[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Freepers Still Love war

Parody ... Jump / Trump --- van Halen jump

"The Democrat Meltdown Continues"

"Yes, We Need Deportations Without Due Process"

"Trump's Tariff Play Smart, Strategic, Working"

"Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts"

"Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands

"Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies"

"Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk"

KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel

"Trade should work for America, not rule it"

"The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP"

"How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap"

‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’

Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible"

"Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!"

"If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think"

"Ending EPA Overreach"

Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built

Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew

The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED!

Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing!

Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy?

Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia)

"Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department"

Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent

"Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail"

Any suggestion that the USA and NATO are "Helping" or have ever helped Ukraine needs to be shot down instantly

"Real problem with the Palestinians: Nobody wants them"

ACDC & The Rolling Stones - Rock Me Baby

Magnus Carlsen gives a London System lesson!

"The Democrats Are Suffering Through a Drought of Generational Talent"

7 Tactics Of The Enemy To Weaken Your Faith

Strange And Biblical Events Are Happening

Every year ... BusiesT casino gambling day -- in Las Vegas

Trump’s DOGE Plan Is Legally Untouchable—Elon Musk Holds the Scalpel

Palestinians: What do you think of the Trump plan for Gaza?

What Happens Inside Gaza’s Secret Tunnels? | Unpacked

Hamas Torture Bodycam Footage: "These Monsters Filmed it All" | IDF Warfighter Doron Keidar, Ep. 225

EXPOSED: The Dark Truth About the Hostages in Gaza

New Task Force Ready To Expose Dark Secrets

Egypt Amasses Forces on Israel’s Southern Border | World War 3 About to Start?

"Trump wants to dismantle the Education Department. Here’s how it would work"

test

"Federal Workers Concerned That Returning To Office Will Interfere With Them Not Working"

"Yes, the Democrats Have a Governing Problem – They Blame America First, Then Govern Accordingly"

"Trump and His New Frenemies, Abroad and at Home"

"The Left’s Sin Is of Omission and Lost Opportunity"

"How Trump’s team will break down the woke bureaucracy"

Pete Hegseth will be confirmed in a few minutes


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Economy
See other Economy Articles

Title: No Cost of Living Raise For Social Security
Source: nyp
URL Source: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/nation ... ocial_MUCVCxHuFw9b70Wjq6kJhK/0
Published: Oct 11, 2010
Author: staff writer
Post Date: 2010-10-11 08:22:10 by Murron
Keywords: None
Views: 13994
Comments: 28

No Cost of Living Raise For Social Security

WASHINGTON — As if voters don't have enough to be angry about this election year, the government is expected to announce this week that more than 58 million Social Security recipients will go through another year without an increase in their monthly benefits.

It would mark only the second year without an increase since automatic adjustments for inflation were adopted in 1975. The first year was this year.

"If you're the ruling party, this is not the sort of thing you want to have happening two weeks before an election," said Andrew Biggs, a former deputy commissioner at the Social Security Administration and now a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute.

"It's not the congressional Democrats' fault, but that's the way politics works," Biggs said. "A lot of people will feel hostile about it."

The cost-of-living adjustments, or COLAs, are automatically set each year by an inflation measure that was adopted by Congress back in the 1970s. Based on inflation so far this year, the trustees who oversee Social Security project there will be no COLA for 2011.

The projection will be made official on Friday, when the Bureau of Labor Statistics releases inflation estimates for September. The timing couldn't be worse for Democrats as they approach an election in which they are in danger of losing their House majority, and possibly their Senate majority as well.

This past Friday, the same bureau delivered another painful blow to Democrats: The U.S. lost 95,000 jobs in September and unemployment remained stubbornly stuck at 9.6 percent.

Democrats have been working hard to make Social Security an election-year issue, running political ads and holding press conferences to accuse Republicans of plotting to privatize the national retirement program.

This week's announcement about Social Security benefits raises more immediate concerns for older Americans whose savings and home values still haven't recovered from the financial collapse: Many haven't had a raise since January 2009, and they won't be getting one until at least January 2012.

"While people aren't getting COLAs they certainly feel like they're falling further and further behind, particularly in this economy," said David Certner, AARP's legislative policy director. "People are very reliant on Social Security as a major portion of their income and, quite frankly, they have counted on the COLA over the years."

Social Security was the primary source of income for 64 percent of retirees who got benefits in 2008, according to the Social Security Administration. A third relied on Social Security for at least 90 percent of their income.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 20.

#1. To: Murron (#0)

Just in time to piss off the most likely to vote demographic.

Seniors.

Badeye  posted on  2010-10-11   9:26:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Badeye (#1)

Exchept its the Repugs doing all the talking about raising the age cap for S.S., or privatizing it.

The COLA is something built into the system as per laws and regulation of Social Security, and has been around longer then the Obama Adminstration.

