[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Historical Title: US And 14 Other European Countries Gave Saddam Chemical Arms Ahlul Bayt News Agency (ABNA.ir), Official documents point the finger at the US and 14 other European countries for equipping former Iraqi strongman Saddam Hussein with chemical weapons, says a top Iranian official. Secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council Saeid Jalili said those weapons were used by the former Baghdad regime, including in the 1987 gas attack on the northwestern Iranian city of Sardasht and in another chemical strike on the northern Iraqi city of Halabcha in 1988. He said as long as the prime suspects in those attacks as well as in the crimes committed in Vietnam are permanent members of the UN Security Council, there is a possibility that such crimes may be repeated. "As long as permanent members of the UN Security Council see their possession of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) as a privilege, they cannot be expected to fight WMDs," added Jalili. Referring to Saddam Hussein's repeated use of chemical arms against Iran during his eight-year imposed war on the Islamic Republic in the 80's, the senior official underscored the international community should call for the United States together with the 14 European governments to stand trial for supplying chemical weapons to Saddam Hussein. Jalili was speaking at a conference in Tehran on Tuesday June 29, marking the day, 23 years ago, when the former Iraqi regime launched a deadly gas attack on the northwestern Iranian city of Sardasht. Many of the survivors are still suffering from very serious health conditions, including severe respiratory problems and skin disorders. The day is also observed as National Day for Fight against Chemical Weapons in Iran. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 77. Gee...I thought you leftwingers said Saddam didn't have WMD's? (roaring with laughter)
#2. To: Badeye (#1) The article says "in the 80's", Boofer. No one disputes that. ROTFLMAOAY!
#3. To: Skip Intro (#2) (Edited) Boofer doesn't do the "reading thing"...it's why he gets so pissed the headlines are changed...
#5. To: war (#3) Boofer doesn't do the "reading thing"...it's why he gets so pissed the headlines are changed... Heh...a busy business owner guy has to cut corners somewhere....
#6. To: mininggold (#5) Heh...a busy business owner guy has to cut corners somewhere.... Cut the guy some slack. He has to run down to the corner gas station to answer the phone every time his business gets a call. Fortunately for him, that doesn't happen very often.
#8. To: Skip Intro (#6) Following my anti groupie is a good way to end up looking ridiculous, skippy.
#14. To: Badeye (#8) Following my anti groupie is a good way to end up looking ridiculous, Taking you seriously is an even better way.
#15. To: Skip Intro (#14) Whatever, skippy.
#16. To: Badeye (#15) Whatever, Boofer. Let's see who can get in the last word. That's a good way for a busy executive like you to spend the day.
#17. To: Skip Intro (#16) Okay. (laughing) This is a good way for an unemployed wannabe to spend the day. At least I'm doing a public service by keeping you off street corners begging for money, and muttering obscenties to those that tell you to fuck off.
#20. To: Badeye (#17) This is a good way for an unemployed wannabe to spend the day. Actually I'm a I-got-mine while you're a make-believe businessman. As hard as it must be for you to grasp, my reality has nothing to do with your imagination.
#22. To: Skip Intro (#20) Actually I'm a I-got-mine while you're a make-believe businessman. As hard as it must be for you to grasp, my reality has nothing to do with your imagination. Uh huh, sure. And Brian S made that article up....(laughing) You're losing it, skippy. Must be time for the meds, huh?
#24. To: Badeye (#22) You're going to hit 100 posts here alone today for sure. Why not go for 200?
#25. To: Skip Intro (#24)
#29. To: Badeye (#25) So tell me, skippy, which one of the above is yours? I see that it takes very little provocation for you to breech confidentiality.
#30. To: mininggold (#29) I see that it takes very little provocation for you to breech confidentiality. I see you don't understand the concept of 'confidentiality'. Hit my website, your reverse address becomes my property, kookie.
#31. To: Badeye (#30) I see you don't understand the concept of 'confidentiality'. If those are visitors to your website then you breeched implied confidentiality. If I visit a website I don't expect my ISP to be posted on a chat site. PERIOD end of story.
#52. To: mininggold, A K A Stone (#31) If those are visitors to your website then you breeched implied confidentiality. If I visit a website I don't expect my ISP to be posted on a chat site. PERIOD end of story. Is Stoner aware of this breach?
#58. To: Fred Mertz (#52) those are visitors to your website then you breeched implied confidentiality. If I visit a website I don't expect my ISP to be posted on a chat site. PERIOD end of story. Is Stoner aware of this breach? Is Stone aware your an idiot? Ah, yeah, I think he's made that pretty clear lately, freddie.
#59. To: Badeye, Fred Mertz, mininggold, Skip Intro (#58) (Edited) Is Stone aware your an idiot? CLASSIC Boofer back pedaling all over this thread... GREAT work girls and boys... Boofer pulled this stunt over at LP when he was on the "war doesn't have a job" kick...he posted my ISP WITH my employer. He also posted dozens of other ISPs. What a guy, eh?
#63. To: war, A K A Stone (#59) He also posted dozens of other ISPs. He also made threats to do this. " Goldi, The next time this poster mentions my legal name, in any respect, on this website, I will post his entire background. Full name. Full address. Mother and Father's legal name. His curious 'civil court' record. Phone number, ISP, email. All of it. I've noted the last couple of times he's done this, you've taken no action. No problem, I've been 'outted' as you know. But just as I dealt with that idiot malador, I'll do the same with this punk. Your call, Goldi. I'd rather you put a stop to it, but since you are in ignore mode on this one...no problem. I'll wait 24 hours for you to see this, before nuking him. Badeye posted on 2007-01-02 12:53:22 ET Reply Trace ×" But he never breaches confidentiality himself, does he? You better watch out for this guy, Stone. You've got a real loose cannon on your hands.
#66. To: Skip Intro (#63) (chuckle) Nice try skippy. No ceegar.
#74. To: Badeye (#66) I'll let others decide about your "ethics", now that they can see what you're willing to do.
#77. To: Skip Intro (#74) So let me get this straight...Boofer posts the ISP's of companies that hit his "company"'s website and he doesn't get suspended or a public spanking?
Replies to Comment # 77. So let me get this straight...Boofer posts the ISP's of companies that hit his "company"'s website and he doesn't get suspended or a public spanking? He even was especially proud of the dhs.gov ones.
#82. To: war (#77) So let me get this straight...Boofer posts the ISP's of companies that hit his "company"'s website and he doesn't get suspended or a public spanking? Not even so much as a reminder posted from the moderator. Talk about preferential treatment. According to BE and The Jethro they own every reverse address and can do with them as they like. I notice that they have been erased from post 25 though, even though we were told there was nothing unethical about posting them..... this from from the two premier sources of professional ethics and morals on the forum, who would NEVER lie.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 77. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|