[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Economy Title: Obama: A captive of his own history As we approach the 2010 mid-term elections, the GOP is poised to make big gains in the House of Representatives, State Governors offices, and State Legislatures. The GOP will also likely pick up several seats in the U.S. Senate, but not enough to gain a majority. Few people predicted this outcome when Barack Obama took office less than two years ago. So what happen? In short, Obama and the Democrats blew it. They took a bad situation, created by George Bush, and made it worse. It didn't have to be this way. In spite of some of some my more partisan friend's opinions to the contrary, the left does come up with some good ideas on occasion. However, most of those ideas never get implemented because of the left's dependence on government employees unions for their political muscle. So, what would a strong, center-left agenda actually look like? Here are a few examples how Obama could could have put such an agenda together: A.) Education, education, education. Everyone knows that are nation's schools are failing. It's not only our inner- city schools. American schools in general are under-serving our kids as evidenced by our drop out rates as well as math and science test scores, compared to the rest of the developed world. Davis Guggenheim (a liberal) just released a movie "Waiting for Superman" which digs into the issues our public school system faces. Everyone should see this. When you do, it will scare the hell out of you. We cannot compete in a increasing technological world with drop outs who don't know much about math and science. Money is not the problem. America spends more money per student than all but two other countries. As a percentage of GDP, America spends more on education than most of the countries who have better results than we do. Democrats have come up some great ways to reform the system. Charter schools are public schools where the parents and principals, not bureaucrats, are put in charge. The first Charter schools were implemented in Minnesota (a liberal state). Magnet schools are schools for the best and brightest, which focus on a specialized area, like math and science. Governor Jim Hunt (D-NC) put a huge focus on Magnet schools in the 1970s. They were a key to attracting tech companies to the Research Triangle in Raleigh. I'll add in Vocational schools for high school kids who aren't going college. Instead of having them waste their time in film appreciation classes, they could be learning a skilled trade that will help them and society. These are Democrat ideas that work. Obama could have used the "stimulus" to champion educational reform. After the 2008 election, he certainty had the political capital to do so. Instead, he just showered "stimulus" money on the teachers' unions to "save" their jobs for one year, without any significant reform at all. B.) Infrastructure, infrastructure, infrastructure. Our aging infrastructure is crumbling. In many places it hasn't kept up with population growth. A real center-left agenda would have used a big part of the "stimulus" money to build a world-class, 21st infrastructure for the U.S. -- roads, bridges, tunnels, airports, shipping ports, and more. Yes, a few infrastructure projects were funded, but the funding was a tiny, small part of the stimulus. Instead, Obama just showered "stimulus" money on government employee's unions to "save" their jobs for one year. C.) Simplify, simplify, simplify Our tax system is a mess. We have the highest corporate tax rates in the world, yet many corporations escape paying taxes. We have a progressive personal income tax system, yet the wealthiest American generally pay a lower percentage of their income in taxes than do the middle to upper-middle class. Complying with our Byzantine tax system costs the American economy several hundred billion dollars a year. It doesn't have to be like this. When Jerry Brown ran for President in 1992 he advocated scrapping all federal taxes and replacing them with a 13% flat rate income tax and a 13% VAT. No deductions. No loopholes. Ralph Nader had a similar proposal in 2004. Every study has shown that a flat rate tax would collect more money from the super rich because the loopholes would be gone. It would also save Americans and our companies hundreds of billions of in tax preparation fees each year. And it would do a lot better job "stimulating" the economy than Obama's "targeted" tax cuts. Obama could have really provided some vision here and gotten a whole bunch of Republicans to join in. But he didn't. Instead, he relegated himself to spewing class warfare rhetoric while arguing about whether or not the top tax rate should be 36% or 39%. It's just pitiful. The bottom line There are many other proposals that a visionary center-left government could have undertaken, that would have gained broad support in the country, and been successful in really moving the country forward. Unfortunately, Obama is not a visionary. He is a captive of his history -- a past of associating with people like 1960s radical Bill Aires, union thug Andy Stern, and racist Jeremiah right, all of whom who do nothing but brood about their class and race grievances. This is why Obama has failed. This is why the country is failing. This is why we will see a significant political change next Tuesday. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 12. This is why Obama has failed. This is why the country is failing. This is why we will see a significant political change next Tuesday. While all of the points in this article have differing levels of validity in relation to the above...none of them address the key point, the most important issue. Its the economy, stupid. Always has been. Always will be. When the economy is going well, the average American will tolerate almost anything going on inside the DC Beltway. They will also reelect the President who is leading the country in that 'good economy'. The history of this is very very clear. Good economic times, Americans are loath to make a change in the Whitehouse. Bad economic times, they can't wait to fire POTUS. Doesn't matter which party controls the Whitehouse in that enviroment. Its been that way since the end of World War Two. 2012 won't be any different, nor will the fast approaching mid terms.
