't natural born because his father wasn't a citizen.

If true, he's ineligible. No big loss.

Hondo68  posted on  2010-11-12   22:41:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Ibluafartsky (#14)
(Edited)

there may be a Joo under your bed!

Who cares? Only a CT tard like you, would worry about such nonsense.

Hondo68  posted on  2010-11-12   22:45:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: hondo68 (#16)

Who cares?

Why you do, hondope. You openly displayed your concern about Rubio making a trip to Israel? Can you provide a link where you display similar concern for Obama visiting a muslim country?

Ibluafartsky  posted on  2010-11-12   22:48:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Ibluafartsky, hondo68 (#17)

Can you provide a link where you display similar concern for Obama visiting a muslim country?

What a fake you are yukon. Why should hondo68 waste time on obama. Everyone knows what he is.

hondo68 is working to strengthen a faction that can DEFEAT obama, and you attack him.

If there's anyone here defending obama and the "one party", it's you yukon.

(sneakypete)DID Palin say or write these things or not?

(Mad Dog's reply) I don't know or F ing care.

Pete, MD doesn't know or care what Palin says or writes, he'll support her no matter what.

Wood_Chopper  posted on  2010-11-12   23:00:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Ibluafartsky (#17) (Edited)

You openly displayed your concern about Rubio making a trip to Israel

A lie. I expressed the opinion that that's not the best basis for choosing a president. Israel is way down on my list of priorities, just above Paliswillian ragheads, which are at the bottom.

Hondo68  posted on  2010-11-12   23:01:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Wood_Chopper, hondo68 (#18)

What a fake you are yukon.

Why should hondo68 waste time on obama.

hondo68 is working to strengthen a faction

What a fookin delusional moron you are chipped toothed organ-grinder.

He's the fookin POTUS, dumbass!

What "faction" is that? You liebertardian phony 6 percenters are insignificant. The tea party has done and accomplished more in a matter of months than you clueless agitators have accomplished in decades.

Ibluafartsky  posted on  2010-11-12   23:16:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: hondo68, Wood Chopper (#19)

Israel is way down on my list of priorities

So why even bring it into the discussion, HONDOPE? You aren't too bright, are you? Are you and Wood Chipper twins?

Ibluafartsky  posted on  2010-11-12   23:19:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Ibluafartsky (#20) (Edited)

What "faction" is that?

The tea party, yukon.

They don't need RINOs. You know, RINOs. The type that want amnesty, and endorse McCain, like Palin did, and the type like you that defend them.

You seem agitated tonight yukon. Pissed, really. The spittle must be all over your monitor with the personal attacks you've been slinging tonight.

Have you broken any keys on your keyboard while pounding away?

(sneakypete)DID Palin say or write these things or not?

(Mad Dog's reply) I don't know or F ing care.

Pete, MD doesn't know or care what Palin says or writes, he'll support her no matter what.

Wood_Chopper  posted on  2010-11-12   23:29:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Wood_Chopper (#22)

The tea party, yukon.

You seem agitated tonight yukon.

Put the paint thinner down, asshole. The tea party doesn't need phony jerks like you. You're not even a 6 percenter.

Don't start crying psycho!

Ibluafartsky  posted on  2010-11-12   23:36:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Ibluafartsky (#23)

Put the paint thinner down, asshole. The tea party doesn't need phony jerks like you. You're not even a 6 percenter.

Don't start crying psycho!

Somebody needs a nap.

(sneakypete)DID Palin say or write these things or not?

(Mad Dog's reply) I don't know or F ing care.

Pete, MD doesn't know or care what Palin says or writes, he'll support her no matter what.

Wood_Chopper  posted on  2010-11-12   23:38:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Ibluafartsky (#23)

hondo68 is working to strengthen a faction that can DEFEAT obama, and you attack him.

Why do you attack someone who doesn't like obama?

(sneakypete)DID Palin say or write these things or not?

(Mad Dog's reply) I don't know or F ing care.

Pete, MD doesn't know or care what Palin says or writes, he'll support her no matter what.

Wood_Chopper  posted on  2010-11-12   23:39:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: hondo68 (#13)

I'm looking at the full text of Wong right now. The majority opinion doesn't say anything about natural born citizen.

Neither Minor, nor Perkins define natural born citizen.

Rhino  posted on  2010-11-12   23:40:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: Wood_Chopper (#24)

Somebody needs a nap.

Will that stop you from being a delusional, lying POS?

Ibluafartsky  posted on  2010-11-12   23:41:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: Wood_Chopper (#25)

hondo68 is working to strengthen a faction

Cut and paste much, organ grinder?

Ibluafartsky  posted on  2010-11-12   23:43:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: hondo68 (#1)

If he was born in the US, and his parents had become US citizens and renounced allegiance to Cuba by the time of his birth, he's natural born.

If he was born in the U.S., he is a citizen. PERIOD. It has nothing to do with his parents.


"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves is sinful and tyrannical." -- Thomas Jefferson

jwpegler  posted on  2010-11-13   12:27:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: jwpegler (#29) (Edited)

If he was born in the U.S., he is a citizen.

