[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Freepers Still Love war

Parody ... Jump / Trump --- van Halen jump

"The Democrat Meltdown Continues"

"Yes, We Need Deportations Without Due Process"

"Trump's Tariff Play Smart, Strategic, Working"

"Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts"

"Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands

"Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies"

"Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk"

KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel

"Trade should work for America, not rule it"

"The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP"

"How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap"

‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’

Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible"

"Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!"

"If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think"

"Ending EPA Overreach"

Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built

Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew

The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED!

Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing!

Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy?

Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia)

"Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department"

Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent

"Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail"

Any suggestion that the USA and NATO are "Helping" or have ever helped Ukraine needs to be shot down instantly

"Real problem with the Palestinians: Nobody wants them"

ACDC & The Rolling Stones - Rock Me Baby

Magnus Carlsen gives a London System lesson!

"The Democrats Are Suffering Through a Drought of Generational Talent"

7 Tactics Of The Enemy To Weaken Your Faith

Strange And Biblical Events Are Happening

Every year ... BusiesT casino gambling day -- in Las Vegas

Trump’s DOGE Plan Is Legally Untouchable—Elon Musk Holds the Scalpel

Palestinians: What do you think of the Trump plan for Gaza?

What Happens Inside Gaza’s Secret Tunnels? | Unpacked

Hamas Torture Bodycam Footage: "These Monsters Filmed it All" | IDF Warfighter Doron Keidar, Ep. 225

EXPOSED: The Dark Truth About the Hostages in Gaza

New Task Force Ready To Expose Dark Secrets

Egypt Amasses Forces on Israel’s Southern Border | World War 3 About to Start?

"Trump wants to dismantle the Education Department. Here’s how it would work"

test

"Federal Workers Concerned That Returning To Office Will Interfere With Them Not Working"

"Yes, the Democrats Have a Governing Problem – They Blame America First, Then Govern Accordingly"

"Trump and His New Frenemies, Abroad and at Home"

"The Left’s Sin Is of Omission and Lost Opportunity"

"How Trump’s team will break down the woke bureaucracy"

Pete Hegseth will be confirmed in a few minutes


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles

Title: Judge Blocks Parts Of Arizona Immigration Law
Source: ASSOCIATED PRESS
URL Source: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/storie ... AULT&CTIME=2010-07-28-13-16-54
Published: Jul 28, 2010
Author: ASSOCIATED PRESS
Post Date: 2010-07-28 13:20:25 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 38750
Comments: 70

PHOENIX (AP) -- A judge has blocked the most controversial sections of Arizona's new immigration law from taking effect Thursday, handing a major legal victory to opponents of the crackdown.

The law will still take effect Thursday, but without many of the provisions that angered opponents - including sections that required officers to check a person's immigration status while enforcing other laws. The judge also put on hold a part of the law that required immigrants to carry their papers at all times, and made it illegal for undocumented workers to solicit employment in public places.

U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton put those controversial sections on hold until the courts resolve the issues.

Opponents say the law will lead to racial profiling and is trumped by federal immigration law.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 69.

#1. To: Brian S (#0)

This judge was a Klintoon nominee, enough said.

We need to start disbarment against these judges and half the Supreme Court.

reaganisright  posted on  2010-07-28   13:33:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: reaganisright (#1)

We need to start disbarment against these judges and half the Supreme Court.

Yup,although you can't disbar or remove a sitting judge from the SC unless you have evidence enough to convict him or her of treason or some other serious federal felony. Lifetime appointments.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-07-28   15:37:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: sneakypete (#21)

A president can be impeached and removed from office for "high crimes or misdemeanors", which the second part means lack of character.

Klintoon was impeached and should have been removed for this reason. The RATS said they wouldn't vote for conviction if he was caught raping a Boy Scout on the front lawn of the WH.

Happy 100th to the BS.

reaganisright  posted on  2010-07-28   16:07:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Pan-Z-Boy (#24)

...which the second part means lack of character.

No it doesn't.

war  posted on  2010-07-28   16:10:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: war (#25)

No it doesn't.

Can a President be impeached for lying to the American people?

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2010-07-28   18:48:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#28)

No.

war  posted on  2010-07-28   20:08:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: war (#29)

No.

You're kidding, right? You're saying that you can't be impeached for lying to the American public????