#2. To: Badeye (#1) (Edited) When the economy is going well, the average American will tolerate almost anything going on inside the DC Beltway Which is actually a big part of the problem. We had pretty good economic times from the early 80s to the mid-2000s. During this entire period, the things that make a country really prosper in the long run where being destroyed. Why is America a technical powerhouse in spite of our failing schools? One reason is that we imported tons technical talent from India and China on H1Bs (250,000 a year for a while) plus more on student visas. Go to any graduate program in math, engineering or science in the U.S. and what do you see? Chinese nationals. At one point 1/3rd of all Silicon Valley firms were created by Indian nationals. The government stupidly clamped down on H1Bs a couple of years ago. The result? A flood of tech jobs got outsourced to India, China, the Philippines, and even Vietnam. The American tax and regulatory system has driven many manufacturers out of the country. I'm not talking about companies that make shoes or cloths. High tech manufacturing from silicon fabs to finally assembly of consumer electronics have high-tailed it to Asia. The Intel CEO recently said that 25% of the cost of a $4 billion fab is U.S. government taxes and regulation, which don't exist in places like Taiwan and mainland China. A big part of the "prosperity" of the last 3 decades was a housing bubbled fueled by the federal reserve. Housing prices inflated and idiots took out home equity loans to buy flat screen televisions. Now, all of us, including people who did the right things, are paying for this. I can go on and on. The point is that American's have done this to themselves. Instead of investing in the future, we spent and spent and spent. Instead of paying attention to our failing schools, we spent and spent and spent. Instead of paying attention to the politicians, we sat back while they spent and spent and spent.
#3. To: jwpegler (#2) Instead of investing in the future, we spent and spent and spent. Instead of paying attention to our failing schools, we spent and spent and spent. Instead of paying attention to the politicians, we sat back while they spent and spent and spent. I'd say this specific part of your post reflects the past decade, from both parties. Bush was stupid with the budget. Democrats? They took that 'stupid' and tripled it...then dared to act self righteous about doing so. Which is why they will be fired in just a few more days.
#4. To: Badeye (#3) I'd say this specific part of your post reflects the past decade, from both parties. The housing bubble was created by Allen Greenspan, who Reagan appointed. The school system has been in self-destruct mode since the 1960s. It's finally gotten bad enough that people, including honest liberals, have taken notice.
#5. To: jwpegler (#4)
I know that. But that doesn't have anything to do with the deficit spending since 2001.
#7. To: Badeye (#5) (Edited) But that doesn't have anything to do with the deficit spending since 2001. Neither did my post. My post had to do with your comment that Americans are fat, dumb and happy so long as the economy seems good. My point was that while things seemed good, we ignored the politicians who were destroying this country.
#8. To: jwpegler (#7) My post had to do with your comment that Americans are fat, dumb and happy so long as the economy seems good. My post never said that. You are projecting here.
#9. To: Badeye (#8) My post never said that. You are projecting here. Of course you did: When the economy is going well, the average American will tolerate almost anything going on inside the DC Beltway. They will also reelect the President who is leading the country in that 'good economy'.
#12. To: jwpegler (#9) Sorry, still doesn't match up to your view the average American is fat, dumb and happy. I take serious exception to the standard assertion by many about the 'dumb' part. Thats simply not true, but popular to say in these forums.
Replies to Comment # 12. orry, still doesn't match up to your view the average American is fat, dumb and happy "Fat, dumb, and happy" is a common expression that means exactly what you said -- people are inattentive when things are going well for them. They don't look at the big picture -- what is happening in Congress, etc. They only see their immediate circumstance.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 12. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|