U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles
Title: Judge Blocks Parts Of Arizona Immigration Law
Source:
ASSOCIATED PRESS
URL Source: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/storie ... AULT&CTIME=2010-07-28-13-16-54
Published: Jul 28, 2010
Author: ASSOCIATED PRESS
Post Date: 2010-07-28 13:20:25 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 38914
Comments: 70
PHOENIX (AP) -- A judge has blocked the most controversial sections of Arizona's new immigration law from taking effect Thursday, handing a major legal victory to opponents of the crackdown.
The law will still take effect Thursday, but without many of the provisions that angered opponents - including sections that required officers to check a person's immigration status while enforcing other laws. The judge also put on hold a part of the law that required immigrants to carry their papers at all times, and made it illegal for undocumented workers to solicit employment in public places.
U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton put those controversial sections on hold until the courts resolve the issues.
Opponents say the law will lead to racial profiling and is trumped by federal immigration law.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
This judge was a Klintoon nominee, enough said.
We need to start disbarment against these judges and half the Supreme Court.
Is it time to take out the trash? Post Date: 2010-07-14 11:48:27 by A K A Stone We know who you mean.
#2. To: Brian S (#0)
The judge also put on hold a part of the law that required immigrants to carry their papers at all times,
Typical Clinton Appointee ignoramus.
Federal law has for decades required all immigrants to carry their immigration papers on them and present them to LEOs upon request.
What a dumb bitch this woman is.
Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.
#3. To: Brian S (#0)
Arizona is simply going to rewrite and reenact those portions of the law struck down.
#4. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#2)
What a dumb bitch this woman is.
I hate to tell you this but most are, just don't tell them, it gets in the way of getting laid.
Is it time to take out the trash? Post Date: 2010-07-14 11:48:27 by A K A Stone We know who you mean.
#5. To: Brian S (#0)
Not good news, though.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Meet the new boss Same as the old boss
The last gasp of a dying Republic is a "living, breathing Constitution."
#6. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#2)
Federal law has for decades required all immigrants to carry their immigration papers on them and present them to LEOs upon request.
Can Arizona pass the federal budget?
#7. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#2)
Federal law has for decades required all immigrants to carry their immigration papers on them and present them to LEOs upon request.
How do the LEOs tell the difference between immigrants the citizens without seeing papers?
#8. To: Pan-Z-Boy (#4)
I hate to tell you this but most are, just don't tell them, it gets in the way of getting laid.
Such sage advice from such an obvious smoker of pole...
#9. To: war (#6)
Federal law has for decades required all immigrants to carry their immigration papers on them and present them to LEOs upon request.
Can a state LEO make an arrest for a violation of a federal law such as a Class III firearm?
Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.
#10. To: lucysmom, *Border Invasion* (#7)
How do the LEOs tell the difference between immigrants the citizens without seeing papers?
It's so easy, even a liberal could figure it out.
#11. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#9)
Yep.
Do you know why?
#12. To: war (#11)
Yep.Do you know why?
Because it's against the law? Why not share with us, okay?
Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.
#13. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#12) (Edited)
Because it's against the law?
Provisions under the US Code pertaining to firearms allow local authorities to enforce criminal provisions of it.
No such empowerment exists in immigration law. Nor is it a "crime" for someone to be here undocumented. It does make them subject to detention and deportation.
#14. To: hondo68 (#10)
It's so easy, even a liberal could figure it out.
Apparently not because a friend's Native American co-worker carries a copy of his military discharge papers on the dashboard of his car for just those special occasions. According to him the law isn't aimed at immigrants per se, but at people who look Indian.
Do LEOs have a right to demand papers from natural born US citizens while hoping to nail an illegal immigrant?
#15. To: war (#13)
No such empowerment exists in immigration law. Nor is it a "crime" for someone to be here undocumented. It does make them subject to detention and deportation.
It's a misdemeanor. You know that.
I bring your attention to this pdf:
http://trac.syr.edu/immigration/library/P48.pdf
Their contention is that it is permissible for local LEOs to inquire about immigration status.
Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.
#16. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#15) (Edited)
It's a misdemeanor. You know that.
Illegal entry is a misdemeanor. Being here is a civil/adminstrative violation.
#17. To: war (#16)
Illegal entry is a misdemeanor. Being here is a civil/adminstrative violation.
I don't know about that. I know in California there is a law which says when you go out you have to present ID, immigrant or citizen to a LEO.
This sounds like the Judge had a political axe to grind like Felzer did in 1994.
To do so in California (not have id) means you go to jail.
Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.
#18. To: Brian S (#0)
(chuckle)
You on the Left are going to pay a terrific price for this insanity come November.
Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.