IT is one of the reasons Obama should be given a second term, to protect S.S. from the whores who serve large multi-national corporations; the Repugs.

Ferret Mike  posted on  2010-10-11   10:11:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Ferret Mike (#3)

IT is one of the reasons Obama should be given a second term, to protect S.S. from the whores who serve large multi-national corporations; the Repugs.

Guess you haven't seen the billions made by the likes of Goldman Sach's since the bailouts, huh? (just one example of hundreds, btw)

We should have privatized SS two decades ago. If for no other reason than congress wouldn't be able to raid it every year to finance bullshit we cannot afford, and don't need. JMHO.

Third, if you think not providing a cost of living increase to the seniors, less than a month before the election, won't hurt the Democrats who are in total control of all three branches of the Federal Government, you are sadly mistaken.

Badeye  posted on  2010-10-11   10:34:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Badeye (#4)

The COLA is triggered by inflation, Badeye. Obama has nothing to do with the mechanisms of Social Security law.

And what is hurting Democrats most is the dumping of cash into the mix by foreigners and corporations empowered and emboldened by the SCOTUS' foolish gutting of election financing laws this last year.

Most seniors I speak to are way more aware of statements by the Rand Pauls of the world talking about upping the retirement age then the COLA mechanism most well know this Administration has no control over.

Ferret Mike  posted on  2010-10-11   13:31:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Ferret Mike (#7)

Obama has nothing to do with the mechanisms of Social Security law.

While thats true, the fact remains seniors aren't going to be happy about this, they are already pissed off with Owe-bama and company, and are going to give voice to that displeasure in 22 days.

Badeye  posted on  2010-10-11   13:59:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Badeye (#8)

We will see how the mid term elections turn out. My view of it is quite different then yours' in that because of voter apathy, the party in office generally loses in the off year election years anyway.

And I support President Obama taking the money machine that has ripped into high gear with much of the campaign funds going to GOPer candidates coming from un-named and unknown sources thanks to a bad ruling by the SCOTUS.

In any event, Obama is merely better then the alternative the last election and the only thing that can fix they system is deep systemic changes. So I really don't worry about this latest showing things are broken in as much as I knew this already.

This is only the first two years of what will be an eight year occupancy by the Obama Administration, so let's see if he can turn lemons to lemonade with a strong GOPer showing as Clinton was able to largely do when similar election results occurred on his watch.

This is an interesting plot twist, but there is no point to a final judgment until this administration has run it's course in 2016.

Ferret Mike  posted on  2010-10-11   14:13:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Ferret Mike (#9)

We will see how the mid term elections turn out. My view of it is quite different then yours' in that because of voter apathy, the party in office generally loses in the off year election years anyway.

Yep...22 days.

And actually, in this century, that well worn vieiwpoint about mid terms has yet to hold true.

Badeye  posted on  2010-10-11   14:35:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Badeye (#10)

And actually, in this century, that well worn vieiwpoint about mid terms has yet to hold true.

Do you mean the GOP actually gained seats in 2006? LOLOL

mininggold  posted on  2010-10-11   15:25:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: mininggold (#11)

And actually, in this century, that well worn vieiwpoint about mid terms has yet to hold true. Do you mean the GOP actually gained seats in 2006? LOLOL

No, ming. Sheesh, you really can't follow a conversation.

I'll type...s...l...o...w...e...r just for you!

First term, mid terms.

2006 was a 'second' (2nd) term, mid term.

So far in THIS CENTURY, its a trend that first term, MID TERMS go to the seated President.

That would be 2002 for those of you 'keeping score at home'.

Badeye  posted on  2010-10-11   15:45:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Badeye (#12)

So far in THIS CENTURY, its a trend that first term, MID TERMS go to the seated President.

That's a trend based on "one" example.

Chuckle.

Don't you agree that Reagan was repudiated by the country when his party lost 27 seats in 1982?

go65  posted on  2010-10-11   15:55:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: go65 (#14)

So far in THIS CENTURY, its a trend that first term, MID TERMS go to the seated President. That's a trend based on "one" example.

Chuckle.

Its a new century. Thats why Democrats are going to lose both the House and the Senate.

They've promoted 1960's era 'great society' nonsense again.

22 days...

Badeye  posted on  2010-10-11   16:12:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Badeye (#18)

They've promoted 1960's era 'great society' nonsense again.

The last major expansion of Medicare, part of the great society, happened when Republicans had control of the Senate, House, and White House.

go65  posted on  2010-10-11   16:49:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 20.

#22. To: go65 (#20)

The last major expansion of Medicare, part of the great society, happened when Republicans had control of the Senate, House, and White House.

Yep, and we on the Right fired their asses for it.

But today, Owe-bama and company are trying to revive the discredited LBJ viewpoint, which is why in 22 days, its 'former' Speaker Pelosi, and 'former' Senate Majority Leader Reid.

22 days...

Badeye  posted on  2010-10-11 16:51:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 20.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com