Ah, but the question is NOT if he's a US citizen. To be president you've got to be "a natural born US citizen". Thus the parents enter the picture.

Hondo68  posted on  2010-11-13   13:24:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: hondo68 (#30)

To be president you've got to be "a natural born US citizen". Thus the parents enter the picture.

No. If you born in the U.S. you are a natural born citizen. PERIOD.

This is one reason people so outraged about illegal immigration. Mexican women cross the border illegally, have a baby in the U.S., and that baby is a U.S. citizen.

Rubio was born in Miami, Florida so he is a natural born citizen. He is eligible to run for President.


"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves is sinful and tyrannical." -- Thomas Jefferson

jwpegler  posted on  2010-11-13   14:32:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: jwpegler (#31) (Edited)

The Constitution reads "natural born citizen" for a reason. If they wanted to include all citizens they would have left out "natural born". They did not want the president to have any foreign allegiances, so no dual citizens like Obama and Rubio. (If in fact his parents had not renounced their Cuban citizenship by the time of his birth)

If immigrants want their kids to be president they need to swear allegiance to the USA, before they have a child.

Hondo68  posted on  2010-11-13   18:06:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: hondo68 (#32)

Huh??? What gives you the idea that Rubio is a dual citizen?

Natural born means a person was born inside the United States, except those not subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. government (such as children of ambassadors or other foreign diplomats). PERIOD.

The other type of citizen is a naturalized citizen -- someone who wasn't born here, but became a citizen by choice. They cannot become President.


"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves is sinful and tyrannical." -- Thomas Jefferson

jwpegler  posted on  2010-11-13   18:26:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: hondo68 (#3)

subject to the jurisdiction thereof

The only people living in the U.S. who are not subject to our laws are people who have diplomatic immunity. Rubio's dad was a Cuban exile, not a Cuban diplomat.


"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves is sinful and tyrannical." -- Thomas Jefferson

jwpegler  posted on  2010-11-13   18:36:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: jwpegler (#34) (Edited)

Rubio's dad was a Cuban exile, not a Cuban diplomat.

None of the above. He left Cuba before the revolution and Castro. He was an immigrant, not an exile/refugee. AFAIK he was a REAL immigrant, and NOT an illegal alien.

Hondo68  posted on  2010-11-13   18:46:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: hondo68 (#35)

None of the above. He left Cuba before the revolution and Castro. He was an immigrant, not an exile/refugee. AFAIK he was a REAL immigrant, and NOT an illegal alien.

Legal or illegal, it doesn't matter. For better or worse, children of illegal immigrants are US citizens, unless the Federal government gives up jurisdiction over illegal immigrants.

Rhino  posted on  2010-11-13   22:31:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: Rhino (#36)

For better or worse, children of illegal immigrants are US citizens

I don't believe that his parents were illegal aliens, but they may not have completed naturalization at the time of Marco's birth. US citizen yes, natural born maybe not. Just being born in the US doesn't make one a natural born citizen.

We need the naturalization dates of the parents to know that.

Hondo68  posted on  2010-11-13   22:49:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: hondo68 (#37)

I don't believe that his parents were illegal aliens, but they may not have completed naturalization at the time of Marco's birth. US citizen yes, natural born maybe not. Just being born in the US doesn't make one a natural born citizen.

We need the naturalization dates of the parents to know that.

Natural born citizen means born a citizen.

Rhino  posted on  2010-11-13   22:51:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: Rhino (#38)

Natural born citizen means born a citizen

.... in the USA, of parents who are US citizens.

Finished it for ya.

Hondo68  posted on  2010-11-13   22:58:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: jwpegler, hondo68 (#33)

Natural born means a person was born inside the United States, except those not subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. government (such as children of ambassadors or other foreign diplomats). PERIOD.

The other type of citizen is a naturalized citizen -- someone who wasn't born here, but became a citizen by choice. They cannot become President.

Incorrect jwpegler. The 14th amendment (which today has been bastardized) was nowhere in sight when the Constitution was written by the Founders.

Using modern day terminology as you have, I could claim someone born via c-section was not "natural born".

You have to look at what the meaning of words were when the Constitution was written.

"Gay" today means something totally different than when the Constitution was penned.

(sneakypete)DID Palin say or write these things or not?

(Mad Dog's reply) I don't know or F ing care.

Pete, MD doesn't know or care what Palin says or writes, he'll support her no matter what.

Wood_Chopper  posted on  2010-11-13   22:59:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: hondo68 (#39)

.... in the USA, of parents who are US citizens.

Finished it for ya.

There isn't a law or court case that says this. And before you show me Wong Ark Kim, give me a pinpoint citation. Because I read the case in the entirety and it doesn't even mention natural born in the majority opinion.

Rhino  posted on  2010-11-13   23:00:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: Wood_Chopper (#40) (Edited)

Incorrect jwpegler. The 14th amendment (which today has been bastardized) was nowhere in sight when the Constitution was written by the Founders.

Using modern day terminology as you have, I could claim someone born via c-section was not "natural born".

You have to look at what the meaning of words were when the Constitution was written.