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2010-07-28   20:32:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#31)

Yep. That's what I am saying.

war  posted on  2010-07-28   20:46:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: war (#32)

Yep. That's what I am saying.

You're so wrong it's laughable.

You had better go back and study US Civics 101 War because you either slept through class or smoked a lot of pot.

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2010-07-28   23:14:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#36) (Edited)

You're so wrong it's laughable.

The grounds for impeachment were debated in Annapolis. If you believe that "lying" is grounds for impeachment, do you care to explain why "malfeasance", which is far more egregious behavior than simply lying, was specifically rejected as grounds for impeachment?

war  posted on  2010-07-29   8:13:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: war (#37)

The grounds for impeachment were debated in Annapolis. If you believe that "lying" is grounds for impeachment, do you care to explain why "malfeasance", which is far more egregious behavior than simply lying, was specifically rejected as grounds for impeachment?

Article 1's impeachment proceedings against Richard Nixon.

8.making or causing to be made false or misleading public statements for the purpose of deceiving the people of the United States into believing that a thorough and complete investigation had been conducted with respect to allegations of misconduct on the part of personnel of the executive branch of the United States and personnel of the Committee for the Re-election of the President, and that there was no involvement of such personnel in such misconduct: or

Nixon lied, so the Democrats were going to impeach him for that.

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2010-07-29   10:34:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#58. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#56)

Nixon lied, so the Democrats were going to impeach him for that.

He also destroyed evidence of his self admitted interference with the opposing party's ability to conduct their election campaigns. I wish gramps had dropped him on his head.

mininggold  posted on  2010-07-29   10:52:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#59. To: mininggold (#58)

Since Nixon left office. There has been one better president. Reagan.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-29   10:54:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#60. To: A K A Stone (#59) (Edited)

Since Nixon left office. There has been one better president. Reagan.

You obviously had not come of age under Nixon. Let's just say that he gave a boost to the role of blatant liars in politics, and hiding the actions of much of our foreign and military policy from those who directly pay for it. A policy Reagan and the rest have continued and the so called 'conservatives' now demand as SOP as seen by their response to the Wikileaks.

He also is directly responsible for most of our manufacturing going overseas to chase the lowest labor cost.

Wage and price controls. Heh we now have the London Broil cut due to that.

I wish gramps had dropped him on his head.

Edit: I forgot to add he put us on the permanent fiat monetary system.

mininggold  posted on  2010-07-29   11:07:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#61. To: mininggold (#60)

He also is directly responsible for most of our manufacturing going overseas to chase the lowest labor cost.

Blame NAFTA etc on Clinton and the stupid R's who went along with it. Including Newt.

Nixon isn't to blame for that one. I never said Nixon was perfect. I just said his successors sucked even worse. Except Reagan who was the greatest president of the 20th century. Hands down, not even close.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-29   11:09:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#62. To: A K A Stone (#61)

Blame NAFTA etc on Clinton and the stupid R's who went along with it. Including Newt.

NAFTA was passed and signed by Poppy Bush and ratified by Clinton and that congress. Newt wasn't speaker yet. Why do you think Poppy really didn't want to run again?

mininggold  posted on  2010-07-29   11:13:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#63. To: mininggold (#62) (Edited)

You're uninformed. Nafta passed after the 94 elections. Newt wasn't speaker yet but he voted for it and didn't try to block it.

Listen to me and you will never go wrong. You will be informed and not look like a fool and make stupid statements like that.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-29   11:14:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#64. To: A K A Stone (#63)

You're uninformed. Nafta passed after the 94 elections. Newt wasn't speaker yet but he voted for it and didn't try to block it.

Of course he didn't, he and Limbaugh would never go against a Bush.

POPPY Bush negotiated and signed the original NAFTA agreement. Feel free to inform yourself. Look it up.

mininggold  posted on  2010-07-29   11:18:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#66. To: mininggold (#64)

Presidnets can't sign a bill until it passes.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-29   11:20:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#69. To: Asswipe (#66)

Presidnets [sic] can't sign a bill until it passes.

NAFTA wasn't a bill it was a treaty and it was signed into law in December of 1993.

Most people believe that the year 1993 came prior to 1994.

Then there's you.

war  posted on  2010-07-29   11:29:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 69.

        There are no replies to Comment # 69.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 69.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com