[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!

The GOSPEL of the ALIENS | Fallen Angels | Giants | Anunnaki

The IMAGE of the BEAST Revealed (REV 13) - WARNING: Not for Everyone

WEF Calls for AI to Replace Voters: ‘Why Do We Need Elections?’

The OCCULT Burger king EXPOSED

PANERA BREAD Antichrist message EXPOSED

The OCCULT Cheesecake Factory EXPOSED

Satanist And Witches Encounter The Cross

History and Beliefs of the Waldensians

Rome’s Persecution of the Bible

Evolutionists, You’ve Been Caught Lying About Fossils

Raw Streets of NYC Migrant Crisis that they don't show on Tv

Meet DarkBERT - AI Model Trained On DARK WEB

[NEW!] Jaw-dropping 666 Discovery Utterly Proves the King James Bible is God's Preserved Word

ALERT!!! THE MOST IMPORTANT INFORMATION WILL SOON BE POSTED HERE


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

I AM A PROPHET and I prophesy
See other I AM A PROPHET and I prophesy Articles

Title: One OF Newt's Several Ex=Wives: He's a Big Fat Liar....Just Don't Call Him Fat
Source: AOL News
URL Source: http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/0 ... hs-skeletons-his-past-wives%2F
Published: Aug 12, 2010
Author: Sarah Wildman
Post Date: 2010-08-12 21:27:05 by war
Keywords: None
Views: 11702
Comments: 16

Newt Gingrich is a phoenix. He's risen again and again from political ashes and appears to be ascendant once more. Rumored to be running for president in 2012, Gingrich is an icon in the Republican Party, an eminence grise at a time of lost leadership. His fall from grace in the late 1990s seems a blip, rather than a political ending. Thus the cover story in Esquire Magazine, September issue, written by John H. Richardson.

If anyone knows something about Newt Gingrich, it is his former wife, Marianne, and Richardson scored an interview with her. She is someone with a bone to pick, one that stems from the ending of their 18-year marriage with an affair. She knows a lot, and has never before spoken out. Richardson notes she is a "Tea Party" conservative. She believes in what she thought Newt Gingrich believed in, too.

Newt proposed to Marianne (she was 28, he 36) in 1980 while his first wife, Jackie, was in the hospital recovering from treatments for uterine cancer. He hadn't yet even asked her for a divorce. Newt met Jackie in high school. She was his geometry teacher. He was sixteen, she was 25. When he left, Jackie was nearly destitute. Jackie, the Esquire story reports, "had to get a court order just to pay her utility bills." These are among the personal tidbits that Marianne Gingrich (she kept his name, these 10 years since the divorce and subsequent annulment), drops casually into the Esquire writer's lap as she smokes endlessly, each cigarette "down to the filter."

Some of the revelations are small -- Newt hated to be criticized for his weight, more than anything. Some of them challenge the folksy narrative Gingrich has created for himself, about his mother, for example. "She was pretty drugged up for a long time," Marianne tells Richardson.

Some of them are explosive in a town that privileges quiet staffers over mouthy associates. "He's a sociopath, but he's our sociopath," Marianne Gingrich quotes his staffers as saying, during the late 1990s when the House Ethics Committee investigated Gingrich's GOPAC's donations and his charity fundraising came under suspicion. Callista Bisek, Gingrich's current wife, became his mistress first and his wife second (really third, if one is counting wives), while Marianne was home visiting her mother. In 1999, Marianne had just been diagnosed with multiple sclerosis. Newt asked Callista to marry him before he and Marianne had agreed to divorce. The affair had been going on for years. Newt compared Marianne to a "Jaguar" and Callista to a "Chevrolet" and said he needed a Chevrolet, not a Jaguar, according to the Esquire story. In 2000 the couple wed.

Even so Gingrich continued to give speeches about family. "How do you give that speech and do what you are doing?" Marianne asked him. They were in the death throes of their relationship. "It doesn't matter what I do," he told her, according to the Esquire story. "People need to hear what I have to say. There's no one else who can say what I say. It doesn't matter what I live."

He recently converted to Catholicism and asked Marianne to agree to an annulment. "It has no meaning," Marianne Gingrich told Richardson. (Amy Sullivan, writing in Time magazine last year, noted that it might be a prep move for a 2012 bid, and also noted that Callista is a lifelong Catholic and sings in the choir.)

The former Mrs. Gingrich believes that Gingrich's do-what-I say, not what I do philosophy will be his undoing. "There's no way," she tells Richardson, of Gingrich becoming president. "He could have been president. But when you try and change your history too much, and try and recolor it because you don't like the way it was or you want it to be different to prove something new...you lose touch with who you really are. You lose your way...He believes that what he says in public and how he lives doesn't have to be connected. If you believe that, then yeah, you can run for president."

Richardson met with Gingrich in his Washington, D.C., K Steet offices. But all of his questions were met with the narrative that Gingrich always offers. His childhood, for example, was all "sugar pies" and "fabulous." (Richardson writes that Gingrich's mother was manic-depressive.) Gingrich says his conversion to Catholicism was for Bisek. "Callista and I kid that I'm four and she's five and therefore she gets to be in charge because the difference between four and five is a lot," he told Richardson, maintaining a cheerful, unruffled air throughout their interview. Marianne Gingrich says the line was hers, not her former husband's.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: war (#0)

My head hurts after trying to make sense of Mr. Newt's world.

"How many confirmed NV Mig kills do YOU have general? I only have three." - Mad Dog, the syphilitic psychopath

Skip Intro  posted on  2010-08-12   21:35:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: war (#0)

He recently converted to Catholicism and asked Marianne to agree to an annulment.

Dagnabit! He's no Catholic.