"Gay" today means something totally different than when the Constitution was penned.

You don't look toward the original intent when there has been an amendment that affects that issue. The constitution isn't the bible, it's a changing document. Amendments are just as valid as any part of the whole.

Natural born means the same thing it did in 1789. That you were born a citizen. The 14th amendment changed who was born a citizen.

Rhino  posted on  2010-11-13   23:02:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: Rhino (#41)

You are familiar with Jus soli and jus sanguinis, right?

(sneakypete)DID Palin say or write these things or not?

(Mad Dog's reply) I don't know or F ing care.

Pete, MD doesn't know or care what Palin says or writes, he'll support her no matter what.

Wood_Chopper  posted on  2010-11-13   23:04:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: Rhino (#42)

You're wrong on this.

(sneakypete)DID Palin say or write these things or not?

(Mad Dog's reply) I don't know or F ing care.

Pete, MD doesn't know or care what Palin says or writes, he'll support her no matter what.

Wood_Chopper  posted on  2010-11-13   23:05:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#45. To: Rhino (#41)

give me a pinpoint citation.

There are many cases to study for precedence, far too many to list here. Please use the link to obamafiles in my post #13.

Hondo68  posted on  2010-11-13   23:06:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: Wood_Chopper (#43)

You are familiar with Jus soli and jus sanguinis, right?

Since the 14th amendment the United States has had both. Actually the Civil Rights of 1866 installed Jur Soli.

Rhino  posted on  2010-11-13   23:11:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: hondo68 (#45) (Edited)

There are many cases to study for precedence, far too many to list here. Please use the link to obamafiles in my post #13.

So give me one. I've skimmed those cases. Not one defines natural born citizen in the majority opinion.

Rhino  posted on  2010-11-13   23:12:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#48. To: Rhino (#42)

The 14th amendment changed who was born a citizen.

Correct.

But it did not change who was a "natural born" citizen, it only changed who was a "citizen". I see nowhere in the 14th that "natuarl born" is mentioned, nor do I see a change in the defintion of "natual born citizen" therein.

In the days of the Founders, "natural born citizen" and "citizen" were different, or they would not have included "natural born" in the requirements for President, they would have just said "citizen".

(sneakypete)DID Palin say or write these things or not?

(Mad Dog's reply) I don't know or F ing care.

Pete, MD doesn't know or care what Palin says or writes, he'll support her no matter what.

Wood_Chopper  posted on  2010-11-13   23:15:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: Wood_Chopper (#48)

Correct.

But it did not change who was a "natural born" citizen, it only changed who was a "citizen". I see nowhere in the 14th that "natuarl born" is mentioned, nor do I see a change in the defintion of "natual born citizen" therein.

In the days of the Founders, "natural born citizen" and "citizen" were different, or they would not have included "natural born" in the requirements for President, they would have just said "citizen".

Natural born citizen means exactly what it appears to. It means you were born a citizen. A citizen is either a natural born citizen or is a naturalized citizen.

The founders were looking for people who were citizens from birth rather than than people who became citizens.

Rhino  posted on  2010-11-13   23:20:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: Rhino (#49)

You do understand that people born in foreign countries can be a "citizen" of the U.S without naturalization, don't you?

(sneakypete)DID Palin say or write these things or not?

(Mad Dog's reply) I don't know or F ing care.

Pete, MD doesn't know or care what Palin says or writes, he'll support her no matter what.

Wood_Chopper  posted on  2010-11-13   23:24:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: Rhino (#49) (Edited)

The founders were looking for people who were citizens from birth

That's just plain wrong. They also wanted no foreign allegiances by birth.

Hondo68  posted on  2010-11-13   23:26:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: Rhino (#49)

A citizen is either a natural born citizen or is a naturalized citizen.

Wrong.

(sneakypete)DID Palin say or write these things or not?

(Mad Dog's reply) I don't know or F ing care.

Pete, MD doesn't know or care what Palin says or writes, he'll support her no matter what.

Wood_Chopper  posted on  2010-11-13   23:26:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#53. To: hondo68 (#51)

That's just plain wrong. They also wanted no foreign allegiances.

Correct.

(sneakypete)DID Palin say or write these things or not?

(Mad Dog's reply) I don't know or F ing care.

Pete, MD doesn't know or care what Palin says or writes, he'll support her no matter what.

Wood_Chopper  posted on  2010-11-13   23:27:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#54. To: hondo68 (#51)

That's just plain wrong. They also wanted no foreign allegiances by birth.

Yet it didn't ban dual citizenship. Your interpretation sounds unlikely.

Also plenty of American's get dual citizenship and have children. Under your definition they'd be natural born, yet have the same allegiance issues.

Rhino  posted on  2010-11-13   23:30:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: Rhino (#54)

Yet it didn't ban dual citizenship.

Dual citizenship is illegal in the U.S.

(sneakypete)DID Palin say or write these things or not?

(Mad Dog's reply) I don't know or F ing care.

Pete, MD doesn't know or care what Palin says or writes, he'll support her no matter what.

Wood_Chopper  posted on  2010-11-13   23:33:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (56 - 74) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com