[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

CBDC Digital Currencies: A Recipe for Global Slavery

The Counterrevolution Against the Constitution

Conservatives in Congress Pushing to Repeal Military Covid Vaccine Mandate via NDAA

Gov’t Criminally Ignoring Vax-injured Living in Hell on Earth

There’s No Natural ‘Carrying Capacity’ for the Human Population: An Essay Inspired by the Happy News that the Human Population Has Reached Eight Billion

Turkey Expects More Extraditions From Sweden for NATO Membership

As the Pentagon Fails Another Audit, Congress Wants to Spend Even More on "Defense"

Danger Zone: On Religion, America Is Becoming More Like China

World Court Must Rule on Climate Justice: UN "Youth" Delegate

California Reparations Task Force Proposes $223K Per Person for Black Residents

Renowned Cardiologist: mRNA Vaccines May be “Changing the Human Genome”

New York Forces Websites To Monitor 'Hateful' Speech. A New Lawsuit Says This Violates the First Amendment.

Congress inches toward year-end government funding deal

Russian Oil Price Cap, EU Sanctions Come Into Effect

Born on the Tenth of January

Word and Sacrament: The marks of the church

SCOTUS Appears Favorable to Web Developer in Lawsuit Against Colorado Anti-discrimination Law

Semiconductor Manufacturers Don't Need More Subsidies. They Need Less Government.

Supreme Court Debates Whether Web Designers Can Be Forced To Make Gay Wedding Pages

NATO Exists To Solve The Problems Created By NATO's Existence

Life insurance companies sound DEATH ALERT warnings over nearly 100,000 excess deaths per month happening right now in the USA

Iran Says It Won’t Resume Nuclear Deal Talks ‘Under Pressure’

US Army Plans ‘Dramatic’ Increase in Ammunition Production as Ukraine Aid Drains Stockpiles

WSJ: US Secretly Limited Range of Weapons Sent to Ukraine

Imagining a Revived, Twenty-First Century Capitalism

Ukraine war: Fighting will be at 'reduced tempo for months' US intelligence experts say

Nigerian President Says Weapons From Ukraine are Winding Up in Africa

Ukraine Says Oil-Price Cap Won’t Dent Russia’s Ability to Fund War

Russia Rejects EU’s $60 Oil Price Cap

Macron Says Security Guarantees for Russia Needed for Future Peace Deal

Old Testament: Isaiah 7:10-17 (Advent 4: Series A)

Doing His Duty

Raytheon Gets $1.2 Billion Contract to Produce Air Defense System for Ukraine

Gospel: Matthew 1:18-25 (Advent 4: Series A)

NRA Files Lawsuit Against Oregon Gun-control Law

The Woman Who Spearheaded Prohibition's Repeal

How to replace the welfare state

Will Your State Reject the Fed’s Digital Dollar?

Rep. Adam Smith Says Calls for Ukraine Aid Oversight are ‘Russian Propaganda’

Epistle: Romans 1:1-7 (Advent 4: Series A)

Almost No One Noticed the Hate Speech Law That Just Took Effect — or the Lawsuit Against It

After a Crackdown on a Pain Clinic, a Tragic Double Suicide

11th Circuit Says a Judge Should Not Have Interfered With the FBI's Review of the Mar-a-Lago Documents

Police thought his cash was suspicious. So they took it. And won’t give it back.

REAL ID Requirement for Travelers Delayed Until May 2025

Lavrov Says Russia, China Stepping Up Military Cooperation in Response to NATO

A Tribute to the U.S. Marine Corps

Church Fathers on Christmas: St. Augustine

Russia Is the Last Remaining Christian Country

Zelensky’s Long History of Crushing Dissent


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Computers-Hacking
See other Computers-Hacking Articles

Title: Virus-Busting Chips! Why Intel Paid Billions for McAfee.
Source: Gizmodo
URL Source: http://gizmodo.com/5616890/intel-wa ... ware-with-virus+fighting-chips
Published: Aug 23, 2010
Author: unattributed
Post Date: 2010-08-23 21:27:41 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 2686
Comments: 2

The news of Intel's very expensive McAfee purchase raises one obvious question: why is security software worth over $7 billion to a chip maker? Intel has been short on specifics, but it's becoming clear that virus-killing silicon is coming.

Computer security with hardware roots isn't new for Intel, but it's stuck in last-gen tech that can't stop your system from getting smoked. Feature sets that can help filter out malicious network traffic or let CPUs screen for certain worms have been safeguarding computers you've already thrown away by now. But they're limited. Right now, most of the anti-malware grunt work is being handled by software. Letting applications do the heavy lifting is a resource-heavy affair, which makes chipmakers like Intel nervous when they look forward and see the future of computing floating in the cloud.

The problem with security in the cloud is twofold. To begin with, netbooks and tablets usually just don't have the muscle to balance intensive malware efforts. Do you think your anemic netbook can root out marauding trojans, scanning hundreds of thousands of files, as well as your desktop? But what about just putting the security software in the cloud too? This leads to a second objection: do we really want our sensitive stuff floating out of our devices? Will people feel comfortable having their secrets scanned remotely? Intel doesn't think so—and says it has a solution.

When we interviewed Intel's head tech honcho, CTO Justin Rattner in June, he had much to say about the intersection of cloud computing and secure computing. And the future of beating viruses, according to Intel, lies in the chips that drive our devices, not some program running in the background. "As silicon developers," Rattner explained, "we have a requirement to provide truly secure capability when it's needed." This means malware-fighting hardware is a new mandate. Rattner asserts that their hardware ambitions are to "protect those systems from the various forms of malware and then, in addition, giving them the ability to keep their secrets no matter what happens." Which sounds a little abstract, right? But put it in context: Rattner's plan sounds pretty real as of right now.

While discussing the news of their acquisition today, Intel minced no words about where their pricey new subsidiary will take them. McAfee technology will be put on Intel silicon. Virus scanning, trojan hunting, buffer overflow-blocking—all beat back before it has a chance to touch your software. McAfee's line of applications will continue to sell as is, but Intel simply doesn't believe that the future of computer security can be done with software alone. Malware keeps getting meaner. To block viruses, you need to hit them as soon as possible, which means as deep into the hardware as possible. Think of it as the difference between swatting flies in your kitchen and just keeping your windows closed in the first place.

Intel's processors won't change for now, but when we asked them about the deal's implications for architecture changes down the line, they confirmed that the era of an antivirus-on-a-chip lies ahead—with a mysterious new hardware product slated for 2011. Thanks to Moore's Law, Intel will have more real estate to fill with security mechanisms—courtesy of McAfee's R&D labs. Whether secure silicon takes the form of hardware acceleration for virus-sniffing heuristics, or something else entirely, remains to be seen. But if Intel makes good on its promises (and on the nearly $8 billion it forked over), that folder of photos you regret will stay safe without having to climb to the cloud.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: A K A Stone (#0)

Okay, 'tard.

"Lets [sic] rent a room." ~ Jethro Tull to Rotara

Fred Mertz  posted on  2010-08-23   23:16:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: A K A Stone (#0)

Intel doesn't think so—and says it has a solution.

And you will only need a terabyte of RAM.

rustynail  posted on  2010-08-24   7:06:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com