"Lets [sic] rent a room." ~ Jethro Tull to Rotara

Fred Mertz  posted on  2010-08-12   22:34:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Skip Intro (#1)

My head hurts after trying to make sense of Mr. Newt's world.

He's nothing compared to Clinton, Edwards or Charlie Rangel. I can't wait for the final Al Gore report!

Ibluafartsky  posted on  2010-08-13   0:58:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Ibluafartsky (#3)

He's nothing compared to Clinton, Edwards or Charlie Rangel. I can't wait for the final Al Gore report!

That's why you're irrelevant yukon. You stand for "moral relativity".

Moral is moral. Moral is not "more moral than the next guy."

(sneakypete)DID Palin say or write these things or not?

(Mad Dog's reply) I don't know or F ing care.

Pete, MD doesn't know or care what Palin says or writes, he'll support her no matter what.

Wood_Chopper  posted on  2010-08-13   1:07:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Ibluafartsky (#3)

He's nothing compared to Clinton, Edwards or Charlie Rangel.

What mental contortions brought you to that conclusion?

lucysmom  posted on  2010-08-13   1:13:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Skip Int-elligence (#1)

My head hurts after trying to make sense of Mr. Newt's world.

No surprise.

You wouldn't even be able to make sense of Mr. Magoo's world.

______________________________________________________________________________
Zero diddled while America burned

Ignore Amos  posted on  2010-08-13   7:14:50 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: war (#0)

I never was much of a Gingrich fan - his starting our as a so-called Rockefeller republican was troubling. To me, he's more of a "stick your finger in the political winds" type of guy. When Reagan came along, Newt suddenly "got religion" and became a small gov't advocate.

He's as sincere as a three dollar bill

That said, one of the troubling things about present day politics in general is our tendency to focus on personalities rather than issues. Both sides do this.

Whether it's the Left attacking Sarah Palin or the Right attacking Zero - we tend to ridicule politicians rather than the policies they represent.

It's the "if you can't refute the message, shoot the messenger" thing. And like I said, both sides are guilty.

Meanwhile, potentially good people are discouraged from running for office.

______________________________________________________________________________
Zero diddled while America burned

Ignore Amos  posted on  2010-08-13   7:23:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Ignore Amos (#7) (Edited)

Thoughtful post but I wouldn't give the pols that much credit. They bring much of this on themselves by talking out of both sides of their mouths.

Palin and amnesty...is she for it or against it? Read her public statements and you can make the case for both.

Obama and Iraq/Gitmo...I knew that fucker was at worst lying...there was no fucking way that his timetable was realistic and the GITMO thing really pisses me off.

war  posted on  2010-08-13   8:08:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: war (#8)

Obama and Iraq/Gitmo...I knew that fucker was at worst lying...there was no fucking way that his timetable was realistic and the GITMO thing really pisses me off.

I'm against just about everything Obama is for . . . yet I was hopeful that he would at least keep his "get us out of Iraq" promise.

Oh well . . .

______________________________________________________________________________
Zero diddled while America burned

Ignore Amos  posted on  2010-08-13   10:25:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: lucysmom (#5)

What mental contortions brought you to that conclusion?

So you deny that those I named were not fornicators, adulterers, liars and disgraceful POS?

Ibluafartsky  posted on  2010-08-14   1:25:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Wood_Chopper (#4)

You stand for "moral relativity".

You suck. I don't care for any fornicators, adulterers, liars or FOS politicians.

Ibluafartsky  posted on  2010-08-14   1:29:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Ibluafartsky (#10)

So you deny that those I named were not fornicators, adulterers, liars and disgraceful POS?

Newt lined up his next wife while still married - twice. He campaigned on "family values" and led the movement to impeach Clinton while carrying on with his aide. That puts him is a special category fornicator, adulterer, liar.

lucysmom  posted on  2010-08-14   8:55:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: lucysmom (#12)

Newt lined up his next wife while still married - twice. He campaigned on "family values" and led the movement to impeach Clinton while carrying on with his aide. That puts him is a special category fornicator, adulterer, liar.

Bill Clinton, married POTUS, had sexual relations in the White House with a young intern, lied about it under oath, not to mention the other gropings and affairs he was guilty of. He lowered the bar to the bottom.

That puts him as THE special category fornicator, adulterer, liar.

Ibluafartsky  posted on  2010-08-14   15:24:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Ibluafartsky (#11) (Edited)

I don't care for any fornicators, adulterers, liars or FOS politicians. He's (Newt) nothing compared to Clinton, Edwards or Charlie Rangel. I can't wait for the final Al Gore report!

Maybe I misunderstood your post yukon. So we agree then? I wouldn't want any of them, including Newt, near the levers of power.

Would you vote for Newt? I wouldn't vote for any of them, Newt, Clinton, Edwards or Rangel, any of them.

How about you? I know you wouldn't vote for Clinton, Edwards, or Rangel.

Would you vote for Newt?

(sneakypete)DID Palin say or write these things or not?

(Mad Dog's reply) I don't know or F ing care.

Pete, MD doesn't know or care what Palin says or writes, he'll support her no matter what.

Wood_Chopper  posted on  2010-08-14   22:52:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Wood_Chopper (#14)

Would you vote for Newt?

No.

Ibluafartsky  posted on  2010-08-15   0:22:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Ibluafartsky (#15)

Would you vote for Newt?

No.

Good enough.

The way I see it, Newt's the same as Clinton et al.

If he'll do it to his wife, the most sacred of bonds, he'll have no compunction about doing it to you.

(sneakypete)DID Palin say or write these things or not?

(Mad Dog's reply) I don't know or F ing care.

Pete, MD doesn't know or care what Palin says or writes, he'll support her no matter what.

Wood_Chopper  posted on  2010-08-15   0:32:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com