911 Audio and video
See other 911 Audio and video Articles
Title: Nails in the Coffin of Trade Seven Close-ups from WTC-7 Collapse Footage Show Unmistakable Signature of Demolition Charges
Source:
st12.startlogic.com
URL Source: http://st12.startlogic.com/~xenonpu ... ibs_along_southwest_corner.htm
Published: Jun 9, 2006
Author: unattributed
Post Date: 2006-06-09 00:12:34 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 12525
Comments: 21
Here you will find proof of what really happend on 911. You will find the truth.
Here is video of the collapse
http://st12.startlogic.com/~xenonpup/video%20archive/wtc-7_collapse.mpa
The smaller clip above was taken from this segment of the Naudet Brothers' DVD. Only cropping and panning techniques were used - there was no use of sharpening or edge-enhancing filters.
Looking at the upper right-hand corner of the building we see a rapid series of small explosions travelling upward just as the building itself begins to fall. The size, placement and timing of these "puffs" is very consistent with squibs from cutting charges of the type used in professional controlled demolitions, and in fact nothing but small explosive charges could create such an appearance. The decreasing volume of the building from the collapse itself could not create enough pressure to cause such localized high-velocity effects, and this early in the collapse would have only created a modest overpressure.
Click for Full Text! (3 images)
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 20.
#13. To: All, master of disaster (#0)
FYI
#18. To: A K A Stone (#13)
"Any structure anywhere in the world, if you put it in these conditions, it will not stand," Mr. Marcus said. "The buildings are not designed to be a torch."
#19. To: TLBSHOW (#18)
Mr. Marcus
Who is the Marcus character. Because several buildings burnt a lot hotter for 18 to 20 hours and more and didn't collapse. Fires like this don't melt steel. It violates the laws of physics and common sense. Put a steel beam in a fire and it's not going to melt or give.
#20. To: A K A Stone (#19)
Silvian Marcus, executive vice president for the Cantor Seinuk Group and a structural engineer involved in the original design of the building, which was completed in 1987.
With the collapse of both towers by 10:30 a.m., larger pieces of the twin towers had smashed parts of 7 World Trade and set whole clusters of floors ablaze. An hour later, the Fire Department was forced to abandon its last efforts to save the building as it burned like a giant torch. It fell in the late afternoon, hampering rescue efforts and hurling its beams into the ground like red-hot spears.
Within the building, the diesel tanks were surrounded by fireproofed enclosures. But some experts said that like the jet fuel in the twin towers, the diesel fuel could have played a role in the collapse of 7 World Trade.
"If the enclosures were damaged, then yes, this would be enough fuel to explain why the building collapsed," Dr. Barnett said.
Dr. Barnett and Mr. Baker are part of an assessment team organized by the American Society of Civil Engineers and the Federal Emergency Management Agency to examine the performance of several buildings during the attacks. If further studies of the debris confirm the findings of extremely high temperature, Dr. Barnett said, "the smoking gun would be the fuel."
Others experts agreed that the diesel fuel could have speeded the collapse, but said the building might have met the same fate simply because of how long it burned.
http://64.233.161.104/search? q=cache:4JFDS2teW48J:www.prisonplanet.com/engineers_are_baffled_over_the_collaps e_of_7_wtc.html+,%22+Mr.+Marcus+said.+% 22The+buildings+are+not+designed+to+be+a+torch.%22&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=1
Replies to Comment # 20.
So what do you think took down building 7?
End Trace Mode for Comment # 20.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]