#19. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#17)
You have to have ID just about every where...
Freedom...
#20. To: Brian S (#0)
The DNC has to have open borders in order to survive.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Toss: ADL,CAIR and the Vatican into the pit they belong in.
#21. To: reaganisright (#1)
We need to start disbarment against these judges and half the Supreme Court.
Yup,although you can't disbar or remove a sitting judge from the SC unless you have evidence enough to convict him or her of treason or some other serious federal felony. Lifetime appointments.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
#22. To: Badeye (#18)
You on the Left are going to pay a terrific price for this insanity come November.
Yes, the Democrats and Republicans will be severely punished in the upcoming elections.
They'll eventually merge into one open borders, globalist, anti-American, neo-liberal party.
#23. To: lucysmom (#14)
According to him the law isn't aimed at immigrants per se, but at people who look Indian.
Wow! I hope he doesn't say this in front of the His and Her Panics because if he does they will jump him. "Hispanic" is a word that means "Direct descendent of a Castillian Don and don't have the tiniest speck of Indian blood in me,dammit!"
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
#24. To: sneakypete (#21)
A president can be impeached and removed from office for "high crimes or misdemeanors", which the second part means lack of character.
Klintoon was impeached and should have been removed for this reason. The RATS said they wouldn't vote for conviction if he was caught raping a Boy Scout on the front lawn of the WH.
Happy 100th to the BS.
Is it time to take out the trash? Post Date: 2010-07-14 11:48:27 by A K A Stone We know who you mean.
#25. To: Pan-Z-Boy (#24)
...which the second part means lack of character.
No it doesn't.
#26. To: reaganisright (#24)
A president can be impeached and removed from office for "high crimes or misdemeanors", which the second part means lack of character.
For all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.
#27. To: war (#19)
You have to have ID just about every where...Freedom...
So citizens have to prove their identity, but illegals don't.
Thanks for the clarification.
Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.
#28. To: war (#25)
No it doesn't.
Can a President be impeached for lying to the American people?
Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.
#29. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#28)
No.
#30. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#27)
So citizens have to prove their identity, but illegals don't.
Identity and immigration/citizenship status are two different issues.
But you know that.
#31. To: war (#29)
No.
You're kidding, right? You're saying that you can't be impeached for lying to the American public????
Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.
#32. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#31)
Yep. That's what I am saying.
#33. To: reaganisright (#24)
A president can be impeached and removed from office for "high crimes or misdemeanors", which the second part means lack of character.
Yes,but as Clinton/Bush 2.0 proved beyond all doubt,it ain't going to happen.
Besides,we were talking about appointees with life time appointments,not a term- limited elected official.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
#34. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#27)
So citizens have to prove their identity, but illegals don't.
Yup.
Did you know that convicted felons can't be charged with lying when they fill out the federal form to buy a weapons because if they told the truth they would be giving evidence against themselves?
Yet,you or I would go to jail for lying on Form 4473.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
#35. To: Nebuchadnezzar, war (#31)
You're kidding, right? You're saying that you can't be impeached for lying to the American public????
war is playing his typical Di......,er,"Independent" games.
ALL presidents lie to the American people. It's even a job requirement. They have to lie to protect national interests at times. This does NOT mean they can lie under oath. That IS an impeachable offense.
The above does not apply to Dim presidents. They can lie under oath all they want.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
#36. To: war (#32)
Yep. That's what I am saying.
You're so wrong it's laughable.
You had better go back and study US Civics 101 War because you either slept through class or smoked a lot of pot.
Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.
#37. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#36) (Edited)
You're so wrong it's laughable.
The grounds for impeachment were debated in Annapolis. If you believe that "lying" is grounds for impeachment, do you care to explain why "malfeasance", which is far more egregious behavior than simply lying, was specifically rejected as grounds for impeachment?
#38. To: war (#37)
War. You're pretty worthless. If they have the votes they can impeach for any reason they want. No one can do anything about it.
#39. To: A K A Stone (#38)
If they have the votes they can impeach for any reason they want.
There is a reason why impeachment is in the House and the trial is in the Senate.
And we saw what happened to House members who impeached for any reason they wanted. Almost all of them got their asses thrown out in 2000.
#40. To: war (#39)
Clinton deserved to be impeached and removed. Your description of what happened afterward is not accurate. The whole house voted against him. More then half kept their jobs. Almost all of them did. Honesty isn't in you.
#41. To: A K A Stone (#40)
Clinton deserved to be impeached and removed.
The prosecutors couldn't even pin down exactly WHERE he committed perjury. Was it in the Jones case or before the Grand Jury? Without looking it up, I'll bet you don't even know.
.
.
.
Comments (42 - 70